What's new

How unfair was it to great players to exclude WSC SuperTests and other unofficial Test statistics?

Harsh Thakor

First Class Star
Joined
Oct 1, 2012
Runs
3,519
Post of the Week
2
Below I am posting a great article and statistical analysis from Cricket country blog by Arunabha Sengupta testifying how unfair it was to batsmen like Viv Richards,Greg Chappell,Barry Richards,Dennis Lillee and Ian Chappell to exclude peformances in Packer cricket and the rest of the world matches in England and Australia.Cricket reached a standard of competitiveness at it's highest zenith in Packer WSC cricket,arguably surpassing the standard of conventional test cricket. On the other hand batsmen like Sunil Gavaskar and Gundappa Vishwanath benefited or bowlers like Ian Botham.Below I would like pakpassion viewers to critically ***** the statistics.It would have made Viv Richards,Barry Richards ,Greg Chappell and Dennis Lillee all the greater.Statistically Greg would have ranked ahead of Gavaskar and Viv Richards and closer to Tendulkar and Lara in test cricket.His match-winning average would have been boosted with his scores of 246 not out v World xi in 1977-78 in Australai and 150 v West Indies in WEst Indies in 1979.Lillee's average and strike rate was on par but aggregate of wickets highly boosted.Viv's 1977-78 performance was only 2nd to that of Bradman.Ian Chappell scored 4 centuries against Rest of the World in 1972.Adding performances for Rest of the world Gary Sobers would have more staggering statistics.

Still I disagree with Abhinav Sengupata that Gavaskar's figures would have dropped down so much or even Vishwanath's .I salute his effort but feel that Gavaskar was magnificient against Imran in Pakistan in 1978 and also stood against the might of paceman like Jeff Thomson and Sylvetser Clarke.I agree he did not face the best West Indian attack at home in 1978-79 but instead of 91.5 I back him to average over 65 against the top attack.Remember Sunny's 221 at the Oval in 1979,an innings which Greg Chappell or Viv Richards have not surpassed in England.Gavaskar also had beter average than Greg or Viv facing Imran.Also remember Vishy against Andy Roberts at his fiery best or Vengsarkar v West Indies in 1997-88 and 1983-84.

Neverthless salute Abhinva Sengupta for bring WSC performances to light and doing justice to the great players.


/.http://www.cricketcountry.com/artic...s-of-the-1970s-had-been-official-tests-194978


The Kerry Packer SuperTests, the Rest of the World XI in England 1970, the World XI in Australia 1971-72. A collection of supreme matches of spectacular cricket and committed performances. Unfortunately, none of these games have been given Test status while official Test matches against the Packer-depleted sides have boosted many career averages. Arunabha Sengupta crunches numbers to find out how the final records would have looked if it was the other way around — the greater ‘Tests’ deemed Test matches and the ones against the depleted sides mere First-Class.

It was one of those modern Test matches between a major cricketing power and the puny Bangladesh, going through its usual one sided yawn-inducing pattern of huge totals followed by abject surrenders. Player after player walked to the wicket and proceeded to give a huge boost to their career averages. And one disgruntled cricketer of the past — one of the greatest of his day — lamented on the social media, “This is a Test match. And the World Series where everyone agreed we played the hardest, toughest cricket is not even considered First-Class.”

One could understand the discontent, the sense of unfairness. In the Kerry Packer sponsored SuperTests, it had been the clash of titanic giants. Dennis Lillee, Mike Procter, Andy Roberts, Joel Garner, Michael Holding, Colin Croft, Wayne Daniel, Imran Khan, Len Pascoe, Jeff Thomson, Garth le Roux, Clive Rice had been the names who had sent down their fast and furious deliveries. Somewhere in the middle Derek Underwood had quietly picked up his share of wickets. And against all these men Barry Richards, Viv Richards and Greg Chappell had led the way with the bat as Gordon Greenidge, Clive Lloyd, Zaheer Abbas and others fought gamely..

This was what defined ‘Test’ in a Test match. The real Test between bat and ball in cricket. A partnership between Trevor Laughlin and Peter Toohey did not come close, neither did the sight of David Oglivie facing Norbert Phillip at Georgetown.

Yet, the latter displays of insipid cricket have gone downofficial Tests while the literal SuperTests had not been granted more value than miscellaneous matches.

Best performances in the SuperTests


Batsmen ‘T’ R Ave Bowlers ‘T’ W Ave
Barry Richards 5 554 79.14 Garth le Roux 3 17 15.88
Greg Chappell 14 1416 56.64 Mike Procter 4 14 16.07
Viv Richards 14 1281 55.70 Imran Khan 5 25 20.84
Lawrence Rowe 9 573 43.85 Michael Holding 9 35 22.83
Kepler Wessels 4 291 41.57 Andy Roberts 13 50 24.18
Clive Lloyd 13 683 37.94 Joel Garner 7 35 24.77

The history of cricket is littered with such instances. The official status of Test matches have often been bestowed post facto based on unstructured and unscientific decision making. How else can one account for Fred Spofforth’s stirring feats against a full strength MCC at Lord’s, 1878, going down as First-Class exploits; while the noble but far less demanding deeds of the bits and pieces English team in South Africa under Charles Aubrey Smith in 1889 has been granted Test status.

While that is perhaps excusable in the days of obscure memories and faded black and white pictures, one would be justifiably aghast at the same occurrences in the 1970s.

Granted, Packer was at loggerheads with the establishment and one could not expect the magnificent games played in front of sparse crowds to be given Test status. But what about those glorious ‘Test’ matches between the Rest of the World XIs and the English and Australian teams at the beginning of the decade?

Poor Alan Jones. He thought he was making his Test debut, but in the end he never did — even though he opened the England innings against an attack of Mike Procter, Garth McKenzie, Garry Sobers, Intikhab Alam and Eddie Barlow at Lord’s. Sobers too believed he was playing Tests when asked to lead the World XI against England as a replacement for the cancelled South African tour.

But, after being included in the Wisden as Test, the status was withdrawn. Sobers took six for 21 and scored 183 at Lord’s but it became a mere First-Class feat. Similarly, Ray Illingworth enjoyed an excellent series averaging over 50 with the bat and 34 with the ball, but all that remains unaccounted for in his Test record.

Best performances in Rest of World vs Eng 1970 series


Batsmen ‘T’ R Ave Bowlers ‘T’ W Ave
Garry Sobers 5 588 73.50 Eddie Barlow 5 20 19.80
Ray Illingworth 5 476 52.89 Mike Procter 5 15 23.93
Mike Procter 5 292 48.66 Garry Sobers 5 21 21.52
Geoff Boycott 2 260 65.00 Tony Greig 5 11 26.18

The same happened to the magnificent 254 scored by Sobers at the Melbourne Cricket Ground (MCG) in the Australian summer of 1971-72 against Dennis Lillee’s furious pace. The same happened to Lillee’s amazing spell of eight for 29, and Rohan Kanhai’s blistering batting in the same series.

The reason given by the authorities was that a Test match had to be played between two nations. Thus, these long and ultra-serious cricketing extravaganza between excellent sides were not recognised.

However, in 2005, the same legislators of cricket did a volte face and decided that the lukewarm, less than keenly contested game between Australia and a largely uninterested Rest of the World would be a true Test match. Even then they did not look back and grant Test status to all those superb matches played three decades ago.

Best performances in World XI vs Australia 1971-72 series


Batsmen ‘T’ R Ave Bowlers ‘T’ W Ave
Greg Chappell 3 425 106.25 DK Lillee 4 24 20.08
Ian Chappell 5 634 79.25 Intikhab Alam 5 19 33.47
Keith Stackpole 5 490 54.44
Doug Walters 4 355 71.00
Rohan Kanhai 3 279 69.75
Garry Sobers 5 341 48.71

It is clearly heart-wrenching for some to see a Zimbabwe or a Bangladesh side being pummelled by world class or inferior cricketers, their Test records getting raised beyond the boundaries of logic, while at the same time Greg Chappell’s 1841 runs at 63 per innings with six hundreds is lost to the Test records — even though scored in the most demanding arena of Packer in 1977-79 and against the Rest of the World in 1972-73.

Or take Sobers — another 10 Tests would have pushed his tally to near 9,000 runs and 265 wickets, bettering his average with both bat and ball. Or Mike Procter’s superb all round performances. Many of the South Africans would indeed have more substantial Test records.

Yet, while the two Chappells, the two Richards, the Holdings and the Roberts were engaged in a contest of a life-time, there were others making merry against sides depleted with the cream of talent engaged in the Packer Circus. Plenty of players boosted their career figures during this period.

The Indian team maximised against the weaker sides

While England did defeat a weak Australia 5-1 in the Ashes and it enhanced the captaincy legend of Mike Brearley, the biggest beneficiaries of the Packer era were the Indians. In those two years, they played 17 Tests against the West Indian and Australian teams, six apiece against them at home and five more in Australia. They did not have splendid team results, winning five and losing three, losing the series in Australia 3-2, but individual careers were definitely boosted. Predictably Sunil Gavaskar scored 1,607 runs in those 17 Tests with nine hundreds. Gundappa Viswanath was not far behind.

Gavaskar did play for the World XI in the 1971-72 series against Australia, but he managed just 257 runs at 28.55. Hence, when we consider the alternate numbers, his career average creeps down below 50. Viswanath suffers even more, finding himself in the late 30s. Chetan Chauhan comes down in the mid 20s.

Men who flourished against weak depleted Australia and West Indies sides 1977-79


Batsmen T R Ave Bowlers T W Ave
Gundappa Viswanath 17 1488 64.69 Dilip Doshi 6 27 23.33
Sunil Gavaskar 17 1607 64.28 Shivlal Yadav 5 24 24.04
Mohinder Amarnath 8 589 53.54 Kapil Dev 12 45 26.35
Kapil Dev 12 541 49.18 Bishan Bedi 8 38 28.00
Dilip Vengsarkar 17 1109 46.20 Bhagwat Chandrasekhar 9 40 28.37
Chetan Chauhan 16 940 40.86 Karsan Ghavri 15 49 29.81



Among their bowlers Kapil Dev, Karsan Ghavri, Dilip Doshi and Shivlal Yadav were immensely successful against the weaker opposition while their numbers take rather significant hits when the Tests played against these oppositions are removed.

Of the England squad who played against the weak Australian side in the 1978-79 Ashes, Geoff Miller and John Emburey enjoyed more success than ever. Take away the Ashes series, and Miller’s bowling average shoots up from 31 to 41.

However, Geoff Boycott enjoyed a moderately good series against Rest of the World in 1970 and had a very poor one Down Under in 1978-79. Hence, if the 1970 series is added and the 1978-79 removed, the Yorkshire opener’s figures shoot over the 50 mark.

While modern day considerations and data awareness often necessitates the categorisation of career records with and without minnows, there is seldom such statistics seen when discussing the men of the 1970s. There is hardly any analysis of record against all versus record against all excluding depleted sides.

That is what we have tried to do in the following exercise.

So, what if all those excellent SuperTests and World XI contests were deemed Test matches? It could definitely have been the case.

Imagine if Kerry Packer had not been satisfied with just the television rights. If he had carried his clout and commercial power into the board rooms till the World Series SuperTests were made official and the Tests played by the second string West Indies and Australia teams mere First-Class games, cricket statistics would have been way different.

Some greats would become just about very good, some goods mediocre, on the other hand some greats would be established as super greats….

This is what we have done in the following exercise.

We have considered the alternate history where the Rest of the World matches of 1970 in England and 1971-72 in Australia are Test matches. The Packer SuperTests are also Test matches. While all the Tests played by the depleted Australian and West Indian sides are not considered at all. (Remember that there had been five official Tests between West Indies and Australia during this period. The full strength West Indian side had appeared in two of them.)

Career figures adjusted for the World XI matches in England in 1970, in Australia in 1971-72, the Packer SuperTests of 1977-79 and after removing the Tests against depleted West Indies and Australia sides.

Batting
Official Career

Adjusted for Packer, World XIs (1970 and 1972-73) and depleted teams
Batsman T R Ave 100s ‘T’ R Ave 100s
Barry Richards 4 508 72.57 2 14 1359 64.71 3
Garry Sobers 93 8032 57.78 26 103 8961 58.19 29
Greg Chappell 87 7110 53.86 24 104 8951 55.60 30
Graeme Pollock 23 2256 60.97 7 31 2715 54.30 9
Viv Richards 121 8540 50.23 24 133 9759 51.09 28
Geoff Boycott 108 8114 47.72 22 104 8111 50.07 23
Sunil Gavaskar 125 10122 51.12 34 113 8772 48.20 25
Rohan Kanhai 79 6227 47.53 15 87 6790 47.15 18
Zaheer Abbas 78 5062 44.79 12 85 5420 43.71 12
Gordon Greenidge 108 7558 44.72 19 119 8181 43.52 20
Eddie Barlow 30 2516 45.74 6 36 2869 43.37 8
Ian Chappell 75 5345 42.42 14 90 6872 43.22 18
Dilip Vengsarkar 116 6868 42.13 17 99 5759 41.43 14
Roy Fredericks 59 4334 42.49 8 69 4955 41.29 8
Mohinder Amarnath 69 4378 42.50 11 61 3789 41.18 9
Desmond Haynes 116 7487 42.29 18 118 7375 40.75 18
Keith Stackpole 43 2807 37.42 7 48 3297 39.25 9
Gundappa Viswanath 91 6080 41.93 14 74 4592 37.64 10
Tony Greig 58 3599 40.43 8 70 3946 37.23 8
Imran Khan 88 3807 37.69 6 93 3934 36.77 6
David Hookes 23 1306 34.36 1 35 2076 35.79 3
Ian Botham 102 5200 33.54 14 96 4909 33.86 14
Mike Procter 7 226 25.11 0 16 700 33.33 0
Kapil Dev 131 5248 31.05 8 119 4707 29.79 7
Chetan Chauhan 40 2084 31.57 0 24 1144 26.60 0
Ray Illingworth 61 1836 23.24 0 66 2244 25.50 0


Bowling



Bowler
Official Career Adjusted for Packer, World Xis (1970 and 1972-73) and depleted teams

T


W


Ave


‘T’


W


Ave
Mike Procter

7


41


15.02


16


70


17.14
Joel Garner

58


259


20.93


63


281


21.69
Imran Khan

88


362


22.81


93


387


22.68
Michael Holding

60


249


23.69


69


284


23.58
Dennis Lillee

70


355


23.92


88


446


24.16
Colin Croft

27


125


23.30


32


146


24.76
Bob Willis

90


325


25.20


84


305


25.34
Wayne Daniel

10


36


25.28


17


50


25.34
Andy Roberts

49


202


25.61


52


240


25.72
Derek Underwood

86


297


25.84


94


320


26.24
Jeff Thomson

51


200


28.01


53


205


27.73
John Snow

49


202


26.67


54


218


27.77
Ian Botham

102


383


28.40


96


360


28.64
Mike Hendrick

30


87


25.84


25


68


28.66
Eddie Barlow

30


40


34.05


36


60


29.30
Bishan Bedi

67


266


28.71


64


245


29.49
Bhagwat Chandrasekhar

58


242


29.75


49


202


30.02
Kapil Dev

131


434


29.65


119


389


30.03
Ray Illingworth

61


122


31.20


66


136


31.49
Tony Greig

58


141


32.21


65


159


32.19
Dilip Doshi

33


114


30.72


27


87


33.01
Garry Sobers

93


235


34.04


103


265


33.53
Intikhab Alam

47


125


35.95


57


158


36.50
KD Ghavri

39


109


33.54


24


60


36.58
Srinivas Venkataraghavan

57


156


36.12


47


128


36.64
Shivlal Yadav

35


102


35.10


30


78


38.50
John Emburey

64


147


38.41


60


131


40.76
Geoff Miller

34


60


30.98


28


37


40.89

*At least five Tests or ‘Tests’ in the 1970 series, 1971-72 series, Packer SuperTests or against depleted sides.


*At least five Tests or ‘Tests’ in the 1970 series, 1971-72 series, Packer SuperTests or against depleted sides.

Observations

• Barry Richards and Procter have more substantial careers. For Richards, the average obviously does not stay in the 70s, but it remains more than impressive. For Procter too, the extremely low bowling average undergoes an upward shift but remains well less than 20.

• The records of Sobers and Greg Chappell indicate what the action the official Test world has missed. Sobers manages to haul his average even higher while Greg Chappell goes past the 55-mark. Interestingly, after adjustment, they have more number of runs and centuries than Gavaskar. Chappell would have ended just ahead of Don Bradman in the centuries list.

• Viv Richards, and not Gavaskar, would have held the world record for highest number of runs.

• Graeme Pollock’s average is down to 54 from 61, which indicates that it is always difficult to maintain the rate after 20 Tests. However, two more centuries in the eight more Tests underline the enormous talent.

• The batting and bowling averages of Sobers both undergo improvement. Imran Khan’s performance remains more or less constant. However, Kapil’s bowling average creeps above 30 while his batting average slips just below the mark.

• Underwood would have reached the 300-wicket mark.

• Had the SuperTests and the World XI matches been considered, Lillee would have remained the world record holder for a long, long time.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Wonderful work, emphasising what I already knew from 42 years of watching cricket.

1. Barry Richards is the GOAT opener.
2. Garry Sobers is the GOAT all-rounder.
3. Mike Procter is a little bit ahead of Imran Khan as the second greatest all-rounder.
4. Viv Richards and Dennis Lillee were absolutely exceptional.
 
Most old timers who know cricket give equal weight to World Series cricket tests and official tests
 
Wonderful work, emphasising what I already knew from 42 years of watching cricket.

1. Barry Richards is the GOAT opener.
2. Garry Sobers is the GOAT all-rounder.
3. Mike Procter is a little bit ahead of Imran Khan as the second greatest all-rounder.
4. Viv Richards and Dennis Lillee were absolutely exceptional.


Would it boost and elevate the rating or ranking of Greg and Ian Chappell?Greg's match-wining average would be boosted to aver 72 and overall averagae to over 55.On stats Greg would overshadow Viv but Greg was not out many more times ,played at 2 down and not one down and v Rest of the world tackled relatively mediocre bowling.Junaid,How would you place Ian compared to Greg or compare Barry to Viv?Finally do you feel Gavaskar would not have had such a great record as he had playing the top attack sin 1977-78 and 1978-79.
 
Would it boost and elevate the rating or ranking of Greg and Ian Chappell?Greg's match-wining average would be boosted to aver 72 and overall averagae to over 55.On stats Greg would overshadow Viv but Greg was not out many more times ,played at 2 down and not one down and v Rest of the world tackled relatively mediocre bowling.Junaid,How would you place Ian compared to Greg or compare Barry to Viv?Finally do you feel Gavaskar would not have had such a great record as he had playing the top attack sin 1977-78 and 1978-79.
1. The Chappells
Ian was way past his best when WSC came around.

Ian was actually the better batsman against extreme pace, but Greg was a really elegant, classy batsman.

I'd rank Greg Chappell as roughly equal to Lara, Tendulkar and Ponting. And Javed Miandad.

Ian is a level below that, more like Younis Khan, Rahul Dravid or Zaheer Abbas.

Gavaskar was a superb opener, of comparable quality to Gordon Greenidge, Geoff Boycott and Dessie Haynes. But a very big step down from Barry Richards.

Barry and Viv Richards each had a terrifying presence that none of those listed above had. They knuckled down and performed in the big matches, but not always in minor ones. They were both a long way above the other batsman whom I've listed.

In the period 1973-1990, the only specialist batsmen and bowlers with that extra aura were:

Batting
Barry Richards
Viv Richards

Bowling
Dennis Lillee
Mike Procter
Malcolm Marshall.

Other players like Hadlee or Gavaskar or Greg Chappell were superb. But not as terrifying. Because they were not as good.
 
Back
Top