What's new

How would Virat Kohli do in the PSL?

CadPakFan

Local Club Regular
Joined
Jun 4, 2017
Runs
1,320
After seeing so many great bowling performances in the PSL so far. I wondered how the great King Kohli would do in the PSL? Would he be the leading run scorer? Would he fail? Or would he just be average? Discuss!
 
Ahmed Shehzad has been one of the top scorers in the PSL, so I'm certain Kohli would boss the PSL.
 
He would be smart enough not to go hard against the likes of Junaid and Amir upfront. His only weakness is upfront outside ofstump ( like most batsmen) generally it only takes him an over to get over it.

As soon as that happens he will destroy every bowling lineup, especially on the flatter pitches
 
He would do well but not as well as he does in the IPL
 
Top of the scoring charts by a long way.
 
He'd struggle to score a 100 runs.

You're being generous there. He'd even struggle to hold his bat let alone even score a run.

His run in international T20Is are all meaningless. Im not even including IPL where nobodies like Starc, Boult, Bumrah, Steyn, Cummins etc usually bowls at him.

I think he would be poor man's Ahmed Shahzad in PSL
 
I don't know his IPL performance, but doesn't he average 10 runs higher than anyone else in international T20?
 
He is a failure in WCs and choked on CT final, so no, he won"t do good in mighty PSL, ask specific PP members, they will tell you the truth, on top of that he must perform in ENG in tests before even dreaming about being in consideration for draft in PSL.
 
Last edited:
Like he does all over the world
He will be the top scorer
Only in some games (Karachi, Islamabad) he would have to work much harder for his runs
 
He would score 50 runs every time he inhaled and another 50 every time he exhaled when has beens like Kamran and Ronchi are scoring like mad men against “best t20 bowling league”
 
Last edited:
I doubt he would come close to replicating some of the innings Ronchi has played. IPL also has a lot of very ordinary Indian bowlers.

FYI Ronchi last played IPL for Mumbai Indians team in 2007. He played five matches for the team scoring a total of 34 runs at an average of 6.80.

He is not consistent, that's the reason no IPL team buy him.
 
His performance is typically based on motivation. There were few IPLs he didn't care before he realized team depended on his star value.
 
FYI Ronchi last played IPL for Mumbai Indians team in 2007. He played five matches for the team scoring a total of 34 runs at an average of 6.80.

He is not consistent, that's the reason no IPL team buy him.

I was referring to this years PSL. In 2007 there was no PSL.
 
He alone can fairly easily take the team score to 160+ when batting first without much contribution from the other end. That is a good total in the PSL. Remember, one boundary every two overs is enough to reach 150. With some good hitters in the team, very good scores would be achieved quite consistently.

And his team would win pretty much every time they chase. Most of the chases I saw in the PSL were fairly straightforward ones made to look extremely difficult by some poor batting, lack of experience and temperament.

Keeping a cool head is the key to winning matches in the PSL. Kohli will definitely shine bright like a diamond there if he plays the way he plays for India :).
 
How many times has he been the top scorer in IPL?

I believe his team has yet to even win the IPL.

This Kohli love is going too far. Sure he is a great batsmen but what next he will hit the ball to the moon? Different environments provide different challenges as Kohli has found out in swinging conditions in England.
 
I didn't quote you. Move on.

But people keep making this claim without any substance at all. Most low scoring games where in the first half of the PSL where every team was struggling against every single bowler but the likes of Hafeez and Karman were excelling. Either Akmal and Hafeez are all time greats of the game or the pitches were really bad
 
But people keep making this claim without any substance at all. Most low scoring games where in the first half of the PSL where every team was struggling against every single bowler but the likes of Hafeez and Karman were excelling. Either Akmal and Hafeez are all time greats of the game or the pitches were really bad

It's T20, you see the ball , you hit the ball. Sometimes it comes off , sometimes it doesnt. Are you claiming you need to have a great technique to do well in T20? Gayle is has made many big scores in the IPL at a destructive strike rate but he never was a technical gifted player.

Btw Akmal scored a brilliant century in the Karachi test where India's greats did nothing in the same match. By your logic Kamran is better than them all?
 
Isn't Ronchi dominating the PSL?...

If Ronchi can do it, it's hard to imagine Kohli not scoring a truckload of runs.

It was a simple question... I didn't ask for explanation. I don't follow the IPL so IDK but wanted to know how many times he has been the top scorer. Surely a league in which a gully mohallah level Unadkhat is the best bowler he must be the highest run scorer in 9 times out of 10 seasons at the very least.
 
It was a simple question... I didn't ask for explanation. I don't follow the IPL so IDK but wanted to know how many times he has been the top scorer. Surely a league in which a gully mohallah level Unadkhat is the best bowler he must be the highest run scorer in 9 times out of 10 seasons at the very least.

Epic :)))
 
The bottom line is T20 isn’t a game of skills. An average batsman can score lots of runs in T20.
 
It was a simple question... I didn't ask for explanation. I don't follow the IPL so IDK but wanted to know how many times he has been the top scorer. Surely a league in which a gully mohallah level Unadkhat is the best bowler he must be the highest run scorer in 9 times out of 10 seasons at the very least.

If Unadkat outbowled the likes of Rabada Cummins Bumrah Fizz etc he must have done something right.

If a galli mohalla discard Ronchi and then Ahmed Shehzad top score in a league it tells the standard of that league.
 
Last edited:
If Unadkat outbowled the likes of Rabada Cummins Bumrah Fizz etc he must have done something right.

If a galli mohalla discard Ronchi is top scorer in a league it tells the standard of that league.

Bhai why is no one telling me how many times he has been top scorer in IPL
 
Yes and if you make a valid related point I will respond. If you want to see a list, make it yourself and tell us what your point is. I will then respond accordingly.

You claim bowling in ipl is ordinary. Lets compare shall we?
 
hm...he averages 50 in T20Is with a SR of 137 and i think he once scored 4 100s in one season of ipl...think he would do just fine. Would probably be the best batsmen along with United's goat Ronchi.
 
So the guy who was outbatted by Rahane, Iyer, Parthiv Patel :yk, Rahul Tripathi, Robin Uthappa, Pant, Nitesh Rana and Manoj Tiwary will automatically start hitting centuries at will in the PSL :))

Keep in mind I omitted the big international and Indian names, master blaster Kohli was at number 23 in the highest run getters.
 
So the guy who was outbatted by Rahane, Iyer, Parthiv Patel :yk, Rahul Tripathi, Robin Uthappa, Pant, Nitesh Rana and Manoj Tiwary will automatically start hitting centuries at will in the PSL :))

Keep in mind I omitted the big international and Indian names, master blaster Kohli was at number 23 in the highest run getters.

You are talking about one season only.
https://www.google.co.in/amp/s/m.ec...tters-in-the-ipl/amp_articleshow/58017821.cms

Here is his overall performance. Need i remind you that Kohli avgs 50 plus in T20Is

PSL isnt that tough a league.
 
So the guy who was outbatted by Rahane, Iyer, Parthiv Patel :yk, Rahul Tripathi, Robin Uthappa, Pant, Nitesh Rana and Manoj Tiwary will automatically start hitting centuries at will in the PSL :))

Keep in mind I omitted the big international and Indian names, master blaster Kohli was at number 23 in the highest run getters.

Tha't shocking, Rahane would struggle to the hit the ball 80 yards.

Mods please lock this thread now. :shhh
 
You are talking about one season only.
https://www.google.co.in/amp/s/m.ec...tters-in-the-ipl/amp_articleshow/58017821.cms

Here is his overall performance. Need i remind you that Kohli avgs 50 plus in T20Is

PSL isnt that tough a league.

But when you bring up Ronchi as top scorer you are happy to talk about one season's runs and averages?



Changing the goal post as it suits you.... hardly unexpected.



PSL has the best T20 bowlers in world cricket and it is a reason why guys like Gayle and Mcculum who smash it all parts in the IPL can hardly buy a run in the PSL.
 
Top T20 bowlers in PSL:

Amir
Hasan
Shadab
Rumman
Usman
Wahab
Faheem
Shaheen
Hasnain
Tahir
Irfan
Narine
Junaid
Fizz
Imad
Afridi
Sami
Gul
Tanvir
Gohar


Even the worst bowler in the PSL (Irfan JR) is miles better than the best bowler in IPL (Unadkat)
 
Last edited:
Current? 2018 season?

Chahal Rashid Khan Starc Rabada Fizz Bumrah Tahir Narine etc etc etc.

When you oringially quoted me . I wrote

" IPL also has a lot of very ordinary Indian bowlers."

Now out of the 8 you have mentioned only ONE is Indian spinner (unless Khan is not Rashid).

Afridi has a better average and a much better economy than Chahal even while having played more than double the matches in List A T20's. Chahal hasn't played enough International T20's to compare.

So if he's the best Indian spin bowler in the IPL, your bowlers arent that good.

Bumrah is good but Sami is just if not better.
 
Name one PSL batsman who is better than Kohli. If you can't name him then you have your answer. Though i don't think he would do as well in PSL as he does in IPL.
 
There we go again with the fallacious Gayle and McCullum examples. :))

Let’s take a look at a few batsmen who have outperformed those two in the PSL by a considerable margin:

Shehzad, Kamran, Hafeez, Bopara, Wright, Ronchi etc.

All of these batsmen are comfortably inferior to Gayle and McCullum. Hence, the notion that they have failed in the PSL because of the high class bowling belongs in the garbage.

So, what could be the reasons behind the barren returns of these two T20 giants (and great ODI and Test players as well) in comparison to vastly inferior batsmen?

We can narrow it down to four possibilities:

(a) the slow pitches do not suit their style of play

(b) they are struggling against the style (not the quality) of bowling in the PSL, e.g. too many left-arm orthodox spinners etc.

(c) the PSL came too late in their careers. Had it started in the early 2010s, they would have set the stage on fire

(d) they might not be motivated enough to perform in the PSL, considering it does not have global standing and is simply a paid holiday in the desert for irrelevant and dead cricketers.

This is a very unlikely possibility, but let’s consider all reasons for the sake of it.

Now let’s look at how these reasons how apply to Virat Kohli, one of the greatest batsmen of all time at the peak of his powers - a batsman who is better than anyone Pakistan has ever produced.

(a) do slow pitches affect him? Absolutely not, as an Indian batsman, he thrives on these wickets. He is a master at building an innings, rotating the strike, manipulating the field and going big once he is set.

possibility (a) ruled out.

(b) is there any particular type of bowling prevalent in the PSL that will trouble him?

No. All batsmen, regardless of how great they are, are vulnerable against quality swing bowling early in their innings especially, and we have not seen anything along those lines in the PSL.

(c) is he too old? Of course not, he is entering his peak years now.

(d) will he lack motivation and interest? there is no doubt that he is too big for the PSL. Playing in this substandard league is below his stature, but if he ever has the misfortune of playing in the PSL, you can be certain that he will give his 120%.

He is a champion competitor who respects the game too much. He will give his best to honor any shirt that he is wearing as long as he is on the field.

He is one of the passionate cricketers I have ever seen, and it has played a huge part in his rise as an one of the greatest cricketers of all time.

So the bottom line is that Kohli will take the PSL by storm and will comfortably be the best batsman, leaving the pensioners, dead cricketers and the medicore local batsmen in his dust.

Obviously he might not do well season after season because players can go out of form, but there is not an iota of doubt that he will be the best performer overall in a league where 99% of the active, contemporary world class batsmen are not playing, and these are the batsmen he generally outperforms in international cricket.

The level of delusion in this thread is off the charts, but I guess whatever helps us sleep better at night I suppose.
 
Last edited:
So how come the King doesn’t tear up the IPL by storm? He is the GOAT and too big for that too. Nothing will trouble him in IPL and is so passionate as well.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
There we go again with the fallacious Gayle and McCullum examples. :))

Let’s take a look at a few batsmen who have outperformed those two in the PSL by a considerable margin:

Shehzad, Kamran, Hafeez, Bopara, Wright, Ronchi etc.

All of these batsmen are comfortably inferior to Gayle and McCullum. Hence, the notion that they have failed in the PSL because of the high class bowling belongs in the garbage.

So, what could be the reasons behind the barren returns of these two T20 giants (and great ODI and Test players as well) in comparison to vastly inferior batsmen?

We can narrow it down to four possibilities:

(a) the slow pitches do not suit their style of play

(b) they are struggling against the style (not the quality) of bowling in the PSL, e.g. too many left-arm orthodox spinners etc.

(c) the PSL came too late in their careers. Had it started in the early 2010s, they would have set the stage on fire

(d) they might not be motivated enough to perform in the PSL, considering it does not have global standing and is simply a paid holiday in the desert for irrelevant and dead cricketers.

This is a very unlikely possibility, but let’s consider all reasons for the sake of it.

Now let’s look at how these reasons how apply to Virat Kohli, one of the greatest batsmen of all time at the peak of his powers - a batsman who is better than anyone Pakistan has ever produced.

(a) do slow pitches affect him? Absolutely not, as an Indian batsman, he thrives on these wickets. He is a master at building an innings, rotating the strike, manipulating the field and going big once he is set.

possibility (a) ruled out.

(b) is there any particular type of bowling prevalent in the PSL that will trouble him?

No. All batsmen, regardless of how great they are, are vulnerable against quality swing bowling early in their innings especially, and we have not seen anything along those lines in the PSL.

(c) is he too old? Of course not, he is entering his peak years now.

(d) will he lack motivation and interest? there is no doubt that he is too big for the PSL. Playing in this substandard league is below his stature, but if he ever has the misfortune of playing in the PSL, you can be certain that he will give his 120%.

He is a champion competitor who respects the game too much. He will give his best to honor any shirt that he is wearing as long as he is on the field.

He is one of the passionate cricketers I have ever seen, and it has played a huge part in his rise as an one of the greatest cricketers of all time.

So the bottom line is that Kohli will take the PSL by storm and will comfortably be the best batsman, leaving the pensioners, dead cricketers and the medicore local batsmen in his dust.

Obviously he might not do well season after season because players can go out of form, but there is not an iota of doubt that he will be the best performer overall in a league where 99% of the active, contemporary world class batsmen are not playing, and these are the batsmen he generally outperforms in international cricket.

The level of delusion in this thread is off the charts, but I guess whatever helps us sleep better at night I suppose.

Well said lol. I mean lets not kid ourselves he is well beyond every PSL batsmen. Top PSL scorers have been Akmal bros :uak and the legendary :shezzy2 has also scored well in the past two seasons as well. Kohli is surely better than them regardless of the conditions.
 
[MENTION=131701]Mamoon[/MENTION], top post as usual. Kohli is a beast in T20.
 
Well said lol. I mean lets not kid ourselves he is well beyond every PSL batsmen. Top PSL scorers have been Akmal bros :uak and the legendary :shezzy2 has also scored well in the past two seasons as well. Kohli is surely better than them regardless of the conditions.

Better doesn’t mean more runs. Babar is better than Hafeez but Hafeez outscored him in NZ.
 
There we go again with the fallacious Gayle and McCullum examples. :))

Let’s take a look at a few batsmen who have outperformed those two in the PSL by a considerable margin:

Shehzad, Kamran, Hafeez, Bopara, Wright, Ronchi etc.

All of these batsmen are comfortably inferior to Gayle and McCullum. Hence, the notion that they have failed in the PSL because of the high class bowling belongs in the garbage.

So, what could be the reasons behind the barren returns of these two T20 giants (and great ODI and Test players as well) in comparison to vastly inferior batsmen?

We can narrow it down to four possibilities:

(a) the slow pitches do not suit their style of play

(b) they are struggling against the style (not the quality) of bowling in the PSL, e.g. too many left-arm orthodox spinners etc.

(c) the PSL came too late in their careers. Had it started in the early 2010s, they would have set the stage on fire

(d) they might not be motivated enough to perform in the PSL, considering it does not have global standing and is simply a paid holiday in the desert for irrelevant and dead cricketers.

This is a very unlikely possibility, but let’s consider all reasons for the sake of it.

Now let’s look at how these reasons how apply to Virat Kohli, one of the greatest batsmen of all time at the peak of his powers - a batsman who is better than anyone Pakistan has ever produced.

(a) do slow pitches affect him? Absolutely not, as an Indian batsman, he thrives on these wickets. He is a master at building an innings, rotating the strike, manipulating the field and going big once he is set.

possibility (a) ruled out.

(b) is there any particular type of bowling prevalent in the PSL that will trouble him?

No. All batsmen, regardless of how great they are, are vulnerable against quality swing bowling early in their innings especially, and we have not seen anything along those lines in the PSL.

(c) is he too old? Of course not, he is entering his peak years now.

(d) will he lack motivation and interest? there is no doubt that he is too big for the PSL. Playing in this substandard league is below his stature, but if he ever has the misfortune of playing in the PSL, you can be certain that he will give his 120%.

He is a champion competitor who respects the game too much. He will give his best to honor any shirt that he is wearing as long as he is on the field.

He is one of the passionate cricketers I have ever seen, and it has played a huge part in his rise as an one of the greatest cricketers of all time.

So the bottom line is that Kohli will take the PSL by storm and will comfortably be the best batsman, leaving the pensioners, dead cricketers and the medicore local batsmen in his dust.

Obviously he might not do well season after season because players can go out of form, but there is not an iota of doubt that he will be the best performer overall in a league where 99% of the active, contemporary world class batsmen are not playing, and these are the batsmen he generally outperforms in international cricket.

The level of delusion in this thread is off the charts, but I guess whatever helps us sleep better at night I suppose.

Shouldnt he be taking the IPL by storm first? :23:
 
Well said lol. I mean lets not kid ourselves he is well beyond every PSL batsmen. Top PSL scorers have been Akmal bros :uak and the legendary :shezzy2 has also scored well in the past two seasons as well. Kohli is surely better than them regardless of the conditions.

Kamran's two test centuries , one in Karachi 2006 and one in India 2005 are better than ANY of Kohlis centuries.
 
So how come the King doesn’t tear up the IPL by storm? He is the GOAT and too big for that too. Nothing will trouble him in IPL and is so passionate as well.

If he is too big for the IPL, then it means he is too big for international cricket, since the IPL is international cricket in franchise form.

Almost every world class player plays in the IPL, which makes it international standard.

Kohli is among the all time leading scorers in the IPL, even though he has been playing in it since season 1 when he was a rookie player. Furthermore, the quality of IPL is very high so one batsman cannot dominate it year in year out.

He has taken his game to the next level in the last two years as he is entering his peak years. He has gone from a world class player to an all-time great.

He dominated the 2016 IPL like no batsman has ever dominated a T20 tournament, but he was not in good form and was not fully fit last year. This year, he is all set to take the IPL by storm again, considering the form that he is in.

[MENTION=43583]KingKhanWC[/MENTION]
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Kamran's two test centuries , one in Karachi 2006 and one in India 2005 are better than ANY of Kohlis centuries.

So what? Laxman’s 281 is better than 99.9% of the Test innings any batsman has ever played in 150 years of Test cricket. Does that make him the best Test batsman ever?

Kamran is not 10% the batsman Kohli is.
 
Better doesn’t mean more runs. Babar is better than Hafeez but Hafeez outscored him in NZ.

Tell me why do you think Kohli wouldn't be able to score more runs than these PSL batsmen? The example you are giving doesn't apply to Kohli. Unlike Babar, Kohli is a proven run machine who can score everywhere and against every opposition.
 
He will be a top scorer in at least one edition of PSL if his team would reach eliminator stages. He is certainly better and more consistent than Kamran, Ronchi, Umar.

He would certainly score with 35-40 AVG at worst and with 135 strike rate.
 
So what? Laxman’s 281 is better than 99.9% of the Test innings any batsman has ever played in 150 years of Test cricket. Does that make him the best Test batsman ever?

Kamran is not 10% the batsman Kohli is.

No its not lol.

According to you Kohli is one of the greatest batsmen to ever hold a piece of willow but this is just a fantasy Indians have and you being their biggest cheerleader would naturally follow suit. He has a lot to prove yet.

Kohli's team has never won the IPL.

Kohli was not even in the top 10 of IPL scorers last season (according to an earlier post).

Stop fantasising and get with reality Doc.
 
It is funny that people are suggesting a batsman who has an T20I average of 50 and T20 average of 40 at a high SR will fail in a T20 Cricket league.
 
He will do better than every other batsman but don't expect one batsman to consistently dominate every edition.
 
It is funny that people are suggesting a batsman who has an T20I average of 50 and T20 average of 40 at a high SR will fail in a T20 Cricket league.

Nobody has said he will fail? What are you reading?

What Indians and their fans are implying is he will automatically be the best batsmen if he plays the PSL because the PSL is of a lesser quaility, which is nonsense. From what I can see the Pakistani bowlers in the PSL are head and shoulders above the Indian bowlers in the IPL, which Kohli has not faced.
 
Kamran's two test centuries , one in Karachi 2006 and one in India 2005 are better than ANY of Kohlis centuries.

The fact is Kamran is nowhere near as consistent as Kohli, you know why? Because Kohli is far superior to him. Most batsmen can play great knocks here and there but to do that as often as Kohli does and in situations that he does it is what makes him one hell of a player. If kamran could consistently score those 100s you speak then you could make an argument for him but that's what separates him and others from Kohli.
 
Nobody has said he will fail? What are you reading?

What Indians and their fans are implying is he will automatically be the best batsmen if he plays the PSL because the PSL is of a lesser quaility, which is nonsense. From what I can see the Pakistani bowlers in the PSL are head and shoulders above the Indian bowlers in the IPL, which Kohli has not faced.

Yes, but the batting competition is also inferior. Ronchi and Akmal are not as good as the batting talent Kohli goes up against in the IPL.

I don't think it's far-fetched to assume Kohli would top the charts.
 
Nobody has said he will fail? What are you reading?

What Indians and their fans are implying is he will automatically be the best batsmen if he plays the PSL because the PSL is of a lesser quaility, which is nonsense. From what I can see the Pakistani bowlers in the PSL are head and shoulders above the Indian bowlers in the IPL, which Kohli has not faced.

Who are the top scorers from the Pakistan team in PSL? How many runs have they scored? Honest question as I haven't followed the league that much except for in the PP.
 
The fact is Kamran is nowhere near as consistent as Kohli, you know why? Because Kohli is far superior to him. Most batsmen can play great knocks here and there but to do that as often as Kohli does and in situations that he does it is what makes him one hell of a player. If kamran could consistently score those 100s you speak then you could make an argument for him but that's what separates him and others from Kohli.

Where have I said he is a superiour batsmen? My point was Kohli hasn't even scored a century as qaulity as Akmal has done so far. You may see him as God but he's just a man who has much to prove esp in the toughest format which isn't flat track T20 cricket. If he played in the PSL this year, Ronchi would have outbatted him because of the way Ronchi has played, attacking almost every single ball which Kohli never does.
 
Yes, but the batting competition is also inferior. Ronchi and Akmal are not as good as the batting talent Kohli goes up against in the IPL.

I don't think it's far-fetched to assume Kohli would top the charts.

It was mentioned Kohli was below 20 in the top scores in the IPL. So all those 20 are better than him and anyone in the PSL? Besides batsmen go up against bowlers, they cannot change what other batsmen do.
 
Nobody has said he will fail? What are you reading?

What Indians and their fans are implying is he will automatically be the best batsmen if he plays the PSL because the PSL is of a lesser quaility, which is nonsense. From what I can see the Pakistani bowlers in the PSL are head and shoulders above the Indian bowlers in the IPL, which Kohli has not faced.

Except Usman Khan and Wahab Riaz no bowler in this PSL has impressed me.

I am not sure which quality of bowling are you talking about.
 
No its not lol.

According to you Kohli is one of the greatest batsmen to ever hold a piece of willow but this is just a fantasy Indians have and you being their biggest cheerleader would naturally follow suit. He has a lot to prove yet.

Kohli's team has never won the IPL.

Kohli was not even in the top 10 of IPL scorers last season (according to an earlier post).

Stop fantasising and get with reality Doc.

Kohli is an ATG already. Yes he still has to prove so and so, but no batsmen in history has proved himself on all frontiers and answered every single question that has been asked of him. However, Kohli has done enough by the age of 29 to be considered a legend of the game.

I have already listed the reasons why I think Kohli will take the PSL by storm. Instead of beating around the bush, I would like you to do the following, if you will be kind enough to do so:

(a) list the reasons why Kohli will not do well in the PSL

(b) explain why those reasons do not apply to the inferior batsmen who have dominated the PSL, unless you think that Kamran, Ronchi, Shehzad, Bopara, Wright, Watson etc. are better batsmen than Kohli.

I request [MENTION=143344]babajee[/MENTION] and everyone else (who thinks Kohli will not dominate the PSL) to answer (a) and (b).
 
Except Usman Khan and Wahab Riaz no bowler in this PSL has impressed me.

I am not sure which quality of bowling are you talking about.

The prerequisite of quality bowling is not to impress one person.

Hasan Ali, Afridi, Sami, Nawaz and others have bowled well too.

Anwyway Kohli will never play in the PSL as Indians are scared of playing with Pakistanis.

I have given my view and have nothing futher to add. I will allow Mamoon to continue arguing on behalf of Indians and India.
 
Where have I said he is a superiour batsmen? My point was Kohli hasn't even scored a century as qaulity as Akmal has done so far. You may see him as God but he's just a man who has much to prove esp in the toughest format which isn't flat track T20 cricket. If he played in the PSL this year, Ronchi would have outbatted him because of the way Ronchi has played, attacking almost every single ball which Kohli never does.

Ok. But what does quality of Kami's century have anything to do with Kohli's performance in PSL. Tell me would you rather have Akmal on your team or Kohli? Like is said earlier Kohli would probably be the best batsmen along with Ronchi. It's hard to top Ronchi's performance because every time he scores a 50 its almost always a sure victory because of his insane 180 SR. Also just because i acknowledge Kohli's abilities doesn't mean i see him in such a high regard.
 
From what I've seen in the last week I'd say that in one PSL season , he would match his IPL record of 970 runs plus another 400 runs ..
 
It was mentioned Kohli was below 20 in the top scores in the IPL. So all those 20 are better than him and anyone in the PSL? Besides batsmen go up against bowlers, they cannot change what other batsmen do.

You have completely ignored context.

Kohli was injured (shoulder) and missed the start of the tournament. He never got into the flow of things. So yes, if he comes into the PSL with an injury he might not top the charts.

The time he did get a chance to play a full tournament in 2016...

Kohli: 973 runs @ 81.08 AVG (top scorer by miles)


He averaged 20 more than the 2nd best batsman in IPL 2016. 20 more.
 
Last edited:
The prerequisite of quality bowling is not to impress one person.

Hasan Ali, Afridi, Sami, Nawaz and others have bowled well too.

Anwyway Kohli will never play in the PSL as Indians are scared of playing with Pakistanis.

I have given my view and have nothing futher to add. I will allow Mamoon to continue arguing on behalf of Indians and India.

Forgot to add Sami to that. Besides that bowling has been nothing sort of excellent(including Amir's) thag you are boasting of.

On top of that poor quality of batting. If Luke Ronchi, Kamran Akmal, Ahmed Shehzad can score runs I don't see any reason that top batsman like Kohli, AB, dhawan wouldn't be able to dominate.
 
Back
Top