There was not a firm offer but a feeler was sent out by the US to India around 1950 with the idea of booting China from the UNSC and giving the seat to India. Booting China should not have been difficult as at that point it was contested who should represent China: Taiwan or Mainland China. Mainland China (People's Republic of China) only got the seat in 1971.
The diplomatic challenge for India was to convert the feeler into a firm offer and Nehru came up short.
Nehru apparently did not want to antagonize China so he said no to the US. Also his ministers like Krishna Menon (known for his "eloquence, brilliance, and forceful, highly abrasive personality"), where busy bad-mouthing the West so they did not want any negotiations with the US.
While Nehru and Krishna Menon occupied the faux moral high ground with their rants against imperialism and colonialism (rather like the faux secular liberals of today), the majority of the country was condemned to grinding poverty. Nehru lived in his mini-palace Teen Murti.
Fat lot of good Nehru's timidness did, China found him to be weak and went ahead and attacked India and took away territory by force anyway. Later it supplied missile technology to Pakistan which now constitutes a serious security threat to India.
Just google "nehru india security council seat", you will find plenty of links.
Excellent demonstration of how not to debate a topic. No links provided, your personal insights about so and so, digression from the topic. Onus is on you to prove that Nehru was the reason behind us not getting UNSC seat, you have failed to demonstrate that to my satisfaction. Now let me ask some questions and you try and respond to them, that way maybe the discussion can be taken forward. [MENTION=76058]cricketjoshila[/MENTION] and [MENTION=150746]SakunaPataka[/MENTION] can join in. I won't rely on copy pasting random articles, would prefer to apply my independent mind. Ok so here are the questions.
1. When was UNSC formed? Who were the permanent 5 members, before Indian independence or after?
2. Has the permanent membership changed these last 74 or so years?
3. What is the procedure to get a permanent seat? Who all are eligible to vote (UNGA, UNSC?), required majority, any veto process? Answers available on UN website.
4. Who proposed to Nehru that India should take a permanent seat instead of China? Was he/she serious or some small talk, formal or informal? Did representatives of all 5 countries send feelers? Did that person propose any way how it could come to fruition?
5. How often do the Big 5 agree on some topic? 50s was peak cold war era, was it possible to bring USA and USSR on the same table? Did USSR and China (post communist revolution) have good relations then or not? Which camp did India belong to? What exactly did India offer back then that all the permanent members would cast aside their differences to back us?
6. Question was who represented China in UN? PRC (mainland) or ROC (Taiwan)? How could India possibly get involved? Would either of the Chinas have bent over backwards and asked India to go ahead? Would both parties, ROC and PRC be ok with a 3rd party (alien) snatching their bone of dispute? Is international diplomacy a joke? You said 'booting China out' wouldn't have been difficult, care to elaborate? Would it have been easier than listing a UN designated dreaded terrorist like Masood Azhar?
7. Continuing on the theme of point 6, something similar happened in 1991 when USSR disintegrated? Till then USSR held the seat, now it was given to Russian Federation. Those countries came to an agreement and decided amongst themselves that Russia be given the seat in exchange of all the debts of Ukraine, Georgia, Latvia etc being taken care of by Moscow (a host of other legal issues among them still pending, not going into that). Were offers made to Japan, Germany, Italy, Canada, Australia. Spain, Brazil, Turkey, South Korea, Saudi Arabia, Israel or India to take that seat? Any feelers given? Would Russia and other ex-Soviet states have allowed it to happen? Again, is international diplomacy a joke?
8. If getting a permanent seat is so easy, why have Japan, Germany, Canada etc never been accepted? Economic powers, influential, capable democracies, high-tech innovators, NATO partners, cultural powerhouses. Why didn't USA give feelers to them to take a seat? Again would other countries accept it? Is there any veto in the selection process, find out. I am emphasizing on veto because trivial things are often vetoed at that level, this is not trivial. We are talking about the 50s where USA (Truman, Eisenhower) and USSR (Stalin) weren't buddies, would they leave their enmity aside and hug each other for the benefit of India. Did 1950s India have so much clout? All I hear is about the poverty, underdevelopment, famines, debts and refugee crisis in that era? Did I hear them wrong? Maybe the land of snake charmers was so powerful and had such a hold over USA, USSR, China that they would all bow their heads and give us a damn seat, while watching Communist China getting kicked out. I always thought that Stalin hated India, he frowned upon her independence for being counter revolutionary while being in love with Chinese revolutionaries making treaty after treaty with them. I wonder what would have changed his mind.
9. If alleged secret feelers have got so much power why has no other country gained entry all these years? Trust me if American feelers were so damn potent and the process so easy, Israel would have won that seat a long time back. Why exactly do you think the permanent members are so eager to share their power, even with friendly nations?
Some questions for you to answer, take your time,urge you to apply your minds. We can expand on that and make logical conclusions depending on how you reply, don't quote aunty gossips or WA history lessons, something more solid sans digs at secular liberals or my 'ilk'. Sounds fair Messrs [MENTION=147527]MP2011[/MENTION], [MENTION=137142]JaDed[/MENTION] ? Feel free to express your views if you think my questions are inappropriate.
Cheers .