What's new

"I felt really bad for Younis Khan, so I said let me just call and speak to him myself" : Azharuddin

Strike Rate

Senior T20I Player
Joined
Oct 23, 2013
Runs
19,788
"I felt really bad for Younis Khan, so I said let me just call and speak to him myself" : Azharuddin

After picking up the Man of the Match award for his double-century that set up Pakistan’s series-drawing victory over England at The Oval on Sunday (August 14), Younis Khan told Michael Atherton that he owed his 218 to Mohammad Azharuddin, the former India captain.

“I received a call before the game from India, from Mohammad Azharuddin, and he talked about my batting, (told me to) stay in the crease,” revealed Younis. Azhar’s advice, and Younis’s adaptability, paid off handsomely as the batsman surged to a monumental sixth Test double-ton, allowing Pakistan to open up a 214-run first-innings lead and eventually round off a 10-wicket win with more than a day to spare. This, after he had hopped and jumped and struggled his way to scores of 31, 4, 1, 28, 33 and 25 in the six knocks preceding the most influential batting performance of the series.

“Younis is a good friend of mine, I keep meeting him often in Dubai especially,” Azhar told Wisden India of the origin of their telephonic conversation. “To be honest, it pained me to watch him bat the way he had been in the first three Tests. I felt he was too good a batsman to be batting in that fashion, and to be getting out in the manner in which he was. So I decided to speak to him before the final Test. It was nice of him to hear me out, and adapt in such a short period of time. The result speaks for itself. Ideally, it is the job of the coach to point out such things but I wasn’t sure if that was happening. I felt really bad for him, so I said let me just call and speak to him myself.”

Azhar’s suggestion to bat inside the crease stemmed from experience and straightforward logic. “A lot of people stand outside the crease in a bid to counter swing,” pointed out Azhar. “I am not sure that is the right way to go. For one thing, when you stand outside the crease, you reduce the distance between yourself and the ball, so the ball comes quicker on to you. For another, you are playing the ball when it is still swinging, which maximises the chances of getting beaten or nicking off.

“When you are inside the crease, conversely, you have a little more time before the ball reaches you, and more often than not, the ball has finished swinging by the time the bat makes contact with it. I know it is almost fashionable to stand outside and meet the ball early, but from experience, I can state that that doesn’t necessarily work because then you are vulnerable to both pace and swing.”

Azhar, of course, has a volume of work on which to base his reasoning. He had four wonderful seasons with Derbyshire in the English County Championship in the early 1990s, making 2728 runs for them in 31 games at 54.56, inclusive of nine hundreds and 11 fifties, between 1991 and 1994. In 1991 alone, he amassed 2016 runs in 22 matches at a remarkable 59.29 – a fabulous achievement in any era and particularly at a time when the top bowlers in the world all plied their wares on the county circuit – with seven centuries and 11 further scores between 50 and 99. He had by then lit up India’s 1990 tour of England with a mesmeric 121 at Lord’s – off 111 deliveries with 22 fours – in an innings that is spoken of more glowingly than Graham Gooch’s 333 and 123, and followed that up with an equally luminous 179 in a tall-scoring draw at Old Trafford in the following game.

“International cricket is all about adjusting to challenges and adapting to conditions,” went on Azhar. “When things aren’t going your way, you need to think why that is happening. This is the day and age of intense analysis through use of video technology; bowlers come armed with specific game plans for specific batsmen, and as a batsman, you must have your own plans to negate their designs.

“You can’t stay static and stagnant in your thinking and your approach because then you will be a sitting duck. That’s the point I tried to make with Younis. Even during our conversation, I got the sense that he had quickly cottoned on to what I was saying. The later you play the ball, the more the chances of finding the gaps. There is no point going hard at the ball and hitting three great shots to the fielder for no runs. When you play the ball late, you give yourself a bigger window to find the gaps. The very good players hit, say, 16-17 boundaries on their way to a hundred, the hallmark of a very good player is to see the gaps and not the fielders. That’s what keeps the game moving forward and transfers the pressure on to the opposition.”

Azhar pointed out that bowlers had wisened up to batsmen standing outside the crease to address swing bowling. “So when you go back, then you are forcing them to adapt and alter their lengths. By the time they start to alter their lengths, you are already say 30-40, and then you can kick on from there. That’s what we saw with Younis in this game. There was a marked difference in the manner in which he batted in this innings compared to the previous innings in the Test series, hats off to him for making the adjustment so brilliantly.

“You have to if you want to be successful,” shot back Azhar when asked how difficult it was to make a technical and tactical adjustment so late in one’s career, and towards the end of a series. “There is no substitute for performance, you can’t afford to take anything for granted, especially in modern-day competitive cricket.”

Perhaps there is a message in it for some of India’s batsmen too, who have had their problems against the swinging ball. Virat Kohli, the current Indian Test captain, had a fairly disastrous tour of England in 2014 when he made just 134 runs from 10 innings with a highest of 39, repeatedly caught behind the stumps driving away from his body. Kohli has since raised his batting to a different plane, with four centuries in one series in Australia alone as well as a maiden double-hundred in the ongoing series in the Caribbean, though his next visit to England for a Test tour will be followed with greater interest than before.

“There aren’t too many genuine swing bowlers in the world, and our players don’t therefore always have exposure to playing quality swing bowling, particularly in domestic cricket,” observed Azhar. “That explains why a young and inexperienced Sri Lankan attack bowled them out for 101 in Pune earlier this year in a Twenty20 International in conditions that generously encouraged swing bowling.”


http://www.wisdenindia.com/cricket-...azhar-advice-that-changed-youniss-game/219431
 
This really shows how much respect these players have for each from both side of the border. Mushtaq/Bedi, Imran/Sunny and so many other great competitors on the field but also great friends off the field from both side of the border.
 
Great analysis from Azhar. Wish he stayed controversy free as he seems to have a lot to contribute to cricket.
 
This guy makes you wonder what the hell is grant flower is doing(unless he tols our batsmen to do that and they didnt follow)

I could see azharuddins name popping up for batting coach very soon
 
Blame azhar for drawn series. Obviously missed the first 2 games and only called him after seeing him in the third!!
 
How many days did Younis Khan have to adapt? Think that in general highlights the class and sheer determination of the man.
 
Sounds like Bollywood drama.

YK was all over the place, his balance was non-existant, his head was all over the place. He batted inside and outside the crease.

Grant Flower was the one who worked with him and gave him the advise, even though Azhar's support may have helped.
 
Plenty of people trying to take the credit for this now. Nobody was interested though when he was failing.
 
Sounds like Bollywood drama.

YK was all over the place, his balance was non-existant, his head was all over the place. He batted inside and outside the crease.

Grant Flower was the one who worked with him and gave him the advise, even though Azhar's support may have helped.

Saj tweeted a yesterday that YK was working Mahmood in nets so i am not sure if it was Grant work?
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Azhar Mahmood has been working with Younis Khan these last couple of days. Positive results already <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/EngvPak?src=hash">#EngvPak</a> <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/Cricket?src=hash">#Cricket</a></p>— Saj Sadiq (@Saj_PakPassion) <a href="https://twitter.com/Saj_PakPassion/status/764498784646754305">August 13, 2016</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
 
I called YK as well. Told him not to worry. The pitch is gonna flatten out with no cloud in the sky, Moeen will be on so this will be your time to cash in. Also told him to get his back leg behind the ball but he didn't listen, maybe next time.
 
its unfair to discredit Grant Flower. The guy is an honest hard worker keeping a low profile while working on batsmen's weaknesses. One should remember the same Grant Flower was praised heaps by Younis during his glorious period in 2014 where he bashed 100s against Aus and NZ.

Surely a subtle advice can work wonders at times but it is Flower who has a greater contribution to polish our successful middle order.
 
Last edited:
Saj tweeted a yesterday that YK was working Mahmood in nets so i am not sure if it was Grant work?
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Azhar Mahmood has been working with Younis Khan these last couple of days. Positive results already <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/EngvPak?src=hash">#EngvPak</a> <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/Cricket?src=hash">#Cricket</a></p>— Saj Sadiq (@Saj_PakPassion) <a href="https://twitter.com/Saj_PakPassion/status/764498784646754305">August 13, 2016</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Probably a combination of help from Grant, Azhar and Azharuddin.
 
Probably a combination of help from Grant, Azhar and Azharuddin.

Grant never really gets the credit he deserve while our youngsta beauties keep thanking captain/head coach and even pcb chairman when they come for pc or post match i have never seen them mentioning grant name that much.
 
Plenty of people trying to take the credit for this now. Nobody was interested though when he was failing.

The Azharuddin thing straight came from the horse's mouth. Grant and Azhar Mahmood was speculated.
 
Grant never really gets the credit he deserve while our youngsta beauties keep thanking captain/head coach and even pcb chairman when they come for pc or post match i have never seen them mentioning grant name that much.

Many players have thanked Grant publicly.
 
Everything was cool but i think Azharudin should have avoided this dig at coaches because it can create problem btw current coaching staff and yk if they read this:
It is the job of the coach to point out such things but I wasn’t sure if that was happening. I felt really bad for him, so I said let me just call and speak to him myself.
 
Younis is experienced enough not to need anyone else, he hasn't got all those 50's and 100's
because other people have showed him how to bat!
 
Azhar himself was going through a lean patch during Indian your of Pakistan in 1989, he discussed with Zaheer Abbas who suggested him some minor adjustment to his batting
and Azhar hit a purple patch after that.
 
This guy makes you wonder what the hell is grant flower is doing(unless he tols our batsmen to do that and they didnt follow)

I could see azharuddins name popping up for batting coach very soon

You will have to see Asad Shafiq when he credited Grant Flower, and YK doing the same in his press conference.. The guy is a gem
 
There is one thing I hate about YK, there is no consistency in his train of thought

In his press conference majority of his quotes about how 'he has not changed his technique much' and he kept going on and on about people saying his technique is not right, or he was not playing correctly for English conditions. And whatever was asked he kept saying this is how I play, and the first person he has to credit for correcting his technique was a phone call from Azhar, after saying all the time I didn't change anything just spent more time at the crease.
 
Last edited:
So at one place he is saying he didn't change anything, and on the other side he is saying stuff like 'azhar uddin called him, I'm pretty sure one phone call won't make a huge difference like the media claim it should
 
The Hate is amongst the Fans only. To fix this situation, may be the stars from both sides of the yester years, cook up a tv show and discuss their actual feelings, provide some humorous incident and in general just be friendly.... that can start healing amongst the present day fans !!!
 
Azhar was very good player of swing bowling.Not that adapt at playing short pitch stuff.So his advise to YK about handling swing in England may have been very useful.

And Azhar didnt try to take credit.YK mentioned his name and gave him credit.Then only did he speak out.And TBH Azhar doesnt need anything.

To be a great technical coach you need to know the minute details of that particular aspect of the game.And that amount of detailed knowledge only comes if you yourself have been a very good exponent of that aspect of the game.Grant Flower was a extremely avg test match player,he himself may not be aware of the minute details that a player needs to change,while someone like Azhar who was very good player is likely to be aware of such details and hence could help YK.

In the words of Sourav Ganguly,when he was talking about how Australian bowling coach is helping his team more than The Indian bowling coach his own team. "Taking wickets in international cricket is an art,you can only teach others that art if you know it yourself,Craig Mcdermott has been there done that,while the Indian bowling coach,well....."

I thing its very relevant in terms of batting as well.Pakistan will be better served if they appoint Inzy as batting coach.Even Salim Malik will be a good choice.Or find some international coach who was a good test batsman,Grant Flower doesnt cut it.
 
This guy makes you wonder what the hell is grant flower is doing(unless he tols our batsmen to do that and they didnt follow)

I could see azharuddins name popping up for batting coach very soon

How about Sami, Shafiq or Azhar.? Im sure Grant Flower helped them. Not enough credit is given to Flower. This is why Younis should not have mentioned Azharuddin to the press..Flower will feel undermined.
 
The Hate is amongst the Fans only. To fix this situation, may be the stars from both sides of the yester years, cook up a tv show and discuss their actual feelings, provide some humorous incident and in general just be friendly.... that can start healing amongst the present day fans !!!

they did those programs multiple times with imran/wasim/kapil/dada/azhar/waqar etc sitting together sharing funny stories, incidents etc.
 
Azhar said:

"Ideally, it is the job of the coach to point out such things but I wasn’t sure if that was happening. I felt really bad for him, so I said let me just call and speak to him myself.”


Which is very true. Grant has been a total clueless "coach", he hasn't been able to fix ANY of our batsmen who were poor to start with.

Shan Masood is the same, Hafeez is the same walking wicket against the moving ball, Ahmed Shehzad static feet slogger, Shafiq still inconsistent and can't score big.

YK and Misbah were the same before Grant started. Same goes for Shafiq+Azhar.

What has he done apart from getting a free ride and paychecks? Someone above said Saleem Malik would've been better.

I totally agree - forget what Saleem did, just hire him as a batting coach who knows his stuff. Or, heck, even Inzy would've been great but he's a selector now.
 
Azhar said:

"Ideally, it is the job of the coach to point out such things but I wasn’t sure if that was happening. I felt really bad for him, so I said let me just call and speak to him myself.”


Which is very true. Grant has been a total clueless "coach", he hasn't been able to fix ANY of our batsmen who were poor to start with.

Shan Masood is the same, Hafeez is the same walking wicket against the moving ball, Ahmed Shehzad static feet slogger, Shafiq still inconsistent and can't score big.

YK and Misbah were the same before Grant started. Same goes for Shafiq+Azhar.

What has he done apart from getting a free ride and paychecks? Someone above said Saleem Malik would've been better.

I totally agree - forget what Saleem did, just hire him as a batting coach who knows his stuff. Or, heck, even Inzy would've been great but he's a selector now.

Yes because Salim will turn them into world beaters. Im not sure what more Grant is supposed to? Pakistani batsmen have always been technically inept.
 
Yes because Salim will turn them into world beaters. Im not sure what more Grant is supposed to? Pakistani batsmen have always been technically inept.

Lol, fix their faults? How come those who used to struggle are not only still struggling, but have regressed?

Those who used to do well are still doing that.

Someone like Grant hasn't been there in the middle, experienced the pressure and came out on top with good scores consistently, like Saleem and Azhar did (or Inzi for that matter).

These guys are in a better position to fix the technical faults of our bats.
 
Sounds like Bollywood drama.

YK was all over the place, his balance was non-existant, his head was all over the place. He batted inside and outside the crease.

Grant Flower was the one who worked with him and gave him the advise, even though Azhar's support may have helped.

I watched Flower work with YK at very close quarters at Worcester but there was a side of me that was thinking about whether YK would listen to a guy whose test record was nowhere near his own.
 
It takes a very good person to actually come forward and help someone just for the sake of it.

Thanks to Azhar-ud-din and a lesson to Pakistani and Indian fans that together they can achieve a lot.
 
I watched Flower work with YK at very close quarters at Worcester but there was a side of me that was thinking about whether YK would listen to a guy whose test record was nowhere near his own.

I agree, he shouldn't need to listen to anyone. When you're 35+ having over 30 test hundreds you should be able to figure out your own flaws! I think YK was being generous with his praise or is probably thinking of applying for the job of UN secretary.
 
Back
Top