What's new

'I was just trying to smell it': Five memorable ball-tampering moments

R3verse Swing

Local Club Star
Joined
Jan 8, 2018
Runs
2,163
Ball-tampering: Five memorable cricketing controversies from Atherton to Du Plessis

Ball tampering is in the news again this weekend with Australia captain Steve Smith's admission that he formulated a plan to alter the ball during the third Test against South Africa in Cape Town.

Smith and vice-captain David Warner have stepped down from their positions for the remainder of the match, both have been fined and Smith is banned for the final Test of the series.

But ball-tampering is not new and Australia are far from alone in trying it. Here are five earlier episodes that made headlines.

Mike Atherton - England v South Africa, Lord's, 1994

_100560894_mikeatherton_getty.jpg


England captain Mike Atherton was in the crosshairs in 1994 when he was accused of ball-tampering during the Lord's Test against South Africa.

After TV pictures appeared to show him applying dirt to the ball, Atherton insisted he had only "put some dust in my pocket from a used pitch... to keep my hands and the ball dry".

His defence was that, in trying to keep the moisture off the ball, he was therefore seeking to maintain its condition, rather than alter it.

There are varying accounts of exactly what Atherton told match referee Peter Burge, who chose a fine rather than a ban.

Punishment: Atherton fined £2,000

Sachin Tendulkar - South Africa v India, Port Elizabeth, 2001

_100561408_tendulkar_getty.jpg


Legendary India batsman Sachin Tendulkar was given a suspended one-match ban by match referee Mike Denness, after being found guilty of ball-tampering based on television footage during the second Test against South Africa.

Tendulkar was shown removing a piece of grass from the ball, and the International Cricket Council eventually decided this amounted to cleaning it without the umpire's permission rather than ball-tampering and so overturned the ban.

However, that was not the end of the controversy as the Indian cricket board refused to accept former England captain Denness as match referee for the third Test and it proceeded but was declared unofficial.

Punishment: Suspended one-match ban, overturned on appeal.

Inzamam ul-Haq - England v Pakistan, The Oval, 2006

_100560898_inzamam_getty.jpg


During the fourth day of the fourth Test between England and Pakistan, umpires Darrell Hair and Billy Doctrove held up play to call for a box of balls, and it soon became apparent that they had decided the tourists had illegally altered the condition of the ball.

The umpires awarded five penalty runs to England and offered them a replacement ball.

Bad light forced the players off shortly afterwards, and when the game resumed after tea Pakistan initially refused to take the field in protest, resulting in the first forfeited match in Test history.

Captain Inzamam-ul-Haq was held responsible for his team's actions but then cleared of the ball-tampering charge by an ICC tribunal. He was, however, banned for four matches for bringing the game into disrepute by refusing to resume play.

The result of the match was later changed to a draw, then altered again to an England win.

Punishment: Inzamam banned for four matches

Shahid Afridi - Australia v Pakistan, Perth, 2010

_100561404_afridi_getty.jpg


Shahid Afridi in discussions with umpries Paul Reiffel and Asoka de Silva
Pakistan captain Shahid Afridi was found guilty of ball-tampering during the fifth and final one-day international against Australia at the Waca in 2010, after he was caught by television cameras apparently biting the ball.

It was reported to the on-field umpires by the TV umpire and, after discussions with Afridi, the ball was changed. Pakistan lost the game, and series, 5-0.

Afridi's initial explanation was that he had been "trying to smell it and how it was feeling" but he admitted later he was "ashamed" of his actions, which had been "in the heat of the moment".

Punishment: Afridi banned for two T20 matches

Faf du Plessis - Australia v South Africa, Hobart 2016

Faf du Plessis: Journalist is shoved into door by South Africa security
The South Africa captain was caught on camera sucking on mints before using his saliva to shine the ball during the second Test against Australia.

Du Plessis was found guilty of ball-tampering by the International Cricket Council. He had previously been fined half his match fee for scuffing the ball on the zip of his trousers against Pakistan in 2013.

The charge did not result from any accusations by Australia but vice-captain David Warner told reporters afterwards: "We hold our heads high and I'd be very disappointed if one of our team members did that.

"The rules are in place for a reason. If you're not going to use them why bother having them?

"If you're going to overstep the mark, be prepared to get fined and miss Test matches."

Punishment: Du Plessis fined 100% of his match fee and given three penalty points.

----------------------

http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/cricket/43532624

Smith and BANcroft got off lightly.
 
I've just read CA might ban Smith and Warner for life so this isnt over yet.

Afridi was a moment of madness but he apologised later.

Inzy did nothing wrong, the umpire was a racist.

Tendulkar did tamper but the Indians started to cry and began threatening all sorts including not playing which meant the decision was overturned. The ICC bowed down under pressure, the bigger disgrace.
 
Afridi was smelling the ball with the teeth. That's hilarious..!
 
The Afridi thing was just so ridiculous that it's difficult for me to get outraged by it.
 
I've just read CA might ban Smith and Warner for life so this isnt over yet.

Afridi was a moment of madness but he apologised later.

Inzy did nothing wrong, the umpire was a racist.

Tendulkar did tamper but the Indians started to cry and began threatening all sorts including not playing which meant the decision was overturned. The ICC bowed down under pressure, the bigger disgrace.

100% agree.

Harper was indeed racist. Not just towards Pakistan, but SL and India too. Though he faced his comeuppance here : https://www.smh.com.au/sport/cricke...-from-orange-bottle-shop-20171023-gz6a1b.html

As for SRT, despite what Indian fans want to believe, he always turns up in ball tampering articles, even today.
 
100% agree.

Harper was indeed racist. Not just towards Pakistan, but SL and India too. Though he faced his comeuppance here : https://www.smh.com.au/sport/cricke...-from-orange-bottle-shop-20171023-gz6a1b.html

As for SRT, despite what Indian fans want to believe, he always turns up in ball tampering articles, even today.

Video clearly shows Tendulkar changing the condition of the ball by trying to manipulating the seam. Whether you bite the ball or use any other method its cheating.

Afridi admitted and apologised, Tendulkar and the BCCI deny to this day. He may be God to Indians but is a normal cricketer to the rest of us.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The Afridi thing was just so ridiculous that it's difficult for me to get outraged by it.

:))) I still can't control my laugh whenever I come across the picture.
The guy wasn't from this planet that's for sure :afridi
 
Afridi walks out with best actor in comic role Oscar Award for that performance :afridi

My favourite player from Pak team :sendoff
 
Video clearly shows Tendulkar changing the condition of the ball by trying to manipulating the seam. Whether you bite the ball or use any other method its cheating.

Afridi admitted and apologised, Tendulkar and the BCCI deny to this day. He may be God to Indians but is a normal cricketer to the rest of us.

I have seen the video many times, there is no grass on the ball. Yet if you look at the Dravid ball tampering incident, it is not a touch or comes close to what SRT did, but Dravid get's done for it.

[utube]YAz8dC7vXks[/utube]
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Afridi is just an honest and upfront guy. No cheap tricks or hidden tactics from him. If he is going to tamper with the ball he is going to do it out and in open! That's just how he rolls.
 
The fourth incident was memorable. I remember that 2010 game and to be fair to Afridi , the ball did look ravishing that night. Om nom nom .. :afridi1
 
I've just read CA might ban Smith and Warner for life so this isnt over yet.

Afridi was a moment of madness but he apologised later.

Inzy did nothing wrong, the umpire was a racist.

Tendulkar did tamper but the Indians started to cry and began threatening all sorts including not playing which meant the decision was overturned. The ICC bowed down under pressure, the bigger disgrace.

Inzi Did nothing wrong and tendulkar did it....okkk
 
Video clearly shows Tendulkar changing the condition of the ball by trying to manipulating the seam. Whether you bite the ball or use any other method its cheating.

Afridi admitted and apologised, Tendulkar and the BCCI deny to this day. He may be God to Indians but is a normal cricketer to the rest of us.

The world know How much pain Tendulkar have gave to you people so its not surprising to see u ppl jumping on every opportunity to degrade him....and ur whinning will not change the fact...u keep living in ur conspiracy theories....
 
Love how hypersensitive Indians get when someone tries to paint their golden boy as a faux idol. The PE incident was probably the first time their board threw the toys out of the pram and got away with blackmail. It's a formula that they've used to great effect since, but of course facts. Clowns.
 
The world know How much pain Tendulkar have gave to you people so its not surprising to see u ppl jumping on every opportunity to degrade him....and ur whinning will not change the fact...u keep living in ur conspiracy theories....

A video isn't a conspiracy theory and his average against Pakistan isnt his highest against all nations.

He cheated so have many others, get over it.
 
Back
Top