What's new

ICC CT : Warm-up | Australia v Pakistan | 29th May, 2017 | Birmingham | Pre-Match Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.

waqar goraya

ODI Debutant
Joined
Nov 6, 2010
Runs
9,434
Both teams playing their second warm up game, after winning their earlier games.

Pakistan squad ; Sarfraz Ahmed (C), Azhar Ali, Ahmed Shehzad, Babar Azam, Mohammad Hafeez, Shoaib Malik, Imad Wasim, Shadab Khan, Fahim Ashraf, Hasan Ali, Fakhar Zaman, Junaid Khan, Mohammad Amir, Wahab Riaz, Haris Sohail

Australia squad ; Steven Smith(c), David Warner, Pat Cummins, Aaron Finch, John Hastings, Josh Hazlewood, Travis Head, Moises Henriques, Chris Lynn, Glenn Maxwell, James Pattinson, Mitchell Starc, Marcus Stoinis, Matthew Wade, Adam Zampa
 
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Fakhar Zaman set to play in Pakistan's next Champions Trophy warm-up against Australia at Edgbaston <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/CT17?src=hash">#CT17</a> <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/Cricket?src=hash">#Cricket</a></p>— Saj Sadiq (@Saj_PakPassion) <a href="https://twitter.com/Saj_PakPassion/status/868809990588555264">May 28, 2017</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
 
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Fakhar Zaman set to play in Pakistan's next Champions Trophy warm-up against Australia at Edgbaston <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/CT17?src=hash">#CT17</a> <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/Cricket?src=hash">#Cricket</a></p>— Saj Sadiq (@Saj_PakPassion) <a href="https://twitter.com/Saj_PakPassion/status/868809990588555264">May 28, 2017</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

any chances of haris sohail playing ?
 
I think Fakhar will be in for Azhar. Amir will play for Wahab and that might be our XI. If Fakhar gets, say a solid 30+ he might start vs India.
 
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Fakhar Zaman set to play in Pakistan's next Champions Trophy warm-up against Australia at Edgbaston <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/CT17?src=hash">#CT17</a> <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/Cricket?src=hash">#Cricket</a></p>— Saj Sadiq (@Saj_PakPassion) <a href="https://twitter.com/Saj_PakPassion/status/868809990588555264">May 28, 2017</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

He should replace Shehzad also in main tournament.The question is does Pakistan management have the nerve to replace Hafeez with Haris?If these two can get into the team Pakistan has a chance to far in the tournament.
 
He should replace Shehzad also in main tournament.The question is does Pakistan management have the nerve to replace Hafeez with Haris?If these two can get into the team Pakistan has a chance to far in the tournament.

Hafeez position is confirmed because of his bowling, his bowling is still vital. He dries up the run, can bowl with new ball against lefts as well. He is going nowhere
 
He should replace Shehzad also in main tournament.The question is does Pakistan management have the nerve to replace Hafeez with Haris?If these two can get into the team Pakistan has a chance to far in the tournament.

Hafeez is a sure starter. So what pakistan can do is

Hafeez
Fakhar
Babar
Haris
Malik
Imad
Sarfraz
Fahim
Shadab
Amir
Hassan
 
Looks like Babar will have a water-boy day. Azhar failed as opener, so he must be given chance to prove himself at 3. May be, Malik'll sit out for Haris.
 
Fakhar
Azhar
Babar
Hafeez
Haris
Sarfraz
Imad
Fahim
Shadab
& 2 of Amir / Junaid / Hasan
 
He should replace Shehzad also in main tournament.The question is does Pakistan management have the nerve to replace Hafeez with Haris?If these two can get into the team Pakistan has a chance to far in the tournament.

hafeez is the weakest link in the team. seriously, getting rid of this pathetic player would be no less than a miracle.
 
Looks like Babar will have a water-boy day. Azhar failed as opener, so he must be given chance to prove himself at 3. May be, Malik'll sit out for Haris.

Babar is the only batsmen in the side who can go on and score 100+ at a SR of 95+ comfortably without looking legged. Hafeez, Malik are both capable more the former will play slow and the latter doesn't seem to get over the line as he passes 50.
It would be a shame is Babar is dropped. But I'm about 90% sure he won't. Would like Haris to start for anyone other than Babar.
 
Given the squad options Pakistan's ideal team would be:

Fakhar
Shehzad/Hafeez
Babar
Haris
Sarfaraz
Malik
Imad/Shadab
Fahim
Hasan
Amir
Junaid


If we want to play both Imad and Shadab then only option left is to move Sarfaraz to open with Fakhar and drop Shehzad/Hafeez, OR drop Haris and move everybody up one spot.

Playing all three Imad, Shadab and Fahim weakens our already fragile batting.
 
Hafeez position is confirmed because of his bowling, his bowling is still vital. He dries up the run, can bowl with new ball against lefts as well. He is going nowhere

Hafeez is a sure starter. So what pakistan can do is

Hafeez
Fakhar
Babar
Haris
Malik
Imad
Sarfraz
Fahim
Shadab
Amir
Hassan

Hafeez's batting is not suitable to modern ODI cricket,everyone knows why.His bowling is not that good after remedial of his action.His age has approached that of retirement. So, why play him?
 
The balance of the Pakistan team is JUST out! . . . there is no good way to balance it . . and with Fahim Ashraf's hitting in the last game, it has only become more clouded . .

Shadab Khan's performance in the PSL, WI and the potential he has shown should be enough to warrant a straight entry into the XI . . second of all, personally I am a huge believer of playing leg spinners if they are good . . Plus, in the run rest against Bangladesh with the short boundaries, he had the standout figures . . Plus his batting gives us strength at the back end . . and considering our batting is brittle as is, we need every bit of reinforcement . .

Imad Wasim has been steady . . economical . . and has chipped in with decent contributions with the bat . . plus his energy in the field is a mood lifter . . so I'd like to have him in the XI too . .

If what we saw from Fahim Ashraf against Bang wasn't a fluke, then that's the missing link in our line up . . someone who can smash it at the end . . none of Imad, Shadab, Sarfaraz are the kinsd who can go at 150 SR . .

Lastly, we're left with the fast bowlers . . From what I have seen of Fahim Ashraf . . I'd be very reluctant to play him as a 3rd pacer in the team . . He can be your 4th seamer, but definitely not 3rd . . Which means you gotta go in with 3 front line seamers . .

Now you can't play Imad, Shadab, Fahim in the same team with 3 pacers . . because that would mean that Imad would have to bat at 6 . .and although he has shown promise with the bat, I am not comfortable with him at number 6 . . so that means . . Imad has to come in at 7 . . Shadab 8 . . Fahim 9 . . Amir 10 . . Hasan 11 . . Junaid 12 . . oops, can't fit them in . .

It's an issue . . where do you make the sacrifice??

On the other end . . I would definitely not play Azhar . . I'd open with Shehzad and Hafeez just because Hafeez is a momentum killer . . and if Hafeez being Hafeez doesn't want to do it . . then perhaps we can consider sending Harris to open . .

so your top 6 would become:

Shehzad
Harris
Babar
Hafeez
Malik
Sarfaraz . .

Question remains, what do you do with the bottom 5 . . . . .

One school of thought is . . because these pitches are goign to be sooo batting oriented, that playing another seamer isn't really going to make too much of a difference so might as well just play Fahim as the 3rd seamer and go on with Fahim at 9, Hasan Ali at 10 and Amir at 11 . .

Its tough!
 
Wahab is being benched for Aamer.. Zaman in for Azhar.. Harris Sohail still unplaced. Looks like a strong batting lineup except for Shehzad.. Pakistan should drop Shehzad—and open with Sarfaraz and Zaman, with Harris batting at Sarfaraz's old position.
 
Looks like Babar will have a water-boy day. Azhar failed as opener, so he must be given chance to prove himself at 3. May be, Malik'll sit out for Haris.

babar has to play and he needs to have some score under his belt, he got a pair recently in WI test series tho it is a different format if you are not among the runs then it will have an impact in the mind regardless of the formats.. Also his last tour here in ENG was not good as he didnt even get a fifty in 5 inns..
 
Probable XI

1. Sarfaraz Ahmed (c)*
2. Fakhar Zaman
3. Babar Azam
4. Mohammed Hafeez
5. Harris Sohail
6. Shoaib Malik
7. Imad Wasim
8. Shadab Khan
9. Faheem Ashraf
10. Mohammed Aamer
11. Hassan Ali
------------------------------------
12. Junaid Khan
 
The balance of the Pakistan team is JUST out! . . . there is no good way to balance it . . and with Fahim Ashraf's hitting in the last game, it has only become more clouded . .

Shadab Khan's performance in the PSL, WI and the potential he has shown should be enough to warrant a straight entry into the XI . . second of all, personally I am a huge believer of playing leg spinners if they are good . . Plus, in the run rest against Bangladesh with the short boundaries, he had the standout figures . . Plus his batting gives us strength at the back end . . and considering our batting is brittle as is, we need every bit of reinforcement . .

Imad Wasim has been steady . . economical . . and has chipped in with decent contributions with the bat . . plus his energy in the field is a mood lifter . . so I'd like to have him in the XI too . .

If what we saw from Fahim Ashraf against Bang wasn't a fluke, then that's the missing link in our line up . . someone who can smash it at the end . . none of Imad, Shadab, Sarfaraz are the kinsd who can go at 150 SR . .

Lastly, we're left with the fast bowlers . . From what I have seen of Fahim Ashraf . . I'd be very reluctant to play him as a 3rd pacer in the team . . He can be your 4th seamer, but definitely not 3rd . . Which means you gotta go in with 3 front line seamers . .

Now you can't play Imad, Shadab, Fahim in the same team with 3 pacers . . because that would mean that Imad would have to bat at 6 . .and although he has shown promise with the bat, I am not comfortable with him at number 6 . . so that means . . Imad has to come in at 7 . . Shadab 8 . . Fahim 9 . . Amir 10 . . Hasan 11 . . Junaid 12 . . oops, can't fit them in . .

It's an issue . . where do you make the sacrifice??

On the other end . . I would definitely not play Azhar . . I'd open with Shehzad and Hafeez just because Hafeez is a momentum killer . . and if Hafeez being Hafeez doesn't want to do it . . then perhaps we can consider sending Harris to open . .

so your top 6 would become:

Shehzad
Harris
Babar
Hafeez
Malik
Sarfaraz . .

Question remains, what do you do with the bottom 5 . . . . .

One school of thought is . . because these pitches are goign to be sooo batting oriented, that playing another seamer isn't really going to make too much of a difference so might as well just play Fahim as the 3rd seamer and go on with Fahim at 9, Hasan Ali at 10 and Amir at 11 . .

Its tough!

Very good analysis.. another warm up against AUS if fahim does well both with bat and ball then no point dropping him, junaid bowls well in tandem with amir in the opening overs.. cannot drop junaid, hasan ali is a very good 3rd seamer and also a good death bowler.. i will play 4 seamers against India..
what i think to stem the runs you need wickets, to take more wickets have more bowlers to take wickets..

Shehzad/haris
Hafeez
babar
Sarfraz
Malik
Imad (back him to play at 6) he has been quite consistent so far in ENG)
shadab
fahim
hasan
amir
junaid
 
The balance of the Pakistan team is JUST out! . . . there is no good way to balance it . . and with Fahim Ashraf's hitting in the last game, it has only become more clouded . .

Shadab Khan's performance in the PSL, WI and the potential he has shown should be enough to warrant a straight entry into the XI . . second of all, personally I am a huge believer of playing leg spinners if they are good . . Plus, in the run rest against Bangladesh with the short boundaries, he had the standout figures . . Plus his batting gives us strength at the back end . . and considering our batting is brittle as is, we need every bit of reinforcement . .

Imad Wasim has been steady . . economical . . and has chipped in with decent contributions with the bat . . plus his energy in the field is a mood lifter . . so I'd like to have him in the XI too . .

If what we saw from Fahim Ashraf against Bang wasn't a fluke, then that's the missing link in our line up . . someone who can smash it at the end . . none of Imad, Shadab, Sarfaraz are the kinsd who can go at 150 SR . .

Lastly, we're left with the fast bowlers . . From what I have seen of Fahim Ashraf . . I'd be very reluctant to play him as a 3rd pacer in the team . . He can be your 4th seamer, but definitely not 3rd . . Which means you gotta go in with 3 front line seamers . .

Now you can't play Imad, Shadab, Fahim in the same team with 3 pacers . . because that would mean that Imad would have to bat at 6 . .and although he has shown promise with the bat, I am not comfortable with him at number 6 . . so that means . . Imad has to come in at 7 . . Shadab 8 . . Fahim 9 . . Amir 10 . . Hasan 11 . . Junaid 12 . . oops, can't fit them in . .

It's an issue . . where do you make the sacrifice??

On the other end . . I would definitely not play Azhar . . I'd open with Shehzad and Hafeez just because Hafeez is a momentum killer . . and if Hafeez being Hafeez doesn't want to do it . . then perhaps we can consider sending Harris to open . .

so your top 6 would become:

Shehzad
Harris
Babar
Hafeez
Malik
Sarfaraz . .

Question remains, what do you do with the bottom 5 . . . . .

One school of thought is . . because these pitches are goign to be sooo batting oriented, that playing another seamer isn't really going to make too much of a difference so might as well just play Fahim as the 3rd seamer and go on with Fahim at 9, Hasan Ali at 10 and Amir at 11 . .

Its tough!
Really good analysis. Playing Haris Sohail as an opener when you already have Azhar ali and Fakhar Zaman on the bench is not something the team management would risk. Plus it will add too much pressure on poor Haris who is trying to cement his place. We do need to think out of the box though. I am a huge huge fan of Shadab Khan's batting. This lad if handled correctly will score tons of runs for us. May be this is the stage to try him up the order. Though the following eleven was not my prefered choice but since thinking out of the box is the theme, i would try:
1. Fakhar Zaman
2. Babar Azam
3. Shadab Khan
4. Muhammad Hafeez
5. Sarfaraz Ahmed
6. Shoaib Malik
7. Haris Sohail
8. Fahim Ashraf
9. Muhammad Amir
10. Hassan Ali
11. Junaid Khan
 
Got to be courageous open with sarfaraz and Fakhar play Imad at 6, Shadab at 7 and Faheem at 8 and then the three bowlers. For the aus warmup rest Malik and play Haris. If he scores then maybe you look at Imad or Shadab making way for him.
 
No, but you can catch the odd clip on Cricket Australia's website.

I thought Channel 9 was broadcasting Australia's first warmup. I hope they do it again for this one as well.
 
Got to be courageous open with sarfaraz and Fakhar play Imad at 6, Shadab at 7 and Faheem at 8 and then the three bowlers. For the aus warmup rest Malik and play Haris. If he scores then maybe you look at Imad or Shadab making way for him.

Imad, Shadab, Fahim and Hasan is a mouth-watering prospect as a lower order. In last few years whenever Pakistan was 4 or 5 down you would think the rest would perish soon after. However, with these four + Amir you will get resistance all the way down to number 10.
 
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Fakhar Zaman set to play in Pakistan's next Champions Trophy warm-up against Australia at Edgbaston <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/CT17?src=hash">#CT17</a> <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/Cricket?src=hash">#Cricket</a></p>— Saj Sadiq (@Saj_PakPassion) <a href="https://twitter.com/Saj_PakPassion/status/868809990588555264">May 28, 2017</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Typical , give Azhar a go against Bangladesh and brand new fahkar against Aus

Still better than nothing, hope he opens and hope he does well
 
Babar is the only batsmen in the side who can go on and score 100+ at a SR of 95+ comfortably without looking legged. Hafeez, Malik are both capable more the former will play slow and the latter doesn't seem to get over the line as he passes 50.
It would be a shame is Babar is dropped. But I'm about 90% sure he won't. Would like Haris to start for anyone other than Babar.

It's not about how good who is. Haris & Fakhar needs a game, while Azhar failed as opener & MoHa played a horrible game - ideally, it's a straight swap for couple of spots. But, dropping Azhar after one failure won't go well for Arthur with PCB (already he instrumental in sending back Umar), while MoHa has already scored a "quality" 49, in "a high pressure" situation, therefore even a 10 ball duck won't cost his spot; BUT he won't leave his no 4 spot for such a soft match - if he can score a 75 against Aussies, it improves his chances big time to become PAK Captain, on Sarfu's first falter.

Solution is to drop Babar, play Azhar at 3 & if Malik is willing to sit out, Haris bat at 5. Only problem I see is that Babar had a duck, hence Arthur would want him to have another outing. I posted that sarcastically, but won't be surprised if Babar & Malik are rested for Fakhar & Haris.
 
babar has to play and he needs to have some score under his belt, he got a pair recently in WI test series tho it is a different format if you are not among the runs then it will have an impact in the mind regardless of the formats.. Also his last tour here in ENG was not good as he didnt even get a fifty in 5 inns..

You are talking from cricket sense - something that doesn't justify selection of Azhar, Shehzad, MoHa, Umar, JK & Wahab at first place.

Ideally, PAK should have played the BD match with MoHa & Fakhar as opener & Haris at 4 - unless otherwise proved, that should be starting XI, in that order - obviously they opened with Ahmed & Azhar & sent MoHa at 4; keeping both the young guys touring UK first time out.
 
If a flop player like hafeez plays in the team then forget about winning a single game. He's a certified flop. More than umar akmal , hafeez is a liability because of him hairs sohail, talent hussain , fahim and other deserving youngsters are being kept out. He has to be dropped if we want to make a decent top and middle order.
 
The balance of the Pakistan team is JUST out! . . . there is no good way to balance it . . and with Fahim Ashraf's hitting in the last game, it has only become more clouded . .

Shadab Khan's performance in the PSL, WI and the potential he has shown should be enough to warrant a straight entry into the XI . . second of all, personally I am a huge believer of playing leg spinners if they are good . . Plus, in the run rest against Bangladesh with the short boundaries, he had the standout figures . . Plus his batting gives us strength at the back end . . and considering our batting is brittle as is, we need every bit of reinforcement . .

Imad Wasim has been steady . . economical . . and has chipped in with decent contributions with the bat . . plus his energy in the field is a mood lifter . . so I'd like to have him in the XI too . .

If what we saw from Fahim Ashraf against Bang wasn't a fluke, then that's the missing link in our line up . . someone who can smash it at the end . . none of Imad, Shadab, Sarfaraz are the kinsd who can go at 150 SR . .

Lastly, we're left with the fast bowlers . . From what I have seen of Fahim Ashraf . . I'd be very reluctant to play him as a 3rd pacer in the team . . He can be your 4th seamer, but definitely not 3rd . . Which means you gotta go in with 3 front line seamers . .

Now you can't play Imad, Shadab, Fahim in the same team with 3 pacers . . because that would mean that Imad would have to bat at 6 . .and although he has shown promise with the bat, I am not comfortable with him at number 6 . . so that means . . Imad has to come in at 7 . . Shadab 8 . . Fahim 9 . . Amir 10 . . Hasan 11 . . Junaid 12 . . oops, can't fit them in . .

It's an issue . . where do you make the sacrifice??

On the other end . . I would definitely not play Azhar . . I'd open with Shehzad and Hafeez just because Hafeez is a momentum killer . . and if Hafeez being Hafeez doesn't want to do it . . then perhaps we can consider sending Harris to open . .

so your top 6 would become:

Shehzad
Harris
Babar
Hafeez
Malik
Sarfaraz . .

Question remains, what do you do with the bottom 5 . . . . .

One school of thought is . . because these pitches are goign to be sooo batting oriented, that playing another seamer isn't really going to make too much of a difference so might as well just play Fahim as the 3rd seamer and go on with Fahim at 9, Hasan Ali at 10 and Amir at 11 . .

Its tough!

You have to play either Shadab or Immad as spinner, because we also have Hafeez. Shadab is a wicket taker, bowlers with good googlie had trouble India most of the time. Look at Imran, he had not only bowled well in IPL, but always bowled well against India(if not pretty much everybody)...

Against India 4 seamers are also important, with Shadab and Hafeez we have bowling covered...Fahim as forth seamer works. I would like to go with Amir,Hassan and Abbas(if possible) for India as first three seamers followed by Fahim...Abbas has very good control, Indian have not seen him, he is best bet among (Junaid and Whahab)...

I can see either Fakhir or Harris will play instead of Azhar, both are better than Azhar, we got to move on from Azhar,Shezad, Hafeez, Sarfraz in next 2 years...They have very strong support despite all of them mediocre against pace, less of them in top 6 better it is....Atleast one of them should go from match one!!
 
XI for India will look like this:
Fakhar/Azhar/Hafeez
Shehzad
Babar
Malik
Haris/Hafeez
Sarf
Imad
Fahim
Amir
Hasan
Wahab/Junaid

Hafeez will definitely play. There are two spots open. Batsman and fast bowler. Fahim's performance has thrown Shadab out.

It will depend on practice match. Whoever bats best between Fakhar, Azhar and Harris will play.

Wahab will play due to seniority. Unless he is injured. In that case, Junaid comes in.
 
This game will give us a good idea of where we stand. If we can beat the Aussies we can beat anyone in the UK.

I hope our players remember afterwards that it's a practice game and don't lose their confidence in their abilities.
 
I would like to see the following combination in the exact order for the match against Australia.

Fakhar
Sarfraz (His 20's and 30's with the strike rate of 90-100 will be gold for us)
Babar
Haris
Malik
Imad
Shadab
Fahim
Hasan
Amir
Junaid
 
I would like to see the following combination in the exact order for the match against Australia.

Fakhar
Sarfraz (His 20's and 30's with the strike rate of 90-100 will be gold for us)
Babar
Haris
Malik
Imad
Shadab
Fahim
Hasan
Amir
Junaid

Batting is tad on the weaker side, but for a warm up that is a good team.
 
Batting is tad on the weaker side, but for a warm up that is a good team.

Yes batting is weaker but I want Sarfraz to go with 4 Fast bowlers strategy in every match, I want to see our glory days back in cricket when we were known for our fast bowlers. We should play to our strength and historically Fast Bowling has been our strength.

Sarfraz should trust his bowlers. Amir, Junaid and Hasan Ali are all match winners on their day.

I belong to Imran Khan school of thought and genuinely believe that someone like Junaid Khan who may give me 3 wickets at the expanse of 55-65 runs is worth much more than Hafeez who will finish his quota of 10 overs with the usual figures of 10-1-48-1.

If Sarfraz wants to squeeze Hafeez in, then he should purely come in as a pure pinch hitter at number 7 spot but I would like to see the mettle of Shadab Khan at this big stage. I can predict that Hafeez will fail 9 out of 10 times in England. So, why not try a youngster?
 
Last edited:
He should replace Shehzad also in main tournament.The question is does Pakistan management have the nerve to replace Hafeez with Haris?If these two can get into the team Pakistan has a chance to far in the tournament.

No hafeez should open with Fakhar. Then we can get another of fahim or haris in the lineup.
Hafeez must play as he is quite economical and canny with the ball. Just in case shadab /imad start going round the park
 
Hafeez is a sure starter. So what pakistan can do is

Hafeez
Fakhar
Babar
Haris
Malik
Imad
Sarfraz
Fahim
Shadab
Amir
Hassan

Are we sure fahim is good enough as 3rd seamer?
This could work if we plan to give imad or hafeez the new ball in these games
 
Don't worry in a couple of weeks our odious team squad will look different

Sahibzada
Sharjeel
Fakhar
Babar
Malik
Sarfaraz
Haris
Imad
Shadab
Fahim
Yamin
Amir
Hasan
Sohail

No more ttfs

Malik will have a good ct n survive the cull
 
It's not about how good who is. Haris & Fakhar needs a game, while Azhar failed as opener & MoHa played a horrible game - ideally, it's a straight swap for couple of spots. But, dropping Azhar after one failure won't go well for Arthur with PCB (already he instrumental in sending back Umar), while MoHa has already scored a "quality" 49, in "a high pressure" situation, therefore even a 10 ball duck won't cost his spot; BUT he won't leave his no 4 spot for such a soft match - if he can score a 75 against Aussies, it improves his chances big time to become PAK Captain, on Sarfu's first falter.

Solution is to drop Babar, play Azhar at 3 & if Malik is willing to sit out, Haris bat at 5. Only problem I see is that Babar had a duck, hence Arthur would want him to have another outing. I posted that sarcastically, but won't be surprised if Babar & Malik are rested for Fakhar & Haris.

Ah I was looking ahead of the warm up. But Babar is more MA's boy than Azhar, and that's why if Azhar gets dropped, it'll be fine. Plus it's not likePCB were going to get someone else new in, would've probably called up Imran Farhat :danis. Umar had to go regardless, or wasn't really gonna have a look in at any game anyway. 91kgs my god don't remind me :facepalm:
Re: Hafeez & captaincy - after his captaincy in T20's I doubt he's eyeing that up. He's doing alright at #4 but I feel that he shouldn't play there because there's no real investment there. But yeah he's a very selfish player, I can't see him lodging from #4. He might even not play vs Aus so he doesn't get embarrassed by them :))

But I agree with you that Fakhar and Haris need a game. But Babar won't get dropped.
 
Short of winning this match ..... it is most important not to get hijacked by the Australians !!! They are good at it .... so we must put some fear of them loosing the match some time during the match !!!!!!
 
If your team wins the warm up match, you tend to tell everyone that your team will do well in the real matches. If your team loses the match, you are at pains to explain to everyone that it was just a warm up match.:afridi1
 
Just for this warm-up:

Fakhar
Hafeez
Babar
Haris
Malik
Sarfraz
Shadab
Fahim
Amir
Hasan
Junaid

We need to try out 4 seamers with Shadab and Hafeez to back them up to see if Imad does make a difference or not. Difficult to see Imad getting dropped in actual matches cuz of his performances vs Eng in Eng
 
Unusual dimensions at Edgbaston will make for interesting viewing when the big hitters are at the crease on Monday

Batsmen taking strike during Australia's ICC Champions Trophy warm-up match against Pakistan at Edgbaston on Monday will do well to put the boundary on the western side of the ground out of their minds.

The Australians trained on Sunday at the Birmingham venue where ground staff were applying the finishing touches to the pitch, which is on the extreme western side of the vast centre-wicket block.

The International Cricket Council says the short boundary for the Pakistan game, which is not an official one-day international to allow both sides to play more than 11 players and maximise game time ahead of the tournament, will be just 42 metres long.

The boundary towards the Eric Hollies Stand on the eastern side will be significantly longer, but the boundary rope on that side has been brought in around 20 metres from the fence in order to even up the dimensions of the ground.

The western boundary doesn't meet the ICC's minimum length requirement (59.43 metres) to constitute an official match, but the benefit of playing on a pitch so far wide of centre will be realised during the tournament itself.

Edgbaston is set to host five matches in less than a fortnight during the Champions Trophy, so the pitches closer to the centre of the ground are being preserved for those bigger matches in the coming weeks.

The 2013 Champions Trophy final here, the seventh match at the ground in just over three weeks, was played on what former England skipper Nasser Hussain recently labelled "a raging dust bowl more like Mumbai than Edgbaston".

And with the venue for this year's final, The Oval, set to host six matches in this tournament, using the extremities of the centre wicket block for the warm-up games at both venues will help to reduce deterioration in the coming weeks.

While the results of the warm-up matches matter little, the unusual dimensions of the ground will nonetheless make for interesting viewing when big hitters like David Warner and Chris Lynn are at the crease on Monday.

Lynn was undone by the uneven boundary lengths during Australia's warm-up against Sri Lanka at The Oval on Friday; the right-hander hit a waist-high full toss from Lakshan Sandakan straight to Kusal Mendis at deep mid-wicket, a mishit that could have been worth six on a smaller venue but was nowhere near long enough when hitting towards the long boundary.

"I think I might take that option (of the short boundary)," Lynn said with a laugh during a cricket.com.au interview with teammate Glenn Maxwell on Sunday.

"I think in the last trial game I took on the long boundary and was caught about 20 (metres) in so I might be a bit wiser this time."

Given Lynn hit a ball onto the roof of The Gabba just five months ago, the vehicles in the western carpark at Edgbaston could be in danger if the Queenslander gets one anywhere near the middle of his bat on Monday.

The strategic positioning of the pitches for these warm-up matches underlines the prevailing wisdom ahead of the tournament, that wear and tear on the centre wicket at the three venues (The Oval, Edgbaston and Sophia Gardens in Cardiff) will see spin bowling play a bigger role as the tournament progresses.

"Early on in this tournament we probably expect (there) to be a little bit in the wickets (for the quicks) with the fresher wickets," Aussie paceman Mitchell Starc said on Sunday.

"Then come the back end, it might take a bit of turn and be a bit slower and lower like we saw last time in the Champions Trophy here in England.

"We're going to have to assess that as the tournament goes."

http://www.cricket.com.au/news/aust...edgbaston-glenn-maxwell-chris-lynn/2017-05-29
 
Last edited:
400 to be breached if Australians get to bat first, weather looks terrible, cloudy with spots of light rain.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top