CricketAnalyst
First Class Captain
- Joined
- Sep 13, 2013
- Runs
- 4,670
I think the logic is that the T20 world cup would be open to maximum number of teams, and then the Champions trophy would be limited to the top 8 or 10 teams.
What this does is signal a major emphasis shift from ODI to T20 as the de facto format of the LOI game. ODI games will only exist in the world cup, and the minimum bilateral games required to qualify for the ODI World Cup.
Its a shame. Because ODIs are a much better format of the game than T20s from a cricket quality perspective.
But the ICC is not going to allow T20s to be dominated by bilaterals and domestic leagues. It wants to make sure it its pound of flesh.
The recent change in voting rules allows the Giles Clarke Coterie to ram these changes through, over the wishes of some major stakeholders. They may enjoy the fruits of the red wedding now, but winter is coming.![]()
Current BCCI might not want it, but the old BCCI as run by Srinivasan was anyway extremely pro T20 and Giles Clark was more a friend than enemy of Srini.
The BCCI itself has so much internal fighting that they don't have a consistent aim and will not as long as COA is there.