Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.


I think only Ajmal deserved it, but maybe chucking cost him, and second one could be Afridi as all rounder.Wow. I expected Babar Azam there.
So not a single Pakistani in any of the three 11s.![]()
Is it's t20 or t20i how ab de villiers selected
Yup dhoni inclusion is bit surprising but kohli earned his spot, he has 2 man of the tournament awards in t20wc this decade.Why is there only 3 bowlers selected? Dhoni and kohli are not needed, what have theyy both done in t20s? 2 bowling allrounders are needed to complete the t20. As per usual, ICC don't have a clue
Why is there only 3 bowlers selected? Dhoni and kohli are not needed, what have theyy both done in t20s? 2 bowling allrounders are needed to complete the t20. As per usual, ICC don't have a clue
Icc picked this t20 squad based on reputation rather than international performances but they have done good job in picking odi and test squads.
Despite these numbers honestly Bobby has still bit to go to be on equal footing as Ab. Ab has played mostly against quality teams. Let's see how Babar fares in the next two T20 WC since that will be the real test.
All well deserved picks including ABD and MSD. Warner is missing though. A couple of Intikhab Alam smilies for those who disagree.
![]()
![]()
De Villiers numbers are awful.
No way does he deserve to be in the team.
Babar too has an inflated average and SR because of playing against depleted sides. You give the same teams to AB he will massacre them. ICC has played it on reputation maybe but I will still take AB over Babar.
Despite these numbers honestly Bobby has still bit to go to be on equal footing as Ab. Ab has played mostly against quality teams. Let's see how Babar fares in the next two T20 WC since that will be the real test.
Babar's competition was at top order, he won't be competing with middle order players.
ICC won't be picking Babar at 5 or below. The only position that could be considered for him is in top 3 maybe in place of Aaron Finch.
Finch has bee excellent so i wouldnt change him but what about gayle with an average of 30 all decade. If it comes to reputation and t20 record he is an atg. But he hasnt done much in t20is.
With 17 wickets in 20 matches.Umar gul should have been there , at least,
Babar too has an inflated average and SR because of playing against depleted sides. You give the same teams to AB he will massacre them. ICC has played it on reputation maybe but I will still take AB over Babar.
With 17 wickets in 20 matches.
Babar doesn't choose who his opposition is. He can only perform against what is in front of him.
Which one is the depleted side here? Take your pick.
Two man of the tournaments in worldcups and 50+ average in the last decade what more do you want?


Selection of Dhoni is a joke.
Abdevilliers did nothing of note in international t20s.
Also, Lala ahead of Maxwell.
Not even being salty or anything why no Pakistani is in there despite Pakistan being the most successful t20i team and having the best players in t20s across the decade be it leading wicket takers or run scorers. The fact that dhoni finch maxwell rashid khan bumrah are in there makes no sense this is beyond a joke
Not even being salty or anything why no Pakistani is in there despite Pakistan being the most successful t20i team and having the best players in t20s across the decade be it leading wicket takers or run scorers.



Funny you mentioned thisICC consulted Sir [MENTION=131701]Mamoon[/MENTION] and asked if they could include any Pak player in any format and there was a big NO from his side as he said that Pak fans deserve to be humiliated who live in their own imaginary world of Pak team being an elite team with superstars and need a reality check from ICC's side too. He has been proved right again, love him or not but u cant ignore him and what he says. Now u have a proof that even ICC agrees with him.
)I don’t know how Dhoni got in ahead of Mccullum but as far as Babar-ABDV argument goes, leave the stats aside but anyone who watched any cricket and are of a stable mind wouldn’t pick Babar Azam ahead of ABDV regardless of their stats in any non-fantasy scenario
Clearly favouring the SENA teams here. Pathetic from the ICC.
AB has achieved nothing notable in T20I, but he's a legend in T20. If this was about selecting a team from domestic competitions, then I would have understood, but internationally, AB cannot be anywhere near the team with an average of 27.7. Granted that his strike rate is good, but he should not have been selected.
I also have my reservations about Bumrah and Rohit Sharma.
I'll let Rohit in because he's a very good batsman, but his stats aren't too compelling. He has centuries against England, South Africa, West Indies, and Sri Lanka, and that's really incredible.
Bumrah hasn't really left a good impression on me, because the likes of Gul were far better. I agree that nowadays, death over bowling is difficult, but if it's a team of the decade, surely the statistics should prevail.
Shoaib Malik could have contended but the middle order is already so excellent.
Leaving out Babar was criminal from the ICC.
Amir should have been in this team. Not sure why they went with 3 bowlers.Pakistan T20 team has done well in patches in the last decade but it had no player that really made an impact. Amir could have been one but his greed consumed him. Babar still is a kid though a precocious one like Shaheen.
However, Pak cricket team does not come close to India in W/L ratio or having impact players like Kohli, Bumrah, Dhoni, Rohit, probably even Jadeja.
Clearly favouring the SENA teams here. Pathetic from the ICC.
AB has achieved nothing notable in T20I, but he's a legend in T20. If this was about selecting a team from domestic competitions, then I would have understood, but internationally, AB cannot be anywhere near the team with an average of 27.7. Granted that his strike rate is good, but he should not have been selected.
I also have my reservations about Bumrah and Rohit Sharma.
I'll let Rohit in because he's a very good batsman, but his stats aren't too compelling. He has centuries against England, South Africa, West Indies, and Sri Lanka, and that's really incredible.
Bumrah hasn't really left a good impression on me, because the likes of Gul were far better. I agree that nowadays, death over bowling is difficult, but if it's a team of the decade, surely the statistics should prevail.
Shoaib Malik could have contended but the middle order is already so excellent.
Leaving out Babar was criminal from the ICC.
They considered his impact level which is huge. The way he destroys the best of the attacks in world is unparallel.
Stats for the last 10 years:
Bumrah gave 7.6 runs per over and picked up 49 wickets
Gul gave 8 runs per over and picked up 33 wickets.
Given the later part of the decade was higher scoring than the earlier part and yet Gul went over 8 runs per over, I don't see how stats are not prevailing in picking Bumrah over Gul for the last 10 years.
They considered his impact level which is huge. The way he destroys the best of the attacks in world is unparallel.

Thanks for sharing the stats, I was focused more on Gul's career stats.
With that knowledge, Bumrah should then rightfully be placed in the team.
AB De Villiers does not merit selection though, and Pollard is also a bit questionable.
I don't see Pakistan as the most successful. I don't see Pakistani among the leading wicket-takers or leading scorer in the last 10 years.
Teams sorted with W/L
View attachment 105642
..
Leading scorers:
View attachment 105643
..
Leading wicket takers:
View attachment 105644
This looks more like the IPL T20 Team of the decade lol.![]()

Rashid Khan has played 0 T20 matches vs Aus, NZ, Ind and Pak (4 out of top 6 teams currently). Went for 0-51 in 4 overs against SA in only match he played.
However, he makes the T20 international team of the decade.![]()
Pathetic
Complaint should be sent to the BCCI sorry I mean the ICC
Pakistan’s run as the number 1 ranked T20I side from 2016-2019 was as fake as it gets. ICC have done the right thing by not naming any member of that side in the T20I XI of the decade.

ABD, MSD, KP and Rashid Khan have been picked based on their performances for RCB, CSK, MI and SRH respectively.
It seems ICC also thinks IPL is at par with T20I.![]()
Are you trolling Pak team or IPL? Or both?Of course it is. IPL, along with WT20, is the highest form of T20 cricket in the game. It is basically to T20 cricket what WSC was to Test cricket.
IPL stats should either be included in T20Is stats or should have its own category. It shouldn’t be grouped together with other franchise T20 stats.
Are you trolling Pak team or IPL? Or both?
Not interested in trolling anyone. My point is that IPL does not deserve to be clubbed together with its low budget imitations like PSL, BBL, CPL, LPL, T20 Blast etc.
It is a completely different beast.
Mamoon man give it a break at least for today. Please explain to me why Rashid Khan is in there, that’s all I want to know. Forget Pakistan, I don’t care if none of our players made it.