What's new

India now as autocratic as Pakistan, worse than Bangladesh: Sweden institute’s Democracy Report

Bhaag Viru Bhaag

Senior Test Player
Joined
Aug 20, 2013
Runs
29,549
After Freedom House report said India is only 'partly free' now, V-Dem Institute's Democracy Report has downgraded India from 'world's largest democracy' to 'electoral autocracy'.

New Delhi: The fifth annual democracy report by Sweden’s V-Dem Institute, titled ‘Autocratisation goes viral’, has downgraded India from “the world’s largest democracy” to an “electoral autocracy”, citing “muzzling” of the media, and overuse of defamation and sedition laws.

V-Dem (Varieties of Democracy) claims to produce the largest dataset on democracy with almost 30 million data points for 202 countries from 1789 to 2020.

This report comes within a week of US watchdog Freedom House downgrading India’s status to “partly free” in its ‘Freedom in the World’ report.

While India’s score was at an all-time high at 0.57 (on a scale of 0-1) in 2013, it had declined to 0.34 by the end of 2020 — a loss of 23 percentage points in seven years. “Most of the decline occurred following BJP’s victory in 2014 and their Hindu nationalist agenda,” says the report.

“India is, in this aspect (censorship) now as autocratic as is Pakistan, and worse than both its neighbors Bangladesh and Nepal. In general, the Modi-led government in India has used laws on sedition, defamation, and counterterrorism to silence critics. For example, over 7,000 people have been charged with sedition after the BJP assumed power and most of the accused are critics of the ruling party,” says the report.

It adds that the use of defamation “frequently used to silence journalists” and the use of the Unlawful Activities Prevention Act (UAPA) have placed constraints on civil society and gone against the Constitution’s commitment to secularism.

“Amended in August 2019 (it) is being used to harass, intimidate, and imprison political opponents, as well as people mobilizing to protest government policies. The UAPA has been used also to silence dissent in academia. Universities and authorities have also punished students and activists in universities engaging in protests against the Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA).”

The report notes that civil society is being increasingly muzzled while organisations aligned with the “Hindutva movement” have gained freedom. “The BJP have increasingly used the Foreign Contributions Regulation Act (FCRA) to restrict the entry, exit and functioning of Civil Society Organisations (CSO),” it says.

Democracy on the decline
The fifth annual report by the organisation summarises the state of democracies of the world against the backdrop of developments that have taken place over the past decade

The report finds that liberal democracies have diminished over the past decade from 41 countries to 32 countries.

“The global decline during the past 10 years is steep and continues in 2020, especially in the Asia-Pacific region, Central Asia, Eastern Europe, and Latin America. The level of democracy enjoyed by the average global citizen in 2020 is down to levels last found around 1990,” says the report.

It adds that what it calls “electoral autocracies” remain the most popular regime type, and along with closed autocracies, number 87 states, home to 68 per cent of the world’s population.

It also notes an accelerating wave of autocratisation engulfing 25 nations, home to one-third of the world’s population — that is 2.6 billion people. “Several G20 nations such as Brazil, India, Turkey, and the United States of America are part of this drift,” says the report.

It also notes that the number of democratising countries has dropped by almost half to 16, hosting a mere 4 per cent of the global population.

https://theprint.in/india/india-now...sh-sweden-institutes-democracy-report/619673/
 
While these foreign think tanks shouldnt be taken seriously, this is a good development if true. India needs autocracy. there is just too much toxic democracy.
 
Bangladesh is more autocratic than India, you cannot criticize the PM/AL publicly unless you are one of a few selected "approved critics" such as that BNP secretary

People get picked up and warned/beaten if they speak too negatively of the government.

But yes, India, or at least parts of it is probably more autocratic than Pakistan
 
While these foreign think tanks shouldnt be taken seriously, this is a good development if true. India needs autocracy. there is just too much toxic democracy.

Autocracy is never good. We don't want to become medieval societies like Saudi Arabia that are still ruled by moronic kings in palaces.

India is effectively an electoral autocracy because the pseudo-secularist Liberal' parties like the Congress have no clue how to counter the Modi narrative. They have been reduced to showing their desperation by opposing everything the BJP says and does, even going to the extent of criticising non-political institutions like the Indian Army simply because they are controlled by the government.

What India needs is a smart opposition with clean, intelligent and eloquent politicians who can counter Modi. Pity that the only option the Congress and the Left can come up with is the clown prince Rahul Gandhi.
 
Last edited:
Get rid of Yogi Bisht and that alone will revive some of these rankings.

I have no hope of the people of Uttar Pradesh though.
 
Autocracy is never good. We don't want to become medieval societies like Saudi Arabia that are still ruled by moronic kings in palaces.

India is effectively an electoral autocracy because the pseudo-secularist Liberal' parties like the Congress have no clue how to counter the Modi narrative. They have been reduced to showing their desperation by opposing everything the BJP says and does, even going to the extent of criticising non-political institutions like the Indian Army simply because they are controlled by the government.

What India needs is a smart opposition with clean, intelligent and eloquent politicians who can counter Modi. Pity that the only option the Congress and the Left can come up with is the clown prince Rahul Gandhi.

These pseudo-liberals while not having much electoral sway sure do manage to get online commentators riled up. Seems like a boogieman that you guys have made up and conveniently use as a scapegoat for Indias problems.

It's an amusing take on events to blame the guys who arent in power for the failings of those that are.
 
Autocracy is never good. We don't want to become medieval societies like Saudi Arabia that are still ruled by moronic kings in palaces.

India is effectively an electoral autocracy because the pseudo-secularist Liberal' parties like the Congress have no clue how to counter the Modi narrative. They have been reduced to showing their desperation by opposing everything the BJP says and does, even going to the extent of criticising non-political institutions like the Indian Army simply because they are controlled by the government.

What India needs is a smart opposition with clean, intelligent and eloquent politicians who can counter Modi. Pity that the only option the Congress and the Left can come up with is the clown prince Rahul Gandhi.

That institute is funded by Soros and has a JNU person and a Pakistani in its advisory board. These think tanks and NGO reports are not even worth the paper they are written on.

Their problem is that foreign ngos are not being allowed to run riot and interfere in our affairs. Second is that CAA has been passed.

This is nothing but another left pseudo liberal pseudo secular agenda, who cannot tolerate that their kind are now unelectable in India.
 
That institute is funded by Soros and has a JNU person and a Pakistani in its advisory board. These think tanks and NGO reports are not even worth the paper they are written on.

Their problem is that foreign ngos are not being allowed to run riot and interfere in our affairs. Second is that CAA has been passed.

This is nothing but another left pseudo liberal pseudo secular agenda, who cannot tolerate that their kind are now unelectable in India.

Knew you would be the first one to bring the credibility of the source in OP.

This is from OP

over 7,000 people have been charged with sedition after the BJP assumed power and most of the accused are critics of the ruling party,” says the report.

Is this true or false? I know you won't quote me directly but quote one of your buddy and give the answer indirectly just like you always do. :inti
 
Knew you would be the first one to bring the credibility of the source in OP.

This is from OP

over 7,000 people have been charged with sedition after the BJP assumed power and most of the accused are critics of the ruling party,” says the report.

Is this true or false? I know you won't quote me directly but quote one of your buddy and give the answer indirectly just like you always do. :inti

you know how many sedition charges under UPA? you will be surprised.
 
This makes no sense. Bangladesh is by far the most autocratic state among all three. A one-party state that has been quelling civil liberties heavily and where the recent elections have been an absolute joke.

India is next in line followed by Pakistan.
 
funny that i thought India was the biggest democracy in the world.

People chose BJP as the govt. It wasn't a coup where previous govt is overthrown. I believe you need to recheck definition of democracy and then analyze whether it isn't applicable for election in India.
 
This makes no sense. Bangladesh is by far the most autocratic state among all three. A one-party state that has been quelling civil liberties heavily and where the recent elections have been an absolute joke.

India is next in line followed by Pakistan.

Most of us suffer from hypermetropia, the flaws of others look very clear, but vision gets blurred when seeing our own.
 
People chose BJP as the govt. It wasn't a coup where previous govt is overthrown. I believe you need to recheck definition of democracy and then analyze whether it isn't applicable for election in India.

re read the study :) whats the opposite of democracy?
 
Most of us suffer from hypermetropia, the flaws of others look very clear, but vision gets blurred when seeing our own.

Not at all. Pakistan as a state has many authoritarian tendencies and regularly quells civil liberties. But in Pakistan teenagers don't get arrested for criticizing the prime minister on social media. In politics, there is still an actual viable opposition.
 
This makes no sense. Bangladesh is by far the most autocratic state among all three. A one-party state that has been quelling civil liberties heavily and where the recent elections have been an absolute joke.

India is next in line followed by Pakistan.



India varies by state
Bangladesh is extremely autocratic by subcontinental standards.

No journalist dares to criticize the leadership else they will be picked up
 
India varies by state
Bangladesh is extremely autocratic by subcontinental standards.

No journalist dares to criticize the leadership else they will be picked up

India has still gotten extremely autocratic. On national issues few can dare not to toe the government's line. A decade ago it was by far the most democratic and open country among these three.
 
Not at all. Pakistan as a state has many authoritarian tendencies and regularly quells civil liberties. But in Pakistan teenagers don't get arrested for criticizing the prime minister on social media. In politics, there is still an actual viable opposition.

Wait, they actually get arrested for criticising the government in Bangladesh? Wow, didn't know it was so bad there.
 
If our economy becomes even close to theirs then no issues at all- they have brought millions out of poverty, freedom without food has no meaning.

Good to see this from you. I thought you were one of those who enjoyed their privileges and didn't care about others as long as some western think tank had good words to say like vibrant and largest democracy, plural society and secular social fabric etcetera etcetera.
 
India needs more autocracy. First things first, minorites should live like minorities. every thing else will follow.
 
Good to see this from you. I thought you were one of those who enjoyed their privileges and didn't care about others as long as some western think tank had good words to say like vibrant and largest democracy, plural society and secular social fabric etcetera etcetera.

I have always supported Chinese model if it eliminates poverty.

I also realize all the “free” thinking Liberal societies are based on years of exploitation of other countries.(even now)

I do not support religious governments because of unequal treatment towards minorities.
 
This makes no sense. Bangladesh is by far the most autocratic state among all three. A one-party state that has been quelling civil liberties heavily and where the recent elections have been an absolute joke.

India is next in line followed by Pakistan.

Do Bangladesh claim to be democratic? :inti
 
So far Modi has succeeded where she failed.

Modi has come via election. Indira suspended the parliament. Took over power. Suspended the constitution.

Just because pakistanis and pseudo secular left liberals dont like the way Indians are voting, doesn't mean that the government isnt a democratic one.
 
If things keep going down this road, then no one's opinion will matter bar the self perpetuating autocracy leadership

Its the people's opinion and vote that makes a government in India. Someone in Sweden doesn't like it, well they can do whatever they want to.
 
So now Freedom House is propaganda too. Kuch bacha

I remember way back in 2013 or so I took a political science course and we read about Freedon house and it’s rankings and was disappointed to find Pakistan ‘partly free’. India was ‘free’ then. Welcome to the ‘partly free’ club, Indian friends!
 
Wait, they actually get arrested for criticising the government in Bangladesh? Wow, didn't know it was so bad there.

If they are lucky they get publicly arrested
If they are unlucky they get picked up by masked agents and released after threats/torture, or in worst cases disappear forever

Now there are certain figures who are beyond this, such as some civil activists, BNP senior members etc.

But ordinary people cannot say anything negative against BAL/Mujib/Hasina
 
Yogi will be PM one day.

Yogi Bear or Yogi Adityanath?

Is this the same bloke who shared a stage with another clown who suggested Muslims would no longer have the right to vote and that supporters would rape dead Muslim women?

You will vote for him I assume?
 
India has still gotten extremely autocratic. On national issues few can dare not to toe the government's line. A decade ago it was by far the most democratic and open country among these three.

Without knowing details, i would guess South Indian states and WB are less so than the Cow belt (UP, MP, Rajasthanetc) ?
 
its all kosher when these foreign agencies label Pakistan a terrorist state or whatever but when they start evaluating India, our neighbors starting throwing hissy hits "Oh only people decide democracy not a nordic ... blah blah blah "

what a load of **! lol
 
Without knowing details, i would guess South Indian states and WB are less so than the Cow belt (UP, MP, Rajasthanetc) ?

Even using the term Cow belt (insinuates its a belt made of cow leather) will get you murdered now, so b careful!

hahah.. Cowbelt! thats pretty ingenious! Did you coin it yourself?
 
its all kosher when these foreign agencies label Pakistan a terrorist state or whatever but when they start evaluating India, our neighbors starting throwing hissy hits "Oh only people decide democracy not a nordic ... blah blah blah "

what a load of **! lol

Foreign agencies? Or some tin pot institute in Sweden.

Btw which foreign agency has labelled pakistan as terrorist state?
 
India has still gotten extremely autocratic. On national issues few can dare not to toe the government's line. A decade ago it was by far the most democratic and open country among these three.

Well can you tell me which are these national issues?

If by being democratic means, there can be terror attacks and the govt sits and does nothing. If being democratic means, a foreign ngo can nearly shutdown a nuclear power plant in India. If being democratic means every tom dick harry can start supporting terrorist separatist movement in India and the govt does nothing. If being democratic means corruption in every govt decision. Then yes India was more democratic a 6-7 years back.
 
Well can you tell me which are these national issues?

If by being democratic means, there can be terror attacks and the govt sits and does nothing. If being democratic means, a foreign ngo can nearly shutdown a nuclear power plant in India. If being democratic means every tom dick harry can start supporting terrorist separatist movement in India and the govt does nothing. If being democratic means corruption in every govt decision. Then yes India was more democratic a 6-7 years back.

There are none in India, stop making up stories.
 
Bangladesh is worse than India in terms of autocracy.

Pakistan has more freedom than both India and Bangladesh.
 
Well can you tell me which are these national issues?

If by being democratic means, there can be terror attacks and the govt sits and does nothing. If being democratic means, a foreign ngo can nearly shutdown a nuclear power plant in India. If being democratic means every tom dick harry can start supporting terrorist separatist movement in India and the govt does nothing. If being democratic means corruption in every govt decision. Then yes India was more democratic a 6-7 years back.

Your tone tells me that you are either (a) exposed to a heavy amount of propaganda, (b) a rabid nationalist who is oblivious to rationality and reason. Or both.

And in both cases there is nothing I can say that will change your mind.

But let me tell you the same thing I tell hardcore nationalists on this side of the border. Everything is not a grand conspiracy against the state. Everyone is not out to get you, and anyone who thinks differently is not a foreign agent working on a foreign agenda. And if you really think your government and leaders are infallible and incorruptible then you really are living in a fantasy world.
 
Bangladesh is worse than India in terms of autocracy.

Pakistan has more freedom than both India and Bangladesh.

Funny how the situation was opposite in the 80s
Pakistan had less freedom back then

Bangladesh was officially a dictatorship but you could speak far more than what you can do in today's "democracy"
 
Your tone tells me that you are either (a) exposed to a heavy amount of propaganda, (b) a rabid nationalist who is oblivious to rationality and reason. Or both.

And in both cases there is nothing I can say that will change your mind.

But let me tell you the same thing I tell hardcore nationalists on this side of the border. Everything is not a grand conspiracy against the state. Everyone is not out to get you, and anyone who thinks differently is not a foreign agent working on a foreign agenda. And if you really think your government and leaders are infallible and incorruptible then you really are living in a fantasy world.

No consipracy. Just a corrupt inept incompetent sold out government that was ruling the country. We Indians voted them in twice. We suffered the consequence. So the first one to be blamed are us that we gave such people the chance to rule us twice.

May be that's what democratic means certain non Indians. To me it was the worst phase.

What i am saying comes from my life and experiences in India.
 
That institute is funded by Soros and has a JNU person and a Pakistani in its advisory board. These think tanks and NGO reports are not even worth the paper they are written on.

Don't waste your time researching these nonsense think tanks. Scandinavians have this itch to be "holier than thou" that we can only laugh at.

Knew you would be the first one to bring the credibility of the source in OP.

This is from OP

over 7,000 people have been charged with sedition after the BJP assumed power and most of the accused are critics of the ruling party,” says the report.

Is this true or false? I know you won't quote me directly but quote one of your buddy and give the answer indirectly just like you always do. :inti

If people commit sedition, if they chant that they will break India, they will obviously be charged with sedition. If they weren't, then the law enforcement agencies would not be doing their duty.

These Western think tanks are increasingly irrelevant. They are only good at criticizing. When it comes to <b>a plan for economic development that works in the real world, something that will pull the country out of poverty</b> they have no clue.
 
Lol. Indira Gandhi tried. Was thrown out.

What makes you so confident the same will happen to the BJP if they tried like her.

There has been a slow systematic takeover of all institutions. I think they look at neighboring China and feel this is a good model to follow.

Personally, the nature of India makes me confident that autocracy can't survive, but I'm curious to know why a BJP loyalist like you believes so confidently that there will still be enough checks remaining to prevent it.
 
Yogi Bear or Yogi Adityanath?

Is this the same bloke who shared a stage with another clown who suggested Muslims would no longer have the right to vote and that supporters would rape dead Muslim women?

You will vote for him I assume?

Yogi Bear was the first thing that came to mind reading the post mentioning him for me too :)))
 
The farmers protests have been really eye opening as to how backwards India has slid.I had no idea India had degenerated to this extent.

Journalists being picked up and beaten by the police in Delhi, the state capital, female protestors being sexually assaulted by the police, the farmers being jailed at the flimsiest of pretexts - it's like U.Pisation of the rest of India.
 
That's what the North Koreans claim. And they have a 101% turn out in elections.

North Korea doesn't allow anyone to compete against the Supreme leader.

Indian constitution of democratic electoral procedure is followed in case of India. Various parties nominate their pm candidates and since BJP got the majority of vote from the people of India, BJP pm candidate, modi became the pm.

When even people from less privilege position could attain the biggest position in a system democratically, it means the system is doing it's part without any discrimination.
 
The farmers protests have been really eye opening as to how backwards India has slid.I had no idea India had degenerated to this extent.

Journalists being picked up and beaten by the police in Delhi, the state capital, female protestors being sexually assaulted by the police, the farmers being jailed at the flimsiest of pretexts - it's like U.Pisation of the rest of India.

yes, the anti farm reform protests showed how much fascism has reached certain sections. Imagine protesting against the building of a new mall, because you worry that the footfall in your favourite mall will reduce. Fascism against choice.
 
Knew you would be the first one to bring the credibility of the source in OP.

This is from OP

over 7,000 people have been charged with sedition after the BJP assumed power and most of the accused are critics of the ruling party,” says the report.

Is this true or false? I know you won't quote me directly but quote one of your buddy and give the answer indirectly just like you always do. :inti

Since you could not do your homework, let me help you with it.

n 2012 and 2013, an astonishing number of 23,000 men and women who protested against a nuclear power plant in Tamil Nadu were held for "waging war against the state" and sedition - 9,000 of them for sedition alone. "Police would name a few accused and then add 2,000 others without naming them while booking them for sedition

You are talking of 7000 sedition charges during NDA rule. UPA had 9000 sedition charges for just one incident in 2012.
 
Don't waste your time researching these nonsense think tanks. Scandinavians have this itch to be "holier than thou" that we can only laugh at.



If people commit sedition, if they chant that they will break India, they will obviously be charged with sedition. If they weren't, then the law enforcement agencies would not be doing their duty.

These Western think tanks are increasingly irrelevant. They are only good at criticizing. When it comes to <b>a plan for economic development that works in the real world, something that will pull the country out of poverty</b> they have no clue.

To be fair, Scandinavians have created one of the highest standards of living in the world and are generally viewed to have the most contented and well balanced populations. They have done a lot better than India in pulling their countries out of poverty and raising life expectancy in general.
 
To be fair, Scandinavians have created one of the highest standards of living in the world and are generally viewed to have the most contented and well balanced populations. They have done a lot better than India in pulling their countries out of poverty and raising life expectancy in general.

Even sweden's highest standards of living could not prevent riots on their streets. Just shows that people need danda to keep them under control. And this is why india needs more autocracy. Jahils will remain jahil no matter how much better quality of life is given to them.
 
North Korea doesn't allow anyone to compete against the Supreme leader.

Indian constitution of democratic electoral procedure is followed in case of India. Various parties nominate their pm candidates and since BJP got the majority of vote from the people of India, BJP pm candidate, modi became the pm.

When even people from less privilege position could attain the biggest position in a system democratically, it means the system is doing it's part without any discrimination.

For how long? Look at the report. India has become a basket case in front of our very own eyes.
 
For how long? Look at the report. India has become a basket case in front of our very own eyes.

If you define yourself through the eyes of others, then you'll find it very difficult to survive in the world. Should you leave your wife because many aunties in your family has stated bad things about her and how you guys are incompatible with each other?

There's an aspect called own conscience. If BJP fails to deliver what they promise in a longer term, people will opt for different options.
 
Not at all. Pakistan as a state has many authoritarian tendencies and regularly quells civil liberties. But in Pakistan teenagers don't get arrested for criticizing the prime minister on social media. In politics, there is still an actual viable opposition.

That's because the real power in Pakistan is the military. So this is false equivalence . Let the said kid criticise the military openly in the country and then we'll see the consequences
 
That's because the real power in Pakistan is the military. So this is false equivalence . Let the said kid criticise the military openly in the country and then we'll see the consequences

People criticize the military openly on social media and in news publications. Teenagers are still not picked up and arrested because of that.
 
People criticize the military openly on social media and in news publications. Teenagers are still not picked up and arrested because of that.

This raises questions on the credibility of this think tank's report. They have said India is now on the same level as Pakistan, but as you say that is not the case, so hard to take this report seriously.
 
What makes you so confident the same will happen to the BJP if they tried like her.

There has been a slow systematic takeover of all institutions. I think they look at neighboring China and feel this is a good model to follow.

Personally, the nature of India makes me confident that autocracy can't survive, but I'm curious to know why a BJP loyalist like you believes so confidently that there will still be enough checks remaining to prevent it.

Slow takeover of the system? Read how Indira amended the constitution. How she superceded judges to make people supporting her as CJI.

The people forced Indira to relent. To give up emergency powers and hold elections. The movement threw up many young leaders, some of them are in power even today some enjoyed important electoral position earlier.

If BJP tries to be autocratic, the people will throw them out.
 
Part of the problem lies with the liberal media and opposition parties like some one else mentioned above. When you criticize and politicize every move of the ruling party and if people don't care about what you say, it emboldens the ruling party even further. Some of the policies were very good including the recent farmer's bill. If India has to improve it's economy, it has to reform one it's most inefficient industries. Look at the shenanigans of the liberal world against this bill. Irony is, every one of those developed countries have let free market run their agriculture for decades now.

India needs a strong opposition party that can make BJP accountable. Instead , we see hilarious buffoons in the opposition with viral videos making a fool out of themselves losing all credibility. A strong alternative will put Modi in check and make sure Modi doesn't become another Indira. Ideally BJP should lose some state elections so there is a balance of power. BJP is still the best party at the national level so they should hold the lower house while a mixture of parties should hold the upper house. Once you have several checks and balances, the autocratic tendencies will die.
 
Since you could not do your homework, let me help you with it.

n 2012 and 2013, an astonishing number of 23,000 men and women who protested against a nuclear power plant in Tamil Nadu were held for "waging war against the state" and sedition - 9,000 of them for sedition alone. "Police would name a few accused and then add 2,000 others without naming them while booking them for sedition

You are talking of 7000 sedition charges during NDA rule. UPA had 9000 sedition charges for just one incident in 2012.

This is from OP too : :inti

While India’s score was at an all-time high at 0.57 (on a scale of 0-1) in 2013, it had declined to 0.34 by the end of 2020 — a loss of 23 percentage points in seven years. “Most of the decline occurred following BJP’s victory in 2014 and their Hindu nationalist agenda,” says the report.
 
This is from OP too : :inti

While India’s score was at an all-time high at 0.57 (on a scale of 0-1) in 2013, it had declined to 0.34 by the end of 2020 — a loss of 23 percentage points in seven years. “Most of the decline occurred following BJP’s victory in 2014 and their Hindu nationalist agenda,” says the report.

These scores are calculated by giving weightage to certain factors. What was the weightage given to the number of sedition case in the formula. Only then we can know how the formula accounted for the higher number of sedition cases during UPA.

See I gave you this information for free, otherwise by default I chicken out (feel like having brown chicken wings now).
 
These scores are calculated by giving weightage to certain factors. What was the weightage given to the number of sedition case in the formula. Only then we can know how the formula accounted for the higher number of sedition cases during UPA.

See I gave you this information for free, otherwise by default I chicken out (feel like having brown chicken wings now).

You can have Bangali biscuits for all I care. :inti
 
To be fair, Scandinavians have created one of the highest standards of living in the world and are generally viewed to have the most contented and well balanced populations. They have done a lot better than India in pulling their countries out of poverty and raising life expectancy in general.

My point was that advice from Scandinavians about how countries like India can get richer is useless.

No idea what you mean by a "well balanced" population, they are countries in demographic decline with falling populations and Sweden has one of the highest rape rates in the world.

https://www.nationmaster.com/country-info/stats/Crime/Rape-rate

Sweden is a really strange country. The number of rapes reported was over 500,000 with only 350 convictions???

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rape_in_Sweden
 
Last edited:
My point was that advice from Scandinavians about how countries like India can get richer is useless.

No idea what you mean by a "well balanced" population, they are countries in demographic decline with falling populations and Sweden has one of the highest rape rates in the world.

https://www.nationmaster.com/country-info/stats/Crime/Rape-rate

Sweden is a really strange country. The number of rapes reported was over 500,000 with only 350 convictions???

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rape_in_Sweden

The numbers given in the Wiki article are probably wrong, it says "there were between 5000 and 7000 reported rape cases per 100,000 population" but the correct numbers are likely 5,000 to 7,000 for the entire population of 10 million. Still, only 6% conviction rate means that their judicial system is being inundated with reported rapes, but they convict only 1 in 16 accused. Low conviction rates for rape are also common in other countries, but in other countries you don't have such a large per capita reported rape cases. Something is not right in Sweden, either they are too many false reports, or they are letting too many accused go free.
 
First things first - democracy is overrated, and a failed system for development. Why? For one no democratic nation implements true democracy - one man one vote - most votes wins. Secondly, when everyone chimes in, progress is minimal.

Look at UK. Democracy has lead to countless delays in infrastructure development because everyone who has a voice wants to be heard the loudest. 3rd Runway at Heathrow is a good example, 25 years and still no decision. USA is another example; one president comes in and makes changes, the next will revert most changes - endless cycle.

There is very little progress in a democratic system. Of course when one man one vote was implemented (EU referendum) - the result was not accepted by those in power, and I don't have to explain what happened next.

Democracy actually guarantees the voice of the minority - this is it. Nothing more nothing less.

In contrast an autocratic system is proven to be successful when it comes to development. China is a top example. One man makes the decision. Look at China now. While UK still pander and debate the 3rd runway, China have gone and built 100s of Airports!

Russia and UAE are also good examples. Russia has made so much progress in the past 20 years that it's not even funny. Putin calls the shots. UAE, you all get it, has completely changed.

Autocracy follows the simple principle of Chain of Command.

There is a caveat, the top guy in an autocracy must be genuine, and not an evil 'dictator'.

Remember, UK ruled the waves and the world when the King/Queen were calling the shots. Now look at UK, down in the dumps because people are given the choice, and the people are fickle minded.

Democracy is nothing but an illusion. Autocracy is the way forwards.
 
Back
Top