What's new

India should send their B team to win T20 World Cup: Graeme Swann's cheeky take on problem of plenty

MenInG

PakPassion Administrator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 2, 2004
Runs
217,977
Former England spinner Graeme Swann came up with a cheeky take to address India's problem of plenty in the T20 World Cup year, saying the Asian giants might as well send their 'B team' to emerge successful in Australia later this year.

Swann's comment came at a time when India have to make changes to the XI that defeated England in the first of a 3-match T20I series comprehensively on Thursday, July 7, in Southampton. India hammered Jos Buttler's side by 50 runs despite not having the likes of Virat Kohli, Rishabh Pant, Jasprit Bumrah and Ravindra Jadeja in the Xi.

The likes of Kohli, Bumrah, Jadeja and Pant were rested for the first T20I, which got underway a day after the completion of the rescheduled fifth Test in Birmingham.

India's bench strength was on display as Rohit Sharma led a 'second string' side that dominated England on Thursday. While captain Rohit set the tone with a quickfire 24, Deepak Hooda, who batted at No. 3, hammered 33 from just 17 balls after which Suryakumar Yadav smashed 39 and Hardik Pandya hit a match-winning fifty.

Notably, Hooda is in terrific form after having scored his maiden T20I hundred in Ireland in June. However, the Baroda all-rounder along with Ishan Kishan and Suryakumar might have to make way for the likes of Kohli and Pant while Jadeja is expected to replace Axar Patel. Shreyas Iyer, who has been part of the limited-overs set-up, is likely to wait for his opportunities.

Arshdeep Singh, who shone on his debut on Thursday picking up 2 wickets and flaunting his swing-bowing skills, will make way for Jasprit Bumrah even as Umran Malik, who made his T20I debut in Ireland, is waiting in the wings.

"India should send their B team to Australia and probably win the World Cup," Swann told Sony Sports.

The former England spinner said the XI that played against England on Thursday has the potential to beat the hosts again and that changing the winning combination is only good news for Buttler's men.

"I think it's a great idea that you bring a load of players in. You got a winning team and completely change that in the 2nd game against England. I would like you to do that, India, please. Because this XI will beat England in 2 day's time, even if you bring in world-class players like Bumrah, Kohli and Pant, it upsets the balance that has played so well.

"Of course, they will come back into the team because of who they are. But if you are the England team, I would be looking for any way to upset the rhythm," he added.

'VIRAT KOHLI SHOULD OPEN'

Meanwhile, Swann suggested that Virat Kohli opens the batting with Rohit Sharma, saying the former captain is not well-suited to playing in the middle overs.

Kohli has been batting at No. 3 for India in T20is but his inability to get going from the word go in the middle-overs has been a cause for concern. The former skipper has been opening the batting for Royal Challengers Bangalore in the Indian Premier League.

"Virat Kohli comes in, he opens the batting, instead of Kishan. That is what I would do.

"When you have got a player as good as Virat, you don't want him to bat at No. 3 in the middle overs because he is not scoring as quickly as SKY or Hooda when they first come in because that's not his game.

"When Rohit is batting so well at the other end, scoring quickly, Virat will follow and do the same thing. Kohli and Sharma score heavily at the top, Hooda and SKY (Suryakumar) can follow suit," Swann added.

https://www.newprocessfromhome.com/...up-cheeky-virat-kohli-open-1973347-2022-07-08
 
Theoretically this should be true considering India's population.
 
Same bench strength when they lost by 10 wickets to Pakistan?
 
Same bench strength when they lost by 10 wickets to Pakistan?

Starting to feel that some of these guys change their tune depending on which country's media they are speaking to.

Not many have the guts to speak the truth.
 
The only time they won was in 2007 (with a B team).
So they maybe play better with the B team.
 
India tried out a rookie like Varun Chakrabarty (instead of Ashwin, Kuldeep, or Chahal) last time which was a mistake.

They need to send in experienced players.
 
Question is which is India's B team?

The one that played 1st T20I would hardly be a B-team. Except Bumrah, I think rest of them pick themselves for national side based on merit. While likes of Kohli, Pant who will be returning to XI don't justify their place atm on the basis of form.
 
Question is which is India's B team?

The one that played 1st T20I would hardly be a B-team. Except Bumrah, I think rest of them pick themselves for national side based on merit. While likes of Kohli, Pant who will be returning to XI don't justify their place atm on the basis of form.

Exactly Kohli doesn’t make the A team right now and Pant in that position doesn’t either.
 
Boss back then it wasn’t like that, also Sachin was always suited. India took a risk with a young team and it paid off.

It was like that. I saw those games live.

BD knocked out India that had Dravid, Ganguly, and Tendulkar. They were finished by then.

It was good that India went without those 3 players.
 
Last edited:
Boss back then it wasn’t like that, also Sachin was always suited. India took a risk with a young team and it paid off.

By 2007, Ganguly and Dravid were finished. They were liabilities in LOI formats.

India's team in 2007 T20 WC was solid. It was young but experienced.
 
Boss back then it wasn’t like that, also Sachin was always suited. India took a risk with a young team and it paid off.

India didn't take risk.. India didn't care about t20s back then and humiliating exit from 2007 wc means india rests their senior players.. only after the success of ipl india take care t20s..
 
Tendulkar, Ganguly, and Dravid were never suitable for T20.

You are thinking from today's perspective. In 2007 nobody knew who would be suitable who would not be suitable for this format. It was an unknown territory for many. Infact that format was mocked by many.
 
By 2007, Ganguly and Dravid were finished. They were liabilities in LOI formats.

India's team in 2007 T20 WC was solid. It was young but experienced.

Uthappa/Yusuf Pathan (did not play a single international match) Rohit sharma/Joginder sharma were all noobs.
 
In T20s, there is no A or B or C team. Any team can beat any team. India B can beat Indian team too.
 
It was like that. I saw those games live.

BD knocked out India that had Dravid, Ganguly, and Tendulkar. They were finished by then.

It was good that India went without those 3 players.

Tendulkar was not finished by 2007. He played some of his best cricket between 2007 and 2011. Not sure what you are on about .
 
It was like that. I saw those games live.

BD knocked out India that had Dravid, Ganguly, and Tendulkar. They were finished by then.

It was good that India went without those 3 players.
So one fluke win by Bangladesh is the basis of your reasoning! Hmm
 
I am sick and tired of these B and C team discussions that have become in fashion in recent times. An international team is an international team.
 
Just because England played their B team against India in the ongoing series, India should also do the same? That too in a world cup? :inti
 
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">India have played outstanding cricket and deserve to win the series. Really impressive bowling performance, they'll surely be one of the favourites for the T20 World Cup in Australia <a href="https://t.co/5vqgnBYfIX">https://t.co/5vqgnBYfIX</a></p>— Shahid Afridi (@SAfridiOfficial) <a href="https://twitter.com/SAfridiOfficial/status/1545821230653128705?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">July 9, 2022</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
 
Graeme Swann it seems has inherited the title of obnoxious little weed.

He has a lot to say and thinks he’s “oh so witty”. But sorry mate, you’re not funny and you’re a coward for leading the Pieterson scapegoating and quitting the ashes midway when mitch was all over your team.

Someone get him off commentary.
 
Just another in a long series of hogwash utterance that end up as headline highlight and people unload on this site with the same old jingoistic biases.
am fed up of the 'b' team thing, all that matter is to play in the right spirit and try and win
 
Back
Top