No. In your eyes a citation is a link to a source or an article. I made it clear I cited the name of a principle [which you quoted thus proving me correct. So when you claimed I cited something, you were basically saying I cited a link. Which I didn’t. You then resorted to a pedantic technicality, thank God it was not a typo.
Sorry. You are wrong.
http://www.dictionary.com/browse/citation?s=t
definitions 1-4 are inapplicable in this context. Definitions 5-7 are applicable.
Dictionary defines citation as :
"
5.
the act of citing or quoting a reference to an authority or a precedent.
6.
a passage cited; quotation.
Synonyms: excerpt, passage, extract, quote.
7.
Also, cite. a quotation showing a particular word or phrase in context."
Ergo, you claimed citation. yet you failed to present any reference for it to qualify as a citation.
Ergo, your claim is dismissed as false.
As i said, kindly improve your English.
There's no backtrack, just your inability to stick with what you have said. You can appreciate how someone responding to you can be confused, because you never stick to your opinion. You shuffle from one post to another.
Post # 59: You claim you cited.
post # 86: You claim you never claimed citation.
Sounds like backtracking to me.
In the process you have anointed yourself in praise calling yourself a scientist who has exceptional citation skills. Even if this notion is granted, you do not read your citation, let alone understand them.
It would be more fun (and educational dare I say), if you were consistent in your views.
Anyway, Like I said, no hard feelings. I have learned my lesson.
I hope the lesson you've learnt, is not to pass off your ** opinions as facts and present citation when asked to do so.
