What's new

India v Pakistan | ICC WT20 2016 | Kolkata | Mar 19, 2016 | India Innings

Status
Not open for further replies.
they must must must must get Kohli early.

Obviously that's like impossible to do but must, somehow
 
we bowled all our spinners against NZ who are one of the worst players of spinners , how much did we concede ? Does it really always has to be as per your script ? oh the pitch is spinning , let me bowl everyone who bowls spin & we would have bowled out Pak for 80 again ? Give the guy some credit

Wow....

Pandya went for runs last game. Got 2 overs.
Raina bowled 4 overs well last game. Got 1 over.
Main strike bowler didn't even complete his quota.
Yuvi didn't bowl both games EVEN though righties were batting and pitch was rank turner

And you want to give credit to this guy?

lol
 
Aamir is absolute genius with ball - already understood the wicket. Compared to that, Irfan ...........:(
 
need to push the required run rate to close to 9 in the next 5 overs, that would put some pressure on them and they might lose wickets.
 
Irfan needs to bowl cutters his cutters will be lethal with bounce


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Aamir is absolute genius with ball - already understood the wicket. Compared to that, Irfan ...........:(

Yes he understood the wicket.

Dont you think he shared that with his team mates???

Its about ability man, the rest dont have the ability to execute the plans as accurately as he does.
 
Wow....

Pandya went for runs last game. Got 2 overs.
Raina bowled 4 overs well last game. Got 1 over.
Main strike bowler didn't even complete his quota.
Yuvi didn't bowl both games EVEN though righties were batting and pitch was rank turner

And you want to give credit to this guy?

lol

you know what , lets just agree that Pak would have been bowled out for 80 if only spinners had bowled OK. Happy whining
 
Amir is one hell of a bowler, easily the best in this WC thus far...
Irfan not using his brain much [emoji84][emoji84][emoji84]


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top