India withdraws Al Jazeera’s security clearance for ‘airing Kashmir documentary’

[Bewal Express]

Once attack is initiated, the retaliation is the prerogative of the one who was attacked.

India at that time was negotiating a agreement with Hyderabad.

Remember, Hyderabad was a land locked state surrounded by India and no movement inbound or outbound was possible without travesing through indian territory or airspace.

You never answered my question. Would Ind have allowed an Independent Hyderabad?

 

[cricketjoshila]

You never answered my question. Would Ind have allowed an Independent Hyderabad?

Thats what was being negotiated.

Can you tell me how did Pakistan get the Khan of Kalat to acede?

 

[Bewal Express]

Thats what was being negotiated.

Can you tell me how did Pakistan get the Khan of Kalat to acede?

No they werent, revisionism on your part makes you look silly. And for whats worth Hyderabad should have been part of Ind, like Kashmir should have been part of PK.

 

[cricketjoshila]

No they werent, revisionism on your part makes you look silly. And for whats worth Hyderabad should have been part of Ind, like Kashmir should have been part of PK.

Agreement was being negotiated with Hyderabad. The same wikipedia page will tell you.

 

[Bewal Express]

Agreement was being negotiated with Hyderabad. The same wikipedia page will tell you.

The fact is that the Ruler wanted stay independent but you guys couldnt hack it as its a hindu majority state, so you started to agitate for control. But when the muslims did the same, apparently the Kashmir ruler was within his rights to join Ind. That's what you call hypocrisy

 

[cricketjoshila]

The fact is that the Ruler wanted stay independent but you guys couldnt hack it as its a hindu majority state, so you started to agitate for control. But when the muslims did the same, apparently the Kashmir ruler was within his rights to join Ind. That's what you call hypocrisy

Fact is that India was negotiating a agreement with Nizam when his forces attacked Indian forces. Thats history.

Now coming to the time line.

Kashmir happened before Hyderabad.Pakistan started this policy of sending armies or militias to forcibly capture land.

Kashmir Aceded to India in October 1947. Pakistani militias had attacked Kashmir before this.

Indian forces went into Hyderabad in september 1948.

What made Pakistan think it could take anything from India by force? Even today that delusion isnt gone.

Why are you avoiding the question of Kalat? How did Pakistan take it?Any idea?

 

[Bewal Express]

Fact is that India was negotiating a agreement with Nizam when his forces attacked Indian forces. Thats history.

Now coming to the time line.

Kashmir happened before Hyderabad.Pakistan started this policy of sending armies or militias to forcibly capture land.

Kashmir Aceded to India in October 1947. Pakistani militias had attacked Kashmir before this.

Indian forces went into Hyderabad in september 1948.

What made Pakistan think it could take anything from India by force? Even today that delusion isnt gone.

Why are you avoiding the question of Kalat? How did Pakistan take it?Any idea?

The guy was forced into submission. He didnt want to join and the Ind agitated because of a Hindu majority. Kashmir should never been in a situation where the ruler decided, it wasnt for him to decide. The majority wanted to be part of PK and to this day, tbey still do because of your violence and rape.

 

[BlackShadow]

Fact is that India was negotiating a agreement with Nizam when his forces attacked Indian forces. Thats history.

Now coming to the time line.

Kashmir happened before Hyderabad.Pakistan started this policy of sending armies or militias to forcibly capture land.

Kashmir Aceded to India in October 1947. Pakistani militias had attacked Kashmir before this.

Indian forces went into Hyderabad in september 1948.

What made Pakistan think it could take anything from India by force? Even today that delusion isnt gone.

Why are you avoiding the question of Kalat? How did Pakistan take it?Any idea?

You can't really make people living in denial see sense, even if you repeat these facts a million times.

Indian govt. is ignoring Pakistan's rona dhona quite successfully, and about time Indian posters start doing the same.

 

[cricketjoshila]

The guy was forced into submission. He didnt want to join and the Ind agitated because of a Hindu majority. Kashmir should never been in a situation where the ruler decided, it wasnt for him to decide. The majority wanted to be part of PK and to this day, tbey still do because of your violence and rape.

Kashmir Hyderabad or Kalat all wanted to be independent. Pakistan even recognised the independence of Kalat before forcibly annexing it in early months of 1948. Before that Pakistan had already tried forcibly take Kashmir. Still India didnot send its army into Hyderabad till Indian troops were attacked.

M.A Jinnah agreed to the position that the rulers of princely states will have the authority to decide the accession. Then Pakistan broke the agreements to forcibly annex Kalat and tried to take Kashmir.


Pakistan broke all agreed agreements on Kashmir. It then broke the ceasefire agreement in 1965. Then it broke the Shimla agreement by sending and training terrorists in Kashmir. Then it broke the lahore declaration. Pakistan is known for its illegal acts.

The day Pakistan realises that it can achieve nothing againist India by force we will have peace.

 

[cricketjoshila]

You can't really make people living in denial see sense, even if you repeat these facts a million times.

Indian govt. is ignoring Pakistan's rona dhona quite successfully, and about time Indian posters start doing the same.

Denial.


https://nation.com.pk/05-Dec-2015/h...pakistan-a-historical-perspective?version=amp

Read how they got Kalat.None of them will talk about this.

 

[Bewal Express]

Kashmir Hyderabad or Kalat all wanted to be independent. Pakistan even recognised the independence of Kalat before forcibly annexing it in early months of 1948. Before that Pakistan had already tried forcibly take Kashmir. Still India didnot send its army into Hyderabad till Indian troops were attacked.

M.A Jinnah agreed to the position that the rulers of princely states will have the authority to decide the accession. Then Pakistan broke the agreements to forcibly annex Kalat and tried to take Kashmir.


Pakistan broke all agreed agreements on Kashmir. It then broke the ceasefire agreement in 1965. Then it broke the Shimla agreement by sending and training terrorists in Kashmir. Then it broke the lahore declaration. Pakistan is known for its illegal acts.

The day Pakistan realises that it can achieve nothing againist India by force we will have peace.

Yes off course you are the good guys, Ind does nothing wrong and your denial of a plebiscite to the people of Kashmir to this date is fully justified.

 

[cricketjoshila]

Yes off course you are the good guys, Ind does nothing wrong and your denial of a plebiscite to the people of Kashmir to this date is fully justified.

Please vacate PoK,and India will negotiate with the Kashmiris regarding plebicite and the return of Kashmiri Pandits.

 

[Bewal Express]

Please vacate PoK,and India will negotiate with the Kashmiris regarding plebicite and the return of Kashmiri Pandits.

Yes off course you will. We will free Kashmir from your oppression. Remember no oppressors ever succeed.

 

[cricketjoshila]

Yes off course you will. We will free Kashmir from your oppression. Remember no oppressors ever succeed.

Chalay Chal. Tumse kuch naa ho payega.

 

[cricketjoshila]

Yes off course you will. We will free Kashmir from your oppression. Remember no oppressors ever succeed.

Why is it so difficult for Pakistan to vacate PoK? Let UN take control.

 

[BlackShadow]

Yes off course you will. We will free Kashmir from your oppression. Remember no oppressors ever succeed.

Not true. Below are examples of oppressors succeeding, and ironically both happen to be India's neighbours.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sinicization_of_Tibet
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_rights_violations_in_Balochistan

 

[Bewal Express]

Not true. Below are examples of oppressors succeeding, and ironically both happen to be India's neighbours.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sinicization_of_Tibet
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_rights_violations_in_Balochistan

Tibet has been under Chinese rule for the last 70 years and just like the Chinese empires of yesteryear went to dust so eill this one if they continue to oppress. And i dont know what makes you think Baluchistan, Baluchistan is not even a disputed territory. Its people have been let down by bad governance but as Yadav found out, you are better off concentrating on Khalistan.

 

[BlackShadow]

Tibet has been under Chinese rule for the last 70 years and just like the Chinese empires of yesteryear went to dust so eill this one if they continue to oppress. And i dont know what makes you think Baluchistan, Baluchistan is not even a disputed territory. Its people have been let down by bad governance but as Yadav found out, you are better off concentrating on Khalistan.

This is what you wrote -

Yes off course you will. We will free Kashmir from your oppression. Remember no oppressors ever succeed.

But now you are implying that oppression can succeed in non-disputed territories. Sounds contradictory.

 

[barah_admi]

So is the West going to speak out against the block of free press as they did in Syria, Afghanistan, Iran and so on? Or will their be more silence?

 

[Bewal Express]

This is what you wrote -



But now you are implying that oppression can succeed in non-disputed territories. Sounds contradictory.

Give it time friend.