What's new

Indian team of the 2010s is extremely overrated

Bleedgreen4ever

Local Club Regular
Joined
Jun 4, 2017
Runs
1,306
I've seen many posts and discussions about India dominating world cricket in the last decade and being the best Indian team in history.

The facts are however otherwise

1. Their test record outside asia is still extremely poor and they can't compete with Pakistan of the 80s and SA of G Smith when it comes to their overseas tests. This is covered in another thread.

2. Their biggest achievement in test cricket this decade is winning in AUS against the weakest AUS side in history. That team was a joke. This is the only overseas series win for India in the last five years.Yes, the only overseas series win.

3. Indian team of the 2000s managed to achieve much more in test cricket- Test series win in PAK, ENG, NZ. Winning test in AUS against an ATG AUS team

4.The only reason India were made to look good was because Pakistan was abysmal in the last decade.We have seen that throughout history Pakistan had always been the best team from asia apart from this decade only due to lack of home matches and the 2010 spot fixing saga. Even in 2000s when PAK lost their stars due to retirement they were higher ranked than India entering both WC 2003 and 2007. I am expecting PAK to again be the dominating asian side this decade. The likes of Shaheen, Babar etc are a breath of fresh air after the horrible last decade. Domestic cricket had always been an issue in Pakistan but that didn't stop us from thrashing other teams in the 70s, 80s, 90s etc.

5. Just like Pakistan of the 90s, India have failed to win major ICC tournaments when it mattered the most. They may have won in 2011,2013 but their KO record has been extremely disappointing. If you want to dominate world cricket, you have to win multiple tournaments like AUS, WI did.
 
Last edited:
They are clearly the number 1 team right now. But everyone has said they aren't up there with great Australian and West Indies side. So I don't see them as ovverated.
 
They are clearly the number 1 team right now. But everyone has said they aren't up there with great Australian and West Indies side. So I don't see them as ovverated.

The ranking system is flawed.

If Misbah's side can be number one than any other team can top the ranking.
 
The ranking system is flawed.

If Misbah's side can be number one than any other team can top the ranking.

They are number 1 and deserve to be. Also they can still win the test championship which would be an excellent achievement for whoever achieves it.

Not every team who loses is ovverated or rubbish. Most sensible team know this Indian team isn't an ATG team. So I really don't understand where this ovverated tag is coming from.
 
How weak other teams are to be ranked below india who are ranked #1. So rather than saying india don’t deserve to be there, look yourself in mirror and improve. Challenge and conquer. Don’t crib and sulk LoL
 
I've seen many posts and discussions about India dominating world cricket in the last decade and being the best Indian team in history.

The facts are however otherwise

1. Their test record outside asia is still extremely poor and they can't compete with Pakistan of the 80s and SA of G Smith when it comes to their overseas tests. This is covered in another thread.

2. Their biggest achievement in test cricket this decade is winning in AUS against the weakest AUS side in history. That team was a joke. This is the only overseas series win for India in the last five years.Yes, the only overseas series win.

3. Indian team of the 2000s managed to achieve much more in test cricket- Test series win in PAK, ENG, NZ. Winning test in AUS against an ATG AUS team

4.The only reason India were made to look good was because Pakistan was abysmal in the last decade.We have seen that throughout history Pakistan had always been the best team from asia apart from this decade only due to lack of home matches and the 2010 spot fixing saga. Even in 2000s when PAK lost their stars due to retirement they were higher ranked than India entering both WC 2003 and 2007. I am expecting PAK to again be the dominating asian side this decade. The likes of Shaheen, Babar etc are a breath of fresh air after the horrible last decade. Domestic cricket had always been an issue in Pakistan but that didn't stop us from thrashing other teams in the 70s, 80s, 90s etc.

5. Just like Pakistan of the 90s, India have failed to win major ICC tournaments when it mattered the most. They may have won in 2011,2013 but their KO record has been extremely disappointing. If you want to dominate world cricket, you have to win multiple tournaments like AUS, WI did.
The 2000 Indian team won in Australia against a team without Mcgrawth and Warne- their most potent bowlers. And if we go the argument of weak teams, almost all the teams in 2000’s were much weaker than Australians and hence their wins shouldnt be counted.
You can also argue also that Shane Warne’s victims were mostly bad players of spin and he got smoked by Indians.
The fact is you can only beat what is in front of you. And India has done that in this era better than others. The ranking system is pretty fair and transparent.
 
Back
Top