What's new

IPL franchises hope to contract players for 12 months a year to play across a range of teams

MenInG

PakPassion Administrator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 2, 2004
Runs
217,977
IPL franchises hope to contract players for 12 months a year to play across a range of teams, Venky Mysore, the chief executive of Indian Premier League side Kolkata Knight Riders, has revealed.

This development would have seismic implications for the world game, enabling franchises to guarantee leading players lucrative year-round deals and, by extension, reduce the attractiveness of the international game.

The Knight Riders now have four teams under their umbrella - their flagship IPL franchise, the Trinbago Knight Riders in the Caribbean Premier League, plus sides in the International League T20 (UAE) and Major League Cricket (US), which both launch next year.

Other IPL teams are buying teams in other leagues - all six franchises in South Africa’s new T20 league, which launches in January - as international cricket faces heightened pressure to compete. Mysore revealed that the Knight Riders would love to be able to contract players for 12 months a year, to play for the teams in the four different leagues.

“In an ideal world, sure - because that gives us the opportunity to make our vision and our strategy even stronger,” he said. “If we were able to have X number of contracted players, and were able to use them all in different leagues, I think that would be nirvana. Hopefully, someday it will happen. I wouldn't be surprised if it did.”

One major barrier to players being contracted to franchises across different leagues is that different leagues use different recruitment rules - a mixture of auctions, drafts and individual negotiations. But Mysore said that he was hopeful of reforms to the structure, which would allow for greater continuity between teams playing in different leagues. In practice, this could allow franchises to tie up their highest-profile players to multi-year deals across leagues. If 12-month contracts were introduced, a series of leading England players would likely be targeted by franchises. Jos Buttler, Jofra Archer and Jonny Bairstow are already among the most coveted players in the IPL.

“If it happened that way, at some point in the future, that’d be great,” Mysore said. “What we want to create is a common platform and a system and a culture that allows us to participate around the year - enhancing our brand, building our fan base, and providing opportunities to cricketers around the world. And in the process, you build hopefully a successful business around it.”

Mysore also said that, if the Hundred was opened up to private investment, the Knight Riders would be interested in investing in the competition.

“Our immediate reaction to any such proposal is to say, yeah, we are absolutely interested because this is part of our strategy. Whether it is the Big Bash or the Hundred, although we understand the challenges these leagues face in inviting private investments.

“Wherever we have gone, we've made it successful for the mutual benefit of the league as well as the Knight Riders. When a proposal comes to us it's because they understand the value that the Knight Riders brand brings with it and the entire package that comes with it - we know how to build those brands.”

Mysore is hopeful Indian players will eventually be allowed to participate in overseas competitions, including the Hundred. It is widely believed that Indian players would provide a major boost to the broadcasting rights of foreign leagues.

“Certainly we’re hoping that will happen at some point in the future,” Mysore said. “When we broach this topic the BCCI say, 'yeah, we have to figure out how to do something'. I think they have an open mind. But they need to figure out what’s best for Indian cricket and for Indian players. That’s how they would be thinking about it, which is fair enough. Some very good minds there would be applying their minds to this idea. If it all comes together, it’d be terrific.

“If that were allowed, even in a very limited way, it would eventually be good for Indian cricket. Some players who aren’t yet given a chance in the IPL could be the starting point.”

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/cricket...ners-aiming-tie-worlds-best-players-12-month/
 
So basically exclusivity for the best players so they cant participate in other leagues.

RIP World Cricket.
 
This is mindboggling really. Can't believe this is happening to cricket.

Cricket became compromised in 2008 when IPL was launched.
 
theres no fighting economics, cricket was great while it lasted in this form but the future, for the most part, is not what i grew up watching as cricket.

helps put ravi shastris comments into context tho, less test teams means the bilateral tours can be organised between the gaps in the leagues.

would be interesting to see how indian players feel about aussie, english and carribean players getting potentially more lucrative, more securive multi year contracts whilst they are limited to playing in the IPL.
 
If there was one criticism about cricket leagues, it was that there were no loyality. A player plays for multiple teams and leagues on an adhoc basis which really makes little sense. Exclusivity will mean he can only play for that franchise unless he is transferred to a seperate team. This will only improve the league system and fans/players loyality. This exclusivity is the main reason why football leagues are so popular. A Ronaldo dont go around playing for Man U in winter, La Liga in Summer, Bundesliga in Autumn etc.

I think making players exclusive is a brilliant idea and can finally open the door for Champions league in cricket which according to me has all the potential to be the best tournament around.
 
Last edited:
theres no fighting economics, cricket was great while it lasted in this form but the future, for the most part, is not what i grew up watching as cricket.

helps put ravi shastris comments into context tho, less test teams means the bilateral tours can be organised between the gaps in the leagues.

would be interesting to see how indian players feel about aussie, english and carribean players getting potentially more lucrative, more securive multi year contracts whilst they are limited to playing in the IPL.

IPL salary cap will go up and the salaries will go up.
 
Maybe the face of cricket just has to change now.

Leagues will be the staple of the cricket year with major tournaments the only time we see international teams get together.

I wouldn't mind saying bye to bilterals. The only problem is how India-centric this new system could be. It's never going to be healthy to have one board dominate the rest and especially awful news for Pakistan as they get further excluded from everyone else.
 
Goodbye to the sport i grew watching up especially the likes of Gavaskar, Muddasar Nazar, Atherton etc who took their time building a innings who wouldn’t get a sniff in the tamasha leagues across the world in this day and age.
 
I think it's a great idea.

Enjoy the slap bam whallop of Indian controlled franchise rubbish and let the game die altogether.
More time to watch and enjoy footie
 
IPL salary cap will go up and the salaries will go up.

but they will go up for all players, not just indian players.

my point is that if u have someone like andre russel playing in 4 tournaments in 12 months, say 50 odd games, im guessing he would want significantly more money than an indian contracted to play 15 ipl games.
 
but they will go up for all players, not just indian players.

my point is that if u have someone like andre russel playing in 4 tournaments in 12 months, say 50 odd games, im guessing he would want significantly more money than an indian contracted to play 15 ipl games.

An Indian in IPL will always command a premium because there are 7 Indian places to be filled in a team.

Virat Kohli makes in excess of 2mn from a IPL season. The salary cap goes up his salary may be doubled. I doubt a Andre Russell will make anywhere close to that amount.

Rusell may play 4 leagues but his salary wont exceed the highest salary cap of that particular league. But KKR doesn't have a team in CSA league. So he will get his IPL salary plus cpl salary plus Emirates league salary.

So he gets 1.5mn for ipl plus 450k for Emirates plus 175k for cpl. So he makes may be 2mn a year.

But i still don't understand how this will work. Every league will have its separate draft or auction. How will a team owner guarantee that a player is picked across 4 leagues.
 
And so the countdown begins for the end of international cricket.
 
It's an idea whose time has come... exciting times ahead..

Not happening unless a central co-ordination committee runs all the leagues. There by giving the team owners a uniform team selection across the leagues. This may not happen because:

1. BCCI may not allow IPL to be diluted by giving other boards any kind of say in the running of leagues.

2. Such a co-ordination committee will not include PCB and PCB would want ICC to run the leagues. BCCI and others may not want that.

3. Other leagues may want a pie of the IPL revenue for such coordination. BCCI will not give that.

4. Lastly, Teams will demand that Indian players play other leagues. BCCI will not allow it. Right now the proposal is to allow players who dont hold a central or state contract be allowed. Even that is facing resistance.
 
Btw all that is in OP is Venky Mysore's opinion, which may mean little for the bcci. His team owner is not a great favourite of the bcci administration.
 
Wishful thinking but he knows it's not possible.

But he is right about Indian players participation in other leagues.

Player's association in India need to step up break bcci shackles. Not every player in ipl earns in millions or have chance to make India's national team so they need to play in other leagues when opportunity comes.
 
Good decision. I dont even care about international cricket anymore unless its a tournament.

If the sport is making more money through framchise than go for the epl model. Simple.

No one watches international cricket thats how dead the sport has become.
 
Wishful thinking but he knows it's not possible.

But he is right about Indian players participation in other leagues.

Player's association in India need to step up break bcci shackles. Not every player in ipl earns in millions or have chance to make India's national team so they need to play in other leagues when opportunity comes.

Why should they break bcci shackles when they are making money?

A good percentage of players of making good money through the ipl. Team india is not even a goal now its the ipl that is the goal.

Cricket will have to adopt a league model. International cricket is a joke. With only 3-4 teams dominating while the rest staying at the bottom

A guy like ryan ten doeschete couldnt play top level cricket because his team mate sucked. Atleast in league model he as an individual can play for some other team.
 
Good decision. I dont even care about international cricket anymore unless its a tournament.

If the sport is making more money through framchise than go for the epl model. Simple.

No one watches international cricket thats how dead the sport has become.

That bit is so not true. I love franchise leagues and despise people who downplays them but international cricket will always be pinnacle. Representing you country gives you a different sense of pride all together.

My point is, since franchise leagues already exists...make it exclusive for players. In that way fan base and loyality will increase and we can have a brilliant tournament like Champions league. It will and should not have any impact on international calendar though.
 
Why should they break bcci shackles when they are making money?

A good percentage of players of making good money through the ipl. Team india is not even a goal now its the ipl that is the goal.

Cricket will have to adopt a league model. International cricket is a joke. With only 3-4 teams dominating while the rest staying at the bottom

A guy like ryan ten doeschete couldnt play top level cricket because his team mate sucked. Atleast in league model he as an individual can play for some other team.

Not everybody in ipl makes big money. Lots of players are still paid paltry amount like 20Lacs or 40 lacs .
Ipl runs for only 2-3 months so If someone who is not centrally contracted or in plans of National team and wants to play in other leagues in rest of the year then they should be allowed to play their trade without any resistance.

Right now there is definitely some indirect hold of bcci over Indian talents participation in other leagues otherwise by now we should have had few appearances of Indian players in other leagues.
 
Last edited:
In Uae t20 league ilt20 a team can have maximum 12 overseas players in the squad and maximum 9 overseas players can be fielded in a playing 11. Which means lots of fringe overseas players will get opportunity to be selected in UAE league.

Let's see how many Indian players are allowed to participate in it.
 
An Indian in IPL will always command a premium because there are 7 Indian places to be filled in a team.

Virat Kohli makes in excess of 2mn from a IPL season. The salary cap goes up his salary may be doubled. I doubt a Andre Russell will make anywhere close to that amount.

Rusell may play 4 leagues but his salary wont exceed the highest salary cap of that particular league. But KKR doesn't have a team in CSA league. So he will get his IPL salary plus cpl salary plus Emirates league salary.

So he gets 1.5mn for ipl plus 450k for Emirates plus 175k for cpl. So he makes may be 2mn a year.

But i still don't understand how this will work. Every league will have its separate draft or auction. How will a team owner guarantee that a player is picked across 4 leagues.

When they are making this much money no wonder they don’t care about the Windies national team the current one is a minnow in ODIs and close to it in tests.
 
Good decision. I dont even care about international cricket anymore unless its a tournament.

If the sport is making more money through framchise than go for the epl model. Simple.

No one watches international cricket thats how dead the sport has become.

That way nobody really cares for a T20 league unless it’s their home country most other people don’t even watch it international cricket still has more following from people whose countries are not playing.
 
That way nobody really cares for a T20 league unless it’s their home country most other people don’t even watch it international cricket still has more following from people whose countries are not playing.

lol, if international cricket had more following than international cricket would had made more money than leagues.

There is a reason why we have more coverage of leagues and online activity of it than series
 
Not everybody in ipl makes big money. Lots of players are still paid paltry amount like 20Lacs or 40 lacs .
Ipl runs for only 2-3 months so If someone who is not centrally contracted or in plans of National team and wants to play in other leagues in rest of the year then they should be allowed to play their trade without any resistance.

Right now there is definitely some indirect hold of bcci over Indian talents participation in other leagues otherwise by now we should have had few appearances of Indian players in other leagues.

20lakhs is paltry amount? That is good amount of money for 2 months of cricket. People in subcontinent make that much money in 2 years.

These players also get funded by their domestic contracts when they go back. Also, this is what OP is saying that instead of two months why not pay them for a whole year and keep them under contract.
 
20lakhs is paltry amount? That is good amount of money for 2 months of cricket. People in subcontinent make that much money in 2 years.

These players also get funded by their domestic contracts when they go back. Also, this is what OP is saying that instead of two months why not pay them for a whole year and keep them under contract.
We are talking about cricketers not common people. Everybody is eyeing for better contract so imo salary below 1cr is unjustifiable for cash rich league like IPL. If a player can earn multiple such 40 lacs by playing in other leagues then they should be allowed imo.

Not everybody have domestic contracts or ready to play four day cricket or other domestic whiteball cricket rest of the year.

OP is talking about contracting players for whole year to keep them synonymous with knight Riders brand by playing them in other leagues like cpl, uae t20 league etc.
 
We are talking about cricketers not common people. Everybody is eyeing for better contract so imo salary below 1cr is unjustifiable for cash rich league like IPL. If a player can earn multiple such 40 lacs by playing in other leagues then they should be allowed imo.

Not everybody have domestic contracts or ready to play four day cricket or other domestic whiteball cricket rest of the year.

OP is talking about contracting players for whole year to keep them synonymous with knight Riders brand by playing them in other leagues like cpl, uae t20 league etc.

cricketers who are indina live in indian. obviously their salary would be compared to the people there.

lol 1 cr should be given to everyone? Contracting for whole year means they also get paid for whole year aswell with a renew salary
 
cricketers who are indina live in indian. obviously their salary would be compared to the people there.

lol 1 cr should be given to everyone? Contracting for whole year means they also get paid for whole year aswell with a renew salary

A Cricketer's salary should be compared with only cricketers of their respective country imo.

1 cr base salary will not be big deal for ipl from next season after new media rights deal imo.


Here contracting for whole year in OP means to make KKR players available to play in CPL and UAE t20 league where there is knight Riders team by giving them whole year deal to keep them synonymous with Knight riders brand.

Anyways my problem is with lack of participation from Indian players in other t20 leagues besides IPL and BCCI's role in it to not allow them.
 
If there was one criticism about cricket leagues, it was that there were no loyality. A player plays for multiple teams and leagues on an adhoc basis which really makes little sense. Exclusivity will mean he can only play for that franchise unless he is transferred to a seperate team. This will only improve the league system and fans/players loyality. This exclusivity is the main reason why football leagues are so popular. A Ronaldo dont go around playing for Man U in winter, La Liga in Summer, Bundesliga in Autumn etc.

I think making players exclusive is a brilliant idea and can finally open the door for Champions league in cricket which according to me has all the potential to be the best tournament around.
It's not entirely exclusive, one would still play in different leagues but for the same owner. I don't know how that is fair though. And it would impact the Champions League if it ever goes ahead

A team in WI/SA/Eng might want to look at a specific player but a different parent team in India has bought him so he can't play for them but for a rival instead. Different coaches would like their own set of players.
 
Last edited:
There was a proposal on this forum some time ago who proposed that ICC should contract all players and manage them. This one seems along those lines.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The issue these guys will realize that the T20 leagues don't create stars it is international cricket. People pay to watch when big names are playing.

All the big names, made their mark playing for the country. 15 years of IPL, name one crowd puller that is not part of the national setup.

What these leagues need to realize is that they need international stars who they can then monetize in their leagues
 
Future of cricket is franchise model. Knight Riders and Zalmi brand are first pioneers.

End of the day need is to put a product which is accepted and consumed by enough fans to make it viable. Currently ICC has troubles doing so in non big 3 Test cricket and bilateral ODI cricket
 
PSL is doomed. Other leagues are stepping up whereas the PSL is stagnating in terms of finances, players and ideas.
 
Trying too hard to copy football now? The number of countries who play football and the number of football players in the world will mean that there will be no shortage of quality players for all the big football leagues which co-exist together. Cricker on the other hand is doomed because BCCI wants everything and can't see other leagues getting big. This is why league model in football works and it will fall flat on the ground in cricket. :inti
 
PSL is doomed. Other leagues are stepping up whereas the PSL is stagnating in terms of finances, players and ideas.

the league can only reflect the economy of its host country, pakistan is a mess, thus it would be unair to expect the league to improve.

with current pkr rate would not be surprised if the wage brackets have to be revised down.
 
the league can only reflect the economy of its host country, pakistan is a mess, thus it would be unair to expect the league to improve.

with current pkr rate would not be surprised if the wage brackets have to be revised down.

If the wages won't go up then the PCB will have to find another window where there is no competition from other leagues and where a good deal of international players will be free.
 
If the wages won't go up then the PCB will have to find another window where there is no competition from other leagues and where a good deal of international players will be free.

they are ok for now, afaik uae league will finish by time psl starts, only issue will be top players wont risk getting injured pre ipl when there are so many other leagues to choose from.

only issue will be when ipl grows it is likely to start earlier than finish later given it already runs into summer. pcb are in a very tight spot given season runs from oct to april.
 
From all that we know at the moment, IPL will have a 2.5 month season starting April and a smaller 1 month tournament in October, thus taking a total of 4 months in 1 year. The remaining 8 months will hopefully have international cricket.

^ This is as per the official BCCI spokesman Shastri in his interview to Michael Vaughan.

I am not fan of franchise cricket being served as the main course. It's sad to see the international structure of cricket crumbling before our eyes. Ah, it was good while it lasted :(
 
Last edited:
So does that mean they will also contract Pakistani players to play in CPL, BBL and the South African franchise?

So the same money source will still be used to pay taxes to the Pakistani government who will then use it for the funding of its Army?
 
So does that mean they will also contract Pakistani players to play in CPL, BBL and the South African franchise?

So the same money source will still be used to pay taxes to the Pakistani government who will then use it for the funding of its Army?


Pakistan players will likely be banned from any IPL franchises competing in CPL, UAE or SA league.
 
Pakistan players will likely be banned from any IPL franchises competing in CPL, UAE or SA league.

How does that work? How will the governments of those countries permit this discrimination?
 
How does that work? How will the governments of those countries permit this discrimination?

I mean they won't explicitly say they are barring Pak players. They will silently just not pick them, as is their right being a private entity. How can govts of host countries object ?
 
I mean they won't explicitly say they are barring Pak players. They will silently just not pick them, as is their right being a private entity. How can govts of host countries object ?

You do not know that definitively do you?
 
How does that work? How will the governments of those countries permit this discrimination?

I mean they won't explicitly say they are barring Pak players. They will silently just not pick them, as is their right being a private entity. How can govts of host countries object ?

The PCB may not issue NOC's. Which makes the above moot. Looks like PCB will deny NOC's for BBL. Not sure what they will do to other leagues.
 
The PCB may not issue NOC's. Which makes the above moot. Looks like PCB will deny NOC's for BBL. Not sure what they will do to other leagues.

That’s not really what the PCB will do because they know their players will rebel to maximise their earnings
 
We were told by many fans that BCCI is opposing growth of other leagues by not letting Indian players participate.

What will these fans now say when PCB is stopping Pak players from participating in BBL by not providing NOC?
 
We were told by many fans that BCCI is opposing growth of other leagues by not letting Indian players participate.

What will these fans now say when PCB is stopping Pak players from participating in BBL by not providing NOC?

Surely you can't see a difference here. BCCI not letting Indian players participate in any league versus PCB stopping their players from participating in BBL only? And BCCI has been doing this since 2008? Desperation at its best. :facepalm :inti
 
Will IPL owned teams pick pakistani players? Thats a very interesting question.

Afaik some pakistani players did play for the KKR owned franchisee in cpl.
 
Will IPL owned teams pick pakistani players? Thats a very interesting question.

Afaik some pakistani players did play for the KKR owned franchisee in cpl.

They more likely will, cause they don't have any Indian government influence or any kind of politics in a UAE league... they will probably end up picking some Pak players.

They already had Azam Khan play for Trinbago Knight Riders.
 
Back
Top