What's new

"IPL links won’t affect Pakistan players' involvement in The Hundred": Richard Gould

Something is not adding up here.

is hundred relying on Indian market for revenues? If it is relying on English market alone, why is ECB toeing the line to BCCI?

Ambani's MI franchise now has teams in India, SA, USA and the UK.

At some point in the immediate future, these billionaire owners are going to bribe some of the top BCCI officials & ask them to let indian players play in overseas leagues .. thus gaining access to the Indian market. Owners have priced that in, I suspect.
 
Ambani's MI franchise now has teams in India, SA, USA and the UK.

At some point in the immediate future, these billionaire owners are going to bribe some of the top BCCI officials & ask them to let indian players play in overseas leagues .. thus gaining access to the Indian market. Owners have priced that in, I suspect.
I'll grant that for the sake of argument.

Indisputable: BCCI will not not compromise IPL value.

If that is the case, is there even enough revenue left in the indian market to justify the numbers for "The Hundred"? I'm skeptical.
 
I'll grant that for the sake of argument.

Indisputable: BCCI will not not compromise IPL value.

If that is the case, is there even enough revenue left in the indian market to justify the numbers for "The Hundred"? I'm skeptical.

Even a tiny tiny percent of the 1.4 billion indian market watching would translate to handy revenues for the Hundred owners. The silicon valley techbro who brought the Lords franchise said this was a mere gamble; if it doesn't work ... well .. it's chump change for them anyway.
 
Even a tiny tiny percent of the 1.4 billion indian market watching would translate to handy revenues for the Hundred owners. The silicon valley techbro who brought the Lords franchise said this was a mere gamble; if it doesn't work ... well .. it's chump change for them anyway.
having a hard time believing that. what numbers are we talking about? what would be a handy number to justify the valuation?

The Indian cricket season is fairly saturated and IPL holds the prime spot. The 100 will most likely be after IPL and no prime Indian player is going to choose the 100 over IPL. So what is the 100 hoping for?
 
there is this


and there is this.


>>>The ECB has previously claimed the competition made profits in the first two years. However, a well-publicized report by Fanos Hira, a chartered accountant and former chair of Worcestershire, stated that the Hundred made a loss of over $11 million in its first two years. That didn’t include the $30.8 million paid by the ECB to the counties and the MCC in return for backing the competition.

The ECB has been accused of inflating the financial projections in a document distributed to investors, claiming domestic TV rights will rise from over $105 million annually from 2029 and that Indian TV rights will increase by 15 million from 2030. Currently, no Indian players are permitted to play in foreign franchises which undermines the breadth of the viewership. The founder of the IPL, Lalit Modi, said that the figures for sponsorship were far-fetched and that the Hundred didn’t even match the Caribbean Premier League, let alone the IPL, for profitability and revenue sustainability.<<<<

Something is not adding up here.

is hundred relying on Indian market for revenues? If it is relying on English market alone, why is ECB toeing the line to BCCI?

Lalit Modi is not exactly a friend of BCCI or IPL at this point

Modi was working with a consortium that was looking to enter the auction process for the teams. His media comments were either a blatant attempt to try and reduce the value of the teams for his own benefit or just straight up cluelessness given the results. I suspect the ECB blocked any bids he was involved in anyway given his track record.
 
having a hard time believing that. what numbers are we talking about? what would be a handy number to justify the valuation?

The Indian cricket season is fairly saturated and IPL holds the prime spot. The 100 will most likely be after IPL and no prime Indian player is going to choose the 100 over IPL. So what is the 100 hoping for?

The valuations were based on an Indian broadcast deal worth £15m annually from 2029 onwards, which doesn't seem particularly unfeasible.
 
Modi was working with a consortium that was looking to enter the auction process for the teams. His media comments were either a blatant attempt to try and reduce the value of the teams for his own benefit or just straight up cluelessness given the results. I suspect the ECB blocked any bids he was involved in anyway given his track record.

Any media links to this?
 
Any media links to this?

Which bit of it, Modi being an interested party? He publicly leaked the valuation information that was only provided confidentially to potential investors on his twitter.

He also tried to organise a purchase of the tournament in full himself earlier last year for $1bn but was rejected by the ECB.

 
The valuations were based on an Indian broadcast deal worth £15m annually from 2029 onwards, which doesn't seem particularly unfeasible.
I guess it is safe to say that the £15m is the optimistic number. That too is very far away onto the future.

Is that for the whole "the 100"? or just for that 1 team

I'm scratching my head as how a 15m in 2029 revenue justifies a current valuation of 200m?

What is total projected revenue and profit between now and 2029?

hell S&P 500 returns are ~15% per year if the 100 can't turn 15m in profit per year, not sure how this makes sense.
 
In a world where you'll likely have an indian in HR at most firms advocating and educating EDI, we have a bunch of them here openly stating they will not pick a section of players for the heck of it.
 
I guess it is safe to say that the £15m is the optimistic number. That too is very far away onto the future.

Is that for the whole "the 100"? or just for that 1 team

I'm scratching my head as how a 15m in 2029 revenue justifies a current valuation of 200m?

What is total projected revenue and profit between now and 2029?

hell S&P 500 returns are ~15% per year if the 100 can't turn 15m in profit per year, not sure how this makes sense.

That £15m is just the projected value of the broadcast deal in India for the entire men's and womens tournament (minimum 68 games + any potential expansion) annually from 2029. For context the Indian broadcast deal for the SA20 (33 games) signed back in 2022 was about £8m annually.

That's only a small part of the full revenue. The central revenue from 2029 is projected to be £131.9m against central costs of £16.9m leaving £115m as the central profit. The ECB keep 10% of that and the rest is distributed evenly between the teams.

On top of that the teams will have their own revenue sources (such as ticketing and hospitality sales, team-specific sponsorships, merchandise etc.) and costs (such as salaries and venue hire).
 
In a world where you'll likely have an indian in HR at most firms advocating and educating EDI, we have a bunch of them here openly stating they will not pick a section of players for the heck of it.

Most posters who are openly supporting discrimination are based in India. They probably think world works like how it works in India. :inti
 
Don't think the hundred is a viable format. The rules are very confusing and unusual. Other countries have not copied or adopted the format.
 
Don't think the hundred is a viable format. The rules are very confusing and unusual. Other countries have not copied or adopted the format.

To this day, I don't understand or care how The Hundred works. All I know is they replaced overs with balls and there are 100 balls.

The Hundred is simply not cricket.
 
That £15m is just the projected value of the broadcast deal in India for the entire men's and womens tournament (minimum 68 games + any potential expansion) annually from 2029. For context the Indian broadcast deal for the SA20 (33 games) signed back in 2022 was about £8m annually.

That's only a small part of the full revenue. The central revenue from 2029 is projected to be £131.9m against central costs of £16.9m leaving £115m as the central profit. The ECB keep 10% of that and the rest is distributed evenly between the teams.

On top of that the teams will have their own revenue sources (such as ticketing and hospitality sales, team-specific sponsorships, merchandise etc.) and costs (such as salaries and venue hire).
Thats sounds rather optimistic.

Who is bearing the the costs of the players contracts? are the teams going to have their own broadcast deals?

the gate receipts and stuff is drop in the bucket. is that even enough to cover the cost of hosting the matches?

the bulk of revenue is from the broadcast rights.

That is ~15m per team per year from which players have to be paid players salary.

so you are getting supposed to get ~10m/year 4 years from now on a investment of ~100m? doesn't sound like good business.
 
Thats sounds rather optimistic.

Who is bearing the the costs of the players contracts? are the teams going to have their own broadcast deals?

the gate receipts and stuff is drop in the bucket. is that even enough to cover the cost of hosting the matches?

the bulk of revenue is from the broadcast rights.

That is ~15m per team per year from which players have to be paid players salary.

so you are getting supposed to get ~10m/year 4 years from now on a investment of ~100m? doesn't sound like good business.

At a team level the projections are for the profits to be between £6m and £9.5m in 2029 depending on the team, rising to £9.6m to £15.5m by 2032.
 
Its funny to see Michael Vaughan desperately boasting that the Hundred sales have rivalled IPL. Vaughan's predictions and analysis usually falls flat and then he tries to cover himself, deflecting humiliation by trolling others.
 
Thats sounds rather optimistic.

Who is bearing the the costs of the players contracts? are the teams going to have their own broadcast deals?

the gate receipts and stuff is drop in the bucket. is that even enough to cover the cost of hosting the matches?

the bulk of revenue is from the broadcast rights.

That is ~15m per team per year from which players have to be paid players salary.

so you are getting supposed to get ~10m/year 4 years from now on a investment of ~100m? doesn't sound like good business.

There's no point going into it in granular detail.

Quite simply, them rich folk have made a wild bet that the indian middle class will grow in the next ten years and create more franchise cricket fans thus potentially fattening the indian broadcast deal with ECB.

Meanwhile the english newspapers all say that this was a magnificent heist .. and that there's zero chance that the new owners will recoup their investment.
 
There's no point going into it in granular detail.

Quite simply, them rich folk have made a wild bet that the indian middle class will grow in the next ten years and create more franchise cricket fans thus potentially fattening the indian broadcast deal with ECB.

Meanwhile the english newspapers all say that this was a magnificent heist .. and that there's zero chance that the new owners will recoup their investment.
Yup. This doesn't pass the smell test.
 
The ECB is hoping that the injection of Indian funds into the Hundred teams will help the English counties to uplift their standard of Cricket, facilities and grass roots
 
Its funny to see Michael Vaughan desperately boasting that the Hundred sales have rivalled IPL. Vaughan's predictions and analysis usually falls flat and then he tries to cover himself, deflecting humiliation by trolling others.

Your sources also fall flat at a time of need
 
The Hundred franchises are not that much interested in selecting Pakistan players anyways and for obvious reasons. Who would want Rizwan opening in t20s??? Shaheen and Haris might play but IPL links won't make much difference. Not like THE HUNDRED was dominated by Pakistan players before...
 
The bulk of the revenue is from the domestic broadcast deal. Given the ECBs relationship with Sky I'd be surprised if the projections for that aren't quite accurate.
Doesn't that take away revenue from county cricket?
 
In what way? County cricket probably contributes very little to the ECBs broadcast deals.
What feeds county cricket now? Isn't county cricket the primary domestic cricket in England?

Do they generate their own revenue or rely on ECB?

Is there such a cricket vacuum in England that "the 100" is able to capitalize on?
 
What feeds county cricket now? Isn't county cricket the primary domestic cricket in England?

Do they generate their own revenue or rely on ECB?

Is there such a cricket vacuum in England that "the 100" is able to capitalize on?

They generate revenue but not enough to fully sustain themselves without ECB distributions too. The T20 Blast is pretty successful and generates profits for counties but not enough to fully cover the year round running costs. A lot of counties have tried to expand their revenue sources a bit with things such as hotels, concerts, corporate facilities etc.
 
Which bit of it, Modi being an interested party? He publicly leaked the valuation information that was only provided confidentially to potential investors on his twitter.

He also tried to organise a purchase of the tournament in full himself earlier last year for $1bn but was rejected by the ECB.



So Lalit Modi is again trying to get involved in Cricket. Good that ECB blocked him
 
I think its heading towards perfect parity, Indian players only get to play in IPL gradually Pakistani players will only play in PSL.
Indirectly, it will help Pakistan Cricket as the players will not be burnt out and play better for the national team. :P
This exclusion could push Pakistani players to seek UK/USA citizenship for league opportunities, leading to a massive 'talent exodus' that weakens Pakistan cricket in the long run.
 
@HitWicket @cricketjoshila @RexRex

Revealed: Hundred deals not done after pushback from Indians and Americans​

>>There are potential issues over ECB sponsors and those brought in by new owners, as well as schedule clashes in 2028 and 2032 with the summer Olympics, which now include cricket.

Multiple sources have said the deals are not done. One described the participation agreement wrangling as a “major issue” and that owners are “flexing muscles with ECB”, but sources at the board insist the deals are on track, that nobody is “on the verge of walking away” and that investors just want “security” because they are “putting so much money in”.<<

🍿
 
Not wasting time in all these low quality leagues might not be a great thing for Pakistani players financial perspective but it doesn’t hurt Pakistan cricket in anyway because you have to understand that apart from maybe IPL there is no league in the world that adds in any value to a cricketer from a technical pov. Actually not even IPL but because majority of top T20 cricketers in the world participate in it so im giving it some weightage like a 1%.

Pakistan must improve the quality of its domestic cricket. Let all these players full domestic cricket calendar when they’re not on international duty. Trust me once the domestic structure quality and competitiveness improves it will improve your national teams by levels over time.

This is blessing in disguise. Even if there’s a conspiracy against Pakistani cricketers, let it be. It’s not hurting your cricketing any way. Think long term. T20 leagues aren’t even real cricket many people will say.
 
@HitWicket @cricketjoshila @RexRex

Revealed: Hundred deals not done after pushback from Indians and Americans​

>>There are potential issues over ECB sponsors and those brought in by new owners, as well as schedule clashes in 2028 and 2032 with the summer Olympics, which now include cricket.

Multiple sources have said the deals are not done. One described the participation agreement wrangling as a “major issue” and that owners are “flexing muscles with ECB”, but sources at the board insist the deals are on track, that nobody is “on the verge of walking away” and that investors just want “security” because they are “putting so much money in”.<<

🍿

The purchasers trying to push to have the participation agreement (that was already known to them before they bid for the teams) in their favour as much as they can doesn't exactly surprise me.
I'd be more surprised if the purchasers
 
The purchasers trying to push to have the participation agreement (that was already known to them before they bid for the teams) in their favour as much as they can doesn't exactly surprise me.
I'd be more surprised if the purchasers
Yes, the sellers are flying to mumbai in a panic over the value broadcast rights and who will get the large portion is a real strong point for "The Hundred"

:inti

PS: Did you ever figure out your confusion over brand value and franchise value?
 
Yes, the sellers are flying to mumbai in a panic over the value broadcast rights and who will get the large portion is a real strong point for "The Hundred"

:inti

PS: Did you ever figure out your confusion over brand value and franchise value?

The debate isn't over who gets what portion of the broadcast rights, that's already fixed. They're questioning why the broadcast rights for the tournament are part of the same package as the England international rights rather than sold separately which, which was also public knowledge before the teams were auctioned.
 
The debate isn't over who gets what portion of the broadcast rights, that's already fixed. They're questioning why the broadcast rights for the tournament are part of the same package as the England international rights rather than sold separately which, which was also public knowledge before the teams were auctioned.
The the goal of ECB is essentially scam the investors by implying that most of the broadcast money is for England internationl rights.

looks like purchasers are doing their due diligence. wonder if ECB will sue the purchasers if this **** falls apart?

If "The Hundred" hundred is so great why not sell the broadcast rights separately?

@RexRex told you this thing smells.

🍿
 
The the goal of ECB is essentially scam the investors by implying that most of the broadcast money is for England internationl rights.

looks like purchasers are doing their due diligence. wonder if ECB will sue the purchasers if this **** falls apart?

If "The Hundred" hundred is so great why not sell the broadcast rights separately?

@RexRex told you this thing smells.

🍿

In the UK at least sports broadcasters will generally pay more for packaged rights because it gives them the exclusivity that means people will sign up for their long term subscriptions which is where most of their income sits as opposed to advertising. If you're a cricket fan and you know all cricket in England all summer is on Sky then you're more likely to take out the 12 months subscription, whereas if you know in the middle of the summer there's a month where you need a completely different subscription to watch any cricket you're less likely to do that.
 
The the goal of ECB is essentially scam the investors by implying that most of the broadcast money is for England internationl rights.

looks like purchasers are doing their due diligence. wonder if ECB will sue the purchasers if this **** falls apart?

If "The Hundred" hundred is so great why not sell the broadcast rights separately?

@RexRex told you this thing smells.

🍿
@cricketjoshila ECB is playing shell game by intentionally mixing/mucking up the broadcast rights of The Hundred with Enlgand international rights

@HitWicket I specically asked you where the hundred is going to find the money and you stated it is going ot be from the domestic broadcast rights. Now we get the truth. tsk tsk
 
In the UK at least sports broadcasters will generally pay more for packaged rights because it gives them the exclusivity that means people will sign up for their long term subscriptions which is where most of their income sits as opposed to advertising. If you're a cricket fan and you know all cricket in England all summer is on Sky then you're more likely to take out the 12 months subscription, whereas if you know in the middle of the summer there's a month where you need a completely different subscription to watch any cricket you're less likely to do that.
you are telling me broadcaster sin UK make their money form cable fees?

LMAO
 
you are telling me broadcaster sin UK make their money form cable fees?

LMAO

Advertising clearly contributes as well but for a mid-range Sky TV package plus both Sky and TNT sports you're looking at probably close to about £100 a month with a 2 year minimum contract.
 
Advertising clearly contributes as well but for a mid-range Sky TV package plus both Sky and TNT sports you're looking at probably close to about £100 a month with a 2 year minimum contract.
England population is -50 million. Assuming 50% follow cricket and a household of -5 each, that leaves with 5 million possible subscribers. With an average household income of 60k, what % of that 5 million will spend 1200 on a sports tv subscription?
 
Remains to be seen what the financial model actually is for a lot of these leagues namely uae, usa and the hundred.

The sky money for the hundred won’t be very much at all and won’t get these investors their money back.

Seems like a case of Indians investing in the future of cricket being these franchise leagues but the reality is only the best will survive. The Indian rights deals for uae and usa leagues may keep them afloat, but my sense is the deep rooted nationalism that has made the ipl such a financial success won’t carry over to those leagues and they’ll eventually fail.

The hundred will be a financial bloodbath, no one watches it and sky wont have huge money to pay for its broadcast rights considering their financial situation. Will Indian rights bail it out? Again, I have to ask what will the Indian consumer see in yet another sub par league to justify a substantial rights fee.

The reality is the economics of these leagues doesn’t make much sense, u less they simply exist to help a black market betting circuit..
 
Remains to be seen what the financial model actually is for a lot of these leagues namely uae, usa and the hundred.

The sky money for the hundred won’t be very much at all and won’t get these investors their money back.

Seems like a case of Indians investing in the future of cricket being these franchise leagues but the reality is only the best will survive. The Indian rights deals for uae and usa leagues may keep them afloat, but my sense is the deep rooted nationalism that has made the ipl such a financial success won’t carry over to those leagues and they’ll eventually fail.

The hundred will be a financial bloodbath, no one watches it and sky wont have huge money to pay for its broadcast rights considering their financial situation. Will Indian rights bail it out? Again, I have to ask what will the Indian consumer see in yet another sub par league to justify a substantial rights fee.

The reality is the economics of these leagues doesn’t make much sense, u less they simply exist to help a black market betting circuit..
Well, it looks like they are taking closer look at the numbers and reading the fine print.
 
England population is -50 million. Assuming 50% follow cricket and a household of -5 each, that leaves with 5 million possible subscribers. With an average household income of 60k, what % of that 5 million will spend 1200 on a sports tv subscription?

You can't subscribe specifically just for the cricket channel but from a quick google there is apparently about 6m Sky Sports subscribers in the UK.

Regardless though, home cricket being split between channels means people are less likely to subscribe, and if people aren't subscribing then that also obviously means reduced ad revenue ontop of less subscription revenue.
 
You can't subscribe specifically just for the cricket channel but from a quick google there is apparently about 6m Sky Sports subscribers in the UK.

Regardless though, home cricket being split between channels means people are less likely to subscribe, and if people aren't subscribing then that also obviously means reduced ad revenue ontop of less subscription revenue.
Given that Football and Rugby are way more popular, What is the value of the broadcast rights for England international cricket?
 
£54.3m this year projected to rise to £85.0m from 2029 if you want the figures.
So it works to be ~10 million USD per team? and team value is at 300 million USD?

Sounds more like a money laundering operation than a sport business.

No wonder they hell bent upon raiding coffers
 
Given that Football and Rugby are way more popular, What is the value of the broadcast rights for England international cricket?

Football way more popular of course, but I wouldn't say the same with rugby. The full collective broadcast deal with Sky is currently £220m per year, so assuming county cricket effectively has no serious value as part of the deal that leaves about £165.7m for the international rights.

So it works to be ~10 million USD per team? and team value is at 300 million USD?

Sounds more like a money laundering operation than a sport business.

No wonder they hell bent upon raiding coffers

The average team valuation was $158m. Plenty of other sources of revenue on top of the domestic broadcast deal too.
 
Football way more popular of course, but I wouldn't say the same with rugby. The full collective broadcast deal with Sky is currently £220m per year, so assuming county cricket effectively has no serious value as part of the deal that leaves about £165.7m for the international rights.
Given that every other tour except ashes and Indian tour is a loss leader, BCCI can really tighten the screws on ECB. Wish teh idiots at BCCI would wake up.
The average team valuation was $158m. Plenty of other sources of revenue on top of the domestic broadcast deal too.
Such as?

gate revenue? probably break even to to hold the event?

Sponsorship deal? probably a fraction of broadcast deal. Say 10%
 
Given that every other tour except ashes and Indian tour is a loss leader, BCCI can really tighten the screws on ECB. Wish teh idiots at BCCI would wake up.

Every international tour in England is profitable.

Such as?

gate revenue? probably break even to to hold the event?

Sponsorship deal? probably a fraction of broadcast deal. Say 10%

Ticketing, hospitality, international TV rights, merchandise, tournament sponsors and team sponsors.

Tournament-level sponsorship value is at 12% of the domestic TV deal for this year, projected to increase to 26% by 2029 and 38% by 2032 (i.e expected to increase at a faster rate than the broadcast deal). There's then the teams own sponsorship deals on top of that.
 
Every international tour in England is profitable.
Sure /S


Ticketing, hospitality, international TV rights, merchandise, tournament sponsors and team sponsors.

Tournament-level sponsorship value is at 12% of the domestic TV deal for this year, projected to increase to 26% by 2029 and 38% by 2032 (i.e expected to increase at a faster rate than the broadcast deal). There's then the teams own sponsorship deals on top of that.
sounds very very optimistic.

  • Established in 2021, the men’s and women’s Hundred competitions generate revenue of around £60m a year for the ECB (from broadcast, ticket sales and sponsorship) and cost around £45m to deliver. This includes the salaries of players and coaches, marketing and digital activity, matchday operations and event presentation.
That is 15 million profit for 8 teams = 2milllion/team/year

Assuming this has gone up 50% (optmistic) that makes in 3 million/team/year

No wonder ECB officials are flying Mumbai.
 

You've said some crazy stuff but suggesting that every international tour in England isn't profitable would be straight up a delusion-level suggestion.


sounds very very optimistic.

All of these projections were available to the investors before they entered their bids. If they didn't agree with them they were free to do their own analysis before weighing up a bid.
  • Established in 2021, the men’s and women’s Hundred competitions generate revenue of around £60m a year for the ECB (from broadcast, ticket sales and sponsorship) and cost around £45m to deliver. This includes the salaries of players and coaches, marketing and digital activity, matchday operations and event presentation.
That is 15 million profit for 8 teams = 2milllion/team/year

Assuming this has gone up 50% (optmistic) that makes in 3 million/team/year

No wonder ECB officials are flying Mumbai.

Expected profits for this year range between £0.1m to £1.6m per team, gradually rising to a range £9.2m to £15.5m by 2032.
 
Sure /S



sounds very very optimistic.

  • Established in 2021, the men’s and women’s Hundred competitions generate revenue of around £60m a year for the ECB (from broadcast, ticket sales and sponsorship) and cost around £45m to deliver. This includes the salaries of players and coaches, marketing and digital activity, matchday operations and event presentation.
That is 15 million profit for 8 teams = 2milllion/team/year

Assuming this has gone up 50% (optmistic) that makes in 3 million/team/year

No wonder ECB officials are flying Mumbai.
Let me add some finacial perspective, in 2024, until Trump F'd it up this year, the market return was in double digits
 
All of these projections were available to the investors before they entered their bids. If they didn't agree with them they were free to do their own analysis before weighing up a bid.
Yes, Thats why ECB officials are flying to mumbai to salvage the deal
Expected profits for this year range between £0.1m to £1.6m per team, gradually rising to a range £9.2m to £15.5m by 2032.
On a 100m investment? mights as light it and have a bonfire. LMAO
 
On investments that give the teams valuations ranging from £79m to £295m. Again, all projections that were available to them prior to bidding.
dude, the 2024 SP 500 return was 25%. That means, 50m got you 12.5M return, you projected profit in 2032.

Not sure how this makes any business sense.

@Bewal Express @IMMY69 Am I missing anything here.

This smells to high heaven
 
dude, the 2024 SP 500 return was 25%. That means, 50m got you 12.5M return, you projected profit in 2032.

Not sure how this makes any business sense.

@Bewal Express @IMMY69 Am I missing anything here.

This smells to high heaven

Comparing to an investment in an index tracker in that way doesn't really work given you're only taking into account the profit of the teams rather than potential changes in the value of the original investment too. There's also the additional partial factor of them being a status thing unlike an investment in an index tracker.
 
Comparing to an investment in an index tracker in that way doesn't really work given you're only taking into account the profit of the teams rather than potential changes in the value of the original investment too. There's also the additional partial factor of them being a status thing unlike an investment in an index tracker.
You are counting on asset appreciating to make for the 1% your are getting now.

With worsening cost of living situation in England, you can expect the subscriptions to stay flat or possibly go down.

Is there an tangible projections of the value increase of the franchise?
 
You are counting on asset appreciating to make for the 1% your are getting now.

With worsening cost of living situation in England, you can expect the subscriptions to stay flat or possibly go down.

Is there an tangible projections of the value increase of the franchise?

Not as far as I'm aware.
 
Not as far as I'm aware.
So you have a sport with dwindling popularity in the country, one with a shitty ecnomic outlook and serious cost of lliving crisis, and a sport surviving on revenues from a developing country for the most part.

Yup, "the Hundred" sounds like a winner.
 
So you have a sport with dwindling popularity in the country, one with a shitty ecnomic outlook and serious cost of lliving crisis, and a sport surviving on revenues from a developing country for the most part.

Yup, "the Hundred" sounds like a winner.

Yet the investors have valued the teams as they have.
 
Tv broadcasters and Sky are not giving the ECB the broadcast deal that they want. It certainly will not be enough to help the hundred owners to recover their investment.
 
Tv broadcasters and Sky are not giving the ECB the broadcast deal that they want. It certainly will not be enough to help the hundred owners to recover their investment.
you need to start posting sources.
 
Tv broadcasters and Sky are not giving the ECB the broadcast deal that they want. It certainly will not be enough to help the hundred owners to recover their investment.

The broadcast deal is already signed until 2029.
 
Back
Top