What's new

IPL to have two-and-a-half month window in ICC's next FTP cycle: Jay Shah/PCB reaction

MenInG

PakPassion Administrator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 2, 2004
Runs
218,165
Attracting astronomical bids that eventually translated into mind-boggling revenue of Rs 48,390 crore for a five year period through IPL's media rights has not surprised BCCI secretary Jay Shah, who asserted that cricket's most talked about T20 league has potential to deliver way more.

In an exclusive interview with PTI, the 33-year-old Shah spoke on a range of subjects related to Indian cricket, IPL's place in the global cricket calendar, running the cricket establishment in times of COVID-19 and the road ahead for both Indian cricket and IPL.

Excerpts:

Were you surprised by the intense bidding for IPL media rights or it was on expected lines?

I am really happy with the kind of numbers that we have achieved. This shows the phenomenal growth potential of Indian cricket. The auction was always going to be exciting for every stakeholder. We have been able to realise the true value and the numbers in-front of you, is a testimony to that.

These numbers show the potential of the Indian economy and the faith of investors in new India. The digital India push has changed the way cricket is watched in India. So the bid outcome of digital rights bears testimony to that.

Were there any apprehensions in the BCCI when it was decided to scale up the cumulative base price of media rights in excess of Rs 32,500 crore when the winning bid during the last media rights auction was almost half (Rs 16,347.50 crore) of it ?

No, the BCCI never felt that the base price was too high. You need to understand that in 2018, it was for 60 games. For the next cycle, we will have 410 games, with 74 games each in the first two seasons and then 84 games in the next and finally 94 in the 2027 edition.

You also need to check the digital numbers -- there were approximately 560 million digital viewers in 2017 and 665 million in 2021. You expect it to grow even more in the coming years.

We have agencies conducting research for us. By 2024, there will be 900 million internet users in India as we would be providers of second-cheapest data in the world. Obviously linear viewership (TV) will remain but there is a transition towards digital viewership and that's how you realise the value.

You are talking about having 94 matches in the future. How do you plan to manage the window and various international teams having their own FTP commitments?

That is an aspect we have worked upon. Let me inform you that from the next ICC FTP calendar, IPL will have an official two-and-a-half month window so that all the top international cricketers can participate. We have had discussions with various boards as well as the ICC.

When Amazon pulled out, there were talks that they were not happy with Package C which offered only 18 games per season for non-exclusive digital rights?

BCCI's aim was simple. Our motto was maximum participation, maximum value and better price discovery. So if someone is winning A and B, they need to shell out more for buying Package C. It is as simple as that.

This is called better price discovery. I think the manner in which we pulled off the e-auction was the most transparent one.

There is speculation that IPL may be held in two phases. Where does the BCCI stand on that aspect and how do you plan to implement that?

We are having discussions with various stake-holders. There are also multiple proposals for all the IPL franchises of playing friendlies overseas. That idea is being seriously contemplated but for that we also need to speak to other boards as we would need to know the schedule of international players.

There are reports that IPL's viewership has dropped by 30 percent this time. The viewers fatigue due to too many matches is also being discussed. Also, the the recall value of games has been talked about this year. Your views?

I don't agree that there has been a viewership dip. You have to factor in pre-COVID and post-COVID numbers. The 2020 and 2021 IPL viewership numbers skyrocketed because cricket was the only source of live sporting entertainment for the Indian public. People were unable to venture out due to COVID-19. So the figures saw a sharp rise.

Now in 2022, the same public after the return of a certain amount of normalcy is venturing out. People are socialising, going out for dinners, taking vacations which they didn't do in the last two years. Also, when you calculate viewership, this year, during evening games, you would have hundreds watching it on TV while sitting in a pub or a restaurant.

So there are hundreds of fans watching an IPL match on one DTH (Direct To Home) connection. Therefore, if you calculate viewership numbers, I would want you to calculate on the basis of 2019 viewership numbers vis-a-vis 2022.

Let's discuss a bit about international cricket. Will India's bilateral calendar take a hit if IPL enjoys a bigger window?

Indian cricket will remain strong as long as world cricket remains strong. Let me assure you of this. The BCCI is committed to international cricket. And it's not just about India versus Australia or India versus England marquee series, we are committed to playing even the smaller nations. All bilateral international commitments across all formats will be honoured. We are playing Ireland in two T20 Internationals this month only. We want a strong robust international circuit and want to help the smaller cricketing nations by playing against them.

BCCI also needs to factor in players workload management in a crunched calendar. How do you tackle the physical fatigue issues?

I have had discussions with NCA head VVS Laxman and we will always have 50 players in our roster. In future, you will have a scenario, where the Indian Test team will be playing a series in one country and the white-ball team will be engaged in a series in a different country. We are going in that direction where we will have two national teams ready at the same time.

Let's turn our focus on women's cricket. You have already said that the Women's IPL will start from 2023. Can you give us an idea about what the scale will be and how you plan to hold it?

This is a project which is very close to my heart. We will start with either five or six teams in the first edition. I am thrilled at the kind of response we have got from stakeholders. Multiple existing IPL teams have enquired and expressed serious interest in owning WIPL franchises.

Not to forget interest from outside. We are in discussions with other Boards about the possible window when all top cricketers will be available. I can promise that the valuation of the league, franchises and media rights will stun one and all.

You took over as BCCI secretary in 2019 and if one asks you to look back at your time so far, what is it that you value most?

Being able to conduct games despite operational difficulties during COVID-19 times was very satisfying. There were challenges and we had to stop the IPL during the second wave last year because we didn't want to compromise on health, safety and security. I would like to thank Emirates Cricket Board (ECB) for helping us with logistical arrangements in 2020 and also the second phase of 2021.

We had Indian women team playing two Test matches after eight years, which is huge achievement. We conducted more than 30,000 RT-PCR tests and had one of the safest bio-bubbles across three editions with minimum number of cases. When Omicron cases were rising in South Africa, the BCCI sent its full-fledged team for Test and ODI series. We sent our team to Australia during the pandemic and also hosted England successfully with not a single case detected.

https://www.business-standard.com/a...shah-122061401067_1.html#.YqiWP7w2fnc.twitter
 
Can someone from the ICC come forward and explain,

1. Why is a BCCI official announcing FTP calendar schedules

2. Why are they further curtailing the international calendar to accommodate a franchise league?
 
Can someone from the ICC come forward and explain,

1. Why is a BCCI official announcing FTP calendar schedules

2. Why are they further curtailing the international calendar to accommodate a franchise league?

Because BCCI = ICC.:sarf
 
I don't mind this at all. The IPL needs to be a three-month tournament running from March to May and should have a couple more teams so that more international players get a chance to play in it.
 
2 and a half months of Pakistan v Zimbabwe and Bangladesh

Ideal opportunity for Babar Azam to beat Tendulkar’s 50 ODI ton record!
 
They are going to want to grow their product and if there are enough viewers they will continue to do so to try to maximise revenue.

It seems as if other boards have agreed.
 
Imagine being Andre Russell…

Used West Indies cricket to gain popularity as a strong cricketer

2 and a half month paid holiday earning millions of dollars as a yearly retainer

Choose whichever franchise, T20 team you want to play for for the extra cash

West Indies coming back to beg you to play for then in ICC events.


What a life man!
 
I think at some point they will bring in non compete clauses for their players.

Why would an IPL team allow Andre Russell using Rana's example to get injured playing BPL and CPL?

With such a massive window the marquee players become even more necessary, especially to build brand value.

That's when the board relationships will get really interesting
 
It's death of international cricket.
India has destroyed international cricket.
In upcoming years it just will be IPL and nothing else.
It's just sad and nobody cab do anything about it.
 
It's death of international cricket.
India has destroyed international cricket.
In upcoming years it just will be IPL and nothing else.
It's just sad and nobody cab do anything about it.

What India is basically doing is this….

Cricket is well on course to become a globally followed sport due to the large influx of money coming through now due to IPL. Before this sport is followed by a wider audience such as Football and Tennis, they are normalising things such as Indian franchise cricket being the representation of cricket as a sport.

The new found audience would care less about the rich history of ICC competitions and bilateral cricket. It wouldn’t matter to the millions of people who will start following IPL.

You wouldn’t expect guys from Moldova or Romania to say ‘ah man I wish we could watch a 5 match ODI series between South Africa and Australia instead of Rajasthan Royals v Delhi Daredevils”
 
Last edited:
It's death of international cricket.
India has destroyed international cricket.
In upcoming years it just will be IPL and nothing else.
It's just sad and nobody cab do anything about it.

I have to disagree. ICC has/will destroy international cricket. The individual boards (other than India) will destroy international cricket.

The IPL is conduction a legal domestic competition. Nothing wrong with that. And well within their right. But the ICC, which is in charge of the game, goes and barters an agreement with IPL for an IPL window. Thus shortening the cricket calendar.

The individual boards also participate in the destruction of international cricket. They issue NOC to their players in return for IPL $$$. While at the same time totally ignoring their own fan base. A fan base that want international cricket. Not IPL.

The blame solely lies with these two.
 
What India is basically doing is this….

Cricket is well on course to become a globally followed sport due to the large influx of money coming through now due to IPL. Before this sport is followed by a wider audience such as Football and Tennis, they are normalising things such as Indian franchise cricket being the representation of cricket as a sport.

The new found audience would care less about the rich history of ICC competitions and bilateral cricket. It wouldn’t matter to the millions of people who will start following IPL.

You wouldn’t expect guys from Moldova or Romania to say ‘ah man I wish we could watch a 5 match ODI series between South Africa and Australia instead of Rajasthan Royals v Delhi Daredevils”

Sorry this will never happen tennis or football are popular because they are great sports T 20 as a sport is a poor sport it does not represent the best elements of cricket yes it will make cricket more popular then what is is currently as currently test/odi are niche sports but it will never be among the top most watched sports in the world as T/20 is not a very good showcase of cricketing tactics/skills and it will reach its ceiling much before other sports like football,tennis,basketball etc.
 
The bollywood haters just conveniently forget Nepotism when it comes to Jay.
 
India's performance in international cricket is going down and the length of IPL is going up simulatenously. :rabada2 Plastic fans are happy with it because they know whatever happens in the end in an IPL match, it will be an Indian team that will win the match. This is something they miss in International cricket these days. If India is allowed to field 3-4 teams per format in international cricket, these same fans will start putting international cricket over IPL. :91: :inti
 
Great decision.

In Test cricket and IPL, the two most relevant thing that is going on currently, no one can beat India as they establish themselves as the most dominant force of this sport.

:inti
 
Jay Shah is savage, finally someone after Srini who goes after ICC and show them their aukaat.
 
Inevitable really. A 3 month IPL can't be too far away.

History will judge, but the reality is that Pakistan is soon going to be left out in the cold for a quarter of the year and that is a fact.
 
BCCI is making a mistake. Just because something is profitable, you don't just increase games in this manner and assume it is going to make more money.

2.5 month or 3 month long tournament means even more fatigue for viewers. You can't just dump 94 games in 50-60 days and expect fans to turn up with same excitement every day.

IPL needs to rope in league experts from around the world before they commit to some kind of mess that leads to IPL taking a hit. There has to be a better way to expand the league, make the games more quality and memorable than to dump 90-100 games in short span.
 
Last edited:
BCCI is making a mistake. Just because something is profitable, you don't just increase games in this manner and assume it is going to make more money.

2.5 month or 3 month long tournament means even more fatigue for viewers. You can't just dump 94 games in 50-60 days and expect fans to turn up with same excitement every day.

IPL needs to rope in league experts from around the world before they commit to some kind of mess that leads to IPL taking a hit. There has to be a better way to expand the league, make the games more quality and memorable than to dump 90-100 games in short span.

I hope they extend it to 6 months. It is like eating food from KFC and McDonald's for months and then puking it all together. :91: :inti
 
I guess since India has not won a ICC tournament sincr 2013, IPL is ideal for all of india like you said it doen not matter which team wins, they are all indian teams anyway

They are softies. Can't take the pressure of watching high quality international cricket so obviously they will be happy with low quality games. :inti
 
Why don't we just scrap all meaningful cricket and play this tedious tripe all year round. Then the rights can be worth 10 trillion and our Ind friends can celebrate forever
 
Why don't we just scrap all meaningful cricket and play this tedious tripe all year round. Then the rights can be worth 10 trillion and our Ind friends can celebrate forever

India should play 12 months of IPL and withdraw its team from all International Cricket Formats and show ICC their 'aukaat'. Other teams can continue playing international cricket and keep the game alive just like the old days. :inti
 
India should play 12 months of IPL and withdraw its team from all International Cricket Formats and show ICC their 'aukaat'. Other teams can continue playing international cricket and keep the game alive just like the old days. :inti

You may joke but don't give them ideas.
 
IPL can have 12 months window in a year; still will not help India win the WT20!

Plus IPL viewership is in decline, adding another few months will not help bolster viewership, if anything, help torpedo the grappling IPL fan base.

This is actually a blessing in disguise and a shot in the foot for BCCI.

Non-Compete clauses will now make an appearance.

There is absolutely no way England/Australia players for example would give up Ashes for IPL. Oh wait, this has already happened.
 
Cricket is best when countries compete against each other, not when 2 Limited Companies play each other. Its entertainment for a few weeks but anymore its deje vu because you have no idea who is play who and with so many games the whole thing is meaningless.
 
Cricket is best when countries compete against each other, not when 2 Limited Companies play each other. Its entertainment for a few weeks but anymore its deje vu because you have no idea who is play who and with so many games the whole thing is meaningless.

Because we grew up watching that way, I watch football mostly when it’s against countries except for Champions League.. (which is somewhat similar to countries) but doesn’t mean club football isn’t the biggest thing.

I do agree on issues with IPL.. but no way can Indian cricket go back to only Internationals due to the monetary financial benefits of IPL..(not meaning in a pompous way, I supported PSL for the same reason of giving opportunities).

IPL is marketed to newer generation, that have started watching cricket only after IPL started.. this is similar to ODI, T20 debate vs Test cricket.
 
This is the future of cricket, most likely. A few years down the line, the majority of cricket fans will be those who grew up with T20 leagues and those who think otherwise have their heads deep in the sand.

If there is too much cricket being played, it is the other formats and international cricket that will pay the price.
 
KARACHI: The Pakistan Cricket Board (PCB) wants discussion with other Boards on the proposed dedicated two and half month window for IPL in ICC's next FTP calendar as they feel it could have an adverse effect on various international series.

Pakistan board's reaction came a day after BCCI secretary Jay Shah's exclusive interview to the PTI, where he stated that the Indian board will be getting a "two and a half month window" for the IPL in ICC's next FTP cycle starting from 2024 till 2031.

Attracting astronomical bids that eventually translated into mind-boggling revenue of Rs 48,390 crore for a five year period through IPL's media rights has not surprised BCCI secretary Jay Shah, who asserted that cricket's most talked about T20 league has potential to deliver way more.

"From the next FTP cycle, IPL will have an official two-and-a-half month window so that all the top international cricketers can participate. We have had discussions with various boards as well as the ICC," Shah said in an exclusive interview to PTI.

Disney Star, Viacom18 and Times Internet bagged the various rights to broadcast IPL matches over the next 5 seasons on TV and digital platforms. The total revenue which will be generated over the next 5 years thanks to the sale of these broadcast rights for 2023-2027 is a staggering Rs 48,390.50

"The ICC board meeting will be held during the Commonwealth Games in Birmingham in July and this matter will probably be discussed there," a PCB source said.

The PCB official said that while the PCB was happy to see the money coming into cricket, however, the BCCI's plans to totally book the top international players for the IPL every year could have an adverse effect on international bilateral series.

"Mr Jay Shah has said the BCCI is committed to international bilateral cricket but with so many leagues cropping up and the IPL planning expansion this has to be discussed among the cricket boards," the PCB official added.

Pakistani players have not been included in the IPL auctions after first edition since Mumbai terror attack in 2008.

While several Pakistani cricketers took part in the inaugural edition of the Indian Premier League, but since then, they have not been included to be part of the cash-rich league nor does the BCCI play any bilateral series with Pakistan due to the tense cross-border relationship.

Many cricket analysts and critics see the enormous money channelised into the IPL in the latest media rights as something that will eventually change the face of international cricket with the ongoing FTP calendar ending with the 2023 World Cup in India.

https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com...cs-next-ftp-calendar/articleshow/92234826.cms
 
Interesting that the PCB wants to have discussions with other boards about the IPL window being extended.

The other boards participated in and agreed to this extended window. It is a done deal. What is PCB going to have discussion about?
 
Interesting that the PCB wants to have discussions with other boards about the IPL window being extended.

The other boards participated in and agreed to this extended window. It is a done deal. What is PCB going to have discussion about?

Won't get too far, PCB has no clout in such matters. Best to grin and bear it instead of making fools of themselves.
 
Won't get too far, PCB has no clout in such matters. Best to grin and bear it instead of making fools of themselves.

The PCB wants to talk to the very same people who literally just got done giving the ok to extend the IPL window. Does anyone in the PCB read the news? Or even do a simple Google search?
 
I think in future we can have leagues played at the same time. PSL, English 100 and IPL..
 
IPL can have 12 months window in a year; still will not help India win the WT20!

Plus IPL viewership is in decline, adding another few months will not help bolster viewership, if anything, help torpedo the grappling IPL fan base.

This is actually a blessing in disguise and a shot in the foot for BCCI.

Non-Compete clauses will now make an appearance.

There is absolutely no way England/Australia players for example would give up Ashes for IPL. Oh wait, this has already happened.

You seem to be very bearish on IPL. Do you think the IPL will fold in the next 3-5 years?
 
BCCI can neutralize any potential opposition from PCB by including Pak players in the next IPL auction. Win win for both parties.
 
I think in future we can have leagues played at the same time. PSL, English 100 and IPL..

Yes... for the full 12 months of the year.
Scrap international cricket and let's all get on board with smack bang whallop cricket.
Where can I buy a shirt?
 
The PCB wants to talk to the very same people who literally just got done giving the ok to extend the IPL window. Does anyone in the PCB read the news? Or even do a simple Google search?

Whats the problem with it?

They may not get anywhere but they have every right to ask why each board agreed to it?

Also the fact that Jay Shah seems confident that there is a window while the PCB seems to have no clue about it means there has been some miscommunication by the ICC.
 
Yes... for the full 12 months of the year.
Scrap international cricket and let's all get on board with smack bang whallop cricket.
Where can I buy a shirt?

Lol I meant just for the summer which “almost” coincides for the nations.

Which one do you want? Jaydev Unadkat or Krunal Pandya? :inti

😂 I would wear Hardik Pandya if he wins us a match ever on his own.
 
We are heading for NBA basketball type situation with cricket and its relationship with Ind. International Basketball has no value and the franchises hold all the cards. With the figures banded about, cricket will die in other countries as the quality of competition won't be available to attract the crowds. If countries allow this, then it will be akin to Turkeys voting for Christmas but will they have a choice.
 
Whats the problem with it?

They may not get anywhere but they have every right to ask why each board agreed to it?

Also the fact that Jay Shah seems confident that there is a window while the PCB seems to have no clue about it means there has been some miscommunication by the ICC.

No miscommunication, just arrogance because it's a fait accompoli
 
Hate this nepo guy Shah but seemingly he has got a team that brings money to BCCI. Well, well.
 
Yes... for the full 12 months of the year.
Scrap international cricket and let's all get on board with smack bang whallop cricket.
Where can I buy a shirt?

We are heading for NBA basketball type situation with cricket and its relationship with Ind. International Basketball has no value and the franchises hold all the cards. With the figures banded about, cricket will die in other countries as the quality of competition won't be available to attract the crowds. If countries allow this, then it will be akin to Turkeys voting for Christmas but will they have a choice.

Or football?

Would one have Ronaldo’s Portugal jersey or Madrid/United one, same for Messi?
 
Hate this nepo guy Shah but seemingly he has got a team that brings money to BCCI. Well, well.

? Long before Amit Don Shah’s son was in charge of BCCI, it was making money.
 
Last edited:
Hate this nepo guy Shah but seemingly he has got a team that brings money to BCCI. Well, well.

As a business deal it's a no brainer but us that love cricket and especially traditional International cricket can see the existential crisis coming its way in the very near future. For example the test yesterday will be remembered for decades but no IPL or any franchise game is remembered for more than a few weeks.
 
You seem to be very bearish on IPL. Do you think the IPL will fold in the next 3-5 years?

I do not think IPL will fold, but I do believe IPL is over hyped and the hype will come crashing down.

Need the hype now more than ever since blockbuster IPL players are no more.
 
"From the next FTP cycle, IPL will have an official two-and-a-half month window so that all the top international cricketers can participate. We have had discussions with various boards as well as the ICC," Shah said in an exclusive interview to PTI.

Beginning of the end.

International cricket will become an afterthought.
 
Whats the problem with it?

They may not get anywhere but they have every right to ask why each board agreed to it?

Also the fact that Jay Shah seems confident that there is a window while the PCB seems to have no clue about it means there has been some miscommunication by the ICC.

Or the rest all boards have agreed and PCB cannot change it
 
We are heading for NBA basketball type situation with cricket and its relationship with Ind. International Basketball has no value and the franchises hold all the cards. With the figures banded about, cricket will die in other countries as the quality of competition won't be available to attract the crowds. If countries allow this, then it will be akin to Turkeys voting for Christmas but will they have a choice.

If? They have been doing this all along. They just did it again.
 
Whats the problem with it?

They may not get anywhere but they have every right to ask why each board agreed to it?

Also the fact that Jay Shah seems confident that there is a window while the PCB seems to have no clue about it means there has been some miscommunication by the ICC.

Actually, they don't. The PCB has no right to ask anything. The boards are free and entitled to their decisions/choices. They do not need to explain to anyone. Except maybe their own home base fans.
 
No miscommunication, just arrogance because it's a fait accompoli

I would put as more of ICC hiding under the desk because of what they just did and have been doing. Not having the guts to own up to what they are doing. Being the cause of shortening of international calendar.
 
As a business deal it's a no brainer but us that love cricket and especially traditional International cricket can see the existential crisis coming its way in the very near future. For example the test yesterday will be remembered for decades but no IPL or any franchise game is remembered for more than a few weeks.

But why is the ICC not seeing this? Why aren't the other boards seeing this? Both are willingly participating in the window. Totally ignoring the local fan base.

Non IPL fans almost yearning for some international cricket. But their own boards are ignoring them. Why are there no questions raised against the boards?
 
Logically PCB should form a bloc and form their own cricket league with like minded cricket boards and boycott ICC matches if their demands are not heard. Eventually like soccer.... international cricket will be just a world cup and some test matches and thats ok if all cricket board agree.
 
The ICC is powerless in the face of Ind money. What is the point of a governing body that has no stomach to fight for its game.

More like ICC's greed, selfishness and incompetent do nothing attitude that makes their backbone disappear.
 
Logically PCB should form a bloc and form their own cricket league with like minded cricket boards and boycott ICC matches if their demands are not heard. Eventually like soccer.... international cricket will be just a world cup and some test matches and thats ok if all cricket board agree.

From what is there for all to see, there are none left.
 
I do not think IPL will fold, but I do believe IPL is over hyped and the hype will come crashing down.

Need the hype now more than ever since blockbuster IPL players are no more.

Crashing down to what? If they don't make $$$$ then there is no IPL. Which means the hype and marketing will be there to get the people involved.
 
Players will get paid peanuts. It's the Ambani of this world that will make million/billions.

Also, I reckon its the end of ODIs for sure. IPL has made many of these formats quite meaningless which is why even many top cricketers retire early from Internationals.

This could also have a negative consequences in the future with depreciating international matches. After, 2019 WC, I can't really think of any meaningful games I fully watched from first ball till the end.
 
Crashing down to what? If they don't make $$$$ then there is no IPL. Which means the hype and marketing will be there to get the people involved.

Hype doesn't last forever.

Who are the blockbuster international IPL players right now? Also why has IPL viewshiped declined in previous season?
 
Last edited:
Hype doesn't last forever.

Who are the blockbuster international IPL players right now? Also why has IPL viewshiped declined in previous season?

Even without blockbuster players around and in sight, the IPL rights have just gone for $6.2 Billion. That should tell us something.

As far as viewership is concerned, I think this season is not the right one to measure. It was split and added and came within months of the part 1.

I think the real measure will be to compare 2023 season with 2019 and 2020 seasons. Let's wait.
 
Hype doesn't last forever.

Who are the blockbuster international IPL players right now? Also why has IPL viewshiped declined in previous season?

Success feeds success. There will be no turning back from such numbers unless WW3 or some other calamity disrupts IPL.
 
Hype doesn't last forever.

Who are the blockbuster international IPL players right now? Also why has IPL viewshiped declined in previous season?

Why would broadcasters pay eye watering amounts if they think there's no demand? There is just no appetite for bilateral games anymore. ICC tournaments, Marquee test series and IPL are the future of cricket. The plan was always to model IPL around the NBA. You will see a dozen more teams added in the future with two groups of 12. They will play IPL for 6 months within the next decade.
 
Another motormouth BCCI head...this Jay Shah. He along with Ganguly will kill the golden goose i.e IPL. The tournament is fine in its current format and extending it will only reduce interest.

BTW, did Jay Shah spoke himself? Bcoz I haven't heard him speaking since announcing Indian team for T20 WC last October. Awesome orator he is :P
 
Why would broadcasters pay eye watering amounts if they think there's no demand? There is just no appetite for bilateral games anymore. ICC tournaments, Marquee test series and IPL are the future of cricket. The plan was always to model IPL around the NBA. You will see a dozen more teams added in the future with two groups of 12. They will play IPL for 6 months within the next decade.

Broadcasters are looking to make more money by reselling TV slots for advertisers. This has nothing to do with demand but everything to do with access to the Indian consumer market.

IPL could add another 100 teams, play 12 months a year, this benefits broadcasters, not the tournament, because more TV slots are up for grabs for advertisers.

There's a reason why Amazon pulled out of the IPL bidding, Amazon does not resell its Prime TV slots for advertisers on Prime, so the only way to make money would be for IPL viewers to sign up to Prime, which would have to be over a Billion subscriptions. Wasn't going to happen.

Facebook pulled out of the IPL bidding too. Facebook has most number of users in India than any other country, and you'd think with its advertising model it would rake it in, nope, all changed when Apple, and now Android, introduced privacy settings on mobile devices that block FB algorithms for personalised adverts etc.

IPL, or cricket for that matter, will never have the same reach or appeal as Football or Basketball do on the international stage, IPL is a domestic product, designed for a domestic market, giving an opportunity for international companies to sell products to the Indian market through advertising via Indian broadcasters.
 
Broadcasters are looking to make more money by reselling TV slots for advertisers. This has nothing to do with demand but everything to do with access to the Indian consumer market.

IPL could add another 100 teams, play 12 months a year, this benefits broadcasters, not the tournament, because more TV slots are up for grabs for advertisers.


There's a reason why Amazon pulled out of the IPL bidding, Amazon does not resell its Prime TV slots for advertisers on Prime, so the only way to make money would be for IPL viewers to sign up to Prime, which would have to be over a Billion subscriptions. Wasn't going to happen.

Facebook pulled out of the IPL bidding too. Facebook has most number of users in India than any other country, and you'd think with its advertising model it would rake it in, nope, all changed when Apple, and now Android, introduced privacy settings on mobile devices that block FB algorithms for personalised adverts etc.

IPL, or cricket for that matter, will never have the same reach or appeal as Football or Basketball do on the international stage, IPL is a domestic product, designed for a domestic market, giving an opportunity for international companies to sell products to the Indian market through advertising via Indian broadcasters.

It has everything to do with demand. No demand, no eye balls on TV. No eye balls, no advertisers. No advertisers, no advertising slots to sell. No advertising slots, no IPL!

Demand is everything.
 
Meaningless ODI and T20s were becoming increasingly meaningless and this is a win-win for all. I believe international matches should be Test Cricket and ICC tournaments, only things fans care about.

League Cricket here is generating insane revenue while leaving us with the very best of international Cricket. I for one would very happy if useless bilateral JAMODIs and T20s just disappear.

Even Ravi Shastri after resigning from the job admitted that they were forced to play ODIs and T20s, while their sole focus remained Test Cricket as a team.
 
Meaningless ODI and T20s were becoming increasingly meaningless and this is a win-win for all. I believe international matches should be Test Cricket and ICC tournaments, only things fans care about.

League Cricket here is generating insane revenue while leaving us with the very best of international Cricket. I for one would very happy if useless bilateral JAMODIs and T20s just disappear.

Even Ravi Shastri after resigning from the job admitted that they were forced to play ODIs and T20s, while their sole focus remained Test Cricket as a team.

The entire concept of bilateral series was created to generate revenue for respective boards. Now league cricket is doing the same but at a scale of 5 times more. So I dont see the point of bilteral cricket anymore.
 
The entire concept of bilateral series was created to generate revenue for respective boards. Now league cricket is doing the same but at a scale of 5 times more. So I dont see the point of bilteral cricket anymore.

I would totally agree. Also I also understand that these leagues will be hated upon, but then so were JAMODIs. It's just a natural and more efficient evolution of "money-making" part of the sport.
 
KARACHI: The Pakistan Cricket Board (PCB) wants discussion with other Boards on the proposed dedicated two and half month window for IPL in ICC's next FTP calendar as they feel it could have an adverse effect on various international series.

Pakistan board's reaction came a day after BCCI secretary Jay Shah's exclusive interview to the PTI, where he stated that the Indian board will be getting a "two and a half month window" for the IPL in ICC's next FTP cycle starting from 2024 till 2031.

Attracting astronomical bids that eventually translated into mind-boggling revenue of Rs 48,390 crore for a five year period through IPL's media rights has not surprised BCCI secretary Jay Shah, who asserted that cricket's most talked about T20 league has potential to deliver way more.

"From the next FTP cycle, IPL will have an official two-and-a-half month window so that all the top international cricketers can participate. We have had discussions with various boards as well as the ICC," Shah said in an exclusive interview to PTI.

Disney Star, Viacom18 and Times Internet bagged the various rights to broadcast IPL matches over the next 5 seasons on TV and digital platforms. The total revenue which will be generated over the next 5 years thanks to the sale of these broadcast rights for 2023-2027 is a staggering Rs 48,390.50

"The ICC board meeting will be held during the Commonwealth Games in Birmingham in July and this matter will probably be discussed there," a PCB source said.

The PCB official said that while the PCB was happy to see the money coming into cricket, however, the BCCI's plans to totally book the top international players for the IPL every year could have an adverse effect on international bilateral series.

"Mr Jay Shah has said the BCCI is committed to international bilateral cricket but with so many leagues cropping up and the IPL planning expansion this has to be discussed among the cricket boards," the PCB official added.

Pakistani players have not been included in the IPL auctions after first edition since Mumbai terror attack in 2008.

While several Pakistani cricketers took part in the inaugural edition of the Indian Premier League, but since then, they have not been included to be part of the cash-rich league nor does the BCCI play any bilateral series with Pakistan due to the tense cross-border relationship.

Many cricket analysts and critics see the enormous money channelised into the IPL in the latest media rights as something that will eventually change the face of international cricket with the ongoing FTP calendar ending with the 2023 World Cup in India.

https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com...cs-next-ftp-calendar/articleshow/92234826.cms

PCB refute above report:

We have not commented on the BCCI proposal of a 2 ½ months IPL window in the ICC FTP 2023-2007. Having said that, it is public knowledge that the ICC AGM is in Birmingham, but to attribute this to a PCB spokesperson in response to a BCCI statement, is inaccurate and false.
 
Back
Top