Why?
Wow, there was a time when Rana supported Babar
Everyone supported him until its getting sick and tired.....Wow, there was a time when Rana supported Babar
The impact of Neutral umpiring on Miandad's stats are shining like a moon.
A little correction.
I thought I'd seen it all but this takes the cake when it comes to desperate, strawman arguments. I guess Chetan Sharma six did more damage to the psyche of certain Indians than I had thought
Do you know what "strawman fallacy" is? or just like to throw random words you hear about??
No I think it's the fact that Miandad always bashed India's pathetic bowlers that you have to come up with such desperate arguments to bring him down. As if neutral umpires only affected him and not other players who played during that era. But I get it. That one Sharjah six traumatized a generation of Indian fans, and I guess that trauma was passed down to the children and grandchildren too.Do you know what "strawman fallacy" is? or just like to throw random words you hear about??
Maybe hard objective facts affect trouble your "psyche"
This is exactly how I remember him. Most of runs at home are due to extremely biased home umpires. They never gave him out and his stats reflect that. He was one of the major reasons for neutral umpires being brought into the game. Such a player’s star has no validity irrespective how good he was. Nothing he achieved at home before neutral umpires should be part of his over all statsA little correction.
Miandad at home: before neutral umpires ( till 1985)
Tests: 36 Average: 81, Test centuries 11
Miandad at home : after neutral umpires (1986 onwards, even here not all tests had neutral umpires, 2 of his centuries are with Pakistani umpires)
Tests: 24, Average: 38, Test centuries: 3 (2 with Pakistani umpires and 1 with neutral umpires)
I am sure with further dissection based on neutral umpires, his HOME average would be close to MIGHTY 30.
Post Nov 1986: Miandad was out 6 out of his 32 innings as LBW,
Before Nov 1986: It was only 1985 he was given lbw 2 times out of his 53 home innings.
LBW out percentage at home shoots up from 3.7% to 18.75%.
Home average dipped by more 50%
What miraculous thing happened to his legs and averages from 1986?? One can only wonder
Lol, your trauma is so intense that facts are argumentsNo I think it's the fact that Miandad always bashed India's pathetic bowlers that you have to come up with such desperate arguments to bring him down. As if neutral umpires only affected him and not other players who played during that era. But I get it. That one Sharjah six traumatized a generation of Indian fans, and I guess that trauma was passed down to the children and grandchildren too.
Strawman ki definition mili ??No I think it's the fact that Miandad always bashed India's pathetic bowlers that you have to come up with such desperate arguments to bring him down. As if neutral umpires only affected him and not other players who played during that era. But I get it. That one Sharjah six traumatized a generation of Indian fans, and I guess that trauma was passed down to the children and grandchildren too.
You're mistaking with someone who is Indian and watched Chetan Sharma get torched before their eyesLol, your trauma is so intense that facts are arguments
your posts are just validating my earlier posts!!
You know, I’ve seen a lot of weird and unique ways of decoding cricket stats, but the neutral umpire statistical breakdown is without a doubt the dumbest and most desperate attempt at lessening a player’s legacy I’ve ever seen.your posts are just validating my earlier posts!!
Carry on! Its funny Pakistanis latching onto legacy created on cheating and fixing. No wonder the new generation of Pakistan couldnt have role models for the modern game.
Miandad was a good batsman with stats inflated by biased umpiring half his career and one super iconic moment of last ball 6. But he is nowhere to earn place in ATGs of cricket.
For me I fondly remember his go slow innings of 92 and 96 world Cup. Sweet Sweet memories!
No other player suffered such a drastic dip in performance.You know, I’ve seen a lot of weird and unique ways of decoding cricket stats, but the neutral umpire statistical breakdown is without a doubt the dumbest and most desperate attempt at lessening a player’s legacy I’ve ever seen.
And even that’s not a real statistical breakdown. It's the most cherry-picked, self-serving statistical breakdown that only looks at his home numbers. Where are the numbers of other prominent players from that era before and after neutral umpires? Here's a groundbreaking idea for you - maybe he started declining because he was pushing past 30? Did that cross your mind? It's amazing how you expect anyone to take you seriously after coming up with something like this.
And it seems like you actually sat down, went through the effort of researching this and coming to this hypothesis which just makes it even funnier. But sure give yourself a pat on the back for a job well done.
His batting average in Test never dipped below 50 throughout his career
