mak36
First Class Captain
- Joined
- Dec 18, 2016
- Runs
- 6,079
- Post of the Week
- 3
Because based on the recent central contracts that is what the management seems to think; Asghar has lost his D grade contract, whilst Imad and Nawaz were awarded C grade contracts (a demotion in category for Imad but a promotion for Nawaz).
This seems very harsh.
After all, it wasn’t that long ago Asghar was in the test squad and now he finds himself left out in the cold.
Asghar bowls with good drift, flights the ball well and can get the ball to dip. Most importantly he actually turns the ball. He also has some good variations including: (i) topspinner, (ii) an excellent arm ball which he can get to swing and (iii) varies his release point to offer subtle changes in trajectory.
Don’t get me wrong. Asghar is by no means the finished article. He is still very much learning the art of setting up a batsman; he needs to stop being so impatient with his variations and actually bowl his stock ball as his main delivery (whilst varying his pace) to tie down the batsman and then use his actual variations as wicket taking deliveries.
All that said, he has a higher ceiling than Imad and Nawaz, particularly when you consider the fact he is only 19.
Asghar may not have been ready to make his debut yet, but removing him from the central contracts seems harsh and sends out the wrong message. The fact another spinner wasn’t awarded a central contract in his place makes the decision all the more unusual.
Your thoughts?
Points to Note:
1) Don’t derail this thread into how there are better left arm spinners in domestic cricket (e.g. Zafar Gohar). This post is focussed on the three left-arm spinners that were centrally contracted, and whether the management were right to retain Imad and Nawaz over Asghar.
2) This post is focussed on bowling ability- don’t bring in arguments about how Imad and Nawaz add value because they are (pseudo)- all rounders. Pakistan are already playing an spin all-rounder in Shadab, and need a specialist spinner!
This seems very harsh.
After all, it wasn’t that long ago Asghar was in the test squad and now he finds himself left out in the cold.
Asghar bowls with good drift, flights the ball well and can get the ball to dip. Most importantly he actually turns the ball. He also has some good variations including: (i) topspinner, (ii) an excellent arm ball which he can get to swing and (iii) varies his release point to offer subtle changes in trajectory.
Don’t get me wrong. Asghar is by no means the finished article. He is still very much learning the art of setting up a batsman; he needs to stop being so impatient with his variations and actually bowl his stock ball as his main delivery (whilst varying his pace) to tie down the batsman and then use his actual variations as wicket taking deliveries.
All that said, he has a higher ceiling than Imad and Nawaz, particularly when you consider the fact he is only 19.
Asghar may not have been ready to make his debut yet, but removing him from the central contracts seems harsh and sends out the wrong message. The fact another spinner wasn’t awarded a central contract in his place makes the decision all the more unusual.
Your thoughts?
Points to Note:
1) Don’t derail this thread into how there are better left arm spinners in domestic cricket (e.g. Zafar Gohar). This post is focussed on the three left-arm spinners that were centrally contracted, and whether the management were right to retain Imad and Nawaz over Asghar.
2) This post is focussed on bowling ability- don’t bring in arguments about how Imad and Nawaz add value because they are (pseudo)- all rounders. Pakistan are already playing an spin all-rounder in Shadab, and need a specialist spinner!