Deewana
Local Club Regular
- Joined
- Mar 7, 2016
- Runs
- 1,355
5 ..5-fer for Amir I think. Or was it 4?
The best thing? THEY WERE TOP ORDER wickets... he took out the best bats.
Sent from my Nexus 4 using Tapatalk
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
5 ..5-fer for Amir I think. Or was it 4?
The best thing? THEY WERE TOP ORDER wickets... he took out the best bats.
5 ..
Sent from my Nexus 4 using Tapatalk
Thanks.
I hope people stop comparing Mustafiz with King Amir (the idol of Mustafiz).
Fizz is good for T20s, no doubt.
5-fer for Amir I think. Or was it 4?
The best thing? THEY WERE TOP ORDER wickets... he took out the best bats.
Not implying Mustafizur is better than aamir through all this but saying Amir is better based on some Pakistan domestic matches is not the correct way to go about it.
5-fer, 4 of them with new ball & against top order - must have bowled well. Also, I think 3 of the 4 was caught behind, which indicates he has moved it & there was quite bit of carry on this dead slow PCB style wicket.
Only question mark is the top 4, doesn't give much confidence....
yes Mustafiz who the hell is he ? he would have shown his place by pakistani batsman if he were bowling in Pakistan domestic against pakistani world beater batsman!Thanks.
I hope people stop comparing Mustafiz with King Amir (the idol of Mustafiz).
Fizz is good for T20s, no doubt.
He doesn't bowl 13 dot balls on the trot and goes for 3 runs of his 3 overs in 90% of his matches if that is what you are imploying
Ease up on what you're smoking mate. Bumrah and 'The Fizz' would have got smacked on those pan-cakes too. Amir just recently decimated a pretty good Indian top-order to pieces.Not trying to put down, just stating the truth. Amir didn't show up in World Cup, he crumbles under pressure. 8 overs for 80 runs against Aussies and Kiwis, looked tired. The way you guys hyped him as if he is the next Wasim, Imran etc. Sorry to say but Bumrah looked a lot better than your Amir. Amir is Pakistan's best but I rate him lower than Bumrah, Musta and the legend![]()
Hyped him so much here and made me watch him bowl only to get spanked. Unadkat at least would have picked up a wicket here and there against Aussies or Kiwis but Amir![]()
Ease up on what you're smoking mate. Bumrah and 'The Fizz' would have got smacked on those pan-cakes too. Amir just recently decimated a pretty good Indian top-order to pieces.
Sent from my SM-G925F using Tapatalk
Our top order is being carried by Kohli (at least in T20s) and Amir couldn't do much to him.
Does it really give people satisfaction in putting someone down just to prove a point? Mustafizur can be good without berating a good bowler in Amir. Childish.Our top order is being carried by Kohli (at least in T20s) and Amir couldn't do much to him.
So the three wickets that Amir took all have an asterisk on them, which says we don't count these?
Mustafiz at the moment is ahead of Amir in Limited Overs, but of course we will not accept it.
No, but saying that Amir "decimated the Indian top order to pieces" is too dramatic when he just got the wickets of Rohit, Rahane and Raina (who failed the entire tournament).
But...that is the top order no?
If by top order you only mean the openers, sure. I think of the top order as the first 3 or 4 batsmen. That includes Kohli. Since the rest of the top order is so feeble, it isn't fair to say Amir destroyed India's top order despite hardly troubling Kohli.
According to Wikipedia the top order means positions 3, 4 and 5. I don't think that's what he meant though.
All but Kohli fell to Amir. I'd pretty much say he demolished your top order. if positions 3, 4,5 are the top order, then what positions are the middle order?
50% of india's top order is kohli and I am sure many of the indian fans will agree with me. I would go as far as to say kohli's wicket = rohit + rahane + raina's wicket considering the form going into that match
In 2016 India made 2144 runs in T20s http://stats.espncricinfo.com/ci/en...al1=span;team=6;template=results;type=batting and Kohli made 625 http://stats.espncricinfo.com/ci/en...6;spanval1=span;template=results;type=batting
That's around 30%. So Kohli's wicket is worth around 4-5 batsmen in T20s. When he is one third of the entire batting order (let alone the top order), it doesn't make sense to say that Amir demolished the top order.
He doesn't bowl 13 dot balls on the trot and goes for 3 runs of his 3 overs in 90% of his matches if that is what you are imploying
Does it really give people satisfaction in putting someone down just to prove a point? Mustafizur can be good without berating a good bowler in Amir. Childish.
Sent from my SM-G925F using Tapatalk
Mustafiz at the moment is ahead of Amir in Limited Overs, but of course we will not accept it.
That's a silly excuse lol. Cricket is played on the field not on paper or stats or what not. Fact is, he took out the top 3/4 of your batsman. To me, that is demolishing the top order.
What do u mean played on field and not on stats. What he said are the facts. Why are you brushing off facts as silly excuse? Fact is, amir couldn't take out kohli who is half the top order and hence LOST the match. To me, that still counts as being the loser and hence he didn't demolish anything
No, but saying that Amir "decimated the Indian top order to pieces" is too dramatic when he just got the wickets of Rohit, Rahane and Raina (who failed the entire tournament).
In 2016 India made 2144 runs in T20s http://stats.espncricinfo.com/ci/en...al1=span;team=6;template=results;type=batting and Kohli made 625 http://stats.espncricinfo.com/ci/en...6;spanval1=span;template=results;type=batting
That's around 30%. So Kohli's wicket is worth around 4-5 batsmen in T20s. When he is one third of the entire batting order (let alone the top order), it doesn't make sense to say that Amir demolished the top order.
What do u mean played on field and not on stats. What he said are the facts. Why are you brushing off facts as silly excuse? Fact is, amir couldn't take out kohli who is half the top order and hence LOST the match. To me, that still counts as being the loser and hence he didn't demolish anything
All but Kohli fell to Amir. I'd pretty much say he demolished your top order. if positions 3, 4,5 are the top order, then what positions are the middle order?
Wikipedia eh??If by top order you only mean the openers, sure. I think of the top order as the first 3 or 4 batsmen. That includes Kohli. Since the rest of the top order is so feeble, it isn't fair to say Amir destroyed India's top order despite hardly troubling Kohli.
According to Wikipedia the top order means positions 3, 4 and 5. I don't think that's what he meant though.
lol what? A team consists of 11 players. Kohli is 1 of the 11 players, not half the team. Stop spouting rubbish. Just because Kohli is that good, doesn't mean Amir shouldn't get credit for taking our Rohit, Rahane and Raina which are 3/4 of your TOP order.
Neither Amir nor Fizzzzzzz have been able to get Kohli out yet till dateOur top order is being carried by Kohli (at least in T20s) and Amir couldn't do much to him.
Neither Amir nor Fizzzzzzz have been able to get Kohli out yet till date
Just shows as good a bowler you are...just one level below the champ
Sent from my GT-I9505 using Tapatalk
Not that way. In an odd game anything can happen.Acha, Sodhi got him out, so he is one level above the champ?![]()
Acha, Sodhi got him out, so he is one level above the champ?![]()
McGrath dismissed Lara also equal number of times as Sachin. Obviously he couldnt dismiss Ponting because they played in same team. So a bowler who pics 2 out of 3 best batsman in that era frequently, he has to be rated highly no? Definitely more than bowlers who mostly boosted stats by picking tailendersno that logic applies to mcgrath. See according to indians, mostly, sachin is the best batsman who ever played cricket.
So subconsciousy [MENTION=139052]Acricketfan[/MENTION] thinks that sine mcgrath dismissed sachin too many times... thus he thinks that mcgrath is the greatest bowler ever)
)
![]()
Sigh!!
Junaid > Amir + MustaNeither Amir nor Fizzzzzzz have been able to get Kohli out yet till date
Just shows as good a bowler you are...just one level below the champ
Sent from my GT-I9505 using Tapatalk
Last decade? So you mean Amir is already a better test bowler than Dale Steyn?Amir is the greatest test fast bowler in the last decade or so...his inswing is unplayable at times...alot of sour grapes out there...Starc is better than both Fizz and Amir in ODIs...Fizz is better than both in t20s...game set match
/ Thread Closed
Sent from my Nexus 4 using Tapatalk
Amir is the greatest test fast bowler in the last decade or so...his inswing is unplayable at times...alot of sour grapes out there...Starc is better than both Fizz and Amir in ODIs...Fizz is better than both in t20s...game set match
/ Thread Closed
Sent from my Nexus 4 using Tapatalk
Mustafiz at the moment is ahead of Amir in Limited Overs, but of course we will not accept it.
Junaid khanNot that way. In an odd game anything can happen.
But Amir bowled against Kohli in 3 games. 2009 CT, Asia Cup and T20 WC. Neither once he got him out.
Fizzzzz (add infinite Z's) played 5 innings against Virat including IPL but yet to get him out.
Sent from my GT-I9505 using Tapatalk
Amir is the greatest test fast bowler in the last decade or so...his inswing is unplayable at times...alot of sour grapes out there.
Junaid khan
Sent from my GT-P3100 using Tapatalk
So VK after all is a FTB..even big nas scored 100s on unplayable pitches..Doctored pitches where BK was unplayable should't count
So VK after all is a FTB..even big nas scored 100s on unplayable pitches..
Sent from my Nexus 4 using Tapatalk
Doctored pitches where BK was unplayable should't count
Strange argument by many posters here, some saying Amir and Fizz didn't take wicket of Kohli so they are not better, when mentioned that JK did thrice in a row so they say that were doctored pitches. Now if some one say that Nasir hit tons on those DOCTORED pitches which means Kohli is an FTB,
What will be next??
What type of reason it is that those were doctored pitches so that should not be counted???? Then i guess all centuries of great players on flat wicket should not be counted?? All wickets on turning tracks should not be counted??
Poor Fizzz and Amir, i think they need to take 10-fer in order to post a concrete reason.
You were saying to other member that how people can write such stuff with straight face.
I guess sir, you should also think about it that how some can write such hilarious reasons or excuses with straight face
As per OP, no doubt atm Fizz is best LOI bowler in Asia, i hope this kid will improve more and more. Would love to see how he will perform in Test matches especially in away conditions, i am sure he will perform better and better.
anything that makes their team/players look bad doesn't count...that is the Indian way of doing analysis
I second this.
Dear Moderators/Administrators,
[MENTION=138254]Syed1[/MENTION] [MENTION=9]Saj[/MENTION] [MENTION=93712]MenInG[/MENTION] [MENTION=138379]#GreenRoars[/MENTION] [MENTION=139847]Ankit007[/MENTION] [MENTION=117]Shayan[/MENTION] [MENTION=139288]Abdul[/MENTION] [MENTION=132270]SL_Fan[/MENTION] @Everyone_else
Please, I plea, why let hatred breed? This is the one of the main reasons the negativity has gone up exponentially recently.
Could you please close this thread. It has served it purpose. 12 page is enough. Both sides have made their argument clear. On top of it posted childish posts that you have to edit/delete etc.
There are threads for Mustafiz and threads for Amir. Please let the members use those thread to glorify their beloved players.
-An older Member of Pakpassion.
This is a blockbuster thread, 12 pages, 60 more posts needed to 1000 and you want it closed?
Why you want this thread to be closed? This comparison is probably the most fair compared to all the ridiculous comparisons we had before. Also no one is spreading hatred here. But in a forum there will be difference of opinion ofcourse. Both Amir and Fizz are contempory great bowlers. Absolutely top class bowlers with similar skills. And its only fair if we have a thread to compare their performances. If we threads like Kohli vs Root vs Smith etc. why we cant have this??
Sent from my GT-I9505 using Tapatalk
Why you want this thread to be closed? This comparison is probably the most fair compared to all the ridiculous comparisons we had before. Also no one is spreading hatred here. But in a forum there will be difference of opinion ofcourse. Both Amir and Fizz are contempory great bowlers. Absolutely top class bowlers with similar skills. And its only fair if we have a thread to compare their performances. If we threads like Kohli vs Root vs Smith etc. why we cant have this??
Sent from my GT-I9505 using Tapatalk
Why you want this thread to be closed? This comparison is probably the most fair compared to all the ridiculous comparisons we had before. Also no one is spreading hatred here. But in a forum there will be difference of opinion ofcourse. Both Amir and Fizz are contempory great bowlers. Absolutely top class bowlers with similar skills. And its only fair if we have a thread to compare their performances. If we threads like Kohli vs Root vs Smith etc. why we cant have this??
Sent from my GT-I9505 using Tapatalk
Dont think so. Amir is pure quality and its a no brainer. I mean that spell of his against India in Asia cup is something any fast bowler can deam off. Fizz proved he is no one season wonder either.This comparison will soon turn into umar akmal vs kohli comparisononly thing to be seen is that who will be akmal and who will be kohli
![]()
Dont think so. Amir is pure quality and its a no brainer. I mean that spell of his against India in Asia cup is something any fast bowler can deam off. Fizz proved he is no one season wonder either.
Dont think either of them degrading to the level of U.Akmal.
Sent from my GT-I9505 using Tapatalk
I will stop watching cricket if it happens![]()
move aside fizz and amir, dinda is here![]()
Well you obviously get bit of a bias considering it a Pak forum. But atleast here you would get as much neutral views as possible. There was a thread in Bangla forum about who is better spinner between Ashwin and Shakib. Shakib won the poll by 100%No disrespect to you, thread starter. I don't see any end to this discussion.
So after 12 page of discussion what is the conclusion you got?
++
This is what I got: (some if not majority)
Bangla fans are delusional. Fizz is a Mendis 2.0; a wrist spinner at best. (These type of comments breeds hatred.)
++
On the other hand, some are in total denial that there can be someone comparable to Amir in this subcontinent who doesn't wear a Pakistani jersey.
++
Instead of Fiz you should have opened it with Bumrah. he is equally talented and extremely difficult to play. All the unwarranted criticism just for being a Bangladeshi fan, I wouldn't have to see then.
Rehman clueless yet again when his team needed him the most. If you guys haven't noticed, mustafiz have only got a bunch of wickets in slow, bowler friendly tracks where even the likes of kumar and grant elliott looked unplayable. He is of course good the first time he faces a batsman, like with india. But his novelty factor is coming off and its starting to show already. He looked like another IPL trundler today. He will end up being similar to ajantha mendis, but will still play international cricket because lack of talent in bd. I think Taskin will be a better bowler than rehman by miles. Heck even that other bd pacer at least has good, consistent pace.
But...but...he was injured. ..What about when Amir was smashed for 40+ runs?
What about when Amir was smashed for 40+ runs?