Bhaijaan
Hall of Famer
- Joined
- Jan 10, 2011
- Runs
- 67,115
- Post of the Week
- 1
Hit 152 kph twice in two overs yesterday. Six times above 150 kph. And rest were all above 145 kph , was outpacing steyn consistently
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
MQ bhai if it was faulty it wouldn't have shown him bowling that quick regularly and would also have shown steyn goni and christian bowl as fast. The rest were around 140 kph but ishant was consistently hitting 150 kph. It was a pleasant sight indeed. So two fastest bowler in sub continent are indian now. Ishant and Varun . Sami has lost bit of pace. Gul is at 3rd now with Mallinga
MQ bhai if it was faulty it wouldn't have shown him bowling that quick regularly and would also have shown steyn goni and christian bowl as fast. The rest were around 140 kph but ishant was consistently hitting 150 kph. It was a pleasant sight indeed. So two fastest bowler in sub continent are indian now. Ishant and Varun . Sami has lost bit of pace. Gul is at 3rd now with Mallinga
MQ bhai if it was faulty it wouldn't have shown him bowling that quick regularly and would also have shown steyn goni and christian bowl as fast. The rest were around 140 kph but ishant was consistently hitting 150 kph. It was a pleasant sight indeed. So two fastest bowler in sub continent are indian now. Ishant and Varun . Sami has lost bit of pace. Gul is at 3rd now with Mallinga
MQ bhai if it was faulty it wouldn't have shown him bowling that quick regularly and would also have shown steyn goni and christian bowl as fast. The rest were around 140 kph but ishant was consistently hitting 150 kph. It was a pleasant sight indeed. So two fastest bowler in sub continent are indian now. Ishant and Varun . Sami has lost bit of pace. Gul is at 3rd now with Mallinga
gul clocked 154 in world cup
He is talking about Under-23 fast bowlers![]()
Ishant Sharma: I want to Bowl 100MPH
Doubt it, Gul was bowling 146-148 over 10 over spells in the world cup game after game.
You can't give the title to Ishant after 2 t20s
Chooti chooti ankhain aur baray baray sapnay![]()
haha you referring to that Abdur Qadir comment on ahmed shehzad right??![]()
No Am referring to freelance_cricketer comment on Ishant Sharma's bowling speed of 150KPH)
![]()
Most of my dreams are coming true, so you better care about your dreams buddy
LOL lagi. Pehlay nahi kerta na aisay babu
PEACE now![]()
![]()
You're smoking something man![]()
looking forward to see Ishant bowl tomorrow, he was faster than Dale Steyn and bowled with a lot of venom, i think he came across this thread and saw all the negative comments and is pumped up
I can judge speed by watching the TV, and no way is he even over 130kph man!
the TV lies, don't believe it.![]()
Which means Dale Steyn was only bowling 110 kph??
Get real
Which means Dale Steyn was only bowling 110 kph??
Get real
Yaar you don't get it. The speed guns were fixed![]()
How can one gain 20kph of pace within a few months?
You need to get real. Wait till he plays international cricket, then his real spead will be revealed. I know this is unprecendented stuff that an Indian is bowling 150kph, but don't read into it much.![]()
only while Ishant was bowling? Why not with Goni? And why haven't we done this before with Zaheer, Agarkar, Nehra, Irfan? Surely our IT guys in Bangalore knew all the stuff back then too
I tuned into the IPL for 5 minutes the other day and its true - the speed guns showed Ishant bowling in the high 140s with the a few in the 150s. I find it really hard to believe though not because he's an Indian and bowling fast isn't something that India has ever achieved, but more than that I can't see how anyone can gain 20khms over night. Its a massive speed jump. It would be like Younus Khan suddenly batting in the style of Sehwag - its just not realistic. I think we'll have to wait and see in the next few games whether the speed gun records the same sort of speeds for him.
What do you mean overnight?
He has been out of action for a few months . Seems to have sorted out his problem. And now after we have won the world cup all these guys wanna get into the squad, so i see extra hard work being done by all these guys
dont be so naive. that guy is trying to say Ishant has taken something like steriods to bowl fast. According to many pakistani fans, indian bowlers cannot bowl over 150K without taking steriods, India cannot beat Pakistan in the world cup semi finals without ICC(BCCI) fixing the game, India always beat SL in bilateral series as BCCI has bought SL cricket board,etc.,
I can judge speed by watching the TV, and no way is he even over 130kph man!
the TV lies, don't believe it.![]()
Yeah so it must be true Akhtar didnt hit that 161 km ball against ENG during the 2003 WC. If you watch the replay Hick seemed to have decent time to flick it off to the leg side, sure the ball may have been in the early 150s but doesnt look like a 161 km ball to me (WATCHING IT ON TV OFCOURSE).
<iframe title="YouTube video player" width="480" height="390" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/gn9kXg7Po4s" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
akhtar has broken the 160 barrier many times before 2003
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gKWM84pADPE
this is the link for shaun taits fastest ball it didant look that fast either
Sapney dekhna achi baat hai![]()
akhtar has broken the 160 barrier many times before 2003
I am not talking bout before, I am talking about seeing it on TV, although TATE's one I saw live at the MCG; if you look at both these games through a screen the videos above clearly shows to me Akhtar's fastest ball looks a lot slower than Tate's fastest ball...
Get a bowler who can bowl above 140kph and then come back.![]()
Get a bowler who can bowl above 140kph and then come back.![]()
Get a batsman who can get 50s on regular basis . Our pacers are coming through nicely, Zaheer outperformed all your fast bowlers in WC and continues to do so. Don't worry about that. World's best cricket team is doing fine
can we stop bumping this stupid thread? Get over it already. Ishant Sharma will never clock 100MPH and if he ever did then you can come boot this thread back up. Do pakistani fans seriously care about this guy with long madonna hair? Come on.
Get a batsman who can get 50s on regular basis . Our pacers are coming through nicely, Zaheer outperformed all your fast bowlers in WC and continues to do so. Don't worry about that. World's best cricket team is doing fine
Umar Gul > Zaheer Khan. He may have outperformed him, but Gul bowled much better (and faster), was iffy in the semi-final. Zaheer Khan took some lucky wickets at the end of the innings where tail-enders came into hit and slog.
![]()
under pressure Gul choked. lol.
most of the Zaheer wickets are either top order or middle order wickets, check zaheers world cup wickets.
Umar Gul > Zaheer Khan. He may have outperformed him, but Gul bowled much better (and faster), was iffy in the semi-final. Zaheer Khan took some lucky wickets at the end of the innings where tail-enders came into hit and slog.
![]()
Zaheer outperformed him in the ENTIRE TOURNAMENT !
There is no doubt that Zaheer has played a pivotal role in getting India the World Cup. He was the seamer of the tournament..with 21 wickets. He was remarkable with the old ball. In the QF against Australia, he came back and smashed Mr. Cricket's stumps. We all know Hussey can be very very destructive with an awesome average. Zaheer also came back and bowled Devon Smith who was playing on 81 at that time. Overall, Zaheer may not be as fast as some other pacers but guess what..he played a massive role in getting India the World Cup. All these talks about Zaheer being mentally weak are ludicrous...A mentally weak bowler is one who is destroyed in his second over of an innings when he is being touted as the strike bowler of the tournament.
Shoaib Akhtar or Umar Gul ?
And yea Zaheer was brilliant, Zaheer Khan was our entire bowling line-up in the WC
Zaheer Khan is hyped up as a bowling 'god', but he is simply a medium pacer who gets low order wickets 'most of the times'. & India have to rely on Zaheer, there only 'real' bowler.![]()
Zaheer Khan is hyped up as a bowling 'god', but he is simply a medium pacer who gets low order wickets 'most of the times'. & India have to rely on Zaheer, there only 'real' bowler.![]()
Zaheer Khan is hyped up as a bowling 'god', but he is simply a medium pacer who gets low order wickets 'most of the times'. & India have to rely on Zaheer, there only 'real' bowler.![]()
Zaheer Khan is hyped up as a bowling 'god', but he is simply a medium pacer who gets low order wickets 'most of the times'. & India have to rely on Zaheer, there only 'real' bowler.![]()
Highest wicket taker in the WC and a member of the WC winning team.....
Evn his test stats are better than that hyped up Gul who lost it when he came up againist Sehwag.
Zaheer is not hailed as any God, where did you get the impression from?
So Munaf, Nehra, Harbhajan and the rest are just our halucinations and don't exist in real?
And about real bowlers-in 96, 03 and 11 wc matches we tore apart Waqar, Shoaib, Gul. As real as it gets.
Are you forgetting our record against you in ODI matches and Test matches?
would you like them? maybe a wake up call for you.![]()
Are you forgetting our record against you in ODI matches and Test matches?
would you like them? maybe a wake up call for you.![]()
Highest wicket taker in the WC and a member of the WC winning team.....
Evn his test stats are better than that hyped up Gul who lost it when he came up againist Sehwag.
He wasn't the highest wicket taker in the World Cup, it was officially Afridi since he had a better average (and Played less mathces) .
And its official.
And being a member of the winning team doesn't make a player a better bowler. Even Zahid Fazal has won a world cup, but doesn't make him a better batsmen.