mominsaigol
Senior T20I Player
- Joined
- Apr 14, 2021
- Runs
- 20,104
- Post of the Week
- 2
This might seem like a weird comparison thread, as one is a bowler and the other is a batsmen however I find them both to be very similar.
Both India and Australia are very strong units however it's very evident that without Bumrah, The Indian bowling lineup is atleast 50 to 60% weaker as a whole.
In 2024 wc, India was heavily dependant on bumrah's magic to get them out of rut and eventually win the cup as a whole. Infact India typically loses big events if Bumrah has an off day with the ball.
Similarly Travis Head seems to be Bumrah's equivalent for Australia. Without Travis Head, Australia's batting line up is atleast 50% weaker then it should be. While Australia can hold its own in tests. In odi and t20 Travis is a must.
Irrespective of opinions on team strength, one thing is clear both Travis and bumrah are their teams respective all format X factors.
So the main question is: Who is more impactful and who would you prefer to have in your unit?
Both India and Australia are very strong units however it's very evident that without Bumrah, The Indian bowling lineup is atleast 50 to 60% weaker as a whole.
In 2024 wc, India was heavily dependant on bumrah's magic to get them out of rut and eventually win the cup as a whole. Infact India typically loses big events if Bumrah has an off day with the ball.
Similarly Travis Head seems to be Bumrah's equivalent for Australia. Without Travis Head, Australia's batting line up is atleast 50% weaker then it should be. While Australia can hold its own in tests. In odi and t20 Travis is a must.
Irrespective of opinions on team strength, one thing is clear both Travis and bumrah are their teams respective all format X factors.
So the main question is: Who is more impactful and who would you prefer to have in your unit?