- Joined
- Oct 2, 2004
- Runs
- 218,146
Johnny Depp is not a "wife beater" and allegations of violence made by his ex-wife Amber Heard are "complete lies", the High Court has been told by his lawyers on the first day of a libel trial.
The Hollywood star is suing The Sun's publisher, News Group Newspapers (NGN), and its executive editor, Dan Wootton, over an article published in April 2018 which referred to "overwhelming evidence" that he attacked Heard during their relationship - claims which he has strenuously denied.
Both he and Heard are at London's High Court today, having arrived separately wearing scarves as face masks.
Depp's legal team has said it is "not a case about money" but about "vindication", with the star wanting to "clear his reputation" following the claims.
They have also argued that Heard, 34, has "invented these stories of serious violence" and that she was the "abuser" in the relationship.
However, lawyers for News Group Newspapers have told the court that The Sun's description of Depp was "entirely accurate and truthful".
Appearing as the first witness, Depp was asked about the allegations of abuse, and also about his drug-taking and relationships with famous figures such as writer Hunter S Thompson, musicians Keith Richards and Marilyn Manson, and fellow actor Paul Bettany.
to a "full-scale attack" on Depp as a "wife beater" with "defamatory allegations of the utmost seriousness".
Mr Sherborne said: "The author deploys a panoply of cultural and topical references - namely the #MeToo movement, the Time's Up movement and the disgraced film mogul and serial abuser of women Harvey Weinstein - in order to convey the seriousness of what the claimant is alleged to have done.
Johnny Depp and Amber Heard arrive at the "3 Days To Kill" at ArcLight Cinemas on February 12, 2014 in Hollywood, California.
"They are allegations which the claimant absolutely denies, and which, at the time of publication, he had already publicly denied."
Mr Sherborne continued: "The claimant's position is clear - Ms Heard's allegations are complete lies.
"The claimant was not violent towards Ms Heard, it was she who was violent to him."
The main allegations of domestic violence the case is centred on were summarised by Mr Sherborne.
"He (Depp) is not and never has been a wife beater," he said.
"Indeed, he says that it was Ms Heard who was the one who started physical fights, who punched or hit him (and there was little he could really do to stop this); she was the abuser, not him."
The barrister said that evidence will be presented to the court which supports this claim.
Speaking about The Sun's article, written by Mr Wootton, he said it "repeated Ms Heard's allegations, referring to what he described as 'overwhelming evidence' in her favour, in an obvious attempt to confirm categorically in the readers' minds, several million readers' minds, that these appalling and serious allegations of criminality were true".
Later in the trial, the court is expected to hear evidence by video-link from actresses Vanessa Paradis and Winona Ryder, former partners of Depp who both say he was never violent towards them, as well as Ms Heard's friends, who claim they witnessed abuse by the star.
Mr Sherborne said the "starkly contrasting nature of the evidence" given by Depp and Heard is "one of the defining features of this case" and that there is "no real room for a middle ground here".
He continued: "One side is plainly lying, and to an extraordinary extent.
"Either Ms Heard's allegations are true, in all their various forms now, and therefore Mr Depp has chosen to launch and pursue a lengthy libel claim despite knowing that the article which forms the subject matter of the claim is completely true.
"Or, as we say, Ms Heard has concocted them, embellishing and adding to them over the years... which means that Mr Depp is right in seeking vindication before this court from a hugely influential newspaper that sought to act as judge (and jury) by endorsing and convicting him in relation to Ms Heard's allegations, not to mention demanding an end to his career as the punishment he supposedly deserved.
"You might be forgiven for wondering why would Mr Depp put himself through all of this process otherwise, ie if he were in fact guilty.
"That is the determination for this court. Mr Depp is either guilty of being a wife beater for having assaulted his ex-wife on numerous occasions, causing the most appalling injuries, or he has been very seriously and wrongly accused."
https://news.sky.com/story/johnny-d...ard-allegations-are-lies-court-hears-12023046
The Hollywood star is suing The Sun's publisher, News Group Newspapers (NGN), and its executive editor, Dan Wootton, over an article published in April 2018 which referred to "overwhelming evidence" that he attacked Heard during their relationship - claims which he has strenuously denied.
Both he and Heard are at London's High Court today, having arrived separately wearing scarves as face masks.
Depp's legal team has said it is "not a case about money" but about "vindication", with the star wanting to "clear his reputation" following the claims.
They have also argued that Heard, 34, has "invented these stories of serious violence" and that she was the "abuser" in the relationship.
However, lawyers for News Group Newspapers have told the court that The Sun's description of Depp was "entirely accurate and truthful".
Appearing as the first witness, Depp was asked about the allegations of abuse, and also about his drug-taking and relationships with famous figures such as writer Hunter S Thompson, musicians Keith Richards and Marilyn Manson, and fellow actor Paul Bettany.
to a "full-scale attack" on Depp as a "wife beater" with "defamatory allegations of the utmost seriousness".
Mr Sherborne said: "The author deploys a panoply of cultural and topical references - namely the #MeToo movement, the Time's Up movement and the disgraced film mogul and serial abuser of women Harvey Weinstein - in order to convey the seriousness of what the claimant is alleged to have done.
Johnny Depp and Amber Heard arrive at the "3 Days To Kill" at ArcLight Cinemas on February 12, 2014 in Hollywood, California.
"They are allegations which the claimant absolutely denies, and which, at the time of publication, he had already publicly denied."
Mr Sherborne continued: "The claimant's position is clear - Ms Heard's allegations are complete lies.
"The claimant was not violent towards Ms Heard, it was she who was violent to him."
The main allegations of domestic violence the case is centred on were summarised by Mr Sherborne.
"He (Depp) is not and never has been a wife beater," he said.
"Indeed, he says that it was Ms Heard who was the one who started physical fights, who punched or hit him (and there was little he could really do to stop this); she was the abuser, not him."
The barrister said that evidence will be presented to the court which supports this claim.
Speaking about The Sun's article, written by Mr Wootton, he said it "repeated Ms Heard's allegations, referring to what he described as 'overwhelming evidence' in her favour, in an obvious attempt to confirm categorically in the readers' minds, several million readers' minds, that these appalling and serious allegations of criminality were true".
Later in the trial, the court is expected to hear evidence by video-link from actresses Vanessa Paradis and Winona Ryder, former partners of Depp who both say he was never violent towards them, as well as Ms Heard's friends, who claim they witnessed abuse by the star.
Mr Sherborne said the "starkly contrasting nature of the evidence" given by Depp and Heard is "one of the defining features of this case" and that there is "no real room for a middle ground here".
He continued: "One side is plainly lying, and to an extraordinary extent.
"Either Ms Heard's allegations are true, in all their various forms now, and therefore Mr Depp has chosen to launch and pursue a lengthy libel claim despite knowing that the article which forms the subject matter of the claim is completely true.
"Or, as we say, Ms Heard has concocted them, embellishing and adding to them over the years... which means that Mr Depp is right in seeking vindication before this court from a hugely influential newspaper that sought to act as judge (and jury) by endorsing and convicting him in relation to Ms Heard's allegations, not to mention demanding an end to his career as the punishment he supposedly deserved.
"You might be forgiven for wondering why would Mr Depp put himself through all of this process otherwise, ie if he were in fact guilty.
"That is the determination for this court. Mr Depp is either guilty of being a wife beater for having assaulted his ex-wife on numerous occasions, causing the most appalling injuries, or he has been very seriously and wrongly accused."
https://news.sky.com/story/johnny-d...ard-allegations-are-lies-court-hears-12023046
Last edited by a moderator:

) it’s like is this guy serious or trolling lol