What's new

Lack of succession planning in Pakistan cricket over the years

Abdullah719

T20I Captain
Joined
Apr 16, 2013
Runs
44,825
It always seems that Pakistan is stuck in a situation of desperation where lack of future-planning leads us to a desperate situation. In terms of transition, there wasn't really much of a succession plan during the Misbah era - Younis was always going to retire sometime soon and Azhar, someone who never had much leadership experience was usually the vice-captain. That wasn't a very good choice, obviously and it took quite a few failures for us to eventually move on.

I hope that in a few years' time when Sarfaraz nears the end of his career, we have done some future planning and don't end up getting stuck in a similar situation. If Mickey sticks around, he will play a crucial role in this regard. It's all about instilling professionalism within the Pakistan cricket setup.
 
The problem is they rely too much on players being spotted out of the blue instead of grooming talent to play and do well in Test cricket.

Also, there is a tendency to not give up and coming players much of a chance in Test cicket until there is no alternative.
 
The problem is they rely too much on players being spotted out of the blue instead of grooming talent to play and do well in Test cricket.

Also, there is a tendency to not give up and coming players much of a chance in Test cicket until there is no alternative.

+1
Pakistan fortunately find players with natural talent every now and then, We may become best in the world if we work on youngsters and produce better players.
 
The problem is they rely too much on players being spotted out of the blue instead of grooming talent to play and do well in Test cricket.

Also, there is a tendency to not give up and coming players much of a chance in Test cicket until there is no alternative.

Yes, this has been hampered by the cult of seniority which I'm glad to see MA addressing.
 
I have seen a lot of criticism on our test team recently but almost no one points out that a big part of our poor performance is no planning and no one blames likes of Misbah, Younis, seniors and the coaches for that. Why did the seniors play for too long in every freaking series while youngsters like Usman Salahuddin kept sitting out?
 
Why plan for succession when you are doing well? Only teams such as Australia or South Africa do that.
 
It's never been our strength. Look at the early 2000s when it took a string of awful results culminating in the 2003 WC debacle to finally cast aside several veterans who were past their peak and bring in younger faces.
 
We never plan well for the future. It's really frustrating. Misbah and Younis went on too long. We have played tests against Bangladesh and Zimbabwe yet we still play our full strength team.
 
I think, succession plan comes from leadership in Cricket. In other team games like soccer or Basketball, it's the Manager/Head Coach who is the boss and he plans his squad, strategy, succession plan. Cricket is a bit different, because here the man run the show is Captain.

Also, in Soccer, these days financials play a big role in succession plan - most Managers have a budget and they don't want to run in a situation where more & more players are touching 30, approaching last years of contract and consuming high wage with low to nil salvage value (transfer fee). In soccer, average squad age of a club owned by a sugar dad is often higher than a squad of managers like Klopp or Wenger or Pochhetino. Similarly, despite most players retiring from National duty by early 30s, International teams have a higher average age in WC/EURO (& Qualifiers) than top clubs in same league year, because National Managers don't bother for succession plan for a tournament - they use friendlies for that and pick most experienced and inform 23 to tournaments.

Over the last 15-20 years, PAK had been led mostly by compromised choices - either Captains who don't merit in XI or Captains who are not natural communicators/leaders and almost every Captain was insecure. In such cases, Captains tend to protect their arm-band by surrounding trusted people, and safe people (less ambitious). Also, most of the Captains appointed were not good man managers, rather they opted players, whom they can manage easily - aka group mate.

Besides, PCB didn't help Captains by appointing them series by series, instead of long term (like next WC or next AUS tour ...) - this makes Captains insecure and safe player; often they would opt for known faces, players on reputation and most importantly, they tried to keep influential players comfortable, never challenged status co.

All these results into a generation gap, always - a bunch of players keep scratching each others back and they remain united, which will always result into increase of average age for the squad (because the core bunch is kept regardless of performance for years).

Operating with younger players needs lots of patience, guidance & mentoring; which none of two long term Captains (IuH & MuH) were comfortable, rather they were happy to have an experienced squad, where it's easier to delegate. And, one needs BIG heart to drop own cousin & mentor for a kid, because that cousin didn't merit place any more.
 
I think sometimes our senior players are a bit selfish and just will not let go meaning that the younger guys don't get their chances until there is no other option.
 
I think sometimes our senior players are a bit selfish and just will not let go meaning that the younger guys don't get their chances until there is no other option.

I think this isn't true at least of the last decade. We've tried out so many younger players (or who were young when they were given chances), Umar akmal, Jamshed, Shehzad, Sharjeel, Shahzaib, Maqsood, Masood, Khurram, Umar Amin, Asad and many more. We've had to given the fixing scandals. For some reason however they just haven't had long term success after initial short term success. People at the time could hardly name any other names they wanted in, we tried so many. Some were simply injured e.g. Haris. And some of course fixing destroyed them.

Things are different now as we've got in younger talent which is finding more long term success e.g. Babar, Hasan, Shadab, Fakhar. These guys are very young/started cricket late and weren't around a few years ago so couldn't be picked.

There were a few places that were taken up unfairly by seniors but not many. Kamran was the main offender, Sarfraz should have got his spot years ago, wicketkeepers take time to adjust to international cricket. And a 20 odd average in ODIs, 30 test average with bad keeping is not hard to beat. And even then most at the time thought Kamran was the best option. Fawad was kept out due to issues with his technique/ YK playing in ODIs over him. Those are the only examples. You could also argue Afridi kept out a better spinner I guess, but if he was kicked out Pakistan would be in uproar, and although I don't rate Afridi, he isn't a terrible player by any means he's just average.
 
Is there lack of planning in Pakistan cricket?

Friends after every World Cup, all teams of world start building team for next World Cup, and are giving proper chances to youngsters......and a year before World Cup we come to know that what their squad will be......
But what Pakistan is doing...
Hafeez in or out (not decided from 2015 to 2019)
Sarfaraz whether he will be captain or not (not decided upto today)
Bating position of legendary Sarfaraz (not confirmed yet)
Our bowling line by which we have won lot of matches (not settled in 4 years) and it will not be a surprise that we will select those whom selectors dropped for various reasons.

From 2015 -2019 we could not develop a proper spin bowler (people rate shadab but for me he is not international standard he could not even get into Zimbabwe or Bangla team.
From 2011 i guess Pakistan could not produce a proper wicket keeper batsmen.
 
Back
Top