What's new

Laxman Sivaramakrishnan retires from BCCI commentary after 23-year career, claims 'colour discrimination' against him

Major

Test Star
Joined
Aug 28, 2013
Runs
39,856
Post of the Week
7
Laxman Sivaramakrishnan has announced that he is retiring from commentary for the BCCI, which prompted a response from R Ashwin.


Sivaramakrishnan, who played nine Tests and 16 ODIs for India between 1983 and 1987, took to commentary in the 2000s but has now announced retirement from BCCI commentary while making a series of cryptic posts on X.

“I am retiring from commentary for BCCI,” he posted first.



When asked by fans about the reason behind his decision, Sivaramakrishnan replied with “I don’t suck up,” before claiming that he wasn’t given chances to call games of late because of “colour discrimination.”


He also pointed out that, despite being among the most experienced names in the commentary world, having been in the profession for 23 years, he wasn’t appointed for toss or presentation duties, while newcomers were preferred: “If I have not been used for TOSSES and PRESENTATION for 23 years and newcomers come in [and] do pitch report, tosses, presentation even when Shastri was coaching, what do you think could be the reason?”

R Ashwin was the first prominent cricketing name to respond to Sivaramakrishnan’s post, writing: “Oh no! Why not this IPL?” The former spin bowlers from Tamil Nadu also share a bit of history, having been involved in a social media war of words.


Notably, Sivaramakrishnan last commentated in IPL 2024, and wasn’t part of the panel for the 2025 season. He had posted on March 17 about expecting a contract for the upcoming season, writing on X: “The Director of BCCI Broadcast, I believe has called my only friend Bharat Arun if I was doing fine. Arun has said that I am perfectly Fine. So I am expecting an email for the IPL.”

Soon you will see the bigger picture: Laxman Sivaramakrishnan
The former spinner hinted that fans were not aware of the complete picture, and there was more to the story than meets the eye, concluding that “soon you will see the bigger picture”.

“This retirement is only the beginning of a story when told, general public, cricket fans and everyone will be utterly shocked,” he wrote before deleting the post. “I am very happy that people who hate me are delighted. But those who thought I was at least decent, thanks. BCCI will be left with disbelief.”


Sivaramakrishnan burst onto the scene in the early 1980s and was India’s youngest Test cricketer at the age of 17 years 118 days when at the time of his debut, against the West Indies at St John’s in May 1983. However, after a famous 12-wicket haul against England at Bombay and a magnificent outing at the 1984/85 World Championship of Cricket, his career went downhill, and he made 24 more international appearances for India.

Image courtesy: Star Sports

Follow Wisden for all cricket updates, including live scores, match stats, quizzes and more. Stay up to date with the latest cricket news, player updates, team standings, match highlights, video analysis and live match odds.



Source: https://www.wisden.com/cricket-news...reer-claims-colour-discrimination-against-him
 
When commentators like Manjreker, Dinesh Karthik and Bhogle can be given the spotlight then why not him?
Indians are insecure of their image. They dont want to be represented by him as it will play into the stereotype.

Like often said, indians will always try to appease
 
So discrimination is ok?
Why do you believe he’s been discriminated against? I can definitely speak for myself and I feel he wasn’t much good and it was boring to listen to him and hardly any insights came from him. You may or may not agree with opinions of cricketers but their presence and analysis must be captivating, his wasn’t. A mediocre commentator can’t be given the spotlight when better options are available.
 
Why do you believe he’s been discriminated against? I can definitely speak for myself and I feel he wasn’t much good and it was boring to listen to him and hardly any insights came from him. You may or may not agree with opinions of cricketers but their presence and analysis must be captivating, his wasn’t. A mediocre commentator can’t be given the spotlight when better options are available.
There is a pattern here

He was a highly rated leg spinner but fsded away quickly due to his lack of discipline & work ethic. Then he put the blame on selectors & captains

Now he failed as a commentator. Just says silly stuff like good ball , good shot , no insights. But thinks he is as good as Ravi Shastri & is being discriminated bcoz of hos skin color
 
He should be thankful that he got more apportunity that he deserve.. he is one of the worst commenters I have seen . Now playing the victim Card. . shameless.

:klopp :kp
 
So discrimination is ok?
It's not, but him claiming discrimination doesn't make it reality. Like many posters mentioned above, the guy never really sat well with coworkers and was quite substandard at his job from my own observation.
 
Why do you believe he’s been discriminated against? I can definitely speak for myself and I feel he wasn’t much good and it was boring to listen to him and hardly any insights came from him. You may or may not agree with opinions of cricketers but their presence and analysis must be captivating, his wasn’t. A mediocre commentator can’t be given the spotlight when better options are available.
He himself said it.
 
He was a pretty dull commentator. Another one that comes to mind from the 2000s and is nowhere to be seen is Arun Lal.

India have still to find their gold standard commentator.
 
Not surprised at all. Indians are racist to their own kinds. Most racist country on earth is India. Racism is normal there, even bollywood films they promote racism. Funny thing is they mostly look like him too, but due to the bollywood fairytales they started thinking they are goray rang westerners. 😂
 
There is a pattern here

He was a highly rated leg spinner but fsded away quickly due to his lack of discipline & work ethic. Then he put the blame on selectors & captains

Now he failed as a commentator. Just says silly stuff like good ball , good shot , no insights. But thinks he is as good as Ravi Shastri & is being discriminated bcoz of hos skin color
How was he as a hindi commentator, because i know the rest were rubbish.
 
Not surprised at all. Indians are racist to their own kinds. Most racist country on earth is India. Racism is normal there, even bollywood films they promote racism. Funny thing is they mostly look like him too, but due to the bollywood fairytales they started thinking they are goray rang westerners. 😂
I know why you’d feel personally attacked here. Bangladeshis are unfortunately often made fun of for their looks.

 
Laxman Sivaramkrishnan was a N Srinivasan stooge. He is a director in Srinivasan's company

Only reason he had a commentary gig was bcoz of Srinivasan's blessings. Now Srini is out of BCCI - so nobody can help his case
 
On the topic, one of the worst Indian commentators alongside Manjarekar.
Naah Manjrekar was actually a lot more classy. Only issue with Manjrekar he was too negative & disrespectful & frequently riled up players like that Jadeja " bits & pieces " jibe. He was trying to become the Indian Nasser Hussain without having Nasser's erudition & gravitas. Ended up looking very bitter & salty
 
Strange as most Indians look like him .

He was a good commie , far better than Harsha Bogle and gavasker .
Waise his reasoning is not out of the ordinary tbh.

Quite a few Indians in this forum make blatantly racist comments toward Bangladeshis based on color. Entire threads of insanely discriminatory comments before mods have to clean house.

Before the whataboutism reply pour in, yes I know it happens in other countries in asia as well, but thread is about India so obviously that’s what I’m gonna talk about
 
He just said the quite part out loud. Good on him for bringing this issue forward.

South Indians should really have gone for their own country.
 
Laxman Sivaramkrishnan was a N Srinivasan stooge. He is a director in Srinivasan's company

Only reason he had a commentary gig was bcoz of Srinivasan's blessings. Now Srini is out of BCCI - so nobody can help his case
Yeah. It's one of the reasons why his commentary career dissipated, I feel.

Not to say that colourism and casual racism isn't rampant in India. It obviously is.
 
See India just like Pakistan & rest of subcontinent has a fair skin fetish & disdain for dark skinned people

But that does not affect ur career. Lot of dark skinned cricketers have excelled for India like Sanju Samson , Javagal Srinath , Hardik Pandya , Jasprit Bumrah

Silly for Siva to think he is being " discriminated " bcoz of his skin color & not his horrendous commentary
 
Think of it - Hardik Pandya & Jasprit Bumrah are amongst the highest paid sportsmen in India. U see their faces in tv ads & billboards. How come their dark skin did not hamper their career & sponsorships ?
 
Waise his reasoning is not out of the ordinary tbh.

Quite a few Indians in this forum make blatantly racist comments toward Bangladeshis based on color. Entire threads of insanely discriminatory comments before mods have to clean house.

Before the whataboutism reply pour in, yes I know it happens in other countries in asia as well, but thread is about India so obviously that’s what I’m gonna talk about
BD is North East part of India. We are diverse, but not nearly as diverse as INDIA though.
 
Isko 23 years baad yaad aaya hai? Why didn't he take a stand before?
It's a new phenomenon. Cricket is not sports now it's sports entertainment and BCCI are attempting to push forward a highly sterilised sanitised image of the game. It's a form of escapism now for frustrated masses, the same way they used to fawn over light skinned actresses the marketers want them to fawn over light skinned cricket. A dark lad like this commentator doesn't fit the image.
 
To be fair, yes personal looks and colors can be held against you, so you also need to over compensate it with personality to be a presenter and someone who is there at the toss.

Shastri was a rubbish cricketer, but the guy has a personality, and has changed the way toss are done. He has adopted the way boxing matches are introduced. Where an introduction is called out. During India vs Pakistan, even if i dont care about the game, the way Shastri opens it, hypes me up.

So if Laxman's competitor was Shastri, than sorry you lose out. Shastri is a great presenter


But Indian commentators are all the same. A problem with Indian commentators and Indians with general is that they try to show off their English speaking skills by using high vocabulary words, buzz words, or cliches alot.
 
To be fair, yes personal looks and colors can be held against you, so you also need to over compensate it with personality to be a presenter and someone who is there at the toss.

Shastri was a rubbish cricketer, but the guy has a personality, and has changed the way toss are done. He has adopted the way boxing matches are introduced. Where an introduction is called out. During India vs Pakistan, even if i dont care about the game, the way Shastri opens it, hypes me up.

So if Laxman's competitor was Shastri, than sorry you lose out. Shastri is a great presenter


But Indian commentators are all the same. A problem with Indian commentators and Indians with general is that they try to show off their English speaking skills by using high vocabulary words, buzz words, or cliches alot.
Ravi Shastri stats are similar to Afridi, but Ravi has 11 centuries in test matches and a double century in Australia.
 
To be fair, yes personal looks and colors can be held against you, so you also need to over compensate it with personality to be a presenter and someone who is there at the toss.

Shastri was a rubbish cricketer, but the guy has a personality, and has changed the way toss are done. He has adopted the way boxing matches are introduced. Where an introduction is called out. During India vs Pakistan, even if i dont care about the game, the way Shastri opens it, hypes me up.

So if Laxman's competitor was Shastri, than sorry you lose out. Shastri is a great presenter


But Indian commentators are all the same. A problem with Indian commentators and Indians with general is that they try to show off their English speaking skills by using high vocabulary words, buzz words, or cliches alot.
Shastri & Gavaskar made a conscious effort to become proper commentstors in the mould of John Arlott , Tony Greig & Richie Benaud

After them came the length & line , good shot , good bowling , good fielding - kind of commentators. These guys made zero effort to improve thenselves. Sivaramkrishnan belongs to that category. They have limited vocab , zero insights , no homework , no story telling skills
 
Afridi smashing Indian trundlers into oblivion with SRT, Dravid and Ganguly sweating bullets in outfield with his commentary in the background… whattay iconic period in cricket yaar 👌🏼 😌 ☺️
 
Shastri & Gavaskar made a conscious effort to become proper commentstors in the mould of John Arlott , Tony Greig & Richie Benaud

After them came the length & line , good shot , good bowling , good fielding - kind of commentators. These guys made zero effort to improve thenselves. Sivaramkrishnan belongs to that category. They have limited vocab , zero insights , no homework , no story telling skills
Gavaskar is rubbish aswell. He is a typical indian who tries to use buzz words and high vocabulary.

Vocab doenst matter, its the insights that one gives.

Holding doesnt use that much high vocabulary. He gives soo much detailed insights, he beautifies bowling.
 
Gavaskar is rubbish aswell. He is a typical indian who tries to use buzz words and high vocabulary.

Vocab doenst matter, its the insights that one gives.

Holding doesnt use that much high vocabulary. He gives soo much detailed insights, he beautifies bowling.
Before Gava became a social justice Karen I actually enjoyed his commentary because he doesn’t have a thick accent and you can genuinely see the enjoyment in his voice from good cricket.

I remember in that 2014 Asia cup when Pakistan started smacking Ashwin out of nowhere he was actually more optimistic and enthusiastic of Pakistan winning in the comm box than even Ramiz and was highlighting Pakistan doing well than Ramiz kind of putting it on fortune.

But then again we all enjoy different aspects of commentary. For me someone easy to listen to and simply not reading off random stats is good, insights is a bonus.
 
I was a big fan of his commentary but this doesn't surprise from the land that is obsessed about promoting this image of "fair and lovely". This is why when it comes to coconut conversion, Indians come out on top because they are insecure about their appearance.
 
It's not, but him claiming discrimination doesn't make it reality. Like many posters mentioned above, the guy never really sat well with coworkers and was quite substandard at his job from my own observation.
have you or the above indian posters have any proof of your claim, in bold?
 
He was a pretty dull commentator. Another one that comes to mind from the 2000s and is nowhere to be seen is Arun Lal.

India have still to find their gold standard commentator.

I liked Arun Lal.
 
How was he good? Like what exactly do you like about his commentary?

Did his job , comments were describing the delivery , batsmen reaction and informing the audience of the state of play .

Every other Indian commie has a frog in their throat if India is struggling or act if they are commenting on wwe.

Asians in general are horrible to listen to but this chap was decent . Unlucky for him he couldn’t help how he was born . India ruins everything related to cricket inc their own .. or not
 
To be fair, yes personal looks and colors can be held against you, so you also need to over compensate it with personality to be a presenter and someone who is there at the toss.

Shastri was a rubbish cricketer, but the guy has a personality, and has changed the way toss are done. He has adopted the way boxing matches are introduced. Where an introduction is called out. During India vs Pakistan, even if i dont care about the game, the way Shastri opens it, hypes me up.

So if Laxman's competitor was Shastri, than sorry you lose out. Shastri is a great presenter


But Indian commentators are all the same. A problem with Indian commentators and Indians with general is that they try to show off their English speaking skills by using high vocabulary words, buzz words, or cliches alot.
Most of ex & current Indian players have studied in convent schools which results in superior English speaking skills just like Ramiz Raja from your country.
 
Shiva was a good commentator for some time, after that he started getting boring on the mic. His association with Srini mama didn't help either.
 
I liked Arun Lal.

Why ? I mean I guess he was okay. I remember listening to him during one of Sehwag's triple tons and he was good in that.

I like commentators with a bouyant personality, can tell entertaining anecdotes, make quirky observations, banter with their fellow commentators and have just the right kind of emotion and intensity when describing the play. Sadly, few indian commentators check these boxes for me.
 
But Indian commentators are all the same. A problem with Indian commentators and Indians with general is that they try to show off their English speaking skills by using high vocabulary words, buzz words, or cliches alot.

Maybe you just have poor language skills. What you consider high vocabulary english might just be normal words to most of us lol. But agree about the cliches bit..
 
Why ? I mean I guess he was okay. I remember listening to him during one of Sehwag's triple tons and he was good in that.

He's earnest and never came across as haughty or a know-it-all like how Shastri became as the years went on.
 
Send him a PSL contract then, I think the guy totally sucked.
  • Just because he spoke about the very possible colour insecurities prevalent in Indian society
  • and frankly the entire subcontinent.
  • This is the problem with current India, no stomach to admit our issues. Sab changa si....
  • Not saying Laxman would be definitely be discriminated against,
  • he might just be putting his lack of career growth to his own insecurity, basically projecting.
  • But that projection itself exposes our issues with color of our skin.
  • High time we accept who we are and be proud of our skin color.
 
If he is facing colour discrimination from even you dark skinned Indians he is unlikely to be PSL material.

What even is "You dark skinned Indians"? Why do Pakistanis often talk about this topic as if they're Greco-Roman descendants? It just sounds so corny lol.

I've seen enough street vlogs from Karachi and Lahore...you guys just look like an average Indian from the non-Southern states..which is 80% of the Indian population. Sorry to break your bubble.
 
Maybe you just have poor language skills. What you consider high vocabulary english might just be normal words to most of us lol. But agree about the cliches bit..
Point is, indians try to show off by using high covabulary while speaking with an accent.

Someone in North America wont use high vocab and just wants to listen to simple english.

Someone like bhogle made his commentator career based on high vocab, because he had no cricket career
 
Back
Top