UzmanBeast
First Class Star
- Joined
- Nov 13, 2020
- Runs
- 3,533
- Post of the Week
- 6
It's been a while since I've been on PP. As the title suggests, there is little evidence that I have seen with the performances in the world-cup so far that suggest the team is ready to play on Australian surfaces.
That is the biggest factor that goes against Pakistan in the remainder of the tournament; we can, and we will be bounced out unless our batsmen can devise a strategy to cope with short-ball barrages.
On subcontinental wickets, you can get away with a poor technique against short-pitched bowling because of the wickets not producing enough uneven bounce for a batter to have to adjust in the final moments before the execution of a shot. In Australia, it is totally different; the pull shot is only played well by those players who latch onto the length quickly. If your eyes are slow, you are going to get caught in a state of sluggishness (as seen with Arshdeep to Asif).
Short-pitched bowling on these surfaces is a danger that the Pakistani batsmen are not equipped to dealing with. Neither of the prolific run-scorers of our team are capable, nor confident, in their ability to face short-pitched bowling. It was a similar time during Pakistan's tour of South Africa where these vulnerabilities showed up; Nortje to Babar is one such dismissal that stands out, and also how the South African quicks bounced out the debutant Danish Aziz.
That being said, this vulnerability was always masked under. To play against short-pitched bowling on massive square boundaries, you need to find ways to negotiate the ball square of the wicket. But even with that in mind, you need the hand-eye coordination to be able to puncture gaps and power the ball over longer distances.
From the current lot, none of the players are strong square on the off-side against proper short-pitched deliveries, so that scoring zone is completely eliminated apart from the occasional short and wide delivery.
Flat-batting the ball down the ground is possible but it is very risky, and as a result, this too disappears as a way of scoring runs on short-pitched deliveries.
Zimbabwe's bowling was brilliant with their variation in the short-pitched bowling too; and under those circumstances (though we hardly play this shot), the ramp shot's utility completely fades away.
The boundaries are far too large for the square cut over third man, unless the bowler is bowling at an absolutely high pace.
What's left now is the leg-side, and this is the only position where Pakistan seems to have at least some relative experience of playing the ball; the occasional slog, or a decent pull shot which finds just a single.
The lack of comfort with short-pitched deliveries is a recipe for disaster in Australia, because neither do we possess the skillset to combat high pace and hostile short-deliveries, oppositions can hold us on a consistent line (like they did with Mohammad Wasim Jr, which I have to say was horrific to watch, those plays and misses cost the match), and these oppositions will easily be able to increase the run-rate pressure and force the team to crumble apart.
I was quite surprised to see that the Pakistan batsmen did not take a few steps forward against the slower Zimbabwe bowlers, which would enable them to access more boundary areas and shot options if they were uncomfortable with the short-delivery.
In Australia, players strong on the back-foot are required, and I can safely say that we do not possess a single player who is confident enough against short-pitched bowling to produce the results we need. That being said, short-pitched bowling itself, in these conditions, is only amplified by pacy wickets that provide more bounce and greater seam movement. Our players do not possess a hook shot, and that further limits us in respect of what we can do.
I am great supporter of the Babar-Rizwan opening combination, but I seriously believe that only one of them can open the innings from this point out. Neither of them have shown the comfort required on these wickets to open the innings, and I believe it is a much better alternative to let Shan open the innings and move the ball around than have Babar and Rizwan play near maiden overs right up front. Fakhar has to make a comeback in the side ahead of Haider Ali as well.
I certainly hope that Pakistan gets their head out of the clouds and faces the reality; in order to cope with their short-ball ineptitude, they must be extremely prolific in acquiring runs from spinners, fuller-length deliveries, and other types of bowling plans.
Having a consistent RH-LH batsman combination will lead to mistakes being made (as it typically occurs) amongst bowling sides where a bowler is unable to adjust from the different styles, and it can be capitalized on.
I find it no surprise that Pakistan have done well in the two stages of this tournament when a LH and RH batsmen were at the wicket.
That being said, I wish the team luck for the remainder of the tournament, but certainly, I can say that we do not deserve qualification solely because our lack of planning in these conditions has made the journey to qualification extremely difficult.
That is the biggest factor that goes against Pakistan in the remainder of the tournament; we can, and we will be bounced out unless our batsmen can devise a strategy to cope with short-ball barrages.
On subcontinental wickets, you can get away with a poor technique against short-pitched bowling because of the wickets not producing enough uneven bounce for a batter to have to adjust in the final moments before the execution of a shot. In Australia, it is totally different; the pull shot is only played well by those players who latch onto the length quickly. If your eyes are slow, you are going to get caught in a state of sluggishness (as seen with Arshdeep to Asif).
Short-pitched bowling on these surfaces is a danger that the Pakistani batsmen are not equipped to dealing with. Neither of the prolific run-scorers of our team are capable, nor confident, in their ability to face short-pitched bowling. It was a similar time during Pakistan's tour of South Africa where these vulnerabilities showed up; Nortje to Babar is one such dismissal that stands out, and also how the South African quicks bounced out the debutant Danish Aziz.
That being said, this vulnerability was always masked under. To play against short-pitched bowling on massive square boundaries, you need to find ways to negotiate the ball square of the wicket. But even with that in mind, you need the hand-eye coordination to be able to puncture gaps and power the ball over longer distances.
From the current lot, none of the players are strong square on the off-side against proper short-pitched deliveries, so that scoring zone is completely eliminated apart from the occasional short and wide delivery.
Flat-batting the ball down the ground is possible but it is very risky, and as a result, this too disappears as a way of scoring runs on short-pitched deliveries.
Zimbabwe's bowling was brilliant with their variation in the short-pitched bowling too; and under those circumstances (though we hardly play this shot), the ramp shot's utility completely fades away.
The boundaries are far too large for the square cut over third man, unless the bowler is bowling at an absolutely high pace.
What's left now is the leg-side, and this is the only position where Pakistan seems to have at least some relative experience of playing the ball; the occasional slog, or a decent pull shot which finds just a single.
The lack of comfort with short-pitched deliveries is a recipe for disaster in Australia, because neither do we possess the skillset to combat high pace and hostile short-deliveries, oppositions can hold us on a consistent line (like they did with Mohammad Wasim Jr, which I have to say was horrific to watch, those plays and misses cost the match), and these oppositions will easily be able to increase the run-rate pressure and force the team to crumble apart.
I was quite surprised to see that the Pakistan batsmen did not take a few steps forward against the slower Zimbabwe bowlers, which would enable them to access more boundary areas and shot options if they were uncomfortable with the short-delivery.
In Australia, players strong on the back-foot are required, and I can safely say that we do not possess a single player who is confident enough against short-pitched bowling to produce the results we need. That being said, short-pitched bowling itself, in these conditions, is only amplified by pacy wickets that provide more bounce and greater seam movement. Our players do not possess a hook shot, and that further limits us in respect of what we can do.
I am great supporter of the Babar-Rizwan opening combination, but I seriously believe that only one of them can open the innings from this point out. Neither of them have shown the comfort required on these wickets to open the innings, and I believe it is a much better alternative to let Shan open the innings and move the ball around than have Babar and Rizwan play near maiden overs right up front. Fakhar has to make a comeback in the side ahead of Haider Ali as well.
I certainly hope that Pakistan gets their head out of the clouds and faces the reality; in order to cope with their short-ball ineptitude, they must be extremely prolific in acquiring runs from spinners, fuller-length deliveries, and other types of bowling plans.
Having a consistent RH-LH batsman combination will lead to mistakes being made (as it typically occurs) amongst bowling sides where a bowler is unable to adjust from the different styles, and it can be capitalized on.
I find it no surprise that Pakistan have done well in the two stages of this tournament when a LH and RH batsmen were at the wicket.
That being said, I wish the team luck for the remainder of the tournament, but certainly, I can say that we do not deserve qualification solely because our lack of planning in these conditions has made the journey to qualification extremely difficult.