What's new

Member Interview : sensible-indian-fan

GLORY OF '92

Test Debutant
Joined
Dec 10, 2007
Runs
13,622
PakPassion.net : Winning a Test series in Australia or winning the World Cup - what would you prefer and why?

SIF : Obviously winning the World Cup holds MORE value in my eyes. In the subcontinent, a World Cup win is remembered for decades. It gives us countless fond memories to recollect. It inspires future generations to take up the sport.

The World Cup is a matter of HUGE HUGE HUGE pride.

A test series win is awesome but I don’t think it has the aura of a World Cup win (atleast in the subcontinent).

With that being said, I must also mention that we humans crave for stuff that we don’t have.

For example, before the Semi Final match against Australia in this World Cup, I found myself having a strange feeling. A few other posts by other Indians confirmed that my feelings weren’t unique.

All of us Indian fans knew that the Aussies were super strong and firm favourites and the odds of us winning were kinda low. But UNLIKE the past, we weren’t too worried about it.

We were ready to accept the result of the game whatever it may be.

Let me tell you…that feeling was WEIRD (considering it was the freaking World Cup) but it was there. For quite a few of us. While the excitement of the game was there, the agony and tension of a loss wasn’t present (I am talking about our feelings before the match).

And you know why that’s the case?

That’s because we won the previous World Cup and also the Champions Trophy (I don’t mean to sound arrogant in any way).

This doesn’t mean we were happy to lose…its just that we were thrilled to see our team punch above our weight in Australia and when the super tough do or die game came…we weren’t all that emotionally vulnerable (even though we really really wanted our team to win).

When the match day came and we got thrashed by the Aussies, we got over it quite fast.

Maybe if we were favourites then we might have felt really bad (like in World Cup T20 2014 finals).

Now contrast this to how we felt when we reached the 2003 World Cup final.

Even there, we punched above our weight (we entered the WC in the worst form possible), lost against the Aussies at first and then won against every side to enter the finals.

And in that final, we were crushed by Haydos, Gilly and Ponting (the scar marks of his assault still remain). Then Glenn McGrath’s wicket of Tendulkar in the first over felt like someone pulled our hearts out.

It STILL pains to this day.

We felt that way because it was a long long time since we won the World Cup.

I guess that’s just human nature.

When you have a World Cup (in recent times), its possible that you may crave more for a test series win in Aus/SA.

But on a general level, assuming you haven’t won anywhere, you would consider a World Cup win to be more special.
I know that’s not the case for Australian and English fans but for SC fans…a World Cup is just OUT OF THE WORLD special achievement.

Nothing can even come close to it for us.


PakPassion.net : Do you think Virat Kohli is a suitable captain?

SIF : To be honest, I really really don’t know.

I support Kohli in tests because he replaced Dhoni (who started off great in Tests but over the years became super stale). I feel any option is better than Dhoni in tests (as of now) but from a general perspective, Kohli’s tactics aren’t all that amazing though its very heartwarming to see him infuse the feeling of never say die attitude in tests. The way he attempted to chase down the Adelaide target in so few overs and ALMOST succeeded in breaking a 100 year old record took my breath away.

Its stuff like this that inspires your team to achieve great things.

Kohli may not be the best player of swing (as of now) or the most sound player for all conditions (as of now) but there is one thing about Kohli that I absolutely admire:

The willingness to take on the impossible and try to achieve something that is virtually impossible.

The Hobart knock and Adelaide knock are special in that regard.

Its not just about winning or losing those games. As a team mate when you see a guy take on the opposition against all odds, you do start thinking….”maybe all this is possible, maybe its just my limiting thoughts that’s preventing me from achieving incredible stuff”.

The reason why I feel Kohli’s performance is inspirational is because there is a METHOD to his madness. When you see guys like Viv, Lara, SRT play certain knocks, you feel like “Oh God…only they can do those stuff”.

They are amazing to watch no doubt but you don’t feel like you can do it.

But Kohli is different.

When he plays in full flow, you feel like:

“Bloody son of a gun. That’s a solid strategy. Why didn’t I ever think of it?”

Now I am not saying you would feel like you can play exactly like him but you would feel like you could achieve a LOT MORE if you think like him and you know what….

This kind of inspiration is POWERFUL. It can’t be delivered via flowery speeches or by understanding a person’s mentality.
It can only be delivered by DEMONSTRATION as it hits a person hard, shakes him up and makes him evaluate his belief system.

These things can be very inspirational for the team and I think Kohli is the kind of guy who will lead the team via these demonstrative performances.

While all that is good, captaincy is a lot more than that.

Man management skills and tactics are aspects that are important too which is where Kohli lacks.

So let’s see how he goes.

If he doesn’t improve in those areas, he would be stripped of captaincy cos to be successful, you need to either be a tactical expert (like Clarke) or have great man management skills (like Ponting, Fleming, Strauss).

As of now, I am a bit disappointed with Kohli’s attitude and I hope he works on it.

Only time can tell.

I think purely from a tactics point of view, Raina could be a brilliant captain in LOIs (not that I am suggesting him for captaincy now).

To be honest, its kinda hard to imagine an Indian ODI team without Dhoni leading us but I guess every good thing comes to an end one day.


PakPassion.net : Who is your favourite Pakistani player and why?

SIF : Its hands down Wasim Akram.

He was the most complete pace bowler (heck…bowler) in the history of the game.

He could swing the new ball, reverse swing the old ball, had pace, could bowl lethal yorkers, well directed bouncers, etc. He was equally proficient at everything.

I didn’t watch Akram’s full career live (watched him from late 90s) but whenever I get a glimpse of some of his exploits, let’s just say it gives me a heart attack. That over to Michael Slater, that over to Dravid and a lot of other videos ….its just…..poetry in motion.

For Tests + ODI combo – I think Wasim Akram was the best ever pacer (this is my view based on a combination of stats, peer opinions and expert opinions).

He was the most iconic pacer of them all.


PakPassion.net : What do you think has been the effect of IPL on Indian cricket? Has it been an overall positive effect? What are the negatives in your book?

SIF : Yes, I do think IPL overall has had a positive effect on Indian cricket. Its effects have been discussed many times in this forum.

1) Youngsters get to play in high pressure situations in front of packed crowds

2) Indian players get to train with world class players from all countries (the experience, the little tips they receive would be invaluable)

3) More financial security

4)Hitting skills of batsmen do improve (which is a major requirement in modern day LOI)

As for the negatives,

1) Lack of county cricket which happens at the same time as IPL

While we do say this, we have to remember that counties these days are allowed to play only 2 overseas players or so (I think). Plus there is some criteria for selection too like you need to have played a few test matches or certain ODIs (I think).

So even if IPL isn’t there, I don’t think everyone would qualify to play county cricket.

I personally think the onus should be on the specific players to skip IPL and go to county cricket to improve their game. Yes, yes I understand that no one wants to forego easy money but when it comes to taking a small pain (like a season or two) to improve your international career, that’s an acceptable trade off.

We do trade offs all the time in life (when we study in a university, when we go for a job, when we start a business, etc). So a trade off here is no big deal. No pain, no gain.

I do understand that its NOT easy when you watch your peers make 10X the income but all it takes is a season or two which could drastically improve your game. Zaheer Khan came back as a transformed bowler post his county stint and helped us get to No 1 in test ranking and played a pivotal role in helping us win the WC.

Now with that being said, I do think BCCI should offer more money to test specialists so that they could choose this option.

Apart from negatives, there are a couple of perceived negatives of IPL (basically stuff that IPL gets accused of which are entirely untrue)

IPL is killing the techniques of batsmen (I too was guilty of thinking this)

Not at all true. IPL performance is not enough to get selected in the national team. You need domestic performance too. So if you are rubbish in List A, then your IPL bashing is isn’t going to land you a place in the ODI squad.

Similarly to get into the Test squad, you need to have First Class domestic performances.

Every domestic player knows that where has to perform to stand a chance for national election.

That is why guys like Uthappa go to Amre to work on their technique instead of practicing slogging the ball in IPL to impress the selectors.

Simply put, IPL gives you recognition. But First Class/List A/A tours seal the deal for you.

IPL is creating darters in domestic cricket (another aspect I too was guilty of thinking)

A spinner who doesn’t perform in First class has no chance to make it to the test squad in IPL. Karn Sharma was an exception probably due to desperation to have a leggie to play in Aus (and we all know how that turned out).

To perform in tests, a spinner has to work on his flight, loop, dip and turn.

The fact that our spinners are becoming more darters is not due to the IPL but because we are dishing out pacer friendly green tracks which makes our trundlers look like McGrath. While this whole setup helps our batsmen become better against pace bowlers, it harms our bowlers as our pacers get easy wickets and our spinners are rarely used (and even if they are used…its for containing option where darting comes into play).

What we need is bouncy tracks with minimal movement which rewards those bowlers who have good skills and punishes those who have bad skills.

So coming back to the point….

IPL overall has had a positive effect but personally I would prefer if teams are allowed to have more foreign players which would result in more quality bowlers in the playing XI which in turn would massively increase the quality of cricket being played.


PakPassion.net : Who would you rate the 3 best upcoming Indian cricketers. Should all be U-23 age right now?

SIF : Here’s my list based on whatever little I have seen and stats

Sandeep Sharma – Hands down the BIGGEST talent in India right now (even better than any of the batsmen we have now). That’s how good he is. Averages 22 in First class, 21 in List A and 18 in Twenty20. Performed well in last IPL and is doing great in this IPL too (outbowling Mitchell Johnson in most games).

He can bowl at a good pace and swing the ball both ways. The best part about him is that he has BRAINS and works hard on his game. Last IPL, his speeds were 120s and now its mid 130s with no reduction in swing.

I am very excited about this guy because he seems to be doing well in every format and at every level. He doesn’t seem troubled when bowling to international batsmen.

That booming inswing at 130s is his hallmark. This guy is going to surprise quite a few international batsmen when he makes his debut (which should be pretty soon).

Sanju Samson

He has woeful List A stats and hasn’t been firing this IPL but still I would rate him as a big prospect. He averages 45 odd in First class which shows that he has the quality in batting and his IPL exploits in the past show his potential. He also performed in Australia recently during the A tour (ODI series) which again shows his quality.

The best part about Samson is that he can smash the ball with complete ease. A straight forward swing of the bat and the ball would be gone. The way he can lift proper good length deliveries off international bowlers and hit them for 6 over their heads is simply shocking. You just have to watch his innings to know what kind of a talent he is.

With that being said, I think he is a few years away from an international call up. Needs to work on his game and temperament too (in the past I have noticed that if he is in the mood to smash the bowling and you keep him tied down, he would sky one – maybe he has worked on that but if he hasn’t, he must make efforts to do so). Definitely one for the future.

Lokesh Rahul (Tests)

Personally speaking, I didn’t find Lokesh Rahul to be really that impressive (as of now) but a guy who can score 100s on green Ranji tracks and has the temperament to score a 100 on the Australian soil (albeit a flatter one) has some potential. Add to the fact, Dale Steyn himself vouched for this guy WAY before he was even selected for the national team…I think we need to back him.

Special Mention to Shreyas Iyer. Seems to have great stats in First class and List A. I watched him in the first few IPL games and wasn’t impressed (he didn’t score much) but later in the tournament, he seems to have found his zone (has been scoring quite consistently but unfortunately I missed watching him bat).


PakPassion.net : What do you do outside the forum for a living?

SIF : I run an online business and I work from home (as of now). Have huge huge plans for the future. Want to expand big.


PakPassion.net : How did you come to know of PP? And what makes you keep coming back and how is it different than other forums you've visited?

SIF : Well…here’s the full story.

Several years back when I used to search about cricket related terms on Google, I would notice Pakpassion popping up a lot of times in the search results. I used to think that since it was a PakPassion…it would also contain heavy duty India bashing which is why I didn’t any of the posts at that time.

You see, a few times BEFORE I first stumbled upon PakPassion, I had somehow found my way into some Pakistan Defense Forum (dunno which one). Eeks. 10 minutes there and I never visited that place again. Naturally, my first impression of PakPassion was influenced by that site.

Then one day during Champions Trophy 2013, I searched about something on Google and landed on this site (again). This time I thought I would read some posts to see what’s what.

10 minutes later…

I am browsing through threads after threads after threads.
Shocked.

Oh God…..how wrong was I. This site was amazing. A goldmine of cricketing information. Sue there were weirdo posts but overall I found most of the posts balanced and insightful and I thought “wow this is so much better than the nonsense I have to put up with Cricinfo” (that time Cricinfo was my only other source).

Since then I have been a lurker who then slowly turned into an occasional poster who then slowly turned into a regular poster who then slowly turned into a PakPassion addict.

Amazing site without a doubt. Very well moderated. Very fair (you can be critical of anyone as long as it remains civil).
We have posters from different nationalities here (though I would love to see more Aussie, Saffer, SL, NZ and WI posters).

Personally I love forums because:

The discussions are much more in depth and analytical. You can express yourself freely without everything getting censored.
You get to make quite a few online friends - I have made a ton of friends (Indian, Pakistani, people from other nationalities) on this forum and elsewhere.

As for cricket forums, I am part of a couple of them and here’s my view:

I think good posters are the life and soul of any forum. Whenever I visit any forum, I do it purely to listen to the views of the balanced posters (I ignore the rest). Any poster who has balanced views is a good poster in my view. I may or may not agree with their views but I sure as hell want to listen to them because its insightful.

As for comparison of forums, I haven’t visited all the cricket forums out there to pass a judgement but among the ones I have been to, I would rate PakPassion as the best one out there.

Considering the fact that I spend majority of my posting time here, you could call this my home.


PakPassion.net : Where do you see the Indian team over the next 5 years?

SIF : While we fans (which includes me) will always criticize and get annoyed due to various issues in our team…overall, I think we have a very good future.

We definitely have a few issues to address (like captaincy, WK batsman post Dhoni retirement) but in general things are shaping up quite nicely.

Talent is coming through, we back our players and give them fair chances and hopefully more A tours will be conducted which will help us identify those players who are likely to make the international cut.

If we take a look at our team in different formats:

Tests:

We have a solid core consisting of Vijay, Kohli, Rahane and Pujara who will be 4 names in our Top 7. I have included Pujara inspite of his horrendous performance because that guy even in his worst phase can play out 50-100 deliveries in overseas Tests. I think he will improve. If he fades away, we may have to go and search for someone else.

Now we have to find out our other opener (Lokesh Rahul looks decent but let’s see), a WK bat and a No 6 batsman (and no I don’t trust Rohit Sharma).

Bowling is an issue for us (as always) but for the first time in Indian history, I am seeing some hope in this front. We have a few bowlers with good potential. We should back them as they seem to have the talent but just need to become more consistent.

At home or in SC conditions, we are pretty much solid. No issues.

Outside the SC, I think we should go with 5 bowlers every game. 3 pacers and 2 spinners as we shouldn’t forego our strength (I say 5 bowlers because we don’t have batsmen who can roll their arms over so 4 bowlers are risky on today’s flat tracks as they may tire and let the opposition pile up runs). In tests, we will always be a batting oriented side. We just need to put together a decent bowling lineup to compete.

ODIs: We always good well in SC, England and WI…while being abysmal in SA, Aus and NZ bilaterals. We seem to do well in tournaments conducted everywhere (as of now).
Things may remain status quo in this regard.
T20I: It’s a lottery. No one really knows how anyone would do in this format.


PakPassion.net : What triggered your interest in cricket and what other sports do you like?

SIF : Just like almost every other kid in India, I got interested in cricket because my Dad follows it and he taught it to me. My friends love cricket too so you kinda start get into the zone fast.

Apart from cricket, I am not into any other sports in a major way. Follow Tennis once in a while. Football is strictly limited to playing video games (haha).


PakPassion.net : Do you think India can ever regain the no.1 status in test Cricket? If so how?

SIF : In today’s times, no one apart from SA deserve the No 1 spot as everyone is good at home and horrendous away. So the rankings are all about who tours where.

India if it ever has to regain the No 1 spot has to follow its tried and tested formula.

Rock solid batting combined with great bowling in subcontinent (basically spin) and decent bowling outside SC (basically one that can punch above its weight in a select few test matches).

This is how we were No 1 for two and half years around the 2008-2011 mark.

Around that period, we won most of the series at home (or drew them) and as far as away series were concerned…we won against England, NZ; lost to Aus (2008) and SL (2008) and drew with SA (which was almost a win but thanks to our bowlers who chose the most inopportune session to screw up).

India now may not have the same batting quality as Fab 4 but considering it already has a decent Test core….we can build upon it and make a solid team.

If we are going to do it, this has to be our formula. But it all depends on how our pacers and batsmen develop.

Let’s see.


PakPassion.net : Do you think majority of Indian fans prefers ODIs and T20s over Tests, if so then why?

SIF : Majority of subcontinental fans (let alone Indians) prefer LOIs (ODI and T20) over Tests.

Reasons are:

We (as in the masses and not forum posters) do not recognize or enjoy the subtleties of Test cricket. No this is not an attack on ODI and T20 lovers but just stating a fact about the masses. The past generation may have enjoy the subtleties of test cricket but very few in the present generation do it.

Time factor. With schools, colleges and jobs – we really don’t have the time to watch Test cricket the whole day. Now checking score via Cricinfo means nothing as you do not contribute to a cricket board’s revenue in any way. The only way you do it is by ACTUALLY watching the live match which very few of us do (for understandable reasons). I still don’t understand how many in England, Australia tune in to watch a whole day’s match live. In comparison, LOIs are generally played during the evening/night when its more easier for people to attend match/tune in on TV.

We find LOI more interesting. Plain and simple.

To be frank, I really don’t see a future for Test cricket in the next few decades even though I personally enjoy it.


PakPassion.net : Do you think India can ever get another player like Dravid playing test cricket?

SIF : When we could produce patient test batsmen like Murali Vijay and Pujara then its possible that we could produce a Dravid in the future. If we could have a Dravid, that would just be awesome.


PakPassion.net : Do you think standard of Asian cricket is falling behind the other teams?

SIF : Not really.

While its true that Asian teams never had good domestic structures compared to non Asian teams, things are now improving. The domestic structures of India, SL and Bangladesh are getting better. If anything the gap is getting reduced and not widening (though I agree there is a lot of ground to be covered).

Instead of looking at everything from a vague perspective, let’s look at compare every team in each format:

Tests: SA is still far ahead of any team. England may be next best when it comes to all round game (though I really doubt whether they would do well in Asia with the current team they have). Australia can’t play in Asia and Asian teams can’t play outside Asia. NZ are on a steep upward curve these days. WI are a joke wherever they play.

So in tests, we can conclude that non Asian teams as a block are much better than India, SL, Pakistan and Bangladesh as of now.

But its all marginal. Apart from SA, no one really stands out.

ODIs – Taking the win loss ration for this decade (from 2010) - Australia, India, SA and SL have been the top 4 teams followed by England, NZ, Pakistan and WI.

Its all mixed up. Even stevens.

T20s have so low sample set that no data can be taken out of it.

So as you can see…things are all over the place.

Nothing to suggest Asians are falling behind the Non Asians. If Pakistan continue to decline and SL don’t recover after Sanga, Dilshan and Mahela retire, then yeah we can say Asian teams are declining.

At the end of the day, its all about talent.

NZ a few years back were nothing. Now they look like world beaters. Even Aus in the CT 2013 looked like a joke team. Now they look almost invincible.

Bangladesh is growing these days. Who knows…SL may find a few youngsters and become a good team post Sanga, Mahela. And Pakistan may find a way to arrest its slide and start its recovery.
We can’t simply look at the players in a team right now and start making assumptions on how things would pan out. We need solid data to pass judgements.


PakPassion.net : Your favourite foods and favourite movies/TV programmes?

SIF : Favourite Food – North Indian food (hate South Indian food barring a few dishes – hate rice in general but I have to eat it almost everyday)

Favourite Movies (not in order atleast from No 5):

Dr Strangelove (Stanley Kubrick)
Pulp Fiction (Quentin Tarantino)
39 Steps (Hitchcock – one of his masterpiece masala movies)
Vertigo (Hitchcock)
No Country For Old Men (Coen Brothers)
12 Angry Men (Sidney Lumet)
Lagaan (Ashutosh Gowariker – masala but super fun)
No Smoking (Anurag Kashyap)
Kill Bill 1 (Tarantino)
The Killing (Kubrick)

And lots and lots of others.

Favourite TV Shows (I stopped myself from watching many of them because once I get hooked, I tend to drop everything and keep watching the episodes):

My favourite would be Friends followed by Dexter (horrible last few seasons though). Big Bang Theory was great first but I find it a torture to watch these days. How I met Your Mother was fine (meh towards the end).

Have a few other shows queued up to watch (will probably watch it later on).
 
Last edited:
Great interview of the most popular Indian on this forum (after me, of course).

Great questions and answers.
 
Good guy sif! And a good poster.

The Mamoon of Indians, most probably. :P
 
Great interview by a real nice guy. One of the most popular and intelligent posters on here.
 
Sif it comes across as you are one of those guys say if you want to know about something or get into something you get real absorbed in it and research it really well and have to know everything about it . Like there are no half measures with you.
 
Awesome interview. Each answers are like whole new post itself. 😉

You still didn't answer my question, if you are sensible indian fan, what are we?

(Don't answer all of you are worms, because that's me only.) :)))
 
One of the few sane Indian PPers that doesn't troll. Great guy, love reading his posts.

Top interview, SIF. :)
 
What brilliant answers! Well done SIF.

I only dissent on two things.

Firstly, in my world any country's away Test series win in Australia outranks the World Cup.

Secondly, not only South Africa but now New Zealand are good away performers in Tests.

I don't always agree, but I always enjoy SIF's posts. And I've learned not to tease him like certain other Indians who are always fun to wind up. He's just too mature!
 
Very nice interview from a well-respected poster. You're one of the posters whose posts I enjoy reading. :)
 
Have to say SIF's posts are usually eye-catching and its no different for this interview.
Too few questions in this interview for my liking for a great poster. I am left with 'asking for more'. :P

Keep it up dude. Have to be an ATG of PP!
 
Thanks a ton for all the great comments guys.

Good interview. Disappointed it got over soon!

Have to say SIF's posts are usually eye-catching and its no different for this interview.
Too few questions in this interview for my liking for a great poster. I am left with 'asking for more'. :P

Keep it up dude. Have to be an ATG of PP!

Awesome interview. Each answers are like whole new post itself. ��

You still didn't answer my question, if you are sensible indian fan, what are we?

(Don't answer all of you are worms, because that's me only.) :)))

These were the questions I was sent so I could reply to them only. ;-)

If you guys have any questions, you can ask here and I will answer them.

As for cricketworm's questions, my answer has always been the same.

My reputation has got quite a bit to do with my username where I proclaim myself to be sensible (haha :facepalm:). There are many other awesome Indian posters who don't get noticed as much just because they have normal usernames.

Brilliant Interview, if you don't mind me asking, what is your online business? :inti

As of now, I am into selling info products and masterminds (in the marketing niche).

What brilliant answers! Well done SIF.

I only dissent on two things.

Firstly, in my world any country's away Test series win in Australia outranks the World Cup.

Secondly, not only South Africa but now New Zealand are good away performers in Tests.

I don't always agree, but I always enjoy SIF's posts. And I've learned not to tease him like certain other Indians who are always fun to wind up. He's just too mature!

Thanks mate.

I did mention that NZ is on a steep upward curve these days.

They lost 0-2 to India but that was a far inferior team to what they have now (the team that toured UAE). If they tour India now, we better be at the top of our game or they could make us pay big time.

Awesome awesome team. Their pacers are pretty good in SC conditions (Southee's 7fer on Indian spin track comes to mind) but they do need a top class spin bowler to consistently trouble good spin playing sides in SC.

It would be very interesting to see where they go from now.
 
Southee's 7fer was in Bengaluru. That was a cloudy day, and offered swing.

Yeah that Bangalore had some swing (Dhoni even said he wasn't sure whether we were battoing in Bangalore or Napier in the presentation ceremony :)) ).

But from what I remember, it was India's second innings (final innings) when we found batting to be the toughest.

Southee took 7fer in our first innings.

I remember Southee using the crease brilliantly to create angles and make batsmen commit mistakes. It wasn't a straight forward case of swing bowling to take wickets. He did try out a lot of stuff to prise out the wickets.
 
Excellent interview! A well balanced one! No bias, no agenda,and very insightful. perhaps that is why [MENTION=134809]sensible-indian-fan[/MENTION] is one of the most likable posters here. Way to go!
 
Some say Richard Hadlee is the absolute best (next to Marshall) due to his exploits where he single handedly carried the NZ attack.

Maybe we need to start a thread on ATG bowlers and dissect their performances in every place, against strong team, against tough bowling tracks, etc to get a picture.
 
Hadlee and Imran were neck and neck in their prime as they both had to single handedly carry their attacks for majority of their career. Both ended with an average of 22, so not bad.
 
Hadlee and Imran were neck and neck in their prime as they both had to single handedly carry their attacks for majority of their career. Both ended with an average of 22, so not bad.

Hardly.

Hadlee had no one to support while Imran had Akram and Qadir and all.

Compare their Outside Asia vs Asia stats:

Outside Asia (post 1960)

outside asia.JPG

Asia (post 1960)

asia.JPG
 
Also must be mentioned, Imran did have the greatest peak for a modern day pacer. Average of 14 or something.

And I heard he lost 3 years of his prime.
 
good thing about PP is that even the days when quality cricket dried up the moderators/administrators able to create lot of interest for cricket fanatic like me.
 
Also must be mentioned, Imran did have the greatest peak for a modern day pacer. Average of 14 or something.

And I heard he lost 3 years of his prime.

Again an excellent interview, and though I agree with most of your views but i believe sandeep sharma is no way different from Bhuvi kumar. I have seen him bowling at motera against gujrat in Ranjis, this year, and he was trundling around 115ks - 120 ks. Nothing special.

What he is doing in IPL, is punching above is weight and bowling as fast as he can, just like bhuvi does in IPL. But if he play a test match i don't think he is capable of sustaining an acceptable pace for a considerable period of time.

Having said that, the next world cup is in England where swing bowling will play a major role, so definitely he has a role to play in future. But i dont think he is a test prospect yet! Just another Bhuvneswar kumar as of now!
 
Hardly.

Hadlee had no one to support while Imran had Akram and Qadir and all.

Wasim debuted in 1985. Imran test lasted 2-3 years more playing games in patches. Qadir yes, but I was talking about pacers.

Compare the number of games played by Asian bowlers in alien and home conditions to Non-Asian bowlers.

Asia

Wasim - 59
Imran - 51

Marshall - 19
Hadlee - 13
Steyn - 17
Mcgrath - 19
Ambrose - 6


Outside Asia


Marshall - 62
Ambrose - 92
Hadlee - 73
Steyn - 61
Mcgrath - 105

Imran - 37
Wasim - 45

You do the percentages.
 
Also must be mentioned, Imran did have the greatest peak for a modern day pacer. Average of 14 or something.

And I heard he lost 3 years of his prime.

Yes, Imran and Waqar both had phenomenal peaks. Unfortunately both were hampered by injuries.
 
Wasim debuted in 1985. Imran test lasted 2-3 years more playing games in patches. Qadir yes, but I was talking about pacers.

Compare the number of games played by Asian bowlers in alien and home conditions to Non-Asian bowlers.

Asia

Wasim - 59
Imran - 51

Marshall - 19
Hadlee - 13
Steyn - 17
Mcgrath - 19
Ambrose - 6


Outside Asia


Marshall - 62
Ambrose - 92
Hadlee - 73
Steyn - 61
Mcgrath - 105

Imran - 37
Wasim - 45

You do the percentages.

I am perfectly aware of the less number of tests all ATG have played in Asia.

But we have to take the whole context as well.

1. In those days (or even today), non Asian teams touring Aisa is more rarer than us touring there. In the 60s, 70s and 80s, we SC teams weren't major money spinners so teams didn't tour much. Now with India becoming a money spinner, many of the teams are coming here.

2. Even if we take the low number of tests, a few points emerge.

a. First is that 13 tests which Hadlee played is quite long considering that in that era you play 80-100 tests if you have a long long career (Hadlee played 86 tests only). So averaging 21 in 13 tests (which would be 3-4 series) is no fluke. Now add in the fact that he had no quality ATG or great bowlers to support him in alien conditions, it makes even more impressive.

b. All ATG bowlers show a SIMILAR TREND of averaging very less in Asia (barring maybe Denniss lillee who played 4 tests with injuries). If over a period of 100+ tests (combined) and 40+ years of data, that trend is rock solid which points to the fact that if you are good enough you will pick wickets at a good average. So we can't assume that if Hadlee had played more, his average would have tanked.

3. Direct head to head comparison - In familiar conditions (outside Asia), Hadlee outperforms Imran by quite a distance and in unfamiliar conditions (Asia), he is just a touch short of Imran. So when you take that aspect into account and overall trend of ATG bowlers in Asia, Hadlee has done better.

4. Familiarity with a condition - This is one aspect that is underrated. I agree that SC bowlers don't have the advantages of non SC bowlers but if you look at the wide data....non SC bowlers do well in Asia PLUS there is one factor that doesn't get talked about.

Familiarity with the conditions.

I will give you an example. Take Vinay Kumar who was smashed like a spinner in Perth by Warner. He is a beast in domestic cricket on Indian tracks. If I am not wrong, he had good stats even before the Ranji tracks were made bowling friendly. The reason why he does well in India is that he knows how to bowl with the SG ball in Indian tracks. No matter what the situation, he just comes and strikes fast in Ranji. Vijay who is the No 2 opener in the world now (after Warner), a guy who has faced all kinds of bowling in all pitches and did very well (barring NZ) got out to him twice. Vinay simply dismantled him with ease. Corridor bowling, jagging in and out and Vijay was gone. Now bring the same Warner to these Indian pitches and make him face Vinay and he will do well. Take Vinay out of his comfort zone and make him play Warner and he would get treated like a spinner.

When you get used to a condition, you tend to play well. Again, not saying SC bowlers have the same advantages as non SC but this factor comes into play too (which is often not talked about).

Take Kapil Dev for example. Averages 26 in India along with 24 in Australia and WI (the best teams of his era). His averages in England of all places is in the 30s (and he is a swing bowler). Bad averages in a few other places destroyed his overall stats and he ended up with an overall averages of 29.

If we dig in deep, we may find more examples.

Of course, opposite cases are also there (like Dravid being more at ease with pure swing than spin...Haydos doing well in India on complete turners while struggling against swing). If Dravid was born in England, its very much possible that he would have averaged a few runs MORE and people would have said that if he was born in India, he would have averaged in the 60s. :)

Coming back to our point, if you take the whole context into account plus peer views and expert views where Hadlee is considered a one man army....the low number of tests in Asia shouldn't matter much. The benefit of the doubt goes to him (like all the other ATGs).
 
Good interview, like SIF's posts as they're balanced and unlike some other Asian cricket fans isn't too emotional or jazbati when it comes to debating players etc.

Not a fan of the one-line paragraphs though :P
 
Again an excellent interview, and though I agree with most of your views but i believe sandeep sharma is no way different from Bhuvi kumar. I have seen him bowling at motera against gujrat in Ranjis, this year, and he was trundling around 115ks - 120 ks. Nothing special.

What he is doing in IPL, is punching above is weight and bowling as fast as he can, just like bhuvi does in IPL. But if he play a test match i don't think he is capable of sustaining an acceptable pace for a considerable period of time.

Having said that, the next world cup is in England where swing bowling will play a major role, so definitely he has a role to play in future. But i dont think he is a test prospect yet! Just another Bhuvneswar kumar as of now!

Thanks bro.

You are a regular follower of domestic cricket and there is no question about the fact that your opinion holds more value than someone who sees stats and some IPL to pass some judgement.

While that's the case, I just want to make a few points and you let me know your views:

1. I never said Sandeep Sharma is an potential ATG or some great great bowler. I think he is damn good for us and a guy like him (if he develops and becomes good in international cricket) would strengthen our team 5X more than a batsmen 2X his skills. Quality wise, I feel Sandeep is our biggest talent amongst youngsters (in an absolute way) but even if he isn't, he would still give more output than many more talented batsmen because he is a bowler and we are talking about India. ;-)

2. Let's tackle the speed issue first and foremost. In the Ranji matches, someone posted the stats elsewhere, the thing is that bowlers have to bowl a HELL a lot of overs. Matches are tightly spaced and with tracks being more seamer friendly, pacers are the main workhorses. This ensures that if a bowler goes full throttle he will burn out fast and won't last the season. That is why many intentionally reduce their pace to make it through the season. Sandeep as in itself is a trundler, so when he reduces his pace, that will be the speed he bowls.

3. As for his pace, last year in IPL, he was clocking in the 120s and this year he is clocking 130s with the same speedgun. All this with NO reduction of swing. This points to the fact that he has increased his pace. How much we don't know until we see Sandeep operating in a ODI or test match.

4. Now you raise a valid concern about his pace in Test matches which could be possibly an issue. And you bring in Bhuvi as an example. Now we have to remember that Bhuvi averaged 16 in the England series AFTER the first 2 tests (which included a test in the poor Trent Bridge track which was a draw). Bhuvi's formula was simple. He would be economical when he wasn't penetrative and when he was in the zone, he would pick up a bunch of wickets. The problem was that we were playing just 4 bowlers (with no genuine part timer like in the past) which meant that Bhuvi had to go through long spells cos at time it looked like only he was either good/economical. I was screaming here about Dhoni's decision to not play 5 bowlers during that series cos I knew that 4 bowlers increases the workload of all and it would SURELY increase the workload of the best bowler many many times.

And that's what happened and after the 2nd test, Bhuvi's bowling lost ALL its venom and was played off very easily inspite of us getting good tracks to bowl to. Pacer workload management is something Dhoni is so horrible it angers me even today.

I am sure I read reports somewhere about Umesh Yadav being overused in the nets during the Aus tour of 2012 and he went out of action after the Ahmedabad test.

So now if we are going to put Sandeep Sharma through all this nonsense, we are going to see similar results with him.

But if we play 5 bowlers and manage pacer workloads properly (which England, Aus, SA do properly), then he can be very effective.

5. The good thing about Sandeep Sharma is that he NEVER had issues stepping up from the U19 level to First class or List A or IPL. He was a good performer in IPL last year too. Plus he has brains which is such a rare quality among our bowlers.

Even this year, when he was bowling at Dhoni, he bowled perfect yorkers outside off stump. Now Dhoni may not be the same old Dhoni but from a young bowler's point of view, he is STILL Dhoni and that puts a lot of pressure on bowlers and Sandeep did well inspite of that.

When you look at his performance ACROSS board in different formats, he has been consistent which is heartwarming. Let's wait and watch.

I started writing this reply then had to go outside and then came back to finish it off. So if its not 100% coherent...this is the reason. :))
 
Good interview, like SIF's posts as they're balanced and unlike some other Asian cricket fans isn't too emotional or jazbati when it comes to debating players etc.

Not a fan of the one-line paragraphs though :P

Thanks.

And working on that. Seems like a never ending process. :))

For long paras, sentence breakup is absolutely horrendous.
 
I haven't thought about ATG bowlers in a serious way that I could accurately rank them in order. Even for batsmen I struggle to come up with a list (I keep changing the order).

So if I were to answer your question...in tests, Imran and Waqar are definite ATGs but would come in the list after the following (this list is in no particular order):

Malcolm Marshall
Dale Steyn
Glenn McGrath
Ambrose
Wasim Akram

I am sure Waqar comes in the list after them but not quite sure about Imran.

Personally I don't like to rank players based on watching some videos or via my limited viewing experience because that lead to bias (for example - I never personally saw Lara or Ambrose performing against us).

A bit deeper statistical analysis mixed with expert opinions is needed. I haven't taken an in depth look so don't have rigid views. Once I do that, I would have stronger views cos I can back it up with data.

I forgot to add one line which changes the meaning of the whole sentence.

I meant....I am sure Waqar comes in the list after them but not quite sure about Imran (who could be amongst the above ATG bowlers too - though I am not sure).

Imran was widely regarded as a better bowler than Waqar.
[MENTION=138983]Neferpitou[/MENTION]
 
I haven't thought about ATG bowlers in a serious way that I could accurately rank them in order. Even for batsmen I struggle to come up with a list (I keep changing the order).

So if I were to answer your question...in tests, Imran and Waqar are definite ATGs but would come in the list after the following (this list is in no particular order):

Malcolm Marshall
Dale Steyn
Glenn McGrath
Ambrose
Wasim Akram

I am sure Waqar comes in the list after them but not quite sure about Imran.

Personally I don't like to rank players based on watching some videos or via my limited viewing experience because that lead to bias (for example - I never personally saw Lara or Ambrose performing against us).

A bit deeper statistical analysis mixed with expert opinions is needed. I haven't taken an in depth look so don't have rigid views. Once I do that, I would have stronger views cos I can back it up with data.

Really? I consider Imran better than Waqar and even Wasim for the sole fact that his peak was outstanding, better than Wasim's, and he has balanced records everywhere, unlike Waqar.

It is like all those "Sachin vs..." threads, others might match Sachin's overall records but what he did during his peak in the 90's was above anything that Lara and Ponting achieved. However, he also has a good record everywhere unlike people like Sanga.

Personally, I would take out Steyn from that list, considering we haven't seen his decline yet and put in Imran. However, since there is no Bradman of bowling, it is very difficult to pick the top five pacers of all time.

Edit: You cleared up your post so it is now more accurate.
 
Last edited:
Really? I consider Imran better than Waqar and even Wasim for the sole fact that his peak was outstanding, better than Wasim's, and he has balanced records everywhere, unlike Waqar.

It is like all those "Sachin vs..." threads, others might match Sachin's overall records but what he did during his peak in the 90's was above anything that Lara and Ponting achieved. However, he also has a good record everywhere unlike people like Sanga.

Personally, I would take out Steyn from that list, considering we haven't seen his decline yet and put in Imran. However, since there is no Bradman of bowling, it is very difficult to pick the top five pacers of all time.

Actually Ponting's peak is better than any of SRT or Lara's peak. His peak is the best among modern day batsmen.

As for Imran, he is without doubt better than Waqar (in the last post I clarified it - what i intended to say came out wrong in the post you quoted - my bad).....but I think I have seen more neutrals may consider Wasim better than Imran. Plus Wasim has more balanced records than Imran.

But as I said, I need to dig in deep to judge Imran accurately. We should open an ATG bowlers thread to discuss this stuff in depth.

That's why I posted this:

I forgot to add one line which changes the meaning of the whole sentence.

I meant....I am sure Waqar comes in the list after them but not quite sure about Imran (who could be amongst the above ATG bowlers too - though I am not sure).

Imran was widely regarded as a better bowler than Waqar.
 
If you are talking about impact, you are right [MENTION=129948]Bilal7[/MENTION].

SRt is rated for his impact in 90s to early 00s and we must rate Imran the same way. Stats wise there is not much difference between a 20 or 22 or 23 average overall but impact is impact.

We should discuss this stuff in depth. I don't have rigid views regarding this cos I have to see a lot more data to come to a reasonable conclusion.
 
If you are talking about impact, you are right [MENTION=129948]Bilal7[/MENTION].

SRt is rated for his impact in 90s to early 00s and we must rate Imran the same way. Stats wise there is not much difference between a 20 or 22 or 23 average overall but impact is impact.

We should discuss this stuff in depth. I don't have rigid views regarding this cos I have to see a lot more data to come to a reasonable conclusion.

Agree about having an in-depth discussion about this topic, this isn't the place for it though.

As for the Sachin's peak, I was talking about his numbers during the 90's which are outstanding and he basically carried the batting lineup like Imran did with Pakistan's bowling attack (Big Saf was a decent bowler at best, Qadir was poor overseas and Wasim hardly played alongside him).
 
Excellent interview, one of the most balanced posters on the forum.
 
to be blunt, i dont know you much :) but from your answers, it reflects your cool,mature personality.
 
Great interview and brilliant, thoughtful answers as usual

Only disappointment is that there weren't any social/political questions and were mostly cricket-related. but I guess that's our fault :))
 
Great interview and brilliant, thoughtful answers as usual

Only disappointment is that there weren't any social/political questions and were mostly cricket-related. but I guess that's our fault :))

Questions were submitted by members then I selected them. There weren't any political qs if I recall correctly.
 
Sif it comes across as you are one of those guys say if you want to know about something or get into something you get real absorbed in it and research it really well and have to know everything about it . Like there are no half measures with you.
[MENTION=134809]sensible-indian-fan[/MENTION] is my assessment right
 
Yeah bro. You are spot on.

Sometimes that's not a good attribute at all when you just have to get on with the game (no kidding). :))
Bro if you dont mind me asking what is your age ? And also are you married or in a relationship or anything like that :amla
 
[MENTION=134809]sensible-indian-fan[/MENTION] may have biggest fan club on the forum!
 
Also a qs.

Who do you think are top 5 TN cricketers ever?
Also do you really root for TN cricket? Like does it make you happy when TN cricketers make it to national team?
 
Also a qs.

Who do you think are top 5 TN cricketers ever?
Also do you really root for TN cricket? Like does it make you happy when TN cricketers make it to national team?

Not very knowledgeable about all TN cricketers but the most prominent ones are (in chronological order are):

1. Venkatraghavan (a member of our famous spin quartets)
2. Kris Srikanth (good for his era though his stats aren't all that great)
3. Laxman Sivaramakrishnan (heard his off field activities impacted his on field performance)
4. Sadagopan Ramesh (did play Wasim Akram and Saqlain well when he debuted but kinda faded away)
5. Laxmipathy Balaji (a bowler who could swing it both ways and trouble batsmen - sadly got injured after the 2004 Pak tour and then was never the same again :( )
6. Dinesh Karthik (brilliant batsman potential but inconsistent - deserves to be where he is IMHO - poor WK too)
7. Vijay (seems to have developed these days)
8. Ashwin (faces his own problems but will retire as the best ever TN cricketer ever IMHO)

Nothing much to rate amongst TN cricketers.

And yeah, I do root for TN cricketers if I genuinely think they are good.

When Vijay was again made his way into the Test squad against the Aussies in 2013, I cringed and was very angry. But he proved me wrong. :))

So yeah, TN cricketers making it in the international team makes me happy but if they are going to be guys like Dinesh Karthik who are forever inconsistent, I would love to see them thrown out.

[MENTION=134809]sensible-indian-fan[/MENTION] may have biggest fan club on the forum!

That's [MENTION=131701]Mamoon[/MENTION]'s territory. Loved and hated in equal measure.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I see.

So then you just have to accept the reality bud.

There is nothing as the perfect soul mate. Its just a myth even though you or her may not feel like that now.

When you accept the reality, you know where a relationship is heading and most importantly the girl knows it too so no one gets too shocked when it ends/you have to move on. Of course, disappointment and emotional outbursts may still be there but that's human nature.

Girls are more emotional than us so its upto us to control the situation and set the expectations not just for our good but their good too.
Bro i told her from.the start about the reality but she is really in love with me. But considering she is non-desi it would be impossible to sell to my parents. I have accepted myself it will end one day just dont know how she will take it when it does. Dont want to hurt her but of course cant upset my family too.
 
Bro i told her from.the start about the reality but she is really in love with me. But considering she is non-desi it would be impossible to sell to my parents. I have accepted myself it will end one day just dont know how she will take it when it does. Dont want to hurt her but of course cant upset my family too.

What's your and her age and what's the age in which male in your family get married?

If you don't mind me asking.
 
What's your and her age and what's the age in which male in your family get married?

If you don't mind me asking.
I am 20 she is 23. If she was desi it would be ok but she is canadian mixed black and white. So its real tough. And its a funny story my Dad actually got married really late he was like 35 when he got married but rest of my uncles got married young and my bua too just my dad delayed it for a long time. Rest of my cousins who are way older than me like early to late 30s half of them are married half of them arent. My family are pretty lenient about not getting married but they have a problem if you get married to someone who they dont approve of.
 
I am 20 she is 23. If she was desi it would be ok but she is canadian mixed black and white. So its real tough. And its a funny story my Dad actually got married really late he was like 35 when he got married but rest of my uncles got married young and my bua too just my dad delayed it for a long time. Rest of my cousins who are way older than me like early to late 30s half of them are married half of them arent. My family are pretty lenient about not getting married but they have a problem if you get married to someone who they dont approve of.

I see.

Dude you are just 20.

Just make your situation clear to her (which you already did) and let your relationship run its natural course.

If you feel things are starting to get too serious at any point (which I don't think will happen anytime soon) that you will have to either sort the situation or move on.

Don't worry about it. I think time will automatically take care of stuff. You are just 20 anyways.
 
I see.

Dude you are just 20.

Just make your situation clear to her (which you already did) and let your relationship run its natural course.

If you feel things are starting to get too serious at any point (which I don't think will happen anytime soon) that you will have to either sort the situation or move on.

Don't worry about it. I think time will automatically take care of stuff. You are just 20 anyways.
Yeah time will take care of it hopefully. Btw sorry for derailing your thread. I did [MENTION=131701]Mamoon[/MENTION]
 
Back
Top