Impose this tax on muslims in Ind and then see the outcome here or should I say the outcry !AFAIK, tax is always a compulsion by its very nature. Never heard of a voluntary tax. .
Please tell me which of the Jaziya or Zakat were voluntary?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Impose this tax on muslims in Ind and then see the outcome here or should I say the outcry !AFAIK, tax is always a compulsion by its very nature. Never heard of a voluntary tax. .
Please tell me which of the Jaziya or Zakat were voluntary?
Now we are getting into the semantics of it. It’s a tax which itself is a compulsion, yes. Not related to the compulsion in faith. From that point of view, it’s a non sequitur.AFAIK, tax is always a compulsion by its very nature. Never heard of a voluntary tax. .
Please tell me which of the Jaziya or Zakat were voluntary?
On the flip side, subject Muslims to zakat rates and not any other tax. Would that be more agreeable?Impose this tax on muslims in Ind and then see the outcome here or should I say the outcry !
I would like all Muslims to leave Islam..and take up Sikhism or Hinduism..
So less of 'sar tan se juda' and more peace and love..
To add to that, he believes all Muslims are out to kill him, poor fella. He should really spend some time outside his comfort zone.Thanks. I did put up a thread on here asking How to become a Hindu but the answers were all a bit muted and not very enthusiastic.
As for the peace and love, it's not what I feel from the posters of those religions who come here, I have to be honest.
What about the Meek Hindus that you and other British Pakistanis have been talking about for years in UK.. surely they are peace loving.Thanks. I did put up a thread on here asking How to become a Hindu but the answers were all a bit muted and not very enthusiastic.
As for the peace and love, it's not what I feel from the posters of those religions who come here, I have to be honest.
Muslims earn brownie Holy points by Zakat, Where are the divine brownies for the Non-Muslims through Jaziya? The grand freedom to breathe?@CricketCartoons @hoshiarpurexpress @Bhaijaan (I think Bhaijaan might already be a Muslim based on his views though)
@Local.Dada
Now we are getting into the semantics of it. It’s a tax which itself is a compulsion, yes. Not related to the compulsion in faith. From that point of view, it’s a non sequitur.
I think he is asking about information on conversion to Hinduism. Nothing to do with being peace loving. I’m actually interested in finding that out myself.What about the Meek Hindus that you and other British Pakistanis have been talking about for years in UK.. surely they are peace loving.
There is no concept of "at the time" with regards to divine diktats. That's what Religions imply.Let me add to the above, I was attempting to explain the merit of zakat and explain the fair concept of jaziya at the time it was implemented. I see there are already attempts to drag it to the modern day world where its application will be almost impossible thanks to the laws and regulations of modern day banking and international trade rules.
A more standard tax code for all citizens regardless of race/religion/etc is the most appropriate solution in modern day governance.
The Janiya is actually an agreement. I shared a detailed research article on that. It entitles non Muslims to rights within the state. Protection, welfare, etc. you could actually look that up yourself as to what it offered/offers.Muslims earn brownie Holy points by Zakat, Where are the divine brownies for the Non-Muslims through Jaziya? The grand freedom to breathe?
You have been an expert on Hinduism for quite sometime. I am surprised you don't know the answer to this simple query.I think he is asking about information on conversion to Hinduism. Nothing to do with being peace loving. I’m actually interested in finding that out myself.
According to Hinduism can one be a Hindu and believe in Muslim faith at the same time?
Where are my Holy brownie points??The Janiya is actually an agreement. I shared a detailed research article on that. It entitles non Muslims to rights within the state. Protection, welfare, etc. you could actually look that up yourself as to what it offered/offers.
I never said the concept itself is “flawed”There is no concept of "at the time" with regards to divine diktats. That's what Religions imply.
There is no modern thing or ancient thing. The word of God is eternal and has been spoken, don't skew its meaning by your own interpretations for modern consumption.
Just like you are an expert on Islam and Muslims, right?You have been an expert on Hinduism for quite sometime. I am surprised you don't know the answer to this simple query.
In other words, can we call it outdated with reference to modern society?I never said the concept itself is “flawed”
It’s just not practical in today’s world for reasons already mentioned.
I tend to start from that but you have considerably failed to live up to the this very post in the past with fantastic flair.Just like you are an expert on Islam and Muslims, right?
The mature way to discuss such things is to learn from each other rather than engage in a game of one upmanship. There are political differences (Hindus vs Islamic extremism) and there are philosophical truths (Islam vs Hinduism). A more educated man can delineate the two.
How can a divine law by God be "outdated" ??In other words, can we call it outdated with reference to modern society?
Absolutely! Modern day economics, trade, taxation is all based on Jewish interest based philosophy. They are deeply embedded in banking, finance, pretty much everywhere. Because they were deeply embedded in the western world and trade, with the overall monopoly of those nations, colonization, and now in the post colonial era, there is absolutely no room for the Islamic taxation laws to survive in the modern day world and a nation or state to be able to survive. I think only the gulf states that are super rich have those laws, but I could be wrong. I am sure they also vary from state to state.In other words, can we call it outdated with reference to modern society?
I don't know if outdated is the right word, I would say applicable or feasible, would be more appropriate perhapsHow can a divine law by God be "outdated" ??
well you know what they say, opinion are like ***** .. everyone has one.I tend to start from that but you have considerably failed to live up to the this very post in the past with fantastic flair.
So you mean to say Divine laws are somehow not applicable or become infeasible by acts of Non-believer humans??I don't know if outdated is the right word, I would say applicable or feasible, would be more appropriate perhaps
It is important to understand the law applies on a "state" or those who "run the state" and not individual Muslims. They can continue to pay zakat, but the concept of running the whole state on zakat and Jaziya like the Muslim states of bygone eras did, is not feasible today, which is why I always say there are no proper "Islamic" states that exist today. They all use interest based trading practices, there is monarchy in KSA (which is not legal in Islam) amongst other things, which a proper Islamic state is not supposed to have.
So you mean to say Divine laws are somehow not applicable or become infeasible by acts of Non-believer humans??
They are empowered by the divine revelation of God. Why do they need to care about the laws created by mortal Kaffir humans?Correct. Non-believers and believers are both part of it. I think we are all part of today's society and one cannot live and survive without some of the modern day constraints in place. How can a state (Muslim or otherwise) survive in the modern day world without abiding by the rules of the modern day trade laws?
They are empowered by the divine revelation of God. Why do they need to care about the laws created by mortal Kaffir humans?
I tend to start from that but you have considerably failed to live up to the this very post in the past with fantastic flair.
I am limited here by patience of the moderation of this forum that allows a particular style of response from one side but will not tolerate a similar response in return. Many of my replies meet a sad demise before they reach the person I am having a conversation with.I don't know if anybody has told you this about yourself but you pretty much engage in what you accuse others of. What is the point then?
Too bad, we can go discuss this stuff on an Indian forum then. Send me the link to a more reasonable and neutral Indian forum than this one, when you find it. I will be happy to debate you there.I am limited here by patience of the moderation of this forum that allows a particular style of response from one side but will not tolerate a similar response in return. Many of my replies meet a sad demise before they reach the person I am having a conversation with.
@CricketCartoons @hoshiarpurexpress @Bhaijaan (I think Bhaijaan might already be a Muslim based on his views though)
@Local.Dada
Now we are getting into the semantics of it. It’s a tax which itself is a compulsion, yes. Not related to the compulsion in faith. From that point of view, it’s a non sequitur.
Bhaijaan is omnipresent..@CricketCartoons @hoshiarpurexpress @Bhaijaan (I think Bhaijaan might already be a Muslim based on his views though)
@Local.Dada
Now we are getting into the semantics of it. It’s a tax which itself is a compulsion, yes. Not related to the compulsion in faith. From that point of view, it’s a non sequitur.
The most interesting point of the debate is lost in rhetoric.Where are my Holy brownie points??