MI5 Intelligence Agency cleared of liability for terrorist attacks

[s28]

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en-gb"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Report by former Ind. Reviewer of Terrorism Legislation, David Anderson, set to clear MI5 and police of liability over 4 terror attacks in the UK in 2017. <a href="https://t.co/2SBMHpkJk5">https://t.co/2SBMHpkJk5</a></p>— Dr. Rizwaan Sabir (@RizwaanSabir) <a href="https://twitter.com/RizwaanSabir/status/932350496060461057?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">19 November 2017</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

 

[Robert]

Good. They disrupt terror plots continually.

 

[Cpt. Rishwat]

Good. They disrupt terror plots continually.

Agreed. Not even sure why they bother having these reviews, although I suppose they are useful for appearance sake if nothing else.

 

[s28]

FBI have been recognised as being complicit in arranging terrorist attacks in the US

So yes Intelligence Agencies should be held to account

 

[Robert]

FBI have been recognised as being complicit in arranging terrorist attacks in the US

So yes Intelligence Agencies should be held to account

In the US.

Recognised by whom in the US?

 

[s28]

by Judge in Federal Court who oversaw, analysed and judged the Evidence...

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en-gb"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Newburgh Four: poor, black, and jailed under FBI 'entrapment' tactics <a href="http://t.co/L7jc63Eu">http://t.co/L7jc63Eu</a> <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/longreads?src=hash&ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#longreads</a></p>— The Guardian (@guardian) <a href="https://twitter.com/guardian/status/146348741136355328?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">12 December 2011</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

 

[Cpt. Rishwat]

I don't really see the relevance of what happens in the USA to proceedings here. That was a case of enticement, this is more a case of complaints against police being investigated by themselves basically. As someone mentioned in the thread about Pakistani military/mullah set up, it's a case of one hand washes the other. National security comes first and all that.

 

[Robert]

I don't really see the relevance of what happens in the USA to proceedings here.

Quite.

Though on a separate point we have no entrapment law and perhaps we should.