What's new

Michael Clarke slams softening of Australian cricket: 'We won't win s***'

Mamba Red

Debutant
Joined
Feb 18, 2018
Runs
265
Former Australian captain Michael Clarke has slammed the new approach of the national team, declaring "we're not going to win s***" by softening a tradition of aggressive cricket.

After a cultural review launched in the wake of the Cape Town ball tampering scandal, Australian cricket emerged with a new mission statement: "Compete with us, smile with us, fight on with us, dream with us."

The statement has been widely mocked by former players and Clarke - who famously told Jimmy Anderson during an Ashes Test to "get ready for a broken f***ing arm" - warned that it could spark a major downturn in results.

"You don’t need to be best mates with everyone. Australian cricket, I think, needs to stop worry about being liked and start worrying about being respected," Clarke said on Macquarie Sports Radio.

"Play tough Australian cricket. Because whether we like it or not, that’s in our blood.

"If you try and walk away from it, we might be the most liked team in the world, we’re not going to win s***. We won’t win a game. Boys and girls want to win."

Clarke launched an impassioned defence of banned star David Warner, the primary scapegoat in the Cape Town disaster who has been banned from leadership positions in the Australian team.

Without specifically naming suspended captain Steve Smith, Clarke said team leadership had failed to handle Warner - the vice-captain before his downfall - and his unique attributes properly.

‘"It’s his style, he’s very upfront, in your face. What you see with David Warner is what you get," Clarke said.

"Your greatest strength can be your greatest weakness. To me I always loved having him in the team I was captaining because he brought that aggression that I wanted. In saying that there was always a line, he knew that. We had a number of conversations one on one about that line he couldn’t overstep.

"There needs to be someone in that leadership, generally it should be your captain, that can control that. If that gets the best out of Warner, which I think it does, then you have to allow him to take it as far as you want and then say, 'Rightio, back you come, pull your head in, that’s enough, no further'.

"He [Warner] brings that positive approach to the Australian cricket team. You can't ask him to bring that and then on the other hand blame him or ask him to be a ***** cat when it comes to giving it.

"David Warner gives it to certain blokes on the field because he wants them to give it to him when he's batting. It's like a turn-on, it makes him play better.

"The people that praise David Warner ... they know him. You've got to accept David for who he is and what he brings to the team."

Clarke lamented that of all the players set to take the field this summer, Indian captain Virat Kohli appeared to be the best exponent of Australia's famed style of ultra-aggressive cricket.

"Virat Kohli's class, absolute class," Clarke said.

"I love the way he plays. I love his intent, I love his aggression and most of all, I love his passion.

"He loves playing for India and loves beating Australia - and that's so Australian.

"That's how I got taught. That's how I grew up, watching Warney, Matty Hayden, Border, Chappell. Watching those guys, they taught you that when you walk on to that field, you fight for every single run or wicket you can get for your country, because it's so important.

"I think Virat Kohli does that. I think that's why we [the Australian public] hate him, because he does exactly what we do.

"And at the moment, he's better than us at it, unfortunately."

https://wwos.nine.com.au/cricket/cr...-cricket/6100d883-764c-4174-9ae4-885dc0b5a59f
 
Clarke didn’t really win....without McGrath, Warne, Ponting, Hayden, Gilchrist, Symonds to make him look good.

I suggest he understands that this cleansing phase in Australian crickets image is highly necessary.
 
What has Kohli won against Australia to be honest? I always see him fall short of leading his side to wins against them.
 
Clarke didn’t really win....without McGrath, Warne, Ponting, Hayden, Gilchrist, Symonds to make him look good.

I suggest he understands that this cleansing phase in Australian crickets image is highly necessary.

Lol at his naïve analysis. Australia just does not have the quality of players coming through the ranks. Even if the current crop start swearing their heads off, they aren't going to win very much.
 
Our bowling is still world class, but the batting is a disgrace.

I think batting might be enough against the Indian bowling, if the aussie attack can find an answer to Kohli, everything else will be easy and business as usual
 
I think batting might be enough against the Indian bowling, if the aussie attack can find an answer to Kohli, everything else will be easy and business as usual

One man can't win the series, they need all their bats to get runs.
 
I agree with Clarke and a case in point is Pakistan since they were called "timid kittens" by the Sky comm box (and deservedly so) during the humiliating ODI series defeat in England 2 years back. Ever since the 2010 spot fixing scandal, the players have been softer than ever before and the results reflect this as well, when they start quaking in their boots against the better sides in ODIs and away tests. Shifting from one extreme to the other doesn't help at all.

It is a part of the Aussie DNA and it is wrong to turn them into a load of softies. All that needs to be addressed is the bullying, cheating and David Warner in particular who must be the most infamous cricketer for all his acts of notoriety.
 
Last edited:
Clarke didn’t really win....without McGrath, Warne, Ponting, Hayden, Gilchrist, Symonds to make him look good.

I suggest he understands that this cleansing phase in Australian crickets image is highly necessary.

Lol Clarke won the WC with a weaker team than Pointing. Won the ashes and in South Africa as test captain. :)) .
 
As long as they don't get personal when it comes to sledging I don't have any issues with them sledging . But Australia seemed to have really calm down since the ball tampering scandal.
 
Please sledge.

Love the Australian sledging and aggressive cricket. Do not worry about if others will get offended or will not like it.

That's the point. Disorient them, full sledge.

Ignore the media.
 
Lol Clarke won the WC with a weaker team than Pointing. Won the ashes and in South Africa as test captain. :)) .

WC and Ashes wins at home for Aussies...come on man! Ponting won 2 world cups away from home.

The South Africa win I can say is a decent achievement
 
Ponting had atgs at his disposal , no need for any captain . Shows you what a bad captain ponting was as soon as everyone retired and he was losing everything
 
Ponting had atgs at his disposal , no need for any captain . Shows you what a bad captain ponting was as soon as everyone retired and he was losing everything

This, the same argument could apply to Steve Waugh as well.
 
In hindsight, the argument is that Clarke needs to cool down with this legendary captain vibe interview because the Aussies built their domineering force around some huge names in the history of the game and once those names retired it just wasn’t the same for Ponting or Clarke.

It’s easy to be a nobody that happens to be Australian but he can use his mouth as a weapon of inflicting mental torture against the opposition, especially when you have Warne and McGrath to bail you out with the ball and Hayden/Gilly with the bat
 
To be honest in the last few years there has been this political correctness stigma where people take offense to everything and everyone has to curb their true intentions. I kind of understand how and why CA has been caught in this storm first with the cringe ad, but I think that was to seem like they're sorry after sandpaper gate to appeal to the cricket fraternity. So I do agree with Clarke here.

Sport is supposed to evoke challenge in the ones playing it, being softies and politically correct is not the way to go. I'm not saying a sportsman should be a douche off the field as well, but there's nothing wrong with bringing intensity on the field. Whatever happens on the field, stays on the field. People reminisce about the 70s, 80s, and 90s as the golden era of cricket, well that era also had plenty of unfiltered characters. Ofc when one crosses the line like Lilee kicking Miandad, they need to be penalized. But this is not like that.
 
Cricket needs villains. Aussies have always obliged to play that role. Nobody likes them.
 
CA has lost the plot completely.

"Compete with us, smile with us, fight on with us, dream with us."

Yeahnah

"get ready for a broken f***ing arm"

That's more like it. It's not a popularity contest.
 
To be honest in the last few years there has been this political correctness stigma where people take offense to everything and everyone has to curb their true intentions. I kind of understand how and why CA has been caught in this storm first with the cringe ad, but I think that was to seem like they're sorry after sandpaper gate to appeal to the cricket fraternity. So I do agree with Clarke here.

Sport is supposed to evoke challenge in the ones playing it, being softies and politically correct is not the way to go. I'm not saying a sportsman should be a douche off the field as well, but there's nothing wrong with bringing intensity on the field. Whatever happens on the field, stays on the field. People reminisce about the 70s, 80s, and 90s as the golden era of cricket, well that era also had plenty of unfiltered characters. Ofc when one crosses the line like Lilee kicking Miandad, they need to be penalized. But this is not like that.

It's fine to bring intensity on the field. But it shouldn't be confused with abusing opposition players. Threatening to cut the f***ing throat off is not an example of intensity. I think players especially Aussies confuse these two.
 
It’s possible to compete hard without being obnoxious.
 
The problem is this, when administrators sitting in comfy offices decide how cricket should be played you will get choir boys on the field.

Sports is about personalities, people want big personalities to play not nice boys.

I would pay to watch Wasim Akram not Rao Iftikhar.

Let the guys go out and play aggressive cricket. Don't worry about few people here and there getting upset. We pay to be entertained, not see some politically correct stunt.
 
It's fine to bring intensity on the field. But it shouldn't be confused with abusing opposition players. Threatening to cut the f***ing throat off is not an example of intensity. I think players especially Aussies confuse these two.

If you cant handle sledging you should not play international cricket. This is supposed to be elite sports, not club cricket, that you and I play.
 
To be honest in the last few years there has been this political correctness stigma where people take offense to everything and everyone has to curb their true intentions. I kind of understand how and why CA has been caught in this storm first with the cringe ad, but I think that was to seem like they're sorry after sandpaper gate to appeal to the cricket fraternity. So I do agree with Clarke here.

Sport is supposed to evoke challenge in the ones playing it, being softies and politically correct is not the way to go. I'm not saying a sportsman should be a douche off the field as well, but there's nothing wrong with bringing intensity on the field. Whatever happens on the field, stays on the field. People reminisce about the 70s, 80s, and 90s as the golden era of cricket, well that era also had plenty of unfiltered characters. Ofc when one crosses the line like Lilee kicking Miandad, they need to be penalized. But this is not like that.

Australia has gone over the top in trying to please the world. Trust me any other country would have banned their players for 1-3 games, no more. This ban is crazy.
 
WC and Ashes wins at home for Aussies...come on man! Ponting won 2 world cups away from home.

The South Africa win I can say is a decent achievement

He only captained at 1 World Cup.

He's a great captain no doubt.
 
All this talk about 'elite honesty' will be set aside moment Aussies are under pressure. Thats their natural instinct and cannot be curbed. After all the somberness surrounding unfortunate passing away of Phill Hughes before 2014 tour, Aussies were at their abusive best (and got plenty in return). Expecting the same thing to play out, will not go by media bytes.
 
If you cant handle sledging you should not play international cricket. This is supposed to be elite sports, not club cricket, that you and I play.

You don't have to graduate in sledging to graduate in cricket. Both are independent of each other .
Aussies have encouraged it under the garb of tough cricket which is absurd.
 
Man this series' gonna be so much fun :kohli

Pity I won't be able to follow much.

But drama is served. Agar Indians is bar na jeete to shayad kabhi nahi jeeten ge.
 
I completely agree. This is the Australia I want to see. A few players made a mistake and are being punished for it, the whole team shouldn't suffer for it. Play hard and aggressive cricket like you like always did. There is no correlation between aggression and tampering, one is playing hard cricket and another is cheating. Australia have over reacted, where others punished players and moved on, not creating a scene.. Australia have changed the whole team dynamic and are somewhat a laughing stock. Just shocking handling of the situation, absolute exaggeration.
 
DtEyuusVsAEOnza.jpg


Clarke on the offensive on Twitter
 
It’s possible to compete hard without being obnoxious.

Agreed.

Or without manipulating the ball.

The Aussies have gone too far with this softly-softly talk, they are frankly becoming a bit of a laughing stock. (Which is a great shame of course - LOL.)
 
Australians can't go long without being the villains. Don't see this soyboy phase lasting long
 
Sledging won't help you play the swinging ball in England or the turning ball in Asia.

Instead of a lack of "aggression" or "softness" - buzzwords this forum loves to fetishize - maybe the real answer lies with the decline in quality of Australia's Sheffield Shield and an inability to produce quality batsmen equipped to play in all conditions ?
 
Quote Originally Posted by Robert View Post
It’s possible to compete hard without being obnoxious.



Agreed.

Or without manipulating the ball.

The Aussies have gone too far with this softly-softly talk, they are frankly becoming a bit of a laughing stock. (Which is a great shame of course - LOL.)

Fair point, but it is also possible to be soft and obnoxious, England have always been obnoxious and most of the time fairly soft too.
 
I can't imagine AUS without being aggressive. Yet they choose a soft-caring guy as the captain so can't really see that happening from now on.
 
Fair point, but it is also possible to be soft and obnoxious, England have always been obnoxious and most of the time fairly soft too.

Always? When were they obnoxious against India, or in SL? Please give example.
 
It's culture here.

Since I was playing under 10s cricket we would swear and crack jokes about the opposing player and try and put them under pressure.

When people were sledging me as a young lad it just made me more competitive and aggressive to make them pay on the field.

After the game we would always shake hands. The only lines we didn't cross was religion, country and family.
 
Please sledge.

Love the Australian sledging and aggressive cricket. Do not worry about if others will get offended or will not like it.

That's the point. Disorient them, full sledge.

Ignore the media.

They need an ashes series in australia asap, with no injuries
 
Always? When were they obnoxious against India, or in SL? Please give example.

Well you did ask.

England fast bowler James Anderson has been charged under Level 3 of the ICC Code of Conduct for allegedly "abusing and pushing Ravindra Jadeja" on the second day of the first Investec Test at Trent Bridge.
 
Well you did ask.
One incident by one player is not the same as “England” “all the time”. You’re overgeneralising.

Neither are England “soft” when they won six of their last seven tests.
 
One incident by one player is not the same as “England” “all the time”. You’re overgeneralising.

Neither are England “soft” when they won six of their last seven tests.

Thats your opinion, Anderson and Broad are under obnoxious in the dictionary, The team is quite soft, a few wins here and there when the opposition is weak but nothing of note.
 
Thats your opinion, Anderson and Broad are under obnoxious in the dictionary, The team is quite soft, a few wins here and there when the opposition is weak but nothing of note.

Just as it is your opinion that A&B are obnoxious.

Whereas six test wins out of the last seven are facts.
 
Back
Top