Gabbar Singh
Test Debutant
- Joined
- Nov 11, 2007
- Runs
- 15,550
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Well, he was explosive during that match so maybe it was a compliment?
I have a hunch who the Aussie in question might be but it speaks wonders for Ali's personality that he does not want to name and shame them.
Completely support moeen Bhai on this.And he remembers it at the end of 2018 to make a fuss out of it ???
Sorry just playing to the galleries now.
"Moeen discussed the incident with several of his team-mates, and believed that England coach Trevor Bayliss raised it with his Australian counterpart, Darren Lehmann."
It wasn't even raised in 2015.
Even if they had a United Nations Conference on the issue then, it was kept in the hush.
Why raised now?
And he remembers it at the end of 2018 to make a fuss out of it ???
Sorry just playing to the galleries now.

Seems suspicious, why is he coming up with this after 3 years? I hope h doesn't become a drama queen.
And he remembers it at the end of 2018 to make a fuss out of it ???
Sorry just playing to the galleries now.
It's an excerpt from his upcoming autobiography
I am sorry but have you never talked about a past experience in your life? It isnt uncommon at all to talk about something that happened in the past.
It wasn't even raised in 2015.
Even if they had a United Nations Conference on the issue then, it was kept in the hush.
Why raised now?
Perfectly valid reason. These are extracts from his book that is just about to be released. Quite normal for new revelations to be released in an autobiography. I’m sure you will agree that Moeen is not a liar or a drama queen. He’s an unassuming and modest man. His book had to have some new stuff and this story is an example. Better to focus on the story rather then look for fires which aren’t there.

Not in the form of a book.
I must say he's got a selling point now.
So a blatantly racist and islamophobic comment was brushed under the carpet.
ECB should answer why.
Not the first or the last time he has played the victim card, but stuff like this is necessary to sell his book.
Compared to Amla, Moeen clearly plays the religion angle more. From showing solidarity with the Palestinians on the field to talking about his background in every interview (have heard his backstory of struggling in inner Birmingham a thousand times now, and viola, here comes the book to shed further light on it).
He also seems to be discriminated over and over again as if he is the only Muslim cricketer playing in a pre-dominantly non-Muslim team, but I guess all these distractions are necessary to deviate from the fact that more often than not, he doesn’t perform well enough to merit a permanent place in the team.
On the contrary, you won’t really hear a word from Amla about the challenges that he faced when he tried to break into the South African cricket setup, or the discrimination that he has faced from evil teams like Australia etc., and nor was he found showing solidarity to the Palestinians on the field.
He has played far longer than Moeen and was far more successful as well, so there is no doubt that if Moeen had to face some discrimination, he must have to deal with it as well, but he prefers not to sing about it.
He has refrained from selling his faith and has managed to keep entirely private, and that is how it should be. Of course the only controversy was the Dean Jones comment, but that was heard by everyone on-air and Amla did not make an issue out of it.
Not sure if he will be realasinf a book any time soon to list the number of times he has been discriminated against. Ultimately, it comes down to the individual mindset - Moeen thrives in victimizing himself, Amla doesn’t.
Moeen spoke to the player at the end of the series, which England won 3-2, and his opponent denied saying "Osama" and claimed that some of his best friends were Muslim.
Not the first or the last time he has played the victim card, but stuff like this is necessary to sell his book.
Compared to Amla, Moeen clearly plays the religion angle more. From showing solidarity with the Palestinians on the field to talking about his background in every interview (have heard his backstory of struggling in inner Birmingham a thousand times now, and viola, here comes the book to shed further light on it).
He also seems to be discriminated over and over again as if he is the only Muslim cricketer playing in a pre-dominantly non-Muslim team, but I guess all these distractions are necessary to deviate from the fact that more often than not, he doesn’t perform well enough to merit a permanent place in the team.
On the contrary, you won’t really hear a word from Amla about the challenges that he faced when he tried to break into the South African cricket setup, or the discrimination that he has faced from evil teams like Australia etc., and nor was he found showing solidarity to the Palestinians on the field.
He has played far longer than Moeen and was far more successful as well, so there is no doubt that if Moeen had to face some discrimination, he must have to deal with it as well, but he prefers not to sing about it.
He has refrained from selling his faith and has managed to keep entirely private, and that is how it should be. Of course the only controversy was the Dean Jones comment, but that was heard by everyone on-air and Amla did not make an issue out of it.
Not sure if he will be realasinf a book any time soon to list the number of times he has been discriminated against. Ultimately, it comes down to the individual mindset - Moeen thrives in victimizing himself, Amla doesn’t.
Considering Moeen is the best spinner in England, the rest of your post isn't even worth reading. As for you, continue blaming victims if it gives you any joy
Moeen might be the best spinner in the England, but he has been in and out of the team because of his inconsistency, and he was last dropped because he was bullied by the big bad Australians.
I am not blaming the victim here - I am simply stating that he appears to thrive in such situations. The guy has played international cricket for 4 years now, while Amla has played for 14. However, poor Moeen has already been discriminated ten times more.
So just because one person stays quiet, everyone should just lay down and take it?
So just because one person stays quiet, everyone should just lay down and take it?
He is doing neither though.
Neither is he strong enough to just ignore it like Amla did nor did he have the stomach to fight back the Aussies when the incident actually happened.
What happened (IF it happened) was wrong but now it seems Moeen is only bringing it up to sell his books. It brings his credibility into question.
There is no statute of limitations in this. There could have been many reasons such as him new to his career etc at that point.
We need to concentrate on the wrong here and not worry about whether he is selling books etc
It is not possible to ignore the fact that this information is coming out along with the release of his book.
I'm sure we have all seen sensationalist pieces in books written by other cricketers and we have seen how that helps the sale.
Yes, officially, there is no statute of limitation on this. But one has to wonder why there was never a single report recorded on this incident even though ICC takes a very hard stand against racism.
Those are fair questions and for something to Moeen to explain but IMO not right to doubt the intentions of the victim of any sort of abuse,
The person who has opted to stay quiet has been a world class cricketer, while the person who is making noise has been pretty average.
I think if Moeen was actually very good, he wouldn’t have had to cry wolf and play the victim card often.
Not the first or the last time he has played the victim card, but stuff like this is necessary to sell his book.
Compared to Amla, Moeen clearly plays the religion angle more. From showing solidarity with the Palestinians on the field to talking about his background in every interview (have heard his backstory of struggling in inner Birmingham a thousand times now, and viola, here comes the book to shed further light on it).
He also seems to be discriminated over and over again as if he is the only Muslim cricketer playing in a pre-dominantly non-Muslim team, but I guess all these distractions are necessary to deviate from the fact that more often than not, he doesn’t perform well enough to merit a permanent place in the team.
On the contrary, you won’t really hear a word from Amla about the challenges that he faced when he tried to break into the South African cricket setup, or the discrimination that he has faced from evil teams like Australia etc., and nor was he found showing solidarity to the Palestinians on the field.
He has played far longer than Moeen and was far more successful as well, so there is no doubt that if Moeen had to face some discrimination, he must have to deal with it as well, but he prefers not to sing about it.
He has refrained from selling his faith and has managed to keep entirely private, and that is how it should be. Of course the only controversy was the Dean Jones comment, but that was heard by everyone on-air and Amla did not make an issue out of it.
Not sure if he will be realasinf a book any time soon to list the number of times he has been discriminated against. Ultimately, it comes down to the individual mindset - Moeen thrives in victimizing himself, Amla doesn’t.
The person who has opted to stay quiet has been a world class cricketer, while the person who is making noise has been pretty average.
I think if Moeen was actually very good, he wouldn’t have had to cry wolf and play the victim card often.
Seems suspicious, why is he coming up with this after 3 years? I hope h doesn't become a drama queen.
Racism is racism.
A) We don't know whether Amla has faced racism on the field
B) It shouldn't matter!
Moeen's ability as a cricketer has no place in this discussion.
In fact, this is something the ACB should investigate considering its squad has a Muslim athlete (Usman Khawaja). If such comments are hurled at opposing players, perhaps it's spreading throughout the dressing room too? Not a good look at all and it should have been addressed immediately (if true).
So a blatantly racist and islamophobic comment was brushed under the carpet.
ECB should answer why.
Outrageous remarks from [MENTION=131701]Mamoon[/MENTION] ! Come on man this is not on.
If the allegation made by Ali is true - disgraceful and disgusting stuff.
Victim shaming should be avoided.
It's also true he has to sell his book, so things like this would be released to create some hype.
But the hype is right, bringing attention to a valid racism issue.
[MENTION=43242]Dr_Bassim[/MENTION] when victims of other racist attacks tell their stories years later, you would not have any problem with that would you?
Not the first or the last time he has played the victim card, but stuff like this is necessary to sell his book.
Compared to Amla, Moeen clearly plays the religion angle more. From showing solidarity with the Palestinians on the field to talking about his background in every interview (have heard his backstory of struggling in inner Birmingham a thousand times now, and viola, here comes the book to shed further light on it).
He also seems to be discriminated over and over again as if he is the only Muslim cricketer playing in a pre-dominantly non-Muslim team, but I guess all these distractions are necessary to deviate from the fact that more often than not, he doesn’t perform well enough to merit a permanent place in the team.
On the contrary, you won’t really hear a word from Amla about the challenges that he faced when he tried to break into the South African cricket setup, or the discrimination that he has faced from evil teams like Australia etc., and nor was he found showing solidarity to the Palestinians on the field.
He has played far longer than Moeen and was far more successful as well, so there is no doubt that if Moeen had to face some discrimination, he must have to deal with it as well, but he prefers not to sing about it.
He has refrained from selling his faith and has managed to keep entirely private, and that is how it should be. Of course the only controversy was the Dean Jones comment, but that was heard by everyone on-air and Amla did not make an issue out of it.
Not sure if he will be realasinf a book any time soon to list the number of times he has been discriminated against. Ultimately, it comes down to the individual mindset - Moeen thrives in victimizing himself, Amla doesn’t.
You do understand this is based on his autobiography and autobiographies are designed to talk about the past.
I mean, where is your common sense?
This is truly despicable. What has Aussie team become on field?
And why didnt Moeen make a big deal of it then?
Think the issue for some is more about him being a Muslim of some Pakistani origin
Not the first or the last time he has played the victim card, but stuff like this is necessary to sell his book.
Compared to Amla, Moeen clearly plays the religion angle more. From showing solidarity with the Palestinians on the field to talking about his background in every interview (have heard his backstory of struggling in inner Birmingham a thousand times now, and viola, here comes the book to shed further light on it).
He also seems to be discriminated over and over again as if he is the only Muslim cricketer playing in a pre-dominantly non-Muslim team, but I guess all these distractions are necessary to deviate from the fact that more often than not, he doesn’t perform well enough to merit a permanent place in the team.
On the contrary, you won’t really hear a word from Amla about the challenges that he faced when he tried to break into the South African cricket setup, or the discrimination that he has faced from evil teams like Australia etc., and nor was he found showing solidarity to the Palestinians on the field.
He has played far longer than Moeen and was far more successful as well, so there is no doubt that if Moeen had to face some discrimination, he must have to deal with it as well, but he prefers not to sing about it.
He has refrained from selling his faith and has managed to keep entirely private, and that is how it should be. Of course the only controversy was the Dean Jones comment, but that was heard by everyone on-air and Amla did not make an issue out of it.
Not sure if he will be realasinf a book any time soon to list the number of times he has been discriminated against. Ultimately, it comes down to the individual mindset - Moeen thrives in victimizing himself, Amla doesn’t.
The person who has opted to stay quiet has been a world class cricketer, while the person who is making noise has been pretty average.
I think if Moeen was actually very good, he wouldn’t have had to cry wolf and play the victim card often.
What kind of whack reasoning is that? That's exactly what abusers say when people come out years latter accusing them of abuse.It wasn't even raised in 2015.
Even if they had a United Nations Conference on the issue then, it was kept in the hush.
Why raised now?
I don't need common sense to see thid could possibly be a publicity stunt. I hope his claims are true, if not he will be a another liar with a victim card.
What’s with the trend of cricketers publishing biographies mid-way through their career?
Bairstow, Yuvraj, Anderson, Smith, Broad (multiple), and now Ali.
[MENTION=131701]Mamoon[/MENTION]
You're a doctor. Try researching the rate of false accusations. It's nowhere near as high as people try to paint it as.
What you're saying is that you're sure he's lying (Probably because you hate him, had Kohli said he was discriminated against by a Pakistan, you'd be all over it. Hell, I remember your comments when Shehzad was kind enough to try and save Dilshan from Hell) but that you can't say it, so you'll ask for evidence and facts.
That this was reported at the time, and Moeen did not make much of it until now, shows that he doesn't play the victim card at all.
[MENTION=131701]Mamoon[/MENTION]
You're a doctor. Try researching the rate of false accusations. It's nowhere near as high as people try to paint it as.
What you're saying is that you're sure he's lying (Probably because you hate him, had Kohli said he was discriminated against by a Pakistan, you'd be all over it. Hell, I remember your comments when Shehzad was kind enough to try and save Dilshan from Hell) but that you can't say it, so you'll ask for evidence and facts.
That this was reported at the time, and Moeen did not make much of it until now, shows that he doesn't play the victim card at all.
I am not talking about the rate, I am talking about the fact that these things are very easy to exploit and we should not jump to conclusions unless and until all the facts are on the table.
The problem is that people don’t wait for facts to unfold because firstly, it is Moeen and secondly, discrimination is a reality. However, we have to go case-by-case.
Look at Serena Williams for example. A sore loser who played the feminist card to deflect the blame.
I am not saying that Moeen is lying; I am saying that there is no reason to take his words at face value. Australian accent can be awkward for non-Australian ears, perhaps he misheard him. I highly doubt that any Australian player would randomly call Moeen Osama or whatever.
People who fish for discrimination often hear and see what they want to, and can turn anything into abuse, and I say this with deep regret that I find Moeen to be someone who thrives in such controversies. I accept all the criticism that has come (or will come) my way for this statement, but this is how I feel.
That is all I have to say on this matter, I don’t have anything further to add.
How come you have then refused to believe that Smith cheated with the DRS in India? You called it "fake Hindutva news", as I recall.
How is it that you are so sympathetic towards Moeen but so full of hatred towards Kohli? Is it because he is kaafir?