What's new

Mohammad Hafeez: 'Spider-cam should be used at coin toss for clarity'

AAli98

First Class Star
Joined
Jun 15, 2017
Runs
3,276
Former Pakistan captain Mohammad Hafeez is keen on having Spider-cams showing the television audience the outcome of the toss at the ICC events.

At a talk show also featuring former Pakistan cricketers Bazid Khan and Rashid Latif, Mohammad Hafeez elaborated on a change he wanted to see at the World Cups.

“I was the captain of the 2012 T20 World Cup,” began Hafeez. “I had suggested the Tournament Director to avail the advantage of the Spider-Cam during the toss at the World Cup. The Spider-Cam should show the outcome when the coin landed for more clarity.

“Normally, when the coin spins, it goes five to ten metres away from you, and the captains are sitting out here. I am not casting aspersions on anyone’s credibility. I am not doubting anyone. But if you show the outcome, there will be more clarity for the fans, for the world.

“Now, only the match referee goes and picks up the coin. We have to take the referee’s words on whether it is head or tail.”
 
Umpires should be installed a 24/7 monitoring collar with microphone and camera imo.

I'm not saying they are corrupt but something is fishy.


I'm suddenly craving fish fry. Brb.
 
I don’t think the coin toss is being rigged but might just add to the viewing experience if they could find a way to show it closer as it’s flipped and us to see where it lands before it’s announced
 
Hafeez has a great point. I totally agree with him. When everything is transparent, then toss outcome should be transparent also.

Why only one person (match referee - ICC's paid employee) should be allowed to look at the toss outcome and announce the result? Why should that person be trusted especially in test matches where winning the toss is winning the game basically.

Remember neutral umpores were brought in by Imran Khan because home umpires were not trusted to make honest decisions. If players can be bought by the bookies then match refree is a human also - generally an ex-player.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Notices sharma always flings the coin on the other side of the pitch only match referee can see it. & always wins the crucial tosses.
Pakistan won the toss against Afghanistan but still couln't prevent Afghanis from scripting history. Before the match Hafeez was crying that it will be a rank turner to favour Afghanistan. Bt teh pitch turned out to be pretty flat. Hafeez should leave cricket analysis and take up a career as a novelist as he can cook up stories in a jiff.
 
Pakistan won the toss against Afghanistan but still couln't prevent Afghanis from scripting history. Before the match Hafeez was crying that it will be a rank turner to favour Afghanistan. Bt teh pitch turned out to be pretty flat. Hafeez should leave cricket analysis and take up a career as a novelist as he can cook up stories in a jiff.
Lol. This. Hafeez was whinging non stop about that pitch and it turned out to be a good Chennai pitch.
 
Pakistan won the toss against Afghanistan but still couln't prevent Afghanis from scripting history. Before the match Hafeez was crying that it will be a rank turner to favour Afghanistan. Bt teh pitch turned out to be pretty flat. Hafeez should leave cricket analysis and take up a career as a novelist as he can cook up stories in a jiff.

I dunno about Hafeez but the pitch was a rank turner, it was the same one as for Aus v Ind and we saw what happened there.

In the first half, the ball certainly turned A LOT and Pakistan produced a seriously above par score...but by the time Afghanistan were bowling the pitch became flat. Was a roller used in between innings? Maybe, I believe the batting side has a call on that don't they, or its just in tests?

But the biggest issue was the pitch looked shiny like concrete, the commentators brought it up several times and most of them couldn't understand how it had changed so drastically. Basically conditions changed and it became very easy to bat.
 
Hafeez is always trying to be over clever.

Of all the things that need to be changed in cricket, this isnt one.
These former cricketers are paid handsomely to cast their opinions on the media.They need to ensure they something to say when the camera is on them
 
I am sure there was a time Indian fans were blaming the coin toss for losses at one point!

Hafeez is right, there was a time in previous WCs when the camera panned on the coin to confirm whether heads or tails.

It is not what you know, it is what you might know!

The best orchestrated WC in history of sports.
 
I dunno about Hafeez but the pitch was a rank turner, it was the same one as for Aus v Ind and we saw what happened there.

In the first half, the ball certainly turned A LOT and Pakistan produced a seriously above par score...but by the time Afghanistan were bowling the pitch became flat. Was a roller used in between innings? Maybe, I believe the batting side has a call on that don't they, or its just in tests?

But the biggest issue was the pitch looked shiny like concrete, the commentators brought it up several times and most of them couldn't understand how it had changed so drastically. Basically conditions changed and it became very easy to bat.
The same happened in Ind vs Aus game as well. batting becomes easy under lights in Chennai. Yet Aussie bowlers fought by picking 3 quick wickets. Babar shud have bowled first on thsi pitch. I am surprised he batted first. With AFG laying 4 spinners the Pak batsmen became extrab cautious not give give away wickets and played very slow. They didn't any wickets to rashid as a result but ended up score lesser than par.
 
I dunno about Hafeez but the pitch was a rank turner, it was the same one as for Aus v Ind and we saw what happened there.

In the first half, the ball certainly turned A LOT and Pakistan produced a seriously above par score...but by the time Afghanistan were bowling the pitch became flat. Was a roller used in between innings? Maybe, I believe the batting side has a call on that don't they, or its just in tests?

But the biggest issue was the pitch looked shiny like concrete, the commentators brought it up several times and most of them couldn't understand how it had changed so drastically. Basically conditions changed and it became very easy to bat.
Lol, do you even know what a rank turner is? Go watch the match again and watch the Afghan bowlers ball - not one ball deviated more than 2 degrees! They kept on showing the ball deviation throughout the match and when Babar was batting the deviation was 1.5-2 degrees - that just means that he and everybody else batted poorly on an expectedly slower wicket!
 
Same Hafeez were crying About Pak- Afg match pitch before the game. But that was good wickets.
Pakistani cricketers and fans are always talking about conspiracies theory . :yk
 
If I am not wrong Hafeez was the one who started crying about meeting Afghanistan in Chennai which led to PCB officially trying to change the venue for the clash even before the WC started? If yes, Prof is a sheer genius- an amazing mystic - he could actually foresee how rubbish the whole Pakistani team will be in the WC!
 
I feel like there are too many noises regarding toss.

Toss shouldn't be discussed at all. A good team shouldn't complain about toss.
Yesterday there was a guy saying we need to do 3 tosses “to make it fairer for both teams”.

Whoever taught him maths at school needs to be fired out of a cannon.
 
Ooh. Why do we keep giving these non sense statements. India would win 9 out 10 games they play vs any team in India/during the WC. Even if they lose all the tosses.
 
I dunno about Hafeez but the pitch was a rank turner, it was the same one as for Aus v Ind and we saw what happened there.

In the first half, the ball certainly turned A LOT and Pakistan produced a seriously above par score...but by the time Afghanistan were bowling the pitch became flat. Was a roller used in between innings? Maybe, I believe the batting side has a call on that don't they, or its just in tests?

But the biggest issue was the pitch looked shiny like concrete, the commentators brought it up several times and most of them couldn't understand how it had changed so drastically. Basically conditions changed and it became very easy to bat.
Batting becomes easier under lights in Chennai. This has been the trend for a long time. Pakistani analysis team/Think tank made a mistake and chose to bat first. The pitch was shining because of the lights.
Overall, there was no conspiracy against Pakistan. The PCT, after posting a good total, was lazy in the second half. You can tell that by their fielding. Once they realized the match was slipping away, they panicked.
 
I dunno about Hafeez but the pitch was a rank turner, it was the same one as for Aus v Ind and we saw what happened there.

In the first half, the ball certainly turned A LOT and Pakistan produced a seriously above par score...but by the time Afghanistan were bowling the pitch became flat. Was a roller used in between innings? Maybe, I believe the batting side has a call on that don't they, or its just in tests?

But the biggest issue was the pitch looked shiny like concrete, the commentators brought it up several times and most of them couldn't understand how it had changed so drastically. Basically conditions changed and it became very easy to bat.
you guys don't know what a rank turner is.. wait for Test matches in Chennai and you will see what a rank turner is. That was an excellent pitch. India/NZ/Aus would have chased 320 comfortably there.
 
Batting becomes easier under lights in Chennai. This has been the trend for a long time. Pakistani analysis team/Think tank made a mistake and chose to bat first. The pitch was shining because of the lights.
Overall, there was no conspiracy against Pakistan. The PCT, after posting a good total, was lazy in the second half. You can tell that by their fielding. Once they realized the match was slipping away, they panicked.
I agree, I don't think it's a conspiracy either I'm just saying the pitch turned during the day as evidenced twice.
 
you guys don't know what a rank turner is.. wait for Test matches in Chennai and you will see what a rank turner is. That was an excellent pitch. India/NZ/Aus would have chased 320 comfortably there.
The same Australia who couldn't make 200 on this pitch, right?
 
Hafeez is right, but instead of having a drone we could just have both sides of the coin coloured blue / red so the viewers and the captains can see much clearly.

If we had so much faith in umpires/referees, we wouldn’t have had neutral umpires.
 
This suggestion is one of the most pointless suggestions I have ever seen. It won't enhance the viewing experience, nor will it do anything.
 
Pakistan won the toss against Afghanistan but still couln't prevent Afghanis from scripting history. Before the match Hafeez was crying that it will be a rank turner to favour Afghanistan. Bt teh pitch turned out to be pretty flat. Hafeez should leave cricket analysis and take up a career as a novelist as he can cook up stories in a jiff.
I think they need to be controversial for ratings. Razzaq, Basit Ali have pretty outrageous theories too. I like Azhar Ali. He looks balanced. But the one with very low IQ comments has always been Rashid Latif. Can't really understand how this man was even a captain of Pakistan once. Every one of us here in PP has more understanding of cricket and tactics than that man.
 
I think they need to be controversial for ratings. Razzaq, Basit Ali have pretty outrageous theories too. I like Azhar Ali. He looks balanced. But the one with very low IQ comments has always been Rashid Latif. Can't really understand how this man was even a captain of Pakistan once. Every one of us here in PP has more understanding of cricket and tactics than that man.
Rashid said Kohli was not a t20 player and Kohli answered with his knock at melbourne last year. Before Basit Ali started his Youtube channel every time India won against any strong team in ICC events he used attribute it to the teams losing wantedly due to IPL. I remember Basit Ali dancing in the Har Lamha Purjosh show when India lost to West Indies in the 2016 t20 SF but he had issues with Ifran Pathan dancing with Rashid Khan. These ex cricketrs always find some sort of controversies when there are none.
 
I’m a little confused so Hafeez didn’t want Babar to win the toss?
 
I think they need to be controversial for ratings. Razzaq, Basit Ali have pretty outrageous theories too. I like Azhar Ali. He looks balanced. But the one with very low IQ comments has always been Rashid Latif. Can't really understand how this man was even a captain of Pakistan once. Every one of us here in PP has more understanding of cricket and tactics than that man.
Basit ali has skills to start a comedy show on cricket theme and it could be a big hit. He is just wasting his time being guest at talk shows. Lol.
I remember watching a video after 2011 final win in which he accused India of cheating and SL losing deliberately due to IPL contracts.
He still does the same without thinking that India hasn't won any ICC trophy in last 10 years whereas IPL contracts have been increased manifold. What a character.
 
Basit ali has skills to start a comedy show on cricket theme and it could be a big hit. He is just wasting his time being guest at talk shows. Lol.
I remember watching a video after 2011 final win in which he accused India of cheating and SL losing deliberately due to IPL contracts.
He still does the same without thinking that India hasn't won any ICC trophy in last 10 years whereas IPL contracts have been increased manifold. What a character.
I like Basit. He is an unabashed India hater. I guess that's why many Indians watch him. People are always curious to see how he can spin things
 
Why Rohit Sharma throws coin far away from the opposite captain.....if anyone has seen today's toss......even Kane Williamson tried to have look at coin,but before he could reach the refree announced.... what it is...
So I think Mohd Hafeez is very right here
 
Honestly not a bad point. Just have a camera zoom in on where the coin landed to record what it landed on so the referee isn't the only one who knows for sure.

However in this specific content, I know he's just been doing all this RR to get more attention for whichever channel he's doing that show on nowadays. I think it's PTV.

This is why I love the A-Sports. 99% of the discussion is about cricket. Even Shoaib Malik behaves.
 
In order to get rid of such issues, both captains should take a look at the coin themselves plus the cameraman can also focus on the coin so everyone can see what really happened. There is no real need for the match referee to quickly go towards the coin, have a little glance and picked it up. We can also follow the football way, where the referee do the coin toss and he catches it and show it to both the captains.
 
Former Pakistan captain Mohammad Hafeez is keen on having Spider-cams showing the television audience the outcome of the toss at the ICC events.

At a talk show also featuring former Pakistan cricketers Bazid Khan and Rashid Latif, Mohammad Hafeez elaborated on a change he wanted to see at the World Cups.

“I was the captain of the 2012 T20 World Cup,” began Hafeez. “I had suggested the Tournament Director to avail the advantage of the Spider-Cam during the toss at the World Cup. The Spider-Cam should show the outcome when the coin landed for more clarity.

“Normally, when the coin spins, it goes five to ten metres away from you, and the captains are sitting out here. I am not casting aspersions on anyone’s credibility. I am not doubting anyone. But if you show the outcome, there will be more clarity for the fans, for the world.

“Now, only the match referee goes and picks up the coin. We have to take the referee’s words on whether it is head or tail.”
The coin should be color coded.
 
The coin should be color coded.
The specific gravity of one color could be different from the one used on the other side. That may tip it in the favor of the higher specific gravity (no pun). This has to be accounted for along with wind direction and wind speed during the coin toss.
 
Should we also use a coin the size of the empire states building so that people can clearly see each side before the game?
 
The specific gravity of one color could be different from the one used on the other side. That may tip it in the favor of the higher specific gravity (no pun). This has to be accounted for along with wind direction and wind speed during the coin toss.
So heads and tails has no affect on gravity?
 
We have the technology to do so, why not its not a bad thing Hafeez is suggesting
 
Even a neutral observer would be better than nothing
Cricket has embraced modern technology where other sports have questioned the time taken
There is half an hour before the game begins so there is no devil's advocate here for not having the technology there and whether or not it saves time, it should be available
 
poor williamson didn’t even see the coin
If Kane insisted on seeing, there would have been a campaign to not hire him for IPL. SENA teams + Afg tend to be very simpish and fawning no matter what BCCI does, the way ABD was running after Kohli on his birthday and posting about it would be embarrassing for any South African
There is already a campaign to malign Simon Doull.

As a team, India has shown that it has and will be unable to win a 50 overs world cup outside its country for half a century, that itself is a testament to how much its needs "assistance" to win something of note, even though they have had world beaters in every position over these decades
 
I don’t think the coin toss is being rigged but might just add to the viewing experience if they could find a way to show it closer as it’s flipped and us to see where it lands before it’s announced

Physical coin toss itself is just there because of tradition.

They can do a virtual coin toss on the big screen so that stadium audience and TV audience can see it with spinning visuals and buildup.

Undoubtedly some third rate analyst will allege that broadcast team is manipulating the random generation algo of virtual coin.
 
Now that Hafeez is in a position of responsibility he should introduce televised coin tosses starting with Pakistan bilaterals, or at least PSL and Pakistan domestics.

Let’s see you walk the talk Hafeez.

Coin tosses are like gambling and as an Islamic state, Pakistan should do away with them

maybe a bowl out of 3 balls at start to see who gets to bat or bowl first?

But then how will they decide who will bowl first in the bowl out....
 
Coin tosses are like gambling and as an Islamic state, Pakistan should do away with them

maybe a bowl out of 3 balls at start to see who gets to bat or bowl first?

But then how will they decide who will bowl first in the bowl out....
Then it will be unfair with the likes of bavuma, kane, latham, jos butler to face off against Pat Cummins in a bowl out contest.
 
Would not be surprised. Steve Waugh called out Ganguly, who would make a call, then quickly call the win and grab the coin before anyone could see the result.
 
Coin tosses are like gambling and as an Islamic state, Pakistan should do away with them

maybe a bowl out of 3 balls at start to see who gets to bat or bowl first?

But then how will they decide who will bowl first in the bowl out....
100meter race between Kaptaans. :inzi
 
Then it will be unfair with the likes of bavuma, kane, latham, jos butler to face off against Pat Cummins in a bowl out contest.
It does not have to be the captains to participate for the bowl out, just have 1 bowler from each side bowl x amount balls and who ever wins the bowl out captain can decide if they bat or bowl first
 
TBH , dont mind this.. Boards and ICC can make more ad money with this.. So ladies and gentlemen -- Today's match toss sponsored by XYZ pan masala, XYZ Gutka, XYZ Cool Drink, XYZ tire etc etc.. Make more moolah I guess ;)
 
If Kane insisted on seeing, there would have been a campaign to not hire him for IPL. SENA teams + Afg tend to be very simpish and fawning no matter what BCCI does, the way ABD was running after Kohli on his birthday and posting about it would be embarrassing for any South African
There is already a campaign to malign Simon Doull.

As a team, India has shown that it has and will be unable to win a 50 overs world cup outside its country for half a century, that itself is a testament to how much its needs "assistance" to win something of note, even though they have had world beaters in every position over these decades
did india not qualify in 2003 World Cup final in South Africa? which team won against the great Aussies in 1999 final, 2003 final or 2007 final. All subcontinent teams playing finals outside Asia.


Check 2011 final coin toss. Sangakkara created a mess and the toss was re-done .Initially dhoni won it but sang did not hear or create some sort of confusion. Second attempt, SL won. Toss alone would not decide the fate of the match.

SA won the toss in semifinal today. Did they not loose?

ABD and Kohli were best of buddies with 10-12 year bonding in RCB. you should not read too much into ADB posting pictures.
 
Coin tosses are like gambling and as an Islamic state, Pakistan should do away with them

maybe a bowl out of 3 balls at start to see who gets to bat or bowl first?

But then how will they decide who will bowl first in the bowl out....

I don’t see a change in coin toss rules for international games that quickly if at all, maybe domestic.

Given that any thing that involves chance may be seen as gambling, we’ve eliminated pretty much most options.

One suggestion is suggest that both parties select a player from the opposing side, and the two have a best of three hit a single wicket competition. That’s tactics (choosing opposing player) and skill (hitting a single wicket).
 
I don’t see a change in coin toss rules for international games that quickly if at all, maybe domestic.

Given that any thing that involves chance may be seen as gambling, we’ve eliminated pretty much most options.

One suggestion is suggest that both parties select a player from the opposing side, and the two have a best of three hit a single wicket competition. That’s tactics (choosing opposing player) and skill (hitting a single wicket).

Sorry - I was kidding!

Coin toss is the best way to do it.

But in ODIs and T20s, it should not matter that much unless rain is expected etc.

Teams need to have ability to deal with batting or bowling first.
 
there was a moment during the final group game one the Indian commentator's (I forget his name) was talking about the upcoming semifinal India New Zealand and his words at the time did get me wondering *when Rohit wins the toss* not if but when, like it is a far-gone concussion that it in fact will happen.
 
there was a moment during the final group game one the Indian commentator's (I forget his name) was talking about the upcoming semifinal India New Zealand and his words at the time did get me wondering *when Rohit wins the toss* not if but when, like it is a far-gone concussion that it in fact will happen.
"When Rohit wins the toss he usually decides to bowl first"
"When Rohit wins the toss , it's grass on the pitch which majorly contributes to his decision to bat first or not "
Hmmmm
 
Hafeez has pointed out a good suggestion. Everything should be transparent. All viewers have the right to see if it was heads or tails. It helps to avoid later conspiracy theories.
 
In order to get rid of such issues, both captains should take a look at the coin themselves plus the cameraman can also focus on the coin so everyone can see what really happened. There is no real need for the match referee to quickly go towards the coin, have a little glance and picked it up. We can also follow the football way, where the referee do the coin toss and he catches it and show it to both the captains.
They can hype it up even more. Make it slow-mo and have loud music and star plus drama-type filming of the crowd in the air with quick cuts to each captain's face after each movement in the air.
 
Hafeez has pointed out a good suggestion. Everything should be transparent. All viewers have the right to see if it was heads or tails. It helps to avoid later conspiracy theories.

It is a conspiracy theory though. He is implying the match officials would cheat by not declaring the right winner of the toss. These guys have spent decades in the sport , casting doubts on their integrity is poor form from someone who is now in an official PCB post.
 
Sorry - I was kidding!

Coin toss is the best way to do it.

But in ODIs and T20s, it should not matter that much unless rain is expected etc.

Teams need to have ability to deal with batting or bowling first.
Oops looks like I need a sense of humour transplant.
 
and Fox sports..

----------------------------------------

Debate erupts over World Cup coin toss conspiracy after India vs New Zealand semi final

India’s undefeated rampage through their home World Cup has raised more than a few eyebrows with a former Pakistan star claiming to have uncovered a conspiracy.

There have been regular claims that India have been set up to claim their home tournament, having won all 10 of their games easily.

While cricket pundits raged over the revelation that the pitch for India’s ODI World Cup semi-final against New Zealand had been hand chosen and curated to suit the host nation, another drama erupted when 26-Test and 27-ODI Pakistani fast bowler Sikander Bakht floated a fresh conspiracy.

He claimed that Indian captain Rohit Sharma purposely tossed the coin in a way that rolled away from the toss and meant the opposition captain couldn’t see the outcome of the toss for themselves.

In Wednesday’s match, New Zealand captain Kane Williamson took the match referee’s word about the toss as the coin had come to rest several metres away.

It then would allow the match referee to simply say it had landed whichever way would benefit India most.

This is despite Sharma winning five and losing five tosses during the event.

There is no suggestion that either Sharma or the match referee have done anything wrong.

“Can I give you a conspiracy theory?” Bakht said on Geo News. “At the time of the toss, Rohit Sharma throws the coin distant from the range of any opposition captain. Thus, the opposition captain cannot go and crosscheck about the call.”

Bakht doubled down on X, where he posted the clip, writing: “Very strange the way Rohit Sharma throws the coin at the toss, far away, don’t let other captains see, compared to other captains in the WC, any reason?”

Speaking to Fox Cricket, a source from the New Zealand camp said Sharma’s coin tosses had raised eyebrows during the tournament.

However, the conspiracy has been rubbished by his own countrymen, with Wasim Akram and Moin Khan trashing the comments.

Speaking on A Sports’ show The Pavillion, Akram said, “Who decides where the coin should land? It is just for sponsorship, coin can go anywhere — I feel embarrassed.”

Khan, who was also on the show, added: “This is not true, I think he is mistaken. He is just creating a fuss, that’s it, nothing else. Because, every captain has a different way of tossing the coin, there is nothing in that.”

It’s just the latest conspiracy theory to explain why the world’s No. 1 ODI team with three of the top five ranked batters and bowlers who are playing at home have gone through the tournament undefeated.

It comes after claims that the ICC and BCCI were changing out balls during the game in a bid to explain why India’s pace bowlers appeared to be getting more swing.

Ex-Pakistani cricketer Hasan Raza said on ABN News: “The way Siraj and Shami were swinging the ball, it seemed like the ICC or the BCCI were giving them different and suspicious balls in the second innings. An inspection is required to be done on the ball. There might be an additional layer of coating for a better swing.”

Raza also claimed India had manipulated the DRS reviews.

Akram responded to these claims as well, saying: “I have been reading about it from last couple of days. I want to have the same things these guys are having … sounds like fun.”

He went on to explain that the balls were selected by the team from a box of 12 balls after the toss in front of the four umpires and the match referee, while the remainder of the balls are taken to the other team, who select their balls.

He also had a simple reason for why the Indian bowlers had been able to get success.

“The arguments in our country for the past three-four days is that no other bowlers are able to swing the ball,” Akram said. “Also think, these bowlers maybe they have learnt something more, maybe they are better right now. Maybe we should appreciate them.”

Indian star Mohammed Shami took to Instagram to slam the conspiracy.

“Have some shame,” he wrote of Raza.

“Focus on the game and not this nonsense. Sometimes, you should enjoy the success of others. This is World Cup and not your local tournament.

“You were once a player, right? Wasim bhai had explained it, and yet. You don’t trust your own player? You are only praising yourself.”

Fans and conspiracy theorists have also pointed to the semi-final pitch debacle before the India-New Zealand clash, which saw the home side book their place in Sunday’s Final in a 70-run victory.

According to the Daily Mail, the semi-final pitch had been moved to the ground’s sixth pitch, which had already staged two games at the World Cup.

It was meant to be played on pitch seven, which was a fresh pitch.

The Indian Express also reported Indian officials asked BCCI curators to shave off most of the grass on the playing surface, which was meant to result in a slow pitch for the semi-final.

A slow, turning pitch would have been expected to suit India’s spinners Ravindra Jadeja and Kuldeep Yadav, and yet off 10 overs each, they claimed 0/63 and 1/56 respectively, while Mohammed Shami took 7/57.

The Mail claimed the ICC’s independent pitch consultant Andy Atkinson was frustrated by changes to pre-tournament plans.

They quoted a leaked email in which he speculated whether the pitch for Sunday’s final in Ahmedabad “will be the first ever ICC CWC final to have a pitch which has been specifically chosen and prepared to their stipulation at the request of the team management and/or the hierarchy of the home nation board”.

India ended up scoring 4/397, dismissing New Zealand for 327 to book their place in the World Cup final.



 
Last edited by a moderator:
They should definitely show the result of the coin toss on tv. It's weird that they don't. They just have to have a camera guy walk up to film the coin on the ground. How hard is that? Don't even need a spider cam.
 
If this is achieved, the next Pakistani theory would be that India gets special coins that flip according to their preference.

If Rohit calls heads, the coin will obey..
 
Last edited by a moderator:
If Kane insisted on seeing, there would have been a campaign to not hire him for IPL. SENA teams + Afg tend to be very simpish and fawning no matter what BCCI does, the way ABD was running after Kohli on his birthday and posting about it would be embarrassing for any South African
There is already a campaign to malign Simon Doull.

As a team, India has shown that it has and will be unable to win a 50 overs world cup outside its country for half a century, that itself is a testament to how much its needs "assistance" to win something of note, even though they have had world beaters in every position over these decades
Why are Pakistanis so obsessed with IPL. Doesn't concern you anyway, because your players will never be given an IPL contract. Sadly you won't be winning a wc because you will never the chance to host a wc, but you will rack home series wins against Zimbabwe and sri Lanka
 
Back
Top