Attiq_Lone
Debutant
- Joined
- Oct 13, 2018
- Runs
- 192
Mohammad Hafeez, one of the senior players of PCT, who recently made a comeback in the test team, has had quite a rollercoaster career in test matches.
He scored a brilliant hundred in the ongoing series, but that hundred has been followed up by a score of 17 and 5 (in this test so far). Wanting to analyse his performance in the previous series, I saw that there is one common thing: "a consistency in the scores below 50 and more precisely below 30 scores.
Here below is the summary of Hafeez's test innings since Australia series in 2014
Australia Series 2014
Innings: 3
100s:0
50s:0
scores under 30: 2 (3 and 24)
New Zealand Series 2014
Innings: 4
100s:2
50s: 1
scores under 30: 1 (24)
Bangladesh series 2015
innings: 3
100s: 1 (double century)
50s: 0
scores under 30: 2 (8 and 0)
Sri Lanka Series 2015
innings: 4
100s: 0
50s:0
scores under 30: 2 (2 and 8)
England Series 2015
innings: 6
100s: 1
50s: 2
scores under 30: 2 (19 and 27)
England Series 2016
innings: 6
100s: 0
50s: 0
Scores under 30: 4 (0, 18, 0 and 2)
Australia Series 2018 (so far)
Innings: 3*
100s: 1
Scores under 30: 2 (17 and 5)
Total
innings: 29
100s: 5 (17.2%)
50s: 3 (10.3%)
Scores under 30: 15 (51.7%)
From the stats mentioned above, we can clearly see that in every series (excluding the New Zealand one), Hafeez has more scores of below 50 than actual 50s. In most of the series there is one big score, but that is followed by some very low scores.
My point is that considering the age factor, added with the performance, which has not been consistent, shouldn't the Pakistan Cricket Team managenent and selection committee think of a younger option? We have so many performers in domestic cricket but we keep giving chances to players who score one big score in the series to cement their place in the team.
He scored a brilliant hundred in the ongoing series, but that hundred has been followed up by a score of 17 and 5 (in this test so far). Wanting to analyse his performance in the previous series, I saw that there is one common thing: "a consistency in the scores below 50 and more precisely below 30 scores.
Here below is the summary of Hafeez's test innings since Australia series in 2014
Australia Series 2014
Innings: 3
100s:0
50s:0
scores under 30: 2 (3 and 24)
New Zealand Series 2014
Innings: 4
100s:2
50s: 1
scores under 30: 1 (24)
Bangladesh series 2015
innings: 3
100s: 1 (double century)
50s: 0
scores under 30: 2 (8 and 0)
Sri Lanka Series 2015
innings: 4
100s: 0
50s:0
scores under 30: 2 (2 and 8)
England Series 2015
innings: 6
100s: 1
50s: 2
scores under 30: 2 (19 and 27)
England Series 2016
innings: 6
100s: 0
50s: 0
Scores under 30: 4 (0, 18, 0 and 2)
Australia Series 2018 (so far)
Innings: 3*
100s: 1
Scores under 30: 2 (17 and 5)
Total
innings: 29
100s: 5 (17.2%)
50s: 3 (10.3%)
Scores under 30: 15 (51.7%)
From the stats mentioned above, we can clearly see that in every series (excluding the New Zealand one), Hafeez has more scores of below 50 than actual 50s. In most of the series there is one big score, but that is followed by some very low scores.
My point is that considering the age factor, added with the performance, which has not been consistent, shouldn't the Pakistan Cricket Team managenent and selection committee think of a younger option? We have so many performers in domestic cricket but we keep giving chances to players who score one big score in the series to cement their place in the team.