Name top 3 racist nations, cults around the world

[rpant_gabba]

Lots of tap dancing and straw manning.

Shocker

 

[Hikaru]

You disappointed @uppercut with that line, since he is the one who resorts to abuse whenever the going gets tough, and that happens far too often. I have never seen @LordJames cross the line.

Even if you see it, your sycophancy to Pakistani posters will make you blind to it, so never mind.

 

[Bhaag Viru Bhaag]

Even if you see it, your sycophancy to Pakistani posters will make you blind to it, so never mind.

Aw, you are still here? I thought you had logged out for good. I won't subject you to my imagination again, just stroll away. Before you go, here is a gift for you.

 

[Boyka]

And what happens to Jews on end times?
Ever heard of how a Muslim should treat if he sees a Jew on the street?
Ever read about the pact of Umar?
The massacre of Banu Qureza?

Have a nice day.

From the Facebook group of ‘Tommy Robinson and friends’.

Do some real research and stop obsessing over Islam, your insecurity is showing.

 

[Theanonymousone]

Terrorism is not limited to only killing people , spreading false propagation and creating hatred against certain kind of people and creating genocide like situation is also terrorism. RSS has been working over the years with this mindset. This has taken deep roots now.

Threatening people with speech is also part of terrorism. This mob mentality of lynching Muslims is result of RSS and Bajrang daal.

Now when you are talking about Islamic Terrorism its totally different topic , make another thread we can discuss.

I understand that some religious nut-jobs have to be put in prison for hate speeches.

Mob mentality is the biggest issue here in India (no relative comparison here) and I assure you, Muslims fall prey to it more often due to the control of the Imams.

But neither of the agenda is to spread hate. I dont think RSS agenda has this hatred towards Muslims. So, you can label the whole organization as Terrorist organization. Just like I cannot blame Islam, the whole religion as one.

I am not sure you know but Bajrang dal people are hater by youths itself as they are against public-display of affection b/w lovers / couples and often threaten them. They are wrong and cross the lines but terrorism is a big word.

I understand the hate towards RSS and BJP here and I dont deny their political stance of milking religion but comparison with ISIS is truly wrong in any sense

 

[LordJames]

Credit to him, he never insulted me personally.

However, ever since my week long debate with him, he upped the ante on India and Hinduism. It is understandable. He is a firm believer in his religion and the miracles there.

Classic Atheist Trope

A common trend observed among many Hindus today is that the majority have little to no real belief in Hinduism itself. In practice, they present themselves as atheists, often without any real understanding of atheism, its philosophical foundations, or its intellectual paradigms. With the advance of modern science, it has become increasingly difficult to defend atheism consistently, and many Hindus appear to be a generation behind in this debate.

When such individuals engage in discussion, certain traits stand out:​

1. Lack of defense for their own faith: They are unable to defend Hinduism and, being aware of this, avoid standing up for it altogether. Instead, they claim atheism as their position—though their arguments are usually nothing more than borrowed talking points from India’s self-styled “rationalists.”​
2. Cheap shots in public forums: Rather than engaging sincerely, they resort to subtle mockery—pretending to “praise” the religiosity of others, but in reality using it as a way to label them as backward or unenlightened.​

This is why, in any serious discussion, strong and impartial moderation is essential to prevent participants from going off-topic, making irrelevant side remarks, or engaging in cheap potshots instead of honest debate. Let people who hear/read make up their minds!

Example 1 of @Champ_Pal: Discussions on Al-Isra Wal-Meraj

It is a discussion on a matter "within religion" but I have steered clear of quoting scripture or narrations:​

1. He has YET to admit his mistake on constantly quoting "Donkey with Wings" etc with no references​
2. It took days to admit clear scientific principles and theories​

In a Moderated session, this will not be allowed.

Example 2 of @uppercut: Discussed on Islamic Revelation

1. Posted wrong analysis of "Jay Smith" who put forth many falsehoods including "Arabic cannot be read without vowels"

To this day @uppercut just like @Champ_Pal are unable to bring themselves to admit their error. Once again, this will not be allowed in an independently moderated discussion.

Since PakPassion is not a moderated debate forum, @uppercut and others are able to hide their shame behind empty rhetoric and badly worded bombastic narrative to soothe their pain.

So the problem here is that unless you fight-back vehemently by responding in a language that he understands ( which is brute force only ) he will categorize you as an easy sales prospect to steamroll you by administering you some "dawah". This is how these people roll in 2025 and believe you me there will be many a minion standing by him and cheer leading him.​

In reality, not only don't have a belief or ideology of their own to feel proud of and to be able to defend, they can't even take an Academically rigorous potshot at Islam so left with regurgitating the vomit of their "White Masters" whom they worship! And this is what we witness, day in and day out.

Sad and pathetic existence...​

 

[uppercut]

Classic Atheist Trope

A common trend observed among many Hindus today is that the majority have little to no real belief in Hinduism itself. In practice, they present themselves as atheists, often without any real understanding of atheism, its philosophical foundations, or its intellectual paradigms. With the advance of modern science, it has become increasingly difficult to defend atheism consistently, and many Hindus appear to be a generation behind in this debate.

When such individuals engage in discussion, certain traits stand out:​

1. Lack of defense for their own faith: They are unable to defend Hinduism and, being aware of this, avoid standing up for it altogether. Instead, they claim atheism as their position—though their arguments are usually nothing more than borrowed talking points from India’s self-styled “rationalists.”​
2. Cheap shots in public forums: Rather than engaging sincerely, they resort to subtle mockery—pretending to “praise” the religiosity of others, but in reality using it as a way to label them as backward or unenlightened.​

This is why, in any serious discussion, strong and impartial moderation is essential to prevent participants from going off-topic, making irrelevant side remarks, or engaging in cheap potshots instead of honest debate. Let people who hear/read make up their minds!

Example 1 of @Champ_Pal: Discussions on Al-Isra Wal-Meraj

It is a discussion on a matter "within religion" but I have steered clear of quoting scripture or narrations:​

1. He has YET to admit his mistake on constantly quoting "Donkey with Wings" etc with no references​
2. It took days to admit clear scientific principles and theories​

In a Moderated session, this will not be allowed.

Example 2 of @uppercut: Discussed on Islamic Revelation

1. Posted wrong analysis of "Jay Smith" who put forth many falsehoods including "Arabic cannot be read without vowels"

To this day @uppercut just like @Champ_Pal are unable to bring themselves to admit their error. Once again, this will not be allowed in an independently moderated discussion.

Since PakPassion is not a moderated debate forum, @uppercut and others are able to hide their shame behind empty rhetoric and badly worded bombastic narrative to soothe their pain.

In reality, not only don't have a belief or ideology of their own to feel proud of and to be able to defend, they can't even take an Academically rigorous potshot at Islam so left with regurgitating the vomit of their "White Masters" whom they worship! And this is what we witness, day in and day out.

Sad and pathetic existence...​

Dude .... you got bent out of shape and started hurling insults ( which BTW wont be allowed in a strictly moderated debate ) when you couldnt handle the harsh facts .... thats as clear cut a sign there is that you got properly nailed in that thread.

 

[LordJames]

Example 2 of @uppercut: Discussed on Islamic Revelation

1. Posted wrong analysis of "Jay Smith" who put forth many falsehoods including "Arabic cannot be read without vowels"

Dude .... you got bent out of shape and started hurling insults like a loser highschool kid ( which BTW wont be allowed in a strictly moderated debate ) when you couldnt handle the harsh facts .... thats as clear cut a sign there is that you got properly nailed in that thread.

Notice that @uppercut never addresses issues.

Peace out, Brother.

 

[Technics 1210]

In no particular order:

India
Isreal
Amreeka

 

[LordJames]

In no particular order:

India
Isreal
Amreeka

America (as a whole) is not as racist as many places in Europe. Try praying Salah in public in France and you will have a different perspective.

People often confuse American Foreign Policy with American people...

 

[Technics 1210]

America (as a whole) is not as racist as many places in Europe. Try praying Salah in public in France and you will have a different perspective.

People often confuse American Foreign Policy with American people...

You're confusing freedom of expression with racism, and Islam is not a race.

Of all the Western countries, Amreeka was the last to fight for equal rights for blacks, Civil rights movement.

The racism in the south is further compounded by freedom of speech.

Forget Salah in France, try wearing a Swatsika on a T shirt in Europe vs Amreeka, let me know how it goes.

 

[LordJames]

You're confusing freedom of speech with racism.

Of all the Western countries, Amreeka was the last to fight for equal rights for blacks, Civil rights movement.

The racism in the south is further compounded by freedom of speech.

Forget Salah in France, try wearing a Swatsika on a T shirt in Europe vs Amreeka, let me know how it goes.

1. I have a home in the South for decades, no issues, compared to my residence in Europe (including UK)
2. One of the most vocal Muslim Advocacy in US in in Texas.
3. James Bell's (MAGA, Texan, Catholic) Interview posted, yesterday

 

[Technics 1210]

1. I have a home in the South for decades, no issues, compared to my residence in Europe (including UK)
2. One of the most vocal Muslim Advocacy in US in in Texas.
3. Charlie Kirk's (MAGA, Texan, Catholic) Interview posted, yesterday

Nothing you have mentioned changes what I have said.

 

[LordJames]

Nothing you have mentioned changes what I have said.

In my direct experience between US and Europe, the later is clearly more racist and also more restrictive in terms of expression of freedom of speech. The Hijab wearing women of our families feel safer in US (deep South) compared to Europe, for sure.​

Btw, I am not praising US to be some sort of exemplary state and my opinion is not about their foreign policies either.