What's new

Non-achieving players who played 50+ Test matches?

Slog

Senior Test Player
Joined
Feb 15, 2015
Runs
28,984
Post of the Week
1
Hafeez has to be up there
 
From India I will nominate Ishant Sharma though our golden boy may even score a century (right now 87*), maybe a daddy 100 by the time he is done with a guard of honour to boot in his last test.
 
No one can touch Rameez Raza here. A Test batting average of 31.83 in 57 Tests with 2 centuries, that too against proper minnows of his time. And that's a specialist batsman we are talking about. And this man even captained his team. Horrendous!
 
Last edited:
No one can touch Rameez Raza here. A Test batting average of 31.83 in 57 Tests with 2 centuries, that too against proper minnows of his time. And that's a specialist batsman we are talking about. And this man even captained his team. Horrendous!

Yea so true
 
No one can touch Rameez Raza here. A Test batting average of 31.83 in 57 Tests with 2 centuries, that too against proper minnows of his time. And that's a specialist batsman we are talking about. And this man even captained his team. Horrendous!

Mohammad Sami would have been undisputed winner if he had hit 50
 
I remember a poster in the past creating a thread on the most undeserving talent to have played International cricket, and he picked Rameez. And that's simply because of the numbers of Tests and ODI's he played for Pakistan despite being a horrible, horrible talent. True, even less talented players have played International cricket, but none got to play as many matches as Rameez.
 
Ramiz Raja has to be the worst from Pakistan. Ishant Sharma is probably the worst from India, but he had his moments.
 
Rohit Sharma with 25 tests is half-way there.

Just putting it out there.
 
Back
Top