What's new

Not getting selected for a job

Dr_Bassim

Senior T20I Player
Joined
Dec 25, 2009
Runs
18,854
Post of the Week
8
I have a friend who bitterly complained that the only reason he was refused the job was because the hiring manager was "racially motivated".

He said he had all the necessary skills but they hired someone with "white skin".

The view that I want to dicuss is

1. If a colored/black man were to NOT get a job, he can ALWAYS resort to racial discrimination even if he is **** for the job.

2. If a white man however, were to NOT get a job, he has to accept that he is simply NOT what the hiring personnel were looking for.

My point.

If blacks/colored skin people often lose out on jobs, they can blame the color of their skin to take solace.

But if a white man loses out, he has to simply accept reality.

Discuss.
 
I have heard this complaint from one of my friends before. I of course don't agree with it.

There can be racism but most rejections probably happen due to other reasons.
 
There’s more white folk in the West than coloured.

Tell your mate to stop being a woke wet wipe and try again.
 
Depends on the organisation and the make up of the team/company.

In smaller companies this is more likely to happen but for big multinationals who are under pressure to hit their diversity target, this is very unlikely to take place.
 
In a job application, imo, sure, a lot of non white CVs will be thrown in the dustbin. But if you get an interview, it will generally be fair. Fair as in, as fair as for a white person.

People need to understand that white people are unfair & biased towards other white people too. Even if there is a prevalent racial angle at work, if one overlooks it, it will be more productive and work better for them. The best way to beat racism is by vehemently believing that there is no racism, even if it stares at you in the face. Once you believe there is no racism, then there will be no racism. This is the key.

Management is a very different ball game though, esp managing white women, you need a lot of tact, and you need to be extremely careful in getting work done, a lot has to be leading by example, but for success, inevitably you have to play the game in a very politically polished way.
 
I have a friend who bitterly complained that the only reason he was refused the job was because the hiring manager was "racially motivated".

He said he had all the necessary skills but they hired someone with "white skin".

The view that I want to dicuss is

1. If a colored/black man were to NOT get a job, he can ALWAYS resort to racial discrimination even if he is **** for the job.

2. If a white man however, were to NOT get a job, he has to accept that he is simply NOT what the hiring personnel were looking for.

My point.

If blacks/colored skin people often lose out on jobs, they can blame the color of their skin to take solace.

But if a white man loses out, he has to simply accept reality.

Discuss.

I have a white colleague who I am close to. He has a PhD from a top university. There are multiple jobs which he was qualified for but did not get because they were looking for someone of a different race and/or gender.
 
Obviously racism exists, both conscious and unconscious. Sadly, racism pervades every part of society and every provision of service so that POC will tend to get worse outcomes - employment, medical care, justice provision.

UK has anti racist human resources procedures to try to reduce the impact of these.
 
It’s been proven that there is direct racial discrimination and unconscious bias in CV/app review.

I’m less certain about the interview stage because to be honest interviewers can be biased in favour of or against anyone when they meet them, for much wider reasons than just race. Looks, hair colour, eye colour, facial hair, height, weight, dress sense, accent, disability, gender, culture, beliefs, etc. (and race)
 
In a job application, imo, sure, a lot of non white CVs will be thrown in the dustbin. But if you get an interview, it will generally be fair. Fair as in, as fair as for a white person.

This is quite apposite and ties in with my own experience. There is an element of subconscious or conscious racial profiling during the initial HR screening process, but if someone is invited for an interview, the process is generally fair and comprehensive, and there are factors at play other than race if someone is rejected.
 
Racism/discrimination is the most convenient, abused, misused and exploited card in the world.

You can completely fabricate it and the woke crowd will sympathize with you and lash out at the accused because racism exists. It is laughable.
 
This is quite apposite and ties in with my own experience. There is an element of subconscious or conscious racial profiling during the initial HR screening process, but if someone is invited for an interview, the process is generally fair and comprehensive, and there are factors at play other than race if someone is rejected.

Probably because the racial profiling is mostly done by people who are less of a decision maker and more of paper shufflers. Some of them derive pleasure in binning deserving applications just because they can and no stake in the business decision. In contrast, a far more powerful person like a CEO would overlook race and go for real value that a candidate may bring.
 
Racism/discrimination is the most convenient, abused, misused and exploited card in the world.

You can completely fabricate it and the woke crowd will sympathize with you and lash out at the accused because racism exists. It is laughable.

Racism is reality. You are lucky for not having to face it to a level that makes you cry.
 
Racism is reality. You are lucky for not having to face it to a level that makes you cry.

It is a reality and what I said is also a reality. It is an indisputable fact that people have played the racism card to have their way.
 
I think if you make it to the interview, regardless of your background or level of experience it’s a 50/50 chance for everyone.

If there is some discrimination, I think it would happen during the initial screening.

Beyond that, if someone does feel strongly about being refused due to their colour etc then perhaps it was a good thing not working for someone who thinks that way.

In the UK I don’t think there is as big a problem anymore and it’s one of the best places to work. Some companies also are global powerhouses and over time have developed an understanding that the best way to solve a problem is a varied approach so diversity and collaboration is a benefit.
 
Anyone I don’t get why some folk have such a narrow view, everything isn’t exactly black and white is it and you fail to grasp some of the root causes and grievances of some people and their history, maybe it’s an inferior complex of their own.
 
This is quite apposite and ties in with my own experience. There is an element of subconscious or conscious racial profiling during the initial HR screening process, but if someone is invited for an interview, the process is generally fair and comprehensive, and there are factors at play other than race if someone is rejected.

My favourite quote from Morgan Freeman is
“Man, the bus runs every day ! “.
 
I think race does play a part sometimes and the best candidate doesn't always get the job.

The excuse that is used is that person wouldn't fit into the team - which is rubbish really.
 
I have a friend who bitterly complained that the only reason he was refused the job was because the hiring manager was "racially motivated".

He said he had all the necessary skills but they hired someone with "white skin".

The view that I want to dicuss is

1. If a colored/black man were to NOT get a job, he can ALWAYS resort to racial discrimination even if he is **** for the job.

2. If a white man however, were to NOT get a job, he has to accept that he is simply NOT what the hiring personnel were looking for.

My point.

If blacks/colored skin people often lose out on jobs, they can blame the color of their skin to take solace.

But if a white man loses out, he has to simply accept reality.

Discuss.

Unless your friend personally knows all the other candidates who had applied for that job, how can he say that he was absolutely the best person for that job & racism was the sole reason they rejected him? Unless there was expressed or implied racist bias during the interview process, ridiculous to assume that the rejection was due to racism.

And while no doubt there are some racists in our society, it is also true that anybody can get away by alleging ‘racism’ in today’s woke world. Case in point that boxer Amir Khan who got kicked out of a plane for not following COVID protocol but is now playing the race card.

If anything, most big firms today have well documented diversity initiatives & preference is always given to women/colored individuals/LGBTQA in the selection process. And recruiting managers & firms always have the added pressure to meet the diversity recruitment quota and are always scrambling to meet them. While there could be individual conscious/unconscious bias in the interview process, the pressure from the senior management ain’t a joke either.
 
Two South Africans teach us in a German university. One is black and another is white. The black one is more qualified but is paid less. The other one is paid more because he is white. Coming from Pakistan I have to show my ID proof along with my debit card when paying at a grocery store. It happens sometimes. However, German citizens do not show ID proof. I have seen enough evidence of it from German professors to an average citizen. Germans are the most racist people I have ever met and attaching a personal photo to your CV is a must when applying for a German employer. Good luck if you have a brown skin by chance.
 
Yes, racism is present and ingrained in western societies.

Muslims get checked at every airport and get called aside for "random searches".

African Americans living in America are treated like criminals, often treated as guilty until proven innocent.

There is also racism within Asian countries, such as people liking "light-skinned" Asians and creating weird complexes.

These are all sad realities that our world is far from being a place of equal opportunity.

It does happen in a lot of aspects of our lives, but with something so deeply ingrained in societies that our complaining will hardly do anything.

I'm not saying that we should stop raising awareness; that's not the right approach, and that needs to continue.

I'm saying that some things are just out of our hands.

Racism was prevalent in the past, exists now, and will most probably (unfortunately) exist in the future.

Not much else we can do except hope that the newer generations have a more inclusive understanding of society, and stop looking at the color of one's skin or the country of origin before taking decisions.
 
its very tough to say. i think more than race there is an issue of team fits, and i've seen people being treated differently in teams cos there a different race, and im not talking about lots of different races being racist to other people.

id love to think it doesnt happen, but the amount of times ive seen teams that are racially very similar to their hiring manager leads me to believe it is not coincidental, and ive felt, at times, whether rightly or wrongly, that i may have been disadvantaged due to that.

then there is also the flip side whereby u get certain advantages because of your race, and ive benefited from this in my life too.

so like most things in life its swings and roundabouts imo.
 
its very tough to say. i think more than race there is an issue of team fits, and i've seen people being treated differently in teams cos there a different race, and im not talking about lots of different races being racist to other people..

meant to say that they were treated differently for cultural reasons, and they happened to be a different race
 
Racism / Islamophobia etc. are rampant.

But sometimes one isn't good enough for a certain job.

One should move on and try not to fall into 'victim mentality' abyss.
 
Last edited:
You see it a lot more in the Southern United States, but overall it’s a fact that Pakistanis in the USA have to work harder than average to get to the same positions. But we are smart and not shy of working hard so mostly you do these this complaint here.
 
Racism/discrimination is the most convenient, abused, misused and exploited card in the world.

You can completely fabricate it and the woke crowd will sympathize with you and lash out at the accused because racism exists. It is laughable.

Best not to go there if I were you, mate.

This is literally my day job and I know more about this topic than any amount of googling will ever tell you.

Just scurry away and don't post in this thread again and you won't be humiliated.
 
I have a friend who bitterly complained that the only reason he was refused the job was because the hiring manager was "racially motivated".

He said he had all the necessary skills but they hired someone with "white skin".

The view that I want to dicuss is

1. If a colored/black man were to NOT get a job, he can ALWAYS resort to racial discrimination even if he is **** for the job.

2. If a white man however, were to NOT get a job, he has to accept that he is simply NOT what the hiring personnel were looking for.

My point.

If blacks/colored skin people often lose out on jobs, they can blame the color of their skin to take solace.

But if a white man loses out, he has to simply accept reality.

Discuss.

You more or less got it.

Black and other non white people (especially those with Muslim names) suffer immense levels of structural discrimination in the West. This discrimination permeates through every institution in society. Therefore non white people suffer disadvantage simply because they are non white.

That is not to say white people do not suffer from disadvantage, nor is it saying they don't have to work hard, nor is it saying they do not suffer from injustices. But their race has no influence on these things. That is what white privilege is.
 
Lets call a spade a spade. The OP refers to a 'friend'. Hmmmm.

Sounds more like it's the Op refused for a job.

Go figure.
 
Two South Africans teach us in a German university. One is black and another is white. The black one is more qualified but is paid less. The other one is paid more because he is white. Coming from Pakistan I have to show my ID proof along with my debit card when paying at a grocery store. It happens sometimes. However, German citizens do not show ID proof. I have seen enough evidence of it from German professors to an average citizen. Germans are the most racist people I have ever met and attaching a personal photo to your CV is a must when applying for a German employer. Good luck if you have a brown skin by chance.

Sad to hear that bro. And attaching a photo to a CV? That’s bad news.
 
Best not to go there if I were you, mate.

This is literally my day job and I know more about this topic than any amount of googling will ever tell you.

Just scurry away and don't post in this thread again and you won't be humiliated.

Regardless of what your day job is, I am not sure why you are getting so triggered / offended. It is a fact that racism exists and people have been discriminated in jobs and work opportunities etc. in general because of racism. However, it is also a fact that people have exploited and misused racism and discrimination in general to have their way.

Not every minority and POC is denied a job because of discrimination, but a lot of them do blame racism even when they are denied on legitimate grounds.

It is easily exploited because our psyche is always to side with the accuser rather than the accused because of the fact that racism is a reality, and hence there is a tremendous room for exploitation and misuse.

If a black person falsely accuses a white person of racism, who are people likely to believe? the black man or the white man. Obviously the black man.

I don't need to google this or listen to your one-dimensional, narrow-minded, heavily biased views on this topic because it seems that you have been a victim of discrimination and hence do not have the capacity to accept and acknowledge that many people have and will continue to play the racism card strategically.
 
Regardless of what your day job is, I am not sure why you are getting so triggered / offended. It is a fact that racism exists and people have been discriminated in jobs and work opportunities etc. in general because of racism. However, it is also a fact that people have exploited and misused racism and discrimination in general to have their way.

Not every minority and POC is denied a job because of discrimination, but a lot of them do blame racism even when they are denied on legitimate grounds.

It is easily exploited because our psyche is always to side with the accuser rather than the accused because of the fact that racism is a reality, and hence there is a tremendous room for exploitation and misuse.

If a black person falsely accuses a white person of racism, who are people likely to believe? the black man or the white man. Obviously the black man.

I don't need to google this or listen to your one-dimensional, narrow-minded, heavily biased views on this topic because it seems that you have been a victim of discrimination and hence do not have the capacity to accept and acknowledge that many people have and will continue to play the racism card strategically.

Why did I get triggered - quite simply, you made a nonsensical, ignorant and illiterate comment that racism is 'is the most convenient, abused, misused and exploited card in the world' and that it is 'laughable'.

From making such a comment it is clear you are utterly prejudiced on this matter. My advise to you is to simply stick to things you know about and don't delve into matters you have no knowledge or experience of. Racism is not just the holding of prejudiced views by some people against some other people - it is structural, deep rooted, impacts societal power structures and permeates through the way every institution functions - from the education system, to the media, to the justice system, housing etc (literally name it and I'll show you the structural racism that affects it).

The West is EMPHATICALLY guilty of this. So don't you dare try to downplay racism by your ignorant nonsense. If you don't know what you're talking about, say nothing at all.
 
Why did I get triggered - quite simply, you made a nonsensical, ignorant and illiterate comment that racism is 'is the most convenient, abused, misused and exploited card in the world' and that it is 'laughable'.

From making such a comment it is clear you are utterly prejudiced on this matter. My advise to you is to simply stick to things you know about and don't delve into matters you have no knowledge or experience of. Racism is not just the holding of prejudiced views by some people against some other people - it is structural, deep rooted, impacts societal power structures and permeates through the way every institution functions - from the education system, to the media, to the justice system, housing etc (literally name it and I'll show you the structural racism that affects it).

The West is EMPHATICALLY guilty of this. So don't you dare try to downplay racism by your ignorant nonsense. If you don't know what you're talking about, say nothing at all.

Instead of copy pasting a generic definition of racism that you would expect in a high school essay flagged for plagiarism and lack of original thought, you should try to understand the issue.

I was actually eager and curious to see your retort. Little did I know that I would end up reading an excerpt from Wikipedia.

Racism exists, it always has existed and always will exist. Millions of people have suffered from it. However, it does not change the fact that many, many people have exploited racism as well by playing the racism card.

People who have been rejected and fired from their jobs on valid grounds have blamed racism, even though it was their incompetence and/or lack of qualification that cost them the job.

There is no point in blaming the West. Racism exists in all cultures and societies. Pakistan itself is one of the most racist countries in the world.

It took Pakistan a little over two decades to lose its Eastern half because of racism and prejudice towards the Bengali people. We looked down on their language, culture, physical characteristics and never considered them Pakistanis, which led to deprivation and eventually a separatist movement.

It is a bit rich for Pakistani people to point fingers at western racism without looking closer to home.

Furthermore, looking at racism from a West vs the rest perspective not only shows ignorance but also a lack of intelligence.

Racism is not about West vs the rest; it is about the powerful vs the weak.

In every society, the powerful has the tendency to suppress the weak. The West, due its superior work ethic, hard work, education and innovation established itself as the dominant society which led to exploitation of the weaker cultures.

This brings me back to my East Pakistan example. West Pakistan was more powerful and dominance and hence they overpowered and dominated East Pakistan. If it was the other way around, East Pakistan would have suppressed West Pakistan.

This is the same reason why Pakistan is among the worst countries in the world when it comes to treatment of minorities. It is an illustration of the dominant suppressing the weak.

Speaking of racism / discrimination in general, people fail to recognize that today’s society is the least racist society in history of mankind. We have clearly come a long way.

Today, we are far less racist compared to our ancestors. You go back a few hundred years and you will find that every culture was more racist compared to today.

This shows that we are actually heading in the right direction. As I said earlier, racism cannot be eliminated but considering the fact that there has been a massive change over the last century or so, one can be hopeful that in a few hundred years, mankind will evolve to the point where racism will be greatly marginalized.
 
Instead of copy pasting a generic definition of racism that you would expect in a high school essay flagged for plagiarism and lack of original thought, you should try to understand the issue.

Copy pasting? generic? lol, this is a bit rich coming from someone who literally just posted that racism is the most convenient, abused, misused and exploited card in the world'. Let me guess, you got that from Ben Shapiro? You seem like the kind of muppet who thinks Jordan Peterson is the most profound man alive today - so don't talk to me about copy and pasting.

It took Pakistan a little over two decades to lose its Eastern half because of racism and prejudice towards the Bengali people. We looked down on their language, culture, physical characteristics and never considered them Pakistanis, which led to deprivation and eventually a separatist movement.

It is a bit rich for Pakistani people to point fingers at western racism without looking closer to home.

Why are you bringing Pakistan into this? Is that the best you can do?

The West isn't bad because Pakistan is worse? This thread and topic has nothing to do with Pakistan - there are plenty of discussions on here about the way Pakistan treated the Bengalis of the Eastern wing and how it treats women and religious minorities today. I'm not about to defend Pakistan here - I actually spent years working for a human rights NGO in Pakistan, so I know far far far more than you about this too.



Furthermore, looking at racism from a West vs the rest perspective not only shows ignorance but also a lack of intelligence.

Racism is not about West vs the rest; it is about the powerful vs the weak.

lol - isn't that what you've just done. Oh, but look at Pakistan! Look at Pakistan! This thread isn't about Pakistan mate. I note how you are conveniently changing the subject to Pakistan, and how Pakistanis shouldn't criticise the west - rather than the topic of racism itself - which as I said, is literally my day job here in London. I literally WILL destroy and obliterate you if you try to downplay it and no amount of rushing to find Shapiro or Peterson quotes will save you from the humiliation that will be dished out to your illiterate ignorance.

But it is good to see from your post that you are not pushing that point - it's for your own good that you aren't.

In every society, the powerful has the tendency to suppress the weak. The West, due its superior work ethic, hard work, education and innovation established itself as the dominant society which led to exploitation of the weaker cultures.

Showing your ignorance here again, I'm afraid. You think the West developed faster than the rest because they have a superior work ethic, good education and innovation? Have you read a history book before? Do you know anything about what happened in the 13th, 14th centuries? Do you know about the agricultural revolution? Start by reading Sapiens by Yuval Harari - it will be at least a starting point for you so you won't make such ignorant illiterate comments like 'the west developed because they have a superior work ethic'

This brings me back to my East Pakistan example. West Pakistan was more powerful and dominance and hence they overpowered and dominated East Pakistan. If it was the other way around, East Pakistan would have suppressed West Pakistan.

This is the same reason why Pakistan is among the worst countries in the world when it comes to treatment of minorities. It is an illustration of the dominant suppressing the weak.

See my above point about Pakistan - this was not about Pakistan. It was about a potential case of discrimination faced by someone in the West. You started by saying 'oh racism is over played, abused bla bla bla' - you have, rather sensibly, stopped pushing that point and are instead now talking about Pakistan - as if being better than Pakistan makes the West completely above any criticism.

We can talk all day about Pakistan, India, Saudi Arabia, Russia, Japan etc etc etc. This topic is about the West - the part of the world that considers itself to be the bastions of freedom and liberty, who constantly arrogantly lecture others, even invade countries and kill millions of people on the basis of this 'freedom' that they love to shout about.

The West is supposed to be equal, democratic. It is supposed to the place you can achieve your dreams - billions of people around the world would give their limbs to live in this bastion of greatness that is the west. The vast majority of them come here to find themselves struggling to survive more than they did in their home countries (refugees excepted). The reason being the institutional and structural racism they face every day - from every institution they have to deal with.



Speaking of racism / discrimination in general, people fail to recognize that today’s society is the least racist society in history of mankind. We have clearly come a long way.

Today, we are far less racist compared to our ancestors. You go back a few hundred years and you will find that every culture was more racist compared to today.

Again, you are confusing racism with individual prejudice.

Yes, the man on the street is perhaps less prejudiced today than he was 20, 30, 40, 50, 100 etc years ago. One of my earliest childhood memories is as a 5 year old having racist abuse shouted at me by a fully grown man - that happened 30 odd years ago. Would it happen now? Unlikely. So in that respect - yes, progress has been made. But what about the way the institutions are functioning? The services that exist in the economy? A handful of brown and black faces doesn't mean things have changed. A black or girl born today is still going to face systemic disadvantage at EVERY STAGE (literally) of their life - in every institution they come into contact with - compared to their white counterparts.

This shows that we are actually heading in the right direction. As I said earlier, racism cannot be eliminated but considering the fact that there has been a massive change over the last century or so, one can be hopeful that in a few hundred years, mankind will evolve to the point where racism will be greatly marginalized.

Very easy to talk about heading in the right direction when you sitting in a cushy house being served by those beneath you everywhere you go and every day.

Individual prejudice will never be eliminated but we can all do our best to mitigate racism as far as possible. That means everyone taking long hard looks at themselves. I am lucky my day job has put me in a position where I can make a difference - however little - but I will not stand for anyone ever downplaying racism or passing to pass it off as a 'card' that is 'played'. Don't you dare ever do that again.
 
Let’s face reality; we now live in a woke society (in the West), and more importantly, compensation culture.

Granted, there are times where people of colour do not get a job due to racism, but those days and the frequency are well and truly over.

Racism/Sexism is an easy excuse to masquerade one’s deficiencies; rather than fess up to your weaknesses; it’s easier to blame and seek compensation.

Did you know in places like Southall, Hounslow, West/East/North West London, Asians are preferred over Whites in careers such as Policing, Banking, and Retail, for the simple reason of local connectivity - is this racist? No it’s smart business and social sense.

In the UK, exams no longer require a full name, just an enrollment number. CVs no longer require a nationality/age/sex - keeping the process as unbiased as possible.

Businesses hire the right skill and mindset - not the right colour. Just look at the IT industry - it’s a case of ‘spot the white man’, in the UK.
 
I haven't experienced racism in employment yet.

I may just be lucky but from what I have seen if you can make your company money they will treat you well. I've always found traditional blue-collar environments to be more welcoming which may be a surprise to many ( it was to me at first).

Sure, there may be racism, but by and large, the UK is the fairest society in the western world ( perhaps the whole world).

Personally, I don't weaponise my religion and culture at work and try to keep things to myself i.e if I am fasting or need to pray namaz.

One other thing I reconciled myself with was that the majority of the workforce follow a culture that I can't follow ( in terms of after works drinks/ socialising). It would be unfeasible for me to ask them to accommodate me so I just sat out those events and was prepared to take the hit to my career bu thankfully it had no affect ( perhaps even increased respect).

I was at an event recently for BAME in Engineering and a Muslim guy spoke about how is company have enforced no alcohol events to accommodate him and some Hindu guy spoke about trying to make the whole office go Veg to accommodate him as if it was a source of pride or a victory.

I haven't really experienced structural racism or am maybe naive to it but I'm at the point in life where if I make enough money to live comfortably and go back to my wife happily at the end of the day then that's enough for me - I don't need to go poking my nose to understand why certain structures could be perceived racist. It doesn't affect people apart from activist types looking for their next earner.
 
Just to add - Without the hard work of generations before us maybe there would have less opportunities for people like me. The real heroes are the guys who broke the barriers in the 70's 80's and perhaps even the early 90's.

People like me ar genuinely standing on the shoulders of giants but a line has to be drawn somewhere and while the UK isn't perfect it is a fantastic place to live and work. The grievance attitude needs to go. If you feel discriminated work harder.
 
Copy pasting? generic? lol, this is a bit rich coming from someone who literally just posted that racism is the most convenient, abused, misused and exploited card in the world'. Let me guess, you got that from Ben Shapiro? You seem like the kind of muppet who thinks Jordan Peterson is the most profound man alive today - so don't talk to me about copy and pasting.



Why are you bringing Pakistan into this? Is that the best you can do?

The West isn't bad because Pakistan is worse? This thread and topic has nothing to do with Pakistan - there are plenty of discussions on here about the way Pakistan treated the Bengalis of the Eastern wing and how it treats women and religious minorities today. I'm not about to defend Pakistan here - I actually spent years working for a human rights NGO in Pakistan, so I know far far far more than you about this too.





lol - isn't that what you've just done. Oh, but look at Pakistan! Look at Pakistan! This thread isn't about Pakistan mate. I note how you are conveniently changing the subject to Pakistan, and how Pakistanis shouldn't criticise the west - rather than the topic of racism itself - which as I said, is literally my day job here in London. I literally WILL destroy and obliterate you if you try to downplay it and no amount of rushing to find Shapiro or Peterson quotes will save you from the humiliation that will be dished out to your illiterate ignorance.

But it is good to see from your post that you are not pushing that point - it's for your own good that you aren't.



Showing your ignorance here again, I'm afraid. You think the West developed faster than the rest because they have a superior work ethic, good education and innovation? Have you read a history book before? Do you know anything about what happened in the 13th, 14th centuries? Do you know about the agricultural revolution? Start by reading Sapiens by Yuval Harari - it will be at least a starting point for you so you won't make such ignorant illiterate comments like 'the west developed because they have a superior work ethic'



See my above point about Pakistan - this was not about Pakistan. It was about a potential case of discrimination faced by someone in the West. You started by saying 'oh racism is over played, abused bla bla bla' - you have, rather sensibly, stopped pushing that point and are instead now talking about Pakistan - as if being better than Pakistan makes the West completely above any criticism.

We can talk all day about Pakistan, India, Saudi Arabia, Russia, Japan etc etc etc. This topic is about the West - the part of the world that considers itself to be the bastions of freedom and liberty, who constantly arrogantly lecture others, even invade countries and kill millions of people on the basis of this 'freedom' that they love to shout about.

The West is supposed to be equal, democratic. It is supposed to the place you can achieve your dreams - billions of people around the world would give their limbs to live in this bastion of greatness that is the west. The vast majority of them come here to find themselves struggling to survive more than they did in their home countries (refugees excepted). The reason being the institutional and structural racism they face every day - from every institution they have to deal with.





Again, you are confusing racism with individual prejudice.

Yes, the man on the street is perhaps less prejudiced today than he was 20, 30, 40, 50, 100 etc years ago. One of my earliest childhood memories is as a 5 year old having racist abuse shouted at me by a fully grown man - that happened 30 odd years ago. Would it happen now? Unlikely. So in that respect - yes, progress has been made. But what about the way the institutions are functioning? The services that exist in the economy? A handful of brown and black faces doesn't mean things have changed. A black or girl born today is still going to face systemic disadvantage at EVERY STAGE (literally) of their life - in every institution they come into contact with - compared to their white counterparts.



Very easy to talk about heading in the right direction when you sitting in a cushy house being served by those beneath you everywhere you go and every day.

Individual prejudice will never be eliminated but we can all do our best to mitigate racism as far as possible. That means everyone taking long hard looks at themselves. I am lucky my day job has put me in a position where I can make a difference - however little - but I will not stand for anyone ever downplaying racism or passing to pass it off as a 'card' that is 'played'. Don't you dare ever do that again.

Maybe its me, but I cant see what is your solution to this problem .Take long hard look at ourselves , What you mean exactly ?

Why are you getting confrontational and derogatory with the previous poster, showing your lack of respect for freedom of speech.

You may indulge in name dropping, quoting books and fancy words, and some illustrious career - but to me, you arguments sound no different from a person who knows all the train timings of the local train . Data not information. Not 1 point of value.

Racism exists, but its not institutional. If you are so confident, that it is there in society , please prove that it exists institutionally, in UK today.

Firstly - did you ever notice, that all cultures are NOT equal …
Some cultures have concept of
Meritocracy,
freedom of speech,
and concept of reason,
and tenet of speaking truth.

These principles which i have mentioned, if you notice, are not just words, they are values crafted for centuries, evolved into western society today.

Yes, 100 % west have a superior work ethic - because of this rational thinking. Would you not agree?

So you want to sacrifice merit & fill the government with minorities. Why should any business/ individual believe in your utopia, and impose your equalitarian views, above his own judgment - thats his prerogative. If he believes that the crime statistics is skewed towards black people or would like to take the mathematical approach to hire germans - you cant hijack his free will.

Of course, the black boy or girl could face discrimination, which he or she absolutely should not face, and history has been unfair to them. But by that rationale, if we see the history of contribution of the black community to the growth of America, it has been very little. So why should you selectively quote history then ? Please note - im not saying that he should be discriminated, just dont appease him, or give him preferential treatment.

There are the required laws in place to sue, for overt racism.

But rather than appeasement, ( which is very risky and loss making ), IF, the current system, engages in meritocracy, reason & free speech, then things will get alright in time. The whole teach a man to fish, feed him for a lifetime thing.
The path of gold is open to be treaded, whoever is worthy can walk it.

I will make a part 2 of this post about the whole victim card angle soon, but in a more structured way, this was more of a type as you go thing :))
 
Maybe its me, but I cant see what is your solution to this problem .Take long hard look at ourselves , What you mean exactly ?

There is no easy solution – to take a long hard look at oneself, does not literally mean to stand in front of the mirror literally for 4 hours clenching your teeth. It means having honest conversations about the way things are done, to challenge the assumptions that you have (and which were littered throughout your post – about the so called meritocracy of the west etc) and make difficult decisions.
There are many organisations doing excellent community based work – I am indeed employed by one of them. We do many things – mentoring programmes, parenting interventions, social and emotional learning, agency collaboration and place based investment etc.
We can make a difference to the people we reach but until and unless the root structural issues in society are fixed, no solution will be sustainable. The UK is the prime example – this great country, at the very top of it you have the royal family. This institution that so many millions of people in the UK love and adore, sing the national anthem in homage to etc. That institution – by definition – is there to maintain white, anglo-saxon, protestant and aristocratic supremacy.
Why are you getting confrontational and derogatory with the previous poster, showing your lack of respect for freedom of speech.
Oh he can say and think whatever he likes. I am not going to take his computer away from him or block his IP, even if I could do those things. But I also have a right for vociferously challenge what I know to be nonsensical, ignorant and illiterate comments. He was saying racism is overplayed, the race card bla bla bla. Classic neoliberal right wing nonsense. And if there is one thing that infuriates me, it is lackeys! I see people like Lawrence Fox and I just laugh at them – but when I see a lackey, it infuriates me.
You may indulge in name dropping, quoting books and fancy words, and some illustrious career - but to me, you arguments sound no different from a person who knows all the train timings of the local train . Data not information. Not 1 point of value.
I have simply made the point – forcefully – that he is nobody to talk down the existence of racism or overplay the existence of the ‘race card’. If you read his posts, he appeared to back down on that point as he didn’t push it – so I assume he was trolling earlier and realised he didn’t know what he was talking about.
Ironically though – I am still waiting for your own point of value – scratching my head a little though.

Racism exists, but its not institutional. If you are so confident, that it is there in society , please prove that it exists institutionally, in UK today.

Well, why don’t we start with getting a job:
https://natcen.ac.uk/media/20541/test-for-racial-discrimination.pdf
Methodology
We sent sets of equivalent applications to 987 real job vacancies across the UK under names commonly associated with minority groups. For each job, we sent three applications with equivalent background and qualifications: one used a ‘white’ name and the other two used names associated with different minority ethnic groups. The names were randomly assigned to the applications at the last stage to ensure there was no bias across the sample.

Findings
The level of name-based racial discrimination was found to be high across all ethnic groups. This is consistent with the high levels of discrimination found in studies in other countries in recent years.

To secure a job interview, we had to send out 74% more applications for ethnic minority candidates compared to white candidates.

This is the great ‘meritocracy’ you think the west is!
Let’s read some more about this great meritocracy, shall we. What happens when you actually get a job?
https://assets.publishing.service.g...6/race-in-workplace-mcgregor-smith-review.pdf
“ Joseph Rowntree Foundation found that BME groups tend to have unequal access to opportunities for development, often because of a lack of clear information on training opportunities or progression routes within their workplaces. This can be made worse if progression relies on opaque or informal processes, if there is a lack of BME role models or mentors at higher levels within their workplaces to provide support and advice, or if there is a gap between equality and diversity policies and practice in the workplace”.
“Our call for evidence asked specifically what the obstacles to progression were for those from a BME background. Only a small proportion of individuals believed language skills or a lack of qualifications or formal skills were an issue. The main barrier many individuals felt was standing in their way was the lack of connections to the ‘right people’. For employers and organisations, it was unconscious bias that was identified as the main barrier. However, for all groups, discrimination featured prominently as an obstacle faced by ethnic minorities. More detail on this can be found in the summary of the call for evidence findings at the end of this report.”
https://www.manchester.ac.uk/discover/news/racism-is-still-a-huge-problem/
A third reported that they had been bullied and/or subjected to insensitive questioning
- Almost 15% of women and 8% of men stated that racial discrimination had caused them to leave their job
- 28% of participants who reported experiencing racism at work reported having to take a period of sick leave
- Part time or non-permanent employees were more likely to report racial harassment and discrimination

Over 40% of those who reported a racist incident said they were either ignored, or that they had subsequently been identified as a ‘trouble maker’. Moreover, more than one-in-ten respondents raising a complaint said that they were subsequently disciplined or forced out of their job as a result of doing so.
I could go on and on and on.
What else do you want to talk about?
School?
https://www.barnardos.org.uk/blog/how-systemic-racism-affects-young-people-uk
“When it comes to school, data shows that some children are disciplined far more often than others. According to Government data, the groups of children with the highest rates of permanent exclusion in the school year 2018-19 are White Gypsy and Roma pupils (0.39%), Traveller of Irish Heritage pupils (0.27%), Black Caribbean pupils (0.25%) and Mixed White and Black Caribbean children (0.24%).
When we look at the wider context of racism within schools, we begin to see a pattern. A poll of more than 400 BAME teachers found that 54 per cent have experienced actions they believe are demeaning to their racial heritage or identity. Students are also likely to have experienced this too - if not from teachers, then from their classmates - incidences of racism in school have increased over the last ten years. “

The justice system?
“This is another area in which accusations of systemic racism emerge time and time again. Across the UK, Black children were over four times more likely than white children to be arrested. Young black men were stopped and searched by police more than 20,000 times in London during the coronavirus lockdown – the equivalent more than a quarter of all black 15- to 24-year-olds in the capital. Overall stop-and-search rates between 2018 and 2019 show that Black people are now nearly 10 times more likely to be stopped and searched by police than white people. The disparity doesn’t end there - research from the Sentencing Council found that Black and minority ethnic people are far more likely to be sent to prison for drug offences than white defendants who have committed similar crimes.”
There is also The Lammy Review which found that the chances of receiving a prison sentence for drug offences were 240% higher for BAME defendants than their white counterparts.
Shall I go on?

Firstly - did you ever notice, that all cultures are NOT equal Â…
Some cultures have concept of
Meritocracy,
freedom of speech,
and concept of reason,
and tenet of speaking truth.

These principles which i have mentioned, if you notice, are not just words, they are values crafted for centuries, evolved into western society today.

Meritocracy, lol, concept of reason and speaking the truth, lol.
I’ll give freedom of speech. I mean, I’m not going to jail for saying these things – but you can look at what the mainstream media does to such people – actually that’s another thing I haven’t mentioned but could easily write a PhD on. Free speech isn’t as simple as not going to jail.

Yes, 100 % west have a superior work ethic - because of this rational thinking. Would you not agree?

No I don’t agree at all – this is the lie that has been told. It’s actually the lie that neoliberalism tells. That all you have to do is work hard blab la bla, work 5 jobs, work 4949 hours a day, work, work, work so someone else can get rich and you will get your reward. It’s a lie. The system is rigged.

So you want to sacrifice merit & fill the government with minorities. Why should any business/ individual believe in your utopia, and impose your equalitarian views, above his own judgment - thats his prerogative. If he believes that the crime statistics is skewed towards black people or would like to take the mathematical approach to hire germans - you cant hijack his free will.

Did I say I want to fill the government with anyone? Did I say I want to sacrifice merit? No. I said neither of those things.
I actually believe in true meritocracy – and that means everyone gets the same chance in life, in a system that isn’t rigged in favour of any group of people. It’s those structural inequalities I want to tear down, not some non existent meritocracy.

Of course, the black boy or girl could face discrimination, which he or she absolutely should not face, and history has been unfair to them. But by that rationale, if we see the history of contribution of the black community to the growth of America, it has been very little. So why should you selectively quote history then ? Please note - im not saying that he should be discriminated, just dont appease him, or give him preferential treatment.

Now I am beginning to understand your mindset better. You say the black community has contributed very little to the growth of America lololol.
Ok. Read a book mate. You were making fun of me for reading, it seems you really haven’t a clue.

There are the required laws in place to sue, for overt racism.

Big deal. Everyone knows about overt racism. What makes institutional and structural racism so dangerous is that it is not in your face. It is not overt. It is not obvious.

There But rather than appeasement, ( which is very risky and loss making ), IF, the current system, engages in meritocracy, reason & free speech, then things will get alright in time. The whole teach a man to fish, feed him for a lifetime thing.
The path of gold is open to be treaded, whoever is worthy can walk it.

There is NO meritocracy. The system is rigged. A handful of exceptions aside, if you are BAME you basically need a whole load of luck and a million things to go your way. The white man doesn’t need that. You could teach a man to fish but if you then don’t let him come to the market, he isn’t going to sell any fish.

I will make a part 2 of this post about the whole victim card angle soon, but in a more structured way, this was more of a type as you go thing :))

Do what you want mate.
 
There is no easy solution –
Do what you want mate.

There is no easy solution – to take a long hard look at oneself, does not literally mean to stand in front of the mirror literally for 4 hours clenching your teeth. It means having honest conversations about the way things are done, to challenge the assumptions that you have (and which were littered throughout your post – about the so called meritocracy of the west etc) and make difficult decisions.
There are many organisations doing excellent community based work – I am indeed employed by one of them. We do many things – mentoring programmes, parenting interventions, social and emotional learning, agency collaboration and place based investment etc.
We can make a difference to the people we reach but until and unless the root structural issues in society are fixed, no solution will be sustainable. The UK is the prime example – this great country, at the very top of it you have the royal family. This institution that so many millions of people in the UK love and adore, sing the national anthem in homage to etc. That institution – by definition – is there to maintain white, anglo-saxon, protestant and aristocratic supremacy.

We do many things – mentoring programmes, parenting interventions, social and emotional learning, agency collaboration and place based investment etc.

Doesn’t answer how this will help uplift OPs friend. Im not a naukri-pesha aadmi, I prefer results, not excuses.
Please publish empirical evidence from your employers organisation and a proof of concept/verified white paper that their methodology can work in real world, along with associated collateral costs, risks & limitations (this is important). Compare it to other variances in society, like mentally challenged, physically disabled, low income, or personality traits like EQ, inability to follow simple instructions, narcissism, and morality.

But I also have a right for vociferously challenge what I know to be nonsensical, ignorant and illiterate comments. He was saying racism is overplayed, the race card bla bla bla. Classic neoliberal right wing nonsense. And if there is one thing that infuriates me,

he is nobody to talk down the existence of racism or overplay the existence of the ‘race card’. If you read his posts, he appeared to back down on that point as he didn’t push it

Maybe he is wary of cancel culture. Or some people, who play the card, because they have 0 stakes, and nothing to lose, and who deliberately make it because this thing is very difficult to prove otherwise.

– I am still waiting for your own point of value – scratching my head a little though.

Unlike you, Ive made original points in post no 5 & the idea that all cultures are not equal, and why they are not equal.

Regarding your reply to institutional racism, I mean show me a law which discriminates not perceptions

why don’t we start with getting a job
School
What happens when you actually get a job?
The justice system

All these points everyone already knows, but Im trying to address the larger issue -
Why are some cross sections having a high crime rate - other than paedophilia, I think you will see some astounding statistics ?
Why are they having less patents in innovation ?
Why are they having low income/standard of living?
Why do they claim more benefits ?
Why do they do badly at school ?
Why do they get in trouble with the law ?
Why are they more unemployed ?

Meritocracy, lol, concept of reason and speaking the truth, lol.
I’ll give freedom of speech

You show your immaturity by LOLing at such ideals.

No I don’t agree at all – this is the lie that has been told. It’s actually the lie that neoliberalism tells. That all you have to do is work hard blab la bla, work 5 jobs, work 4949 hours a day, work, work, work so someone else can get rich and you will get your reward. It’s a lie. The system is rigged.

Nobody is stopping you to get rich, the bus runs every day.

It’s those structural inequalities I want to tear down

Please show me the law which discriminates.

Now I am beginning to understand your mindset better. You say the black community has contributed very little to the growth of America lololol.
Ok. Read a book mate. You were making fun of me for reading, it seems you really haven’t a clue.
Compare it pound for pound, you will get your answer. Im not working in minorities office to sugarcoat things.

There is NO meritocracy. The system is rigged.

When life gives you lemons, make lemonade. You are free to make up your own organisation like Antifa, and further your agenda.


Lets agree to disagree. Lets respect freedom of speech, and please dont judge posters based on 1 or 2 exaggerations.
 
Doesn’t answer how this will help uplift OPs friend. Im not a naukri-pesha aadmi, I prefer results, not excuses.

Facts about context is not an excuse – it is a fact. And context is everything. Life is never black and white (excuse the pun!) – that results are all that matters and everything that happened before and around it is irrelevant. The whole story is important, not just the last line.

Please publish empirical evidence from your employers organisation and a proof of concept/verified white paper that their methodology can work in real world, along with associated collateral costs, risks & limitations (this is important). Compare it to other variances in society, like mentally challenged, physically disabled, low income, or personality traits like EQ, inability to follow simple instructions, narcissism, and morality.

Interesting that you are so interested in the work of my employer. I don’t wish to give them away as that may compromise my identity, but I can certainly show you several white papers which we have been involved in, or our partner organisations have.

This paper talks about how community based funders such as ourselves can address institutional racism. It includes limitations to a lot of the work we do as well as mitigations against those limitations https://static1.squarespace.com/sta...9ad1175ad/1618990674726/Booska+Paper+2021.pdf

There’s this paper on how civil society can play a role in levelling up and reducing inequalities in our communities. It talks about addressing power dynamics, from a variety of perspectives, including people and place (ie local areas)
https://www.dannykruger.org.uk/site...9/Kruger 2.0 Levelling Up Our Communities.pdf

There’s this paper on using a community-powered approach, where people across localities worked together to achieve shared objectives during the pandemic.
https://www.newlocal.org.uk/publications/shifting-the-balance/

You rightly raised other variances in our society e.g., mental health, disability. This is huge – mental health in particular is a risk factor associated with many negative outcomes such as crime and violence. We have already launched funding rounds on diverting young people who have committed less serious offences away from the justice system and into clinical therapies e.g. CBT and are about to launch one on family interventions – think I mentioned this in my last post – and the importance of having an environment where people feel safe at home and how important this is for their life chances. So there is plenty more to come.

In terms of your latter points e.g. following instructions etc. We also look at life skills interventions such as practical life skills but also social and emotional skills e.g. how to respond when someone criticises you etc. These are all well evidenced interventions.

We are not reinventing the wheel here, rather doing things which have already been proven through RCTs. You can look them all up since you are so interested.


Maybe he is wary of cancel culture. Or some people, who play the card, because they have 0 stakes, and nothing to lose, and who deliberately make it because this thing is very difficult to prove otherwise.

He didn’t seem very weary to me. He was very sure of himself when he categorically stated that racism was the most overplayed card in the world bla bla bla. Then he didn’t push the point and I acknowledged and appreciated his not doing so. He seems to be a long standing poster here so there isn’t any worry about him being banned.

As for cancel culture, if you are going to publicly express views – which may well be controversial, you have to be prepared for people to challenge those views, to think you are a fool etc. That is the risk you take when you are a public figure. If you can’t handle the backlash, say nothing. Though, I’m not sure people are actually ‘cancelled’ so to speak, they may lose their job.

Unlike you, Ive made original points in post no 5 & the idea that all cultures are not equal, and why they are not equal.

Nahhh. Seem like platitudes to me. You made some ludicrous comment that if you don’t believe in racism it wont exist. Like if you believe the earth is flat, I guess it will be. In any case belief is evidence and experience based – if you experience something, or you see the evidence for it if you don’t experience it yourself – you can’t disbelieve it.

Regarding your reply to institutional racism, I mean show me a law which discriminates not perceptions

Well I mean you seem to be making the mistake that structural / institutional racism means there are actual laws which categorically discriminate. That is not true. Institutional or structural racism is simply “discrimination or unequal treatment on the basis of membership of a particular ethnic group (typically one that is a minority or marginalized), arising from systems, structures, or expectations that have become established within an institution or organization.” (this is from the Oxford English dictionary).

About 20 years ago, a leading judge in the UK declared the police to be institutionally racist – that wasn’t because they actually had written down racist regulations or laws – it was the way the police operated culturally and structurally. Are you aware of the Macpherson Inquiry? Indeed the judge defined institutional racism as:

“The collective failure of an organization to provide an appropriate and professional service to people because of their colour, culture, or ethnic origin.”

Here you go:
https://assets.publishing.service.g.../uploads/attachment_data/file/277111/4262.pdf

So there doesn’t NEED to be a law. Institutional racism is defined by how the institutions operate day to day, in practice.

As an aside by the way, you can’t be King of England unless you are protestant ��

All these points everyone already knows, but Im trying to address the larger issue -
Why are some cross sections having a high crime rate - other than paedophilia, I think you will see some astounding statistics ?
Why are they having less patents in innovation ?
Why are they having low income/standard of living?
Why do they claim more benefits ?
Why do they do badly at school ?
Why do they get in trouble with the law ?
Why are they more unemployed ?

There has been lots and lots and lots (and lots!) of research into all of these questions. A simple google will find you lots of resources which will answer the question. Ultimately though the bottom line is stems from structural and institutional disadvantage – they are born disadvantaged, they start school disadvantaged and that disadvantage stays with them throughout their lives.

You show your immaturity by LOLing at such ideals.

Those were not ideals. Those were things you were presenting as ‘facts’ about the way the West is. I laughed because I live here, have done so for most of my life, grew up here, went to school here, work here, have had the opportunity to travel all over the UK through my work, met with and worked with diverse communities from all backgrounds – white, black, Asian, Brazilian, Arab, Eastern European etc. I know those things to be so far from the truth. I was laughing at the way you were so sure of those things, yet they are so far from the truth.

Nobody is stopping you to get rich, the bus runs every day.

The point is – not everyone is allowed on the bus. Many people aren’t even allowed to look at it. If it were as simple as getting on the bus, 30% of children in the UK wouldn’t be living in poverty.

Please show me the law which discriminates.

Please see above what institutional racism is.

Compare it pound for pound, you will get your answer. Im not working in minorities office to sugarcoat things.

Literally the whole of America’s infrastructure was built by slaves. Their economy was kept afloat by the slaves on the cotton fields etc. It’s not sugar coating to be aware of history.



When life gives you lemons, make lemonade. You are free to make up your own organisation like Antifa, and further your agenda.

And that is exactly what many people are doing. When inequality and disadvantage is so entrenched and deep rooted, it will take time. We will get there but in order to do so we need those who aren’t racist to understand and acknowledge the problems that exist – when they don’t it sets us back and makes the task harder. We will still do it, with or without them, but it is one of the reasons lackeys infuriate me so much.

Lets agree to disagree. Lets respect freedom of speech, and please dont judge posters based on 1 or 2 exaggerations.

‘Agreeing to disagree’ implies that both views have a certain amount of validity. That is not a step I am prepared to take. To me ‘there is no institutional racism’ is as far from being valid as saying ‘the earth is flat’. So I won’t agree to disagree, but of course you are free to believe whatever you wish.
Further, freedom of speech works both ways. If you make brash statements, or exaggerated statements, people are free to come back at you.
 
Babeikh, I salute you. Top posting. As a mid level leader with a lot of exposure to HR and various HR initiatives, having seen how these things work, positively and negatively, it was refreshing to read someone who is clearly affiliated with the philosophies behind recruitment and various other anthropological issues.

Could relate to a lot of the things you've said, evidenced in reality, as opposed to the "theory" some people trying to peddle.
 
Facts about context is not an excuse – it is a fact.

...

Literally the whole of America’s infrastructure was built by slaves. Their economy was kept afloat by the slaves on the cotton fields etc. It’s not sugar coating to be aware of history.

Do you have a reliable source for this claim? What percentage of the working age population was black? Were the rest of the population (mostly whites) sitting around doing nothing? Were the Chinese immigrants who built the transcontinental railroad (an important infrastructure) black too?

If you make nonsensical claims it shows a wrapped worldview and it is hard to take anything else you say seriously. It will get you a successful career in modern politics and academics though :))
 
Race/ethnicity/culture does play a big role in hiring. Job discrimination is real and it's universal but I think things are getting better albeit at snail pace.
 
Do you have a reliable source for this claim? What percentage of the working age population was black? Were the rest of the population (mostly whites) sitting around doing nothing? Were the Chinese immigrants who built the transcontinental railroad (an important infrastructure) black too?

If you make nonsensical claims it shows a wrapped worldview and it is hard to take anything else you say seriously. It will get you a successful career in modern politics and academics though :))

You could always google and find sources yourself. I shouldn't need to hold your hand, but here are a few sources for you...

Contribution of slaves to America's infrastructure:

Railroad building in the south

"The closest studies we have of Southern subregions include Kenneth Noe's Southwest Virginia's Railroad: Modernization and the Sectional Crisis (University of Illinois Press, 1994) and Mark Wetherington's Plain Folk's Fight: The Civil War and Reconstruction in Piney Woods Georgia (University of North Carolina Press, 2005). Both indicate the intensity of railroad development even in the South's most remote regions. Slaveholding expanded in the Wiregrass and in the Appalachian mountains, and commercial agriculture developed in the wake of the railroads. The fastest growing regions of the South, especially along the western border of Texas, Arkansas, and Missouri, demonstrated just how compatible slavery was with southern railroad growth.

Southern railroad companies began buying slaves as early as the 1840s and used enslaved labor almost exclusively to construction their lines. Thousands of African Americans worked on the southern railroads in the 1850s. For African Americans the work was often the hardest, most difficult, and dangerous they were forced to undertake. Although historians, such as Allen Trelease, Robert Starobin, and Walter Licht, have acknowledged the presence of slave labor on Southern railroads, we have little sense its overall dimensions or its relationship to the southern expansionism of the 1850s. Each of these historians has found slave labor on southern railroads; more recently, Theodore Kornweibel, Jr., has documented the use of enslaved labor on 85 of 113 railroads in the Confederate states."

https://railroads.unl.edu/views/item/slavery_rr

The Eufala Railroad also gave Alabama commercial access to the Port of Savannah. Savannah was a key cotton and rice trading port, and slavery was integral to the growth of the city.
https://www.georgiaencyclopedia.org/articles/history-archaeology/atlantic-slave-trade-to-savannah/

Today, Savannah’s deep-water port remains one of the busiest container ports in the U.S. Among its top exports: cotton.

For a good narrative on how important the railroads were for the American economy, I suggest you read “The American South”. Really a fascinating book

https://rowman.com/ISBN/97814422622...om-Settlement-to-Reconstruction-Fifth-Edition

Probably worth you reading this article as well https://www.theroot.com/6-historic-structures-in-america-that-were-built-by-sla-1790856172

You asked for sources so hopefully that should be enough for you, for now, on the infrastructure side. Of course happy to continue the conversation if you really want to but this thread is turning a bit into me holding people's hand and providing them with historical facts etc. It's a little frustrating, i'd appreciate if you could do your own research and we could have a discussion rather than me doing all the research and one or two others only speaking based on prejudice or theory, as Halaribo said above.

On the cotton fields:

"In the pre-Civil War United States, a stronger case can be made that slavery played a critical role in economic development. One crop, slave-grown cotton, provided over half of all US export earnings. By 1840, the South grew 60 percent of the world's cotton and provided some 70 percent of the cotton consumed by the British textile industry. Thus slavery paid for a substantial share of the capital, iron, and manufactured goods that laid the basis for American economic growth. In addition, precisely because the South specialized in cotton production, the North developed a variety of businesses that provided services for the slave South, including textile factories, a meat processing industry, insurance companies, shippers, and cotton brokers."

https://www.gilderlehrman.org/histo...t-was-slavery-engine-american-economic-growth

This paper on the economics of the civil war gives a very solid account of the economic contribution of slavery to the US economy https://eh.net/encyclopedia/the-economics-of-the-civil-war/

The bodies of the enslaved served as America’s largest financial asset, and they were forced to maintain America’s most exported commodity. In 60 years, from 1801 to 1862, the amount of cotton picked daily by an enslaved person increased 400 percent. The profits from cotton propelled the US into a position as one of the leading economies in the world, and made the South its most prosperous region. The ownership of enslaved people increased wealth for Southern planters so much that by the dawn of the Civil War, the Mississippi River Valley had more millionaires per capita than any other region."


Hopefully that should be enough for now, but it's getting a bit frustrating having to hold people's hands and find sources for them. We all have google and i'd much prefer a conversation where you have your sources, I have mine and we discuss our opinions. All this 'please publish this, find your source for that' is fine but just a little boring. I'd rather have a discussion. So in future please just google it, you'll find plenty of sources.
 
Last edited:
I have sat on numerous interview panels for large publi sector organisations... including the BBC. My other half has been a union rep for 15 years at a massive multi national.

Any child or bhakht on here saying racism is a figment of your imagination is an imbecile.
 
Facts about context is not an excuse – it is a fact. And context is everything. Life is never black and white (excuse the pun!) – that results are all that matters and everything that happened before and around it is irrelevant. The whole story is important, not just the last line.



Interesting that you are so interested in the work of my employer. I don’t wish to give them away as that may compromise my identity, but I can certainly show you several white papers which we have been involved in, or our partner organisations have.

This paper talks about how community based funders such as ourselves can address institutional racism. It includes limitations to a lot of the work we do as well as mitigations against those limitations https://static1.squarespace.com/sta...9ad1175ad/1618990674726/Booska+Paper+2021.pdf

There’s this paper on how civil society can play a role in levelling up and reducing inequalities in our communities. It talks about addressing power dynamics, from a variety of perspectives, including people and place (ie local areas)
https://www.dannykruger.org.uk/site...9/Kruger 2.0 Levelling Up Our Communities.pdf

There’s this paper on using a community-powered approach, where people across localities worked together to achieve shared objectives during the pandemic.
https://www.newlocal.org.uk/publications/shifting-the-balance/

You rightly raised other variances in our society e.g., mental health, disability. This is huge – mental health in particular is a risk factor associated with many negative outcomes such as crime and violence. We have already launched funding rounds on diverting young people who have committed less serious offences away from the justice system and into clinical therapies e.g. CBT and are about to launch one on family interventions – think I mentioned this in my last post – and the importance of having an environment where people feel safe at home and how important this is for their life chances. So there is plenty more to come.

In terms of your latter points e.g. following instructions etc. We also look at life skills interventions such as practical life skills but also social and emotional skills e.g. how to respond when someone criticises you etc. These are all well evidenced interventions.

We are not reinventing the wheel here, rather doing things which have already been proven through RCTs. You can look them all up since you are so interested.




He didn’t seem very weary to me. He was very sure of himself when he categorically stated that racism was the most overplayed card in the world bla bla bla. Then he didn’t push the point and I acknowledged and appreciated his not doing so. He seems to be a long standing poster here so there isn’t any worry about him being banned.

As for cancel culture, if you are going to publicly express views – which may well be controversial, you have to be prepared for people to challenge those views, to think you are a fool etc. That is the risk you take when you are a public figure. If you can’t handle the backlash, say nothing. Though, I’m not sure people are actually ‘cancelled’ so to speak, they may lose their job.



Nahhh. Seem like platitudes to me. You made some ludicrous comment that if you don’t believe in racism it wont exist. Like if you believe the earth is flat, I guess it will be. In any case belief is evidence and experience based – if you experience something, or you see the evidence for it if you don’t experience it yourself – you can’t disbelieve it.



Well I mean you seem to be making the mistake that structural / institutional racism means there are actual laws which categorically discriminate. That is not true. Institutional or structural racism is simply “discrimination or unequal treatment on the basis of membership of a particular ethnic group (typically one that is a minority or marginalized), arising from systems, structures, or expectations that have become established within an institution or organization.” (this is from the Oxford English dictionary).

About 20 years ago, a leading judge in the UK declared the police to be institutionally racist – that wasn’t because they actually had written down racist regulations or laws – it was the way the police operated culturally and structurally. Are you aware of the Macpherson Inquiry? Indeed the judge defined institutional racism as:

“The collective failure of an organization to provide an appropriate and professional service to people because of their colour, culture, or ethnic origin.”

Here you go:
https://assets.publishing.service.g.../uploads/attachment_data/file/277111/4262.pdf

So there doesn’t NEED to be a law. Institutional racism is defined by how the institutions operate day to day, in practice.

As an aside by the way, you can’t be King of England unless you are protestant ��



There has been lots and lots and lots (and lots!) of research into all of these questions. A simple google will find you lots of resources which will answer the question. Ultimately though the bottom line is stems from structural and institutional disadvantage – they are born disadvantaged, they start school disadvantaged and that disadvantage stays with them throughout their lives.



Those were not ideals. Those were things you were presenting as ‘facts’ about the way the West is. I laughed because I live here, have done so for most of my life, grew up here, went to school here, work here, have had the opportunity to travel all over the UK through my work, met with and worked with diverse communities from all backgrounds – white, black, Asian, Brazilian, Arab, Eastern European etc. I know those things to be so far from the truth. I was laughing at the way you were so sure of those things, yet they are so far from the truth.



The point is – not everyone is allowed on the bus. Many people aren’t even allowed to look at it. If it were as simple as getting on the bus, 30% of children in the UK wouldn’t be living in poverty.



Please see above what institutional racism is.



Literally the whole of America’s infrastructure was built by slaves. Their economy was kept afloat by the slaves on the cotton fields etc. It’s not sugar coating to be aware of history.





And that is exactly what many people are doing. When inequality and disadvantage is so entrenched and deep rooted, it will take time. We will get there but in order to do so we need those who aren’t racist to understand and acknowledge the problems that exist – when they don’t it sets us back and makes the task harder. We will still do it, with or without them, but it is one of the reasons lackeys infuriate me so much.



‘Agreeing to disagree’ implies that both views have a certain amount of validity. That is not a step I am prepared to take. To me ‘there is no institutional racism’ is as far from being valid as saying ‘the earth is flat’. So I won’t agree to disagree, but of course you are free to believe whatever you wish.
Further, freedom of speech works both ways. If you make brash statements, or exaggerated statements, people are free to come back at you.

Thank you for this amazing rebuttal of the numerous clowns we have on here..I hope some of you read this and put your testosterone fuelled jahilliyat to one side..and ignore our resident bhakht crowd..
 
I can come in & educate all but i was thinking whats my motivation …

My gurus have taught me, not to educate for free.
But ok ! I will take it on
Ill get back, ok ?

Lol, you keep saying ‘you’ll get back to us’ - this thread isn’t an IT support ticket you know.
 
To be honest I don't really care whether people engage in discussion, leave discussions, continue discussions etc. My life is not defined by discussions on an internet forum, with all due respect to this wonderful website and little victories or defeats in debates on a time pass thread isn't going to change the reality of the world we live in.
 
To be honest I don't really care whether people engage in discussion, leave discussions, continue discussions etc. My life is not defined by discussions on an internet forum, with all due respect to this wonderful website and little victories or defeats in debates on a time pass thread isn't going to change the reality of the world we live in.

Absolutely. Your knowledge on this subject should be widely used on this forum to educate. I think many of us have experiences that can add to it.
 
I think some of you need to take a deep breath and actually read what is being said. No one is denying that racism doesn’t exist, the point here is the PoC resort to racism as an excuse for their failure to impress/qualify for a job rather than focusing on why they’ve failed.

The reverse is also true, once PoC get a job, anything they are not comfortable with on duty; an instruction, project etc, then they will again resort to the racist card, and straight over to HR and claim unfair this and that on the grounds of racism; earn a few bob - it’s becoming the norm.

In my industry I have witnessed more racism towards whites than any colour, but a white complaining about racism/being a victim of racism at work is rare as rocking horse5h1t.
 
Also it doesn’t help when desis prop up to an interview with fake/fabricated credentials. I interviewed many CCIEs, with certs, but turned out they were cheating in their exams, someone else took an exam for them, or the certs were outright fakes. Way to make an impression and set a trend.

Countless stories of dungar doctors with fake degrees, IT engineers with fake certification etc.
 
I think some of you need to take a deep breath and actually read what is being said. No one is denying that racism doesn’t exist, the point here is the PoC resort to racism as an excuse for their failure to impress/qualify for a job rather than focusing on why they’ve failed.

The reverse is also true, once PoC get a job, anything they are not comfortable with on duty; an instruction, project etc, then they will again resort to the racist card, and straight over to HR and claim unfair this and that on the grounds of racism; earn a few bob - it’s becoming the norm.

In my industry I have witnessed more racism towards whites than any colour, but a white complaining about racism/being a victim of racism at work is rare as rocking horse5h1t.

My posts were in relation to two points...

1. Somebody saying racism 'is the most overplayed card in the world', which I took as denigrating to the experiences of people who have to suffer from it.

2. Somebody saying 'there is no institutional racism', which I know to be factually incorrect, though it appears the comment stems from a misunderstanding of what institutional racism actually is (ie the poster thought it meant there had to be actual laws which discriminated)

In terms of 'racism' and white people suffering from it - no doubt many people hold views that are prejudiced and judge others based on those views and allow those views to affect the way they treat people and white people can be victims of that. However, as has been stated - 'racism' goes beyond individual prejudice. A white person will not suffer from the structural and institutional disadvantage based on their race that non white people have to suffer. That is what white privilege is - it is not a belief that white people never suffer or have to work hard etc.
 
Also it doesn’t help when desis prop up to an interview with fake/fabricated credentials. I interviewed many CCIEs, with certs, but turned out they were cheating in their exams, someone else took an exam for them, or the certs were outright fakes. Way to make an impression and set a trend.

Countless stories of dungar doctors with fake degrees, IT engineers with fake certification etc.

A strong recruitment process can weed out the fakes from the genuine.
 
A strong recruitment process can weed out the fakes from the genuine.

You mean like saying no to a desi who is caught with fake credentials (due to said person’s inability to answer simplest of technical questions) only for the desi to play the racism card?
 
You mean like saying no to a desi who is caught with fake credentials (due to said person’s inability to answer simplest of technical questions) only for the desi to play the racism card?

I was thinking more about referencing and checking with the institutions they have apparently got certificates from. Competency based questions in interviews are very useful for weeding out people who don't actually have the skills they claim to.

But the point is- as shown by the study I posted above - non white people struggle to even reach that stage in the process. They have to send out 75% more CVs to get an interview, with the same qualifications and experience as a white person.
 
My posts were in relation to two points...

1. Somebody saying racism 'is the most overplayed card in the world', which I took as denigrating to the experiences of people who have to suffer from it.

2. Somebody saying 'there is no institutional racism', which I know to be factually incorrect, though it appears the comment stems from a misunderstanding of what institutional racism actually is (ie the poster thought it meant there had to be actual laws which discriminated)

In terms of 'racism' and white people suffering from it - no doubt many people hold views that are prejudiced and judge others based on those views and allow those views to affect the way they treat people and white people can be victims of that. However, as has been stated - 'racism' goes beyond individual prejudice. A white person will not suffer from the structural and institutional disadvantage based on their race that non white people have to suffer. That is what white privilege is - it is not a belief that white people never suffer or have to work hard etc.

White privilege is a woke wet wipe term designed to fuel division.

Which country do you live in?

In the UK a white has equal rights to a non-white. What white privilege are you referring to? Plus as I have mentioned above, in certain fields PoC are preferred to whites, such as policing, counselling, and customs and excise.

Go look at the Asian airlines at Heathrow, Gatwick, Manchester - PIA, Air India, Air Lanka, Emirates, Qatar, etc etc - their staff are predominately non-white. Do you hear of whites complaining?

Plus it stands to reason, if living in a country where whites are a majority, UK as an example, then whites will have more jobs. This is a statistical certainty rather than a privilege.
 
I was thinking more about referencing and checking with the institutions they have apparently got certificates from. Competency based questions in interviews are very useful for weeding out people who don't actually have the skills they claim to.

But the point is- as shown by the study I posted above - non white people struggle to even reach that stage in the process. They have to send out 75% more CVs to get an interview, with the same qualifications and experience as a white person.

Do you know why non-whites struggle in this process? Because ratafication (memorising) is the best for examination. Memorising papers and answers is no substitute for experience and intelligence. It’s not so much what a solution to a problem is rather how to approach a problem. Desis fail on the majority because they memorise stock questions and fail. This is how they get weeded out but then go on to complain about racism!
 
Let’s not pretend - desis are notorious for cheating, lying, and fabricating their CVs. Then they complain about racism when caught!
 
White privilege is a woke wet wipe term designed to fuel division.

Which country do you live in?

In the UK a white has equal rights to a non-white. What white privilege are you referring to? Plus as I have mentioned above, in certain fields PoC are preferred to whites, such as policing, counselling, and customs and excise.

Go look at the Asian airlines at Heathrow, Gatwick, Manchester - PIA, Air India, Air Lanka, Emirates, Qatar, etc etc - their staff are predominately non-white. Do you hear of whites complaining?

Plus it stands to reason, if living in a country where whites are a majority, UK as an example, then whites will have more jobs. This is a statistical certainty rather than a privilege.

You clearly don't know what the term 'white privilege' actually means. It has nothing to do with white people having more rights, or more jobs. Nor does it mean that white people cannot be disadvantaged, nor does it mean that they don't suffer from injustices nor does it mean they don't have to work hard.

It simply means that their race is not a factor in these things, whereas for non white people, it is. This is backed up by absolute undeniable facts across every element and institution of society.

Your use of the term 'woke' also indicates you've been taken in by the right wing cancelling of that word from the English language. It is not divisive to be woke - to be woke is simply to be aware of the injustices that are happening around us, and to speak up for them. It is not divisive to to speak up for people suffering injustice. The divisive part is to deny what is backed up by undeniable facts, simply because the facts don't suit your political narrative.
 
Do you know why non-whites struggle in this process? Because ratafication (memorising) is the best for examination. Memorising papers and answers is no substitute for experience and intelligence. It’s not so much what a solution to a problem is rather how to approach a problem. Desis fail on the majority because they memorise stock questions and fail. This is how they get weeded out but then go on to complain about racism!

No you are misunderstanding.

I was talking about job applications - CVs pre interview. And the fact that non white people, with equivalent qualifications and experience, get binned even before the interview stage as shown by the study.

I note that every point I make is backed up by facts and evidence whereas yours is just hearsay and 'oh those desis complain about racism bla bla bla!'
 
Simply tosh, complete and utter tosh.

Not in my field.

Tosh is failing to answer which country you reside in.

Go figure.

Rest of you inane racist drivel is just that, racist and hypocritical.(see whatbi did here?)

You admit dess lie and fabricate on their CVs, but then get pulled up on it you cry ‘tosh’ instead of racism.

One more time, which country do you reside in?
 
Last edited:
No you are misunderstanding.

I was talking about job applications - CVs pre interview. And the fact that non white people, with equivalent qualifications and experience, get binned even before the interview stage as shown by the study.

I note that every point I make is backed up by facts and evidence whereas yours is just hearsay and 'oh those desis complain about racism bla bla bla!'

Please stop with this drivel. I completely understand. I pointed out when desis are caught lying they claim racism.

The fact you keep claiming you are speaking the truth is evidence of this.

Your subjective research and racism along with Google citing is not the truth.
 
Last edited:
Not in my field.

Tosh is failing to answer which country you reside in.

Go figure.

Rest of you inane racist drivel is just that, racist and hypocritical.(see whatbi did here?)

You admit dess lie and fabricate on their CVs, but then get pulled up on it you cry ‘tosh’ instead of racism.

One more time, which country do you reside in?

If you had actually read my posts in this thread you would already know which country I live in. I have talked about it already and don't need to repeat myself again and again.

I simply stated strong recruitment procedures as ways to mitigate against anyone lying on their CV - I did not anywhere state 'desis lie on their CV'.

I don't have the power to be racist.

Stay ignorant my friend. It gets you far in the West.
 
If you had actually read my posts in this thread you would already know which country I live in. I have talked about it already and don't need to repeat myself again and again.

I simply stated strong recruitment procedures as ways to mitigate against anyone lying on their CV - I did not anywhere state 'desis lie on their CV'.

I don't have the power to be racist.

Stay ignorant my friend. It gets you far in the West.

I have clearly stated that in my field the recruitment process weeds out the fraudsters who tend to be desis. Desis faking CVs and qualifications isn’t something new, I never claimed you did state this, I did (fraud caught again due to insecurity), but you clearly didn’t factor this point in your hail Mary routine.

You are being racist, you don’t need power, just perspective and vision.

So save it.
 
Please stop with this drivel. I completely understand. I pointed out when desis are caught lying they claim racism.

The fact you keep claiming you are speaking the truth is evidence of this.

Your subjective research and racism along with Google citing is not the truth.

The drivel is coming from you. You don't understand it, or you pretended not to - hence your ridiculous laughable examples to back up your point - oh more asians work for Air India than white people therefore there can't be white privilege. I mean, LOL. You are ridiculous.

People lying on their CVs and making a claim of racism - even if this happens in whatever industry you work in - does not change the facts and institutional disadvantage that non white people face - and yes it is backed up by extensive research that can be found all over google or in all reputable institutions across the world. And no amount of your prejudice about desis lying on their CVs will change those facts.
 
I have clearly stated that in my field the recruitment process weeds out the fraudsters who tend to be desis. Desis faking CVs and qualifications isn’t something new, I never claimed you did state this, I did (fraud caught again due to insecurity), but you clearly didn’t factor this point in your hail Mary routine.

You are being racist, you don’t need power, just perspective and vision.

So save it.

Yes you did, you said 'You admit dess lie and fabricate on their CVs, but then get pulled up on it you cry ‘tosh’ instead of racism.' It was written very badly, clearly rushed but you are saying 'you admit desis lie', I think anyway. To be honest didn't really understand it.

You cannot be racist without power - that's what racism is. You are ignorant - no other word to describe you. But as I said, ignorance is what gets you far in the west.
 
The drivel is coming from you. You don't understand it, or you pretended not to - hence your ridiculous laughable examples to back up your point - oh more asians work for Air India than white people therefore there can't be white privilege. I mean, LOL. You are ridiculous.

People lying on their CVs and making a claim of racism - even if this happens in whatever industry you work in - does not change the facts and institutional disadvantage that non white people face - and yes it is backed up by extensive research that can be found all over google or in all reputable institutions across the world. And no amount of your prejudice about desis lying on their CVs will change those facts.

You have fake concern. My point of Asian airlines hiring more PoC stands. Your retort? LOL? Is that it? For all your bravado and googling, you come up with LOL? You know why? Cos you never thought about it. Brainwashwd propaganda sheep.

I was born before you, live in the West, and have first hand experience compared to your liberal lefty lies.

Go back to your hymn sheet; woke wet wipes are so easily exposed.

Still, feel happy cos a few posters give you a high five.

Carry on with the collateral damage posting.
 
You have fake concern. My point of Asian airlines hiring more PoC stands. Your retort? LOL? Is that it? For all your bravado and googling, you come up with LOL? You know why? Cos you never thought about it. Brainwashwd propaganda sheep.

I was born before you, live in the West, and have first hand experience compared to your liberal lefty lies.

Go back to your hymn sheet; woke wet wipes are so easily exposed.

Still, feel happy cos a few posters give you a high five.

Carry on with the collateral damage posting.

Yes LOL is the only response. I mean 'Air India hires more Asians therefore there is no white privilege'. I mean, is that even a serious point? LOL is the only response, but if it makes you feel better to think that was some kind of hit, by all means believe so, LOL.

Maybe I never thought about it because it was so ridiculou.

Hey, you ever been to that restaurant in London? Lahore Kebab House? Do you know all their waiters are desi? I completely take back everything I said - all their waiters are desi! There can't be white privilege!

My posts are based on first hand experience, in depth study, traveling all over the country and spending time and working with communities. Your first hand experience is based on looking at a few CVs and doing a couple of job interviews. I'd rather be a wet wipe than ignorant.

P.S. Air India has more Asian employees than whites therefore there can't be such a thing as white privilege :)):)):)):)):))
 
Yes LOL is the only response. I mean 'Air India hires more Asians therefore there is no white privilege'. I mean, is that even a serious point? LOL is the only response, but if it makes you feel better to think that was some kind of hit, by all means believe so, LOL.

Maybe I never thought about it because it was so ridiculou.

Hey, you ever been to that restaurant in London? Lahore Kebab House? Do you know all their waiters are desi? I completely take back everything I said - all their waiters are desi! There can't be white privilege!

My posts are based on first hand experience, in depth study, traveling all over the country and spending time and working with communities. Your first hand experience is based on looking at a few CVs and doing a couple of job interviews. I'd rather be a wet wipe than ignorant.

P.S. Air India has more Asian employees than whites therefore there can't be such a thing as white privilege :)):)):)):)):))

First of all, the fact you are using LOL smilies reveals all. Secondly you have not addressed the point where PoC are hired as preference in policing and counselling in UK. Sums up your understanding and racism.

You are a racist clearly, I wouldn’t hire you as paper boy.

Rest of your post is emotive rhetoric with aloa vera coated woke wet wipes.

See yah!
 
You could always google and find sources yourself. I shouldn't need to hold your hand, but here are a few sources for you...

Contribution of slaves to America's infrastructure:

Railroad building in the south

"The closest studies we have of Southern subregions include Kenneth Noe's Southwest Virginia's Railroad: Modernization and the Sectional Crisis (University of Illinois Press, 1994) and Mark Wetherington's Plain Folk's Fight: The Civil War and Reconstruction in Piney Woods Georgia (University of North Carolina Press, 2005). Both indicate the intensity of railroad development even in the South's most remote regions. Slaveholding expanded in the Wiregrass and in the Appalachian mountains, and commercial agriculture developed in the wake of the railroads. The fastest growing regions of the South, especially along the western border of Texas, Arkansas, and Missouri, demonstrated just how compatible slavery was with southern railroad growth.

Southern railroad companies began buying slaves as early as the 1840s and used enslaved labor almost exclusively to construction their lines. Thousands of African Americans worked on the southern railroads in the 1850s. For African Americans the work was often the hardest, most difficult, and dangerous they were forced to undertake. Although historians, such as Allen Trelease, Robert Starobin, and Walter Licht, have acknowledged the presence of slave labor on Southern railroads, we have little sense its overall dimensions or its relationship to the southern expansionism of the 1850s. Each of these historians has found slave labor on southern railroads; more recently, Theodore Kornweibel, Jr., has documented the use of enslaved labor on 85 of 113 railroads in the Confederate states."

https://railroads.unl.edu/views/item/slavery_rr

The Eufala Railroad also gave Alabama commercial access to the Port of Savannah. Savannah was a key cotton and rice trading port, and slavery was integral to the growth of the city.
https://www.georgiaencyclopedia.org/articles/history-archaeology/atlantic-slave-trade-to-savannah/

Today, Savannah’s deep-water port remains one of the busiest container ports in the U.S. Among its top exports: cotton.

For a good narrative on how important the railroads were for the American economy, I suggest you read “The American South”. Really a fascinating book

https://rowman.com/ISBN/97814422622...om-Settlement-to-Reconstruction-Fifth-Edition

Probably worth you reading this article as well https://www.theroot.com/6-historic-structures-in-america-that-were-built-by-sla-1790856172

You asked for sources so hopefully that should be enough for you, for now, on the infrastructure side. Of course happy to continue the conversation if you really want to but this thread is turning a bit into me holding people's hand and providing them with historical facts etc. It's a little frustrating, i'd appreciate if you could do your own research and we could have a discussion rather than me doing all the research and one or two others only speaking based on prejudice or theory, as Halaribo said above.

On the cotton fields:

"In the pre-Civil War United States, a stronger case can be made that slavery played a critical role in economic development. One crop, slave-grown cotton, provided over half of all US export earnings. By 1840, the South grew 60 percent of the world's cotton and provided some 70 percent of the cotton consumed by the British textile industry. Thus slavery paid for a substantial share of the capital, iron, and manufactured goods that laid the basis for American economic growth. In addition, precisely because the South specialized in cotton production, the North developed a variety of businesses that provided services for the slave South, including textile factories, a meat processing industry, insurance companies, shippers, and cotton brokers."

https://www.gilderlehrman.org/histo...t-was-slavery-engine-american-economic-growth

This paper on the economics of the civil war gives a very solid account of the economic contribution of slavery to the US economy https://eh.net/encyclopedia/the-economics-of-the-civil-war/

The bodies of the enslaved served as America’s largest financial asset, and they were forced to maintain America’s most exported commodity. In 60 years, from 1801 to 1862, the amount of cotton picked daily by an enslaved person increased 400 percent. The profits from cotton propelled the US into a position as one of the leading economies in the world, and made the South its most prosperous region. The ownership of enslaved people increased wealth for Southern planters so much that by the dawn of the Civil War, the Mississippi River Valley had more millionaires per capita than any other region."


Hopefully that should be enough for now, but it's getting a bit frustrating having to hold people's hands and find sources for them. We all have google and i'd much prefer a conversation where you have your sources, I have mine and we discuss our opinions. All this 'please publish this, find your source for that' is fine but just a little boring. I'd rather have a discussion. So in future please just google it, you'll find plenty of sources.

The specific claim you made was “ Literally the whole of America’s infrastructure was built by slaves”.

When asked to provide sources for your claim you try to confuse the issue by providing a bunch of cites none of which validate the claim the WHOLE OF AMERICA’S INFRASTRUCTURE was built by slaves.

Slaves participating in building infrastructure is not the same as WHOLE OF AMERICA’S INFRASTRUCTURE.

I don’t have time for such dishonesty, I will not reply unless I see something honest.
 
Last edited:
First of all, the fact you are using LOL smilies reveals all. Secondly you have not addressed the point where PoC are hired as preference in policing and counselling in UK. Sums up your understanding and racism.

You are a racist clearly, I wouldn’t hire you as paper boy.

Rest of you post is emotive rhetoric.

See yah!

I'm using LOL because your point was so ridiculous it was laughable. Air India :)):)):)):)):))

Sorry I totally missed your point about police etc because i was laughing so hard at the Air India example. Yes, this is one of several things that have been attempted especially in public facing jobs, to mitigate against institutional and structural racism and to build trust with communities where that trust has been broken (largely because of institutional racism). As a temporary measure it really shouldn't have to be done but sometimes it does. If there was no institutional racism, there wouldn't be a need for it.

Thankfully I don't need or want an ignorant like you to hire me for anything, paper boy or CEO. Very pleased to be working for a fantastic organisation with some fantastic people with more life experience in our little toes alone than looking at a couple of fake CVs would ever give us.

Air India :)):)):)):)):))
 
The specific claim you made was “ Literally the whole of America’s infrastructure was built by slaves”.

When asked to provide sources for your claim you try to confuse the issue by providing a bunch of cites none of which validate the claim the WHOLE OF AMERICA’S INFRASTRUCTURE was built by slaves.

Slaves participating in building infrastructure is not the same as WHOLE OF AMERICA’S INFRASTRUCTURE.

I don’t have time for such dishonesty, I will not reply unless I see something honest.

Yes that was an exaggeration. I apologise.

'A significant contribution to America's infrastructure and economic development was made by slaves'.
 
I'm using LOL because your point was so ridiculous it was laughable. Air India :)):)):)):)):))

Sorry I totally missed your point about police etc because i was laughing so hard at the Air India example. Yes, this is one of several things that have been attempted especially in public facing jobs, to mitigate against institutional and structural racism and to build trust with communities where that trust has been broken (largely because of institutional racism). As a temporary measure it really shouldn't have to be done but sometimes it does. If there was no institutional racism, there wouldn't be a need for it.

Thankfully I don't need or want an ignorant like you to hire me for anything, paper boy or CEO. Very pleased to be working for a fantastic organisation with some fantastic people with more life experience in our little toes alone than looking at a couple of fake CVs would ever give us.

Air India :)):)):)):)):))

More smilies, but no response to why UK policing and counselling jobs are offered to the right skill rather than colour.

No response to why desis are caught lying on their CVs than others.

Still more LOLs from someone who pulled a report from Google unable to explain why Asian airlines hire more staff from Asians in UK than whites. Why no cry of racism, from desi racists now?

Come back when you live in the West.
 
It’s all sensationalism. Non-white do resort to the racist card, when caught lying on their CVs. Yes we all know racism exists, but what we are not told is that desis are more racists than whites. These Peter Pans of desi moraility and wokeness fail to address this point, and I have nothing but pleasure in exposing their racism, and lies during an interview process.
 
Back
Top