ODI Cricket Win/Loss record by countires

Since when does Fluke equate to One off events.

In which universe does that occur? Explain this theoretical hypothesis please?
Yea one of tukka win is same as fluke .

if you go by Oxford dictionary than tell me where is mid off called in cricket field .
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Last 9 odi between India- Pakistan either sides of champion trophy.

India won -7
Pakistan won -1
1 no result due to rain otherwise it was easy win for india .

So Pakistan won one gane by Fluke lol
 
Yea one of tukka win is same as fluke .

if you go by Oxford dictionary than tell me where is mid off called in cricket field .
Why are you even Arguing with me?

India is obviously a superior team, doesn't change the fact that Pakistan hunilated them black and blue that day.

It's a one off event, Can such dominance happen again? Likely not

But it doesn't change the fact that in this one off event Pakistan controlled the pace, swtting and flow of the game. None of this occurred by chance. They were the superior team that day.

Also ik you're being sarcastic but who cares, Here's your definition

Fluke : an unlikely chance occurrence, especially a surprising piece of luck.

One off events: a happening that occurs only once and is not repeated

Mid off: a fielding position on the off side of the field nearer to the batsman than long off


Abh Kush?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Why are you even Arguing with me?

India is obviously a superior team, doesn't change the fact that Pakistan hunilated them black and blue that day.

It's a one off event, Can such dominance happen again? Likely not

But it doesn't change the fact that in this one off event Pakistan controlled the pace, swtting and flow of the game. None of this occurred by chance. They were the superior team that day.

Also ik you're being sarcastic but who cares, Here's your definition

Fluke : an unlikely chance occurrence, especially a surprising piece of luck.

One off events: a happening that occurs only once and is not repeated

Mid off: a fielding position on the off side of the field nearer to the batsman than long off


Abh Kush?
If you go by Oxford dictionary than mid off should called in place of cover right??
 
Last edited by a moderator:
If you go by Oxford dictionary than mid off should called in place of cover right??
Jee jee, if you go by Oxford dictionary, the term cricket also means the insect that is commonly eaten by a mantis.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Jee jee, if you go by Oxford dictionary, the term cricket also means the insect that is commonly eaten by a mantis.

That's why do not use oxford dictionary when comes to understand cricket .

Self Cricket knowledge >>>>> oxford dictionary term like Fluke :kp
 
That's why do not use oxford dictionary when comes to understand cricket .

Self Cricket knowledge >>>>> oxford dictionary term like Fluke :kp
Yes yes sir, you're absolutely correct.

I have now learned that fluke and one off events are indeed one and the same thing.

In other words the meteorite that Wiped put the dinosaurs was a fluke.

The woman who accidentally got hit by lightning was also a fluke, She fluked it indeed.
 
Yes yes sir, you're absolutely correct.

I have now learned that fluke and one off events are indeed one and the same thing.

In other words the meteorite that Wiped put the dinosaurs was a fluke.

The woman who accidentally got hit by lightning was also a fluke, She fluked it indeed.
I have nothing more to discuss so you can keep your theory and be happy .

Btw one last time, Pakistan CT win was 100% Fluke :kp
 
I have nothing more to discuss so you can keep your theory and be happy .

Btw one last time, Pakistan CT win was 100% Fluke :kp
I have nothing more to discuss so you can keep your theory and be happy .

Sorry bro, i m always happy, I guess me being upset is a fluke.
 
It was Fluke and it wast Last time pakistan won any odi against India.

After that Fluke win india humiliated pakistan whenever they were face each others

19 September 2018, Asia Cup – India Won by 8 Wickets

23 September 2018, Asia Cup – India Won by 9 Wickets


16 June 2019, ICC World Cup – India Won by 89 Runs ( All thanks to DLS otherwise 150+ runs lose)

10 September 2023, Asia Cup - India won by 228 runs

14 October 2023 , World Cup - india won by 7 wickets


All five games after that fluke win India not just won but humiliated pakistan by big margins
So when Pakistan wins by a big margin its a fluke so all these wins by India are a fluke than
 
Margin of victory doesn't matter. If a team is not even able to even compete in any other games than the one off game, it is most definitely a fluke.

Check the defeat margins above in Devadwal's post. Pakistan couldn't even make a fight in a single game.
When you demolish your opponent wheater it happened one time, 2 times or 3 times etc...its not a fluke...a fluke is when you get lucky and win by chance...beating a team by 180 runs is no fluke by that logic all of indias wins by big margin are fluke too
 
The whole thread has been derailed because of you guys discussing what fluke actually means.

Come back to the topic or find some other for your irrelevant chat now.
 
This record used to mean something before IPL/T20 happened.

It doesn't mean much anymore. It is because many top teams don't play their full sides during bilateral games.
No bilaterals like sharjah cup, Pepsi cup, coco cola cup, kiptley cup, Lipton dash cup

All don't mean squat. Never meant anything.

Just testers for all teams. Important games are bilateral tests as always, odi world cups and then t20 world cup followed by Asia cup etc and then these rubbish bilaterals
 
No bilaterals like sharjah cup, Pepsi cup, coco cola cup, kiptley cup, Lipton dash cup

All don't mean squat. Never meant anything.

Just testers for all teams. Important games are bilateral tests as always, odi world cups and then t20 world cup followed by Asia cup etc and then these rubbish bilaterals

Before T20 days, bilaterals were taken seriously by teams. I know because I used to watch and teams used to play their full sides.

Those were the days.
 
Before T20 days, bilaterals were taken seriously by teams. I know because I used to watch and teams used to play their full sides.

Those were the days.
I watched all of them and no. It was always a tested. Doesn't matter if full strength. Nothing on the line so it doesn't matter.

Only wc matters. Winning matters and test bilaterals.

Now it's test bilaterals first along with odi world cup then t20 world cup

And then rest
 
I watched all of them and no. It was always a tested. Doesn't matter if full strength. Nothing on the line so it doesn't matter.

Only wc matters. Winning matters and test bilaterals.

Now it's test bilaterals first along with odi world cup then t20 world cup

And then rest

Before T20 became mainstream, everything mattered. But, World Cups mattered the most. I agree.

After T20 became mainstream, bilateral LOIs no longer matter much. Teams barely play their full sides. World Cups and Tests are the only things which matter now.

In conclusion, T20 has ruined the beauty of cricket.
 
Back
Top