Varun
Senior Test Player
- Joined
- Dec 25, 2012
- Runs
- 26,052
- Post of the Week
- 1
Wow, April 2 is going to be the 10th anniversary of our World Cup win.
Time flies.
Time flies.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It’s name was Mali. The owner of the patriot claimed that it is psychic and he made it predict the World Cup winner just the octopus predicted the winner of the 2010 football World Cup.
The parrot picked Pakistan as the winner thrice, and apparently it got killed by an Indian fan few days later.![]()
And I thought I knew everything about this world cup.
Also I’ve not seen a choke as bad as Umar Gul choked that day
For India, Zaheer Khan in the 2003 final. Also Bumrah in 2017 CT final.
Unpopular opinion but I don't really blame Misbah for the defeat. For me the reason for the defeat was that players like Umar Akmal, Afridi and Razzaq did not have the match awareness to understand what was required.
End of Over 28:
Pakistan were 117/4
Akmal 6(9)
Misbah 6(8)
Required Run Rate 6.55
End of Over 33:
Pakistan were 142/4
Misbah 8(24)
Akmal 29(23)
Required Run Rate 7.00
Misbah could've and should've scored at a better pace by taking some singles. I concede that.
However, despite that, at the end of over 33, Pakistan required 119 from 102 balls. Hardly any cause for concern.
At this point in time, I totally understood what Misbah was trying to do. He was trying to take the game deep by preserving wickets in hand.
Even if Pakistan scored 4.5 RPO for the next 9 overs (from overs 33-42), the required target would've become 79 runs off the last 8 overs. If Pakistan had all 6 wickets remaining intact by then, 10 RPO would've been a cakewalk given the batting firepower of Misbah, Akmal, Afridi and Razzaq along with 5 overs of batting powerplay.
Scoring 6.55 RPO off 22 overs with the last recognized batting pair of Misbah and Akmal was a much difficult task than scoring 10 RPO off 8 overs with 5 overs of batting powerplay and Misbah, Akmal, Afridi and Razzaq to bat.
But what happens is Akmal gets out the first ball of the 34th over, Razzaq gets out in the 37th over and Afridi gets himself out trying to hit a six in the 42nd over, killing the contest.
Now the incredible bit is, Pakistan scored 42 runs from 33rd over till the 42nd over. Almost at the same 4.5 RPO that I talked about. But they lost 3 wickets in the process because they got scared of the required run rate by over 33.
When Afridi got out, Pakistan required 77 runs from 49 balls (RRR of 9.43). This should've been a routine chase with 6 wickets in hand and 5 overs of batting powerplay.
Misbah wasn't the one to blame here. Akmal, Razzaq and Afridi didn't understand what was required. Sometimes you just need to sit back and let the other team make their move. If Pakistan isn't losing those 3 wickets by the 43rd over, panic would've engulfed India. It was a great opportunity lost. Nobody can convince me that Pakistan could not hit guys like Munaf, Nehra, Harbhajan for aplenty and score at 10RPO in the last 8 overs of an innings with only 3 players outside the circle.
Unpopular opinion but I don't really blame Misbah for the defeat. For me the reason for the defeat was that players like Umar Akmal, Afridi and Razzaq did not have the match awareness to understand what was required.
End of Over 28:
Pakistan were 117/4
Akmal 6(9)
Misbah 6(8)
Required Run Rate 6.55
End of Over 33:
Pakistan were 142/4
Misbah 8(24)
Akmal 29(23)
Required Run Rate 7.00
Misbah could've and should've scored at a better pace by taking some singles. I concede that.
However, despite that, at the end of over 33, Pakistan required 119 from 102 balls. Hardly any cause for concern.
At this point in time, I totally understood what Misbah was trying to do. He was trying to take the game deep by preserving wickets in hand.
Even if Pakistan scored 4.5 RPO for the next 9 overs (from overs 33-42), the required target would've become 79 runs off the last 8 overs. If Pakistan had all 6 wickets remaining intact by then, 10 RPO would've been a cakewalk given the batting firepower of Misbah, Akmal, Afridi and Razzaq along with 5 overs of batting powerplay.
Scoring 6.55 RPO off 22 overs with the last recognized batting pair of Misbah and Akmal was a much difficult task than scoring 10 RPO off 8 overs with 5 overs of batting powerplay and Misbah, Akmal, Afridi and Razzaq to bat.
But what happens is Akmal gets out the first ball of the 34th over, Razzaq gets out in the 37th over and Afridi gets himself out trying to hit a six in the 42nd over, killing the contest.
Now the incredible bit is, Pakistan scored 42 runs from 33rd over till the 42nd over. Almost at the same 4.5 RPO that I talked about. But they lost 3 wickets in the process because they got scared of the required run rate by over 33.
When Afridi got out, Pakistan required 77 runs from 49 balls (RRR of 9.43). This should've been a routine chase with 6 wickets in hand and 5 overs of batting powerplay.
Misbah wasn't the one to blame here. Akmal, Razzaq and Afridi didn't understand what was required. Sometimes you just need to sit back and let the other team make their move. If Pakistan isn't losing those 3 wickets by the 43rd over, panic would've engulfed India. It was a great opportunity lost. Nobody can convince me that Pakistan could not hit guys like Munaf, Nehra, Harbhajan for aplenty and score at 10RPO in the last 8 overs of an innings with only 3 players outside the circle.
Bro 10 an over isnt a cake walk in odis Rarely have teams ever chased 80+ in last 10.Misbah should definitely be blamed but younis shouldnt be spared too who idk how managed to play 200 odis with an avg of 30.Now by the end of 32nd over had misbah scored 20 off 24 rather than 8/24 and younis had scored 28/32 instead of his playing with a pathetic sr of 40 . Pak would have only required 92 of 102 which would have been a piece of cake considering we still had Afridi and Razzaq and ajmal wahab and gul could also bat a little
The hype for this match was unreal. Both teams won their respective semifinals a week before and we had a week of trash-talking from both sides.
ICC also made sure this blockbuster semifinal happens by producing slow pitches in the two quarterfinals.
The amount of hype and pressure overwhelmed both sets of players and almost every player showed nerves. As a result, the match itself was of low quality with both sides playing ordinary cricket.
The result of this match was only hugely significant in the context of the World Cup but also its influence on Pakistan and Indian cricket over the next decade.
While India would have still gone onto become a much better team than Pakistan simply because they had much better talent at their disposal, a lot of things would have been different.
There is no doubt that Pakistan would have gone on to win the World Cup final. Sri Lanka were a strong side in those conditions, but the momentum and confidence that Pakistan would have gained from beating India in the semifinal would have helped them overpower Sri Lanka in Mumbai.
They had already beaten them in Colombo in the group stage and also beat them the in WT20 Final two years back, so Pakistan would have a psychological advantage as well.
Winning the World Cup would have changed Afridi’s legacy completely.
He would have gone on to win the player of the World Cup and would also be the highest wicket-taker.
More importantly, it would have made him a bigger figure in Pakistan cricket than Imran Khan.
Winning a World Cup final India and beating India along the way would have made Afridi the most celebrated hero of Pakistan cricket.
It would also have ensured that he leads the Pakistan team for the next 4 years and at the 2015 World Cup.
With Pakistan winning the World Cup, the Misbah era in ODI and T20Is would have never taken place.
On the contrary, Dhoni’s legacy as captain would have been less celebrated. He would still be considered a great captain but not to this extent, and there would be no biopic either.
Winning the World Cup would have certainly given Pakistan a lot of confidence and boost. It would have replaced the 1992 World Cup as the cornerstone of Pakistan cricket.
PCB would have been able to use its leverage as world champions to get regular bilateral cricket with India in the 2012-2015 period and maybe even accelerate the return of international cricket to Pakistan.
In hindsight, Pakistan should have selected Malik for the World Cup. He was in unreal form in domestic cricket in 2010-11, and he would certainly have handled Yuvraj and Harbhajan better than Younis and Misbah.
Malik batting in the middle-order alongside Umar Akmal in that World Cup would have boosted Pakistan’s batting.
Shafiq did well in that World Cup when he replaced Shehzad who was a complete waste of space. Hafeez and Akmal opening from the beginning with Malik in the middle-order was a much better combination.
That defeat signaled the end of an era as far as Pakistan vs India World Cup rivalry is concerned. It was the last World Cup where Pakistan had a strong chance of beating India. By 2015, it was a more of a David vs Goliath situation.
The Mohali semifinal also signaled the beginning of the end of my love affair with Pakistan cricket. It made me realize that Pakistan will never have the talent and the mentality to become a top side.
Had we won the World Cup, not only would Pakistan cricket be different but PakPassion would also be a different place today.
The 2011 World Cup was the best World Cup of my time as a cricket follower. It was the first World Cup since 1999 that was unpredictable and Australia winning wasn’t a forgone conclusion.
Also, the return of the World Cup to the subcontinent after 15 years caused a lot of excitement in spite of the disappointed of Pakistani losing hosting rights in 2009.
Nevertheless, it was a hugely anticipated World Cup because Pakistan had a very strong chance. The fact that an Indian parrot predicted Pakistan to lift the World Cup also added to the excitement of Pakistani fans.
Pakistan scored 91 in the last 10 overs on the same ground in 2007 chasing 322. Scored 39 in the last 3 overs with afridi and tanvir. Without any batting powerplay.
10 rpo off the last 8 overs with all 6 wickets in hand would've been a cakewalk.
Check Misbah's comment on that same match on cricinfi. He said "i really enjoyed the partnership with Younis. We decided if we play 50 overs, we will win the game."
Exactly the same thing was needed here. Just needed to conserve wickets for afridi and razzaq to come and smash it.
In spite of Sehwag’s early onslaught, India were on the ropes at 200/7 and Pakistan were into the tail. Had Pakistan restricted them to 220-230, they would have won in spite of the bottle-job with the bat.
Raina’s innings was the real game-changer in the context of the match. 4 years later, he played another stellar innings against Pakistan in the 2015 World Cup.
Unpopular opinion but I don't really blame Misbah for the defeat. For me the reason for the defeat was that players like Umar Akmal, Afridi and Razzaq did not have the match awareness to understand what was required.
End of Over 28:
Pakistan were 117/4
Akmal 6(9)
Misbah 6(8)
Required Run Rate 6.55
End of Over 33:
Pakistan were 142/4
Misbah 8(24)
Akmal 29(23)
Required Run Rate 7.00
Younis scored 13 off 32 balls, a strike rate of 40.62. Misbah scored 17 from the first 42 balls he faced, playing out 27 dots. During this period Pakistan’s required run rate jumped from 6.07 to 8.45. During the 74 balls in which Younis and Misbah were at the crease together, 30 runs were scored.