What's new

One bouncer per over rule

Manager101

Local Club Regular
Joined
Oct 20, 2014
Runs
1,685
Just watched Russell bowling four bouncers in an over and then three in next over.

Is the rule still intact or the umpire sleeping ?
 
What constitutes a bouncer? Are they getting to head height or maybe just short pitched around ribs?
 
There's a difference between short pitched bowling and bouncers..

Bouncers are above shoulder level deliveries with batsman standing.
 
I watched Russell bowling three above shoulder bouncers in a row in early overs.
 
I watched Russell bowling three above shoulder bouncers in a row in early overs.

Can you show photos of those deliveries? I started watching midway and it seems they are bowling legitimately short pitched stuff and not all balls are bouncers.
 
Another one above head height just now and not even called a wide. Crowd booing.

Rubbish stuff by pathetic umpires.
 
Sarfarqz is captain and is at crease, hafeez is senior most player at crease. They should let the umpires know to start calling bouncers/wides. A new player might not be confident enough but these two should take charge and put a word in umpires ears

Need to take sir Alex Ferguson coaching course on how to influence decisions in your favour. As the two most experienced players if they meekly submit to decisions it's extremely poor and subversive behaviour.
 
Really silly umpiring...
Couldn't believe my eyes when Russel bowled four bouncers in a row and just now ball sailed over the head and wasn't called a wide...
 
WI is bringing their A game and hammering Pakistan right now.
 
Only 1 i felt was missed otherwise the rest were very well directed below the shoulders. Brilliant bowling.

So stop crying.
 
Pakistanis should be happy. Now they'll have a convenient excuse for the embarrassing loss. (11th in a row?)
 
Only 1 i felt was missed otherwise the rest were very well directed below the shoulders. Brilliant bowling.

So stop crying.

If you can't be objective then best shut up. Some of them were borderline so fair enough, but there have been at least 4 which should have been called.
 
Only 1 i felt was missed otherwise the rest were very well directed below the shoulders. Brilliant bowling.

So stop crying.

That doesn't even make sense.
below shoulder? Just because they aren't flying over the head doesn't mean they are not bouncers.
Anyway, as long as the umpires are consistent thats the most important thing.
 
Sums up the gutless mentality of our players. Any brave cricketer would have protested and taken up the matter with the umpires. Or, at least given a stare to the leg umpire.

Our players are more interested in bootlicking the opposition.
 
Pakistanis should be happy. Now they'll have a convenient excuse for the embarrassing loss. (11th in a row?)

They will lose because they play short pitch bowling badly, but that doesn't mean bouncers should be let go by the umpires just because it's Pakistan batting.
 
If you can't be objective then best shut up. Some of them were borderline so fair enough, but there have been at least 4 which should have been called.

Who is objective here? The emotional supporter or the neutral observer?

Follow your own advice.
 
That doesn't even make sense.
below shoulder? Just because they aren't flying over the head doesn't mean they are not bouncers.
Anyway, as long as the umpires are consistent thats the most important thing.

You can bowl as many balls you want below the shoulder but only 1 per over above makes perfect sense to me.
 
Who is objective here? The emotional supporter or the neutral observer?

Follow your own advice.

If you were neutral you wouldn't use emotional language like stop crying. No need for such spite unless there is some underlying motive.
 
Clever bowling from West Indies and particularly Rusell. He banged it in and confused the Pakistani batsmen. Several of the wickets to short balls.
 
If you were neutral you wouldn't use emotional language like stop crying. No need for such spite unless there is some underlying motive.

their enjoying our struggles..hence why they are on this forum..to enjoy the pain many of us have to endure..says alot about the type of people we are dealing with here..
 
I have got to say some rubbish dismissals..completely caught off guard..i mean two out on the legside?? rubbish..and haris dismissal was a disgrace also babars..
 
They will lose because they play short pitch bowling badly, but that doesn't mean bouncers should be let go by the umpires just because it's Pakistan batting.


True but umpires may be allowing Pakistani fans to go back home with a little self respect.
 
Talk about knee jerk reactions. Nothing illegal happened here the only embarassing bit was timid batting
 
If you were neutral you wouldn't use emotional language like stop crying. No need for such spite unless there is some underlying motive.

There is no spite at all. People are whinging like its some conspiracy and i offered my opinion the matter. I have no grudge against team Pakistan just the whinging about the short ball.
 
I have got to say some rubbish dismissals..completely caught off guard..i mean two out on the legside?? rubbish..and haris dismissal was a disgrace also babars..

Umpiring aside, the Windies did their homework, they knew Pakistan batsmen were crap against short bowling, it made sense to bowl as many as possible and hope for weak shots.
 
their enjoying our struggles..hence why they are on this forum..to enjoy the pain many of us have to endure..says alot about the type of people we are dealing with here..

Enjoying the ball having a victory over the bat in ODI cricket definately. Its a rare sight these days.
 
I have got to say some rubbish dismissals..completely caught off guard..i mean two out on the legside?? rubbish..and haris dismissal was a disgrace also babars..

Fans like you should suffer who were against the inclusion of Malik
 
I always find it funny how Pakistan comes in 2 months early do all sorts of practise.

And there are teams like West Indies, who dont have to practise, all they do is study the opposition and thats it.

Short ball, and they are gone.

Also, didn't pakistani fans always advocated for bouncers to be allowed and not be any limit?
 
Agree that it was a wrong call to not call those bounces as no ball. But that doesn’t justify the horror show Pakistani batsmen pulled off today. Extremely disappointed today with them.
 
Sunil Gavaskar is not happy with umpires. As per him umpire should have signalled bouncer.
 
So the umpire should be more lenient on the batsmen and harder on the bowlers.
 
Mark Nicholas sounded surprised as well, but looking at the umpires I expect borderline decisions to go against Pakistan.

Yup it feels Pakistan choked at this moment when they saw all bouncers coming up on their faces and umpires are doing nothing.
 
I can think of a couple perhaps that should have been adjudged as bouncers but otherwise no... It was just well directed short pitch bowling
 
I see pakistani batsman being peppered by Short balls in every match of this World Cup. I hope they are prepared for that.
Starc, Bumrah, Boult
 
Harris sohail’s wicket was simply down to the atrocious calls on bouncers. He felt he needed to go after it
 
Harris sohail’s wicket was simply down to the atrocious calls on bouncers. He felt he needed to go after it

In reality he did. The only way to stop short bowling is to hit boundaries from them. You can be sure Windies batsmen will go after our bowlers if they pitch short.
 
Terrible umpiring in this match and the English series buuuut no excuse got 105 all out.
 
Good. We deserve rough treatment from the umpires.

Come on. Regardless of how good or bad a team is, no one deserves rough treatment from the umpires. Bit of a dumb statement from you here.

On topic, I believe you're allowed 2 shoulder height (after bouncing of course) balls per over
 
Just watched Russell bowling four bouncers in an over and then three in next over.

Is the rule still intact or the umpire sleeping ?

It was out "dashing" batsman Harris Sohail who was making those short pitch deliveries bouncers by ducking them very low. He could have easily taken singles or would have pulled or cut them for more runs.
 
Back
Top