Pakpak
ODI Debutant
- Joined
- Jan 31, 2009
- Runs
- 9,137
It is not the bowlers fault. They have no score to defend. They can hardly do anything when our batsmen barely score 180.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Apart from England and Windies who use the Dukes ball where have you seen this swing Bhai? I haven't seen but maybe Boult is swinging the red kookaburra in NZ in the morning session but that's it? This ball doesn't swing at all these days. You had the best outswing bowler in the world playing this series and he couldn't bowl one good outswinger. Starc has found none in Australia and neither have the Indian bowlers. If the kookaburra ball isn't swinging in SA for Steyn of all people then you can't blame Aamir . What Steyn did do was hit that good length and a good line at 140 kph + and stuck to that with the odd fast bouncer . Aamir was doing that but around 10 kph slower. Therein was the difference.
Coach Mickey Arthur insisted for Amir whereas captain and others wanted Mir Hamza to tour SA.
Really- Mir Hamza is not going bowl out any teams. Tbh none of these guys are at the level of bowling out top teams. They are solid pros but that's about it.
This talk of bowlers being too slow didn't come up anywhere in the last two years. Suddenly you lose 2 test matches in SA and you dump all the blame on the bowlers. When will this management realize that we have been limping on in tests solely on the basis of bowling performances this last year.
Batting has done zilch and the reason for 95% of our test losses since MisYou
How many did Amir bowl out btw? Amir was himself bowling at 128 km/hr.
Mir HAmza atleast swings the bowl both ways unlike Amir.
Amir has a decent track record, and if wasn't picked , everyone on here would have complained and quite rightly so. Mir Hamza is a ok FC bowler but if you think he could bowl out the Saffer in SA then we really are in trouble.
Amir has a decent track record, and if wasn't picked , everyone on here would have complained and quite rightly so. Mir Hamza is a ok FC bowler but if you think he could bowl out the Saffer in SA then we really are in trouble.
wrong amir was good in first test but in second test he have failed in critical situation and took wickets when game was already over.the amount of investment we have put in amir if it was put on someone like hamza he would have outperformed him easily
Mohammad Amir was fine actually. He’s got 8 wickets at an average of 21 in 3 innings, so no problems there.
Mohammad Amir was fine actually. He’s got 8 wickets at an average of 21 in 3 innings, so no problems there.
It is not the bowlers fault. They have no score to defend. They can hardly do anything when our batsmen barely score 180.
For once, I agree with Sarfaraz - even though batting failures are a bigger problem.
I feel bowling coaches are focused on tight/length bowling - while in older time, it was to go out and blow the opposition away. You could say Amir/Shaheen can bowl 8-10 clicks faster but they are scared - like their batting is scared. All in the mind.
Pakistan's bowling is a sad replica of itself.
I may also add, since India keeps coming up - India pace bowling is very very high quality - and committed. I am sure Kohli gives them free rein. However, Indian bowling is not fast - it's fast medium. Fast bowling is a different animal.
Pakistani bowling unit is probably the slowest among the major test nations, but what are you going to gain by pointing this out in middle of a test series?
yeah even though i think it is one of better bowling talent that we have over the previous few years but dont know why they are that slow, maybe bowling on UAE pitches has taken a toll . I can understand for Abbas but amir and shaheen must have bowled quicker.
The elephant in the room. Graeme Smith also rightly pointed out. And I won't put it down to "lack of rest" as even in their first spells these guys were considerably slower than their counterparts.
Putting it down to lack of rest or lack of 5th bowling partner etc. would be ignoring the issue in hand. Fresh bowlers bowling at 125kph-135kph. That's Bangladesh level.
In the mean time Usman Khan Shinwari is bowling at 150+ in Australia
Pakistani bowling unit is probably the slowest among the major test nations, but what are you going to gain by pointing this out in middle of a test series?
Reading between the lines it seems that Sarfaraz is suggesting that Pakistan's bowlers could have bowled quicker.
Exactly.We should've gone with four fast bowlers and ditched the specialist spinner. The record of spinners at Centurion and Cape Town speaks for itself, though as usual Sarfraz doesn't do his homework.
Did Sarfraz really think this pathetic batting lineup that he belongs in would take the Tests into Day 4 and 5 when Yasir would become a threat ?
In ODIs these bowler bowl it a much higher pace, Shaheen touched 147 kph in UAE against NZ in ODIs even Faheem was bowling around 140 koh.
Its something to do with mindset of conserving energy maybe bcz if you can bowl 140 plus with white ball you can do the same with red ball but yeah we have been facing this issue in tests and in SA it only exaggerated.
0s
We should've gone with four fast bowlers and ditched the specialist spinner. The record of spinners at Centurion and Cape Town speaks for itself, though as usual Sarfraz doesn't do his homework.
Did Sarfraz really think this pathetic batting lineup that he belongs in would take the Tests into Day 4 and 5 when Yasir would become a threat ?
Bhai Amir averages 34 in England since his comeback.
Like it or not Amir is the weak link in our bowling attack. Don't get fooled by his 4 tailender wickets.
Won't blame Hasan, Abbas and Shaheen much
Lol what happened to the cliché that pace isn't everything.
Yes bowling workloads have played a role, the lack of a proper 5th bowling pace option is a factor but our pacers have horrible fitness for international cricket.
Sarfaraz deflecting the blame onto the bowlers rather than accepting that the senior batsmen are not performing.
Who is the fastest young bowler in Pakistan ATM?
DISGRACEFUL comments by the captain of our national side! As I read them, I was just lost for words to describe his lack of insight.
COWARD - He never mentioned his own pathetic batting, keeping or god awful captaincy from what I read!
Perhaps the bowlers are tired of running in hard and spilling their blood to get us into match winning positions only to see this captain and his pals water it away - how many times have we seen that!!!
I might be in minority here but our bowling apart from Shaheen in 1st test 1st innings has below way below par.
I agree that the current crop is not Express in pace, although Shaheen Shah Afridi can be.The 130kph comment as much as we don't like it, it's true.
It's painful to see Pakistan's pace bowlers heading this way. It's hard to accept when we have been used to watching some of the fastest and greatest bowlers.
I agree that the current crop is not Express in pace, although Shaheen Shah Afridi can be.
But the big problem was this.
Any normal tour of England - let alone Australia or South Africa or New Zealand - requires a minimum of 6 quick bowlers.
Consider the 1992 Pakistan tour of England. Everybody knows that there was Wasim, Waqar and Aaqib. But there was also Saleem Jaffer, Ataur Rehman, Tanvir Mehdi and Naved Anjum (whom Johnners called "National Anthem").
Inzamam was there. He knows that there was a seventh quick because Waqar wasn't fit for the First Test. If he has any intelligence (which I admit I have long questioned) he should be able to remember this.
This tour of South Africa featured 3 back-to-back Test matches. Six quicks was a bare minimum.
But Inzamam sent 4 quicks of whom one was injured, plus an all-rounder.
So we get to Cape Town last week.
One of the four quicks - Hasan Ali - has already been shown to be unselectable, because in a low-scoring First Test his shortness meant he couldn't find a length to slow down the scoring rate in the First Innings.
That leaves 2 fit quicks (Amir and SSA), plus the all-rounder, plus the semi-fit Mohammad Abbas.
South Africa's quicks were all fit, and they still chose to drop their spinner and select 4 quicks.
Yet Sarfraz and Inzamam over-ruled Mickey's request for 4 quicks and decided to pick 2 fit quicks (Amir and SSA) plus the semi-fit Abbas.
And that is why neither Amir nor SSA could bowl at their fastest. They had to not just bowl much longer spells than were ideal, they could not go flat out and risk injury because if they did the team would be down to 1 quick bowler plus the semi-fit Abbas.
In Tests Amir is only a 133-138K bowler and SSA is only a 137-142K bowler. But those paces are dependent upon having a fourth quick to share the workload.
If you go down the 3 quicks plus a spinner route, then you take 5K off their median speeds.
Because if I know that I’m one of only two fit quicks and that I can’t afford to take the handbrake off, I’m not going to go at full tilt.I’m not sure this theory makes any sense! Why are the first spells of MA and SSA still below 137kmh??
Because if I know that I’m one of only two fit quicks and that I can’t afford to take the handbrake off, I’m not going to go at full tilt.
They are 10K slower than the South Africans anyway. But when there aren’t enough fit quicks, it’s even worse.
I’m not sure how fast bowlers operate. They can’t withhold their full strength with a new ball or slightly new ball in their hand because they must make the most out of it. Even with 3 pacers, the SA fast bowlers would not take their foot of the gas.
Firstly, Amir isn’t as motivated to bend his back in Test cricket because there seems to be no thrill in it for him. Shaheen is a bright prospect and I’m expecting him to become a 150-154kmh bowler by the age of 23. Amir really needs to save his energy for what he really wants to do, and that is to bowl in big matches where the whole world wants him to deliver
To be honest, it would be extremely fair to question the attitude and commitment of the two pacers especially Amir and Shaheen as both have shown that they can operate at 137-144 km/hr but are resorting to 127-130 km/hr stuff from their second spell onwards.
Either the bowlers are deliberately not bowling at full throttle because they dont have the stomach for it or they dont have the fitness for long spells in international cricket
We were a 3 man attack. The bowlers perhaps felt too much pressure as Yasir hardly bowled.
Blame goes to the batsmen and poor team selection.
To be honest, it would be extremely fair to question the attitude and commitment of the two pacers especially Amir and Shaheen as both have shown that they can operate at 137-144 km/hr but are resorting to 127-130 km/hr stuff from their second spell onwards.
Either the bowlers are deliberately not bowling at full throttle because they dont have the stomach for it or they dont have the fitness for long spells in international cricket
But I showed in the stats thread that:Can't blame the team management, we have posters over here who are advocates of playing an extra batsman and going in with a 4 man attack and that the likes of Azhar Ali, Asad Shafiq, Shan Masood can be used to ease the workload of pacers
We were a 3 man attack. The bowlers perhaps felt too much pressure as Yasir hardly bowled.
Blame goes to the batsmen and poor team selection.
But I showed in the stats thread that:
Imam-ul-Haq = half a batsman
Azhar Ali = a quarter of a batsman
Fakhar Zaman = a sixth of a batsman
Playing Fakhar as an extra batsman - the third opener - only gave the team around 15% of the runs an extra batsman should give, but wore out the quicks and reduced their already limited pace.
It was insanity.
And Sarfraz and Inzamam over-ruled Mickey Arthur to do it.