What's new

Pakistan-Afghanistan relations under Taliban regime in Kabul

I can understand this viewpoint. From their point of view, Pakistan is not representative of an Islamic state, so a strict Taliban might not feel it is appropriate to stand in respect of Pakistan's national anthem. Problem is, even many Pakistanis themselves no longer respect their own flag. They feel no association with the imposed govt.

It’s controversial when i say it here but a growing number of Pakistanis have been often raising the point in the last decade that Pakistan does not have a genuine national identity.

One person famously said that generally people have illegitimate children but in Pakistan’s case the army dictatorship created illegitimate forefathers just so the Pakistanis would have an antagonistic identity to Bharatiyas till eternity when the reality is very different.

It’s a sensitive topic and one to be addressed with utmost care. No disrespect is intended but a flawed national identity will continue to fail to bring a genuine national pride.

The only time Pakistan gives the resemblance of a nation is when they play Bharat in sports and their players get an opportunity to display Sajda etc to show an antagonistic identity to the neighbours. This fake display fails when dealing with the Afghans, Baloch, Iranians etc.
 
Outrage over Kabul envoy’s ‘disrespect’ for national anthem

Pakistan condemned the “reprehensible disrespect” for the country’s national anthem by an Afghan diplomat, who decided to remain seated when the anthem was played at a Khyber Pakhtunkhwa government event on Tuesday, sparking an uproar on social and mainstream media.

However, the Afghan consulate downplayed the incident, attributing the envoy’s decision to remain seated to the presence of “music in the anthem”.

The hard-line Afghan Taliban regime in Kabul is intolerant towards many art forms, including music. Their dislike for artists compelled many singers, musicians and other artists to flee the country when the Taliban claimed control of the country over two years ago.

On Tuesday, Foreign Office spokesperson Mumtaz Zahra Baloch said such “disrespect” for the host country’s anthem was against diplomatic norms.

“We are conveying our strong protest to the Afghan authorities both in Islamabad and Kabul,” she said in a statement.

In contrast, the Afghan consulate general’s spokesman, Shahidullah, insisted that “we cannot even think about disrespecting Pakistan’s national anthem”.

“The only reason why the diplomat [the Afghan consul general in Peshawar, Mohibullah Shakir] remained seated was [because there is] music in the anthem,” Shahidullah told Dawn on Wednesday.

“Imagine a religious scholar standing up for music,” he said.

KP Chief Minister Ali Amin Khan Gandapur acknowledged the envoy’s explanation.

DAWN NEWS
 

Pakistan rejects Afghan consul's explanation for not standing during national anthem​


Pakistan has officially rejected Afghan Consul General Hafiz Mohibullah Shakir's explanation for not standing during the Pakistani national anthem at an event in Peshawar, terming the action a violation of diplomatic norms.

In a statement, the Foreign Office spokesman emphasised that disrespecting the host country's national anthem goes against diplomatic protocol.

"We have lodged a strong protest over this," the spokesman said, adding that the Afghan consul general enjoys diplomatic status in Pakistan and holds a valid visa.

The incident occurred during the Rahmatul-lil-Alameen conference on 12th Rabi-ul-Awwal in Peshawar. Unlike the other attendees, the Afghan consul general and his delegation did not stand when the Pakistani national anthem was played.

The Afghan Consulate later issued a clarification, stating that the consul general had no intention to disrespect the national anthem, explaining that his decision not to stand was due to the inclusion of music in the anthem.

Despite this clarification, Pakistan has maintained its stance, rejecting the explanation.

Later, Pakistan’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs lodged an official protest with Afghan authorities in Islamabad and Kabul.

Ministry spokesperson Mumtaz Zahra Baloch described the incident as a breach of diplomatic norms, stating, "Disrespecting the host country’s national anthem is against diplomatic protocol and is unacceptable."

Amid this diplomatic fallout, reports have emerged that Hafiz Mohibullah Shakir is residing in Pakistan illegally.

Sources claim that Shakir lacks proper documentation, including an Afghan passport, and that he returned to Afghanistan in 2015 under a UNHCR aid scheme, with his refugee status now expired.

As of 1st September, all Afghan refugees, including Shakir, are considered to be residing illegally in Pakistan due to the non-extension of their stay by the Ministry of Interior.

Earlier this week, Afghan Consul General in Peshawar, Hafiz Mohibullah Shakir, caused outrage during the Rehmat-ul-Alameen Conference in Peshawar by remaining seated during Pakistan’s national anthem, flouting diplomatic protocols and showing what experts have called “utter disregard” for the host nation.

The conference, hosted by Chief Minister of Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa, Ali Amin Gandapur, saw Afghan consular officials in attendance.

However, as the national anthem played, Shakir and his colleague remained in their seats, a move widely condemned as a breach of diplomatic decorum.

"By not respecting the national anthem, the Afghan Consul General has shown blatant disrespect to Pakistan and its people. This is an extraordinary incident and contrary to the very essence of diplomatic conduct," said a political analyst, adding that such behaviour would be deemed unacceptable in any civilised society.

Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa Chief Minister Ali Amin Gandapur has come to the defence of Afghan Consul General Hafiz Mohibullah Shakir, who faced criticism for not standing during Pakistan’s national anthem at a recent event.

Speaking at a ceremony, Gandapur offered an explanation for Shakir’s actions, citing a clarification from the Afghan Consulate.

"The Afghan Consulate has explained that the Consul General did not stand because the anthem included music. The Afghan government has also removed music from their own national anthem," he said.

Instead of condemning the act, the chief minister focused on supporting Shakir, referencing cultural differences.

"There was no disrespect intended," he emphasised.

 
Khawaja Asif says Pakistan committed to expand trade in Afghanistan

Defence Minister Khwaja Muhammad Asif says Pakistan remains committed to expanding trade, commerce and investment in Afghanistan.

He addressed the third meeting of the Quadripartite Group on Afghanistan in New York. Pakistan, China, Iran and Russia are the member of Quadripartite Group on Afghanistan.

The Defence Minister said we must continue to support the provision of humanitarian assistance to the 23.7 million destitute people in Afghanistan.

He expressed hope that the UN Secretary-General’s appeal for over three billion dollars in humanitarian assistance will be fully funded, especially by the Western donor countries.

Khawaja Asif said the early release of Afghanistan’s frozen national resources, the revival of the banking system and connectivity projects is essential.

He said at the same time, we should continue to work jointly to promote peace and security within Afghanistan and to neutralize the threats to the regional countries emanating from Afghanistan.

 
Controlling border infiltration in Pakistan not possible: Afghan charge d’Affaires

Afghan Charge d’Affaires in Pakistan Mawlawi Sardar Ahmad Shakeeb stated that while certain elements may infiltrate into Pakistan, it was not part of the interim government’s policy.

At a seminar titled ‘Stabilising Economic Relations between Pakistan, Afghanistan, and Central Asia,’ organised by the Institute of Regional Studies in Islamabad, Shakeeb acknowledged the existing channels of communication between Pakistan and Afghanistan but noted that there was no high-level dialogue taking place.

He mentioned that while Pakistan may have some complaints, the Afghan government was uncertain about how to assure Pakistan regarding peace and security.

While denying allegations that Afghan territory was used against Pakistan, Shakeeb asserted: “These claims are completely false. Afghanistan does not allow its land to be used against anyone.”

He acknowledged that while infiltration does occur, it was not a policy of Afghanistan and emphasized that controlling such border crossings “is not a new issue.” He added: “Even if there were a desire to manage this situation, it would remain impossible.”

Shakeeb claimed that no Afghan engages in terrorism upon entering Pakistan, emphasising that Afghanistan “does not permit any Afghan to participate in jihad in neighbouring countries, with formal fatwas already issued on this matter.”

The Afghan charge d’affaires highlighted ongoing efforts to enhance trade and investment with Pakistan, noting that there were several challenges and obstacles hindering economic and trade relations.

He pointed out that mutual trade relations were being maintained through border corridors, but issues such as repeated closures of such corridors, unnecessary vehicle searches, and customs-related challenges persist.

Shakeeb stressed the importance of diplomatic negotiations for establishing long-term trade relations, adding that Afghanistan can serve as a “vital corridor” from Central Asia to South Asia.

“Afghanistan respects the new border regulations under the Pakistan-Afghanistan One Document regime,” he said and acknowledged that such regulations “sometimes create difficulties for residents on both sides of the border, who prefer simpler policies reminiscent of those from 70 years ago.”

Shakeeb expressed concern that Pakistan “often mixes trade and transit issues with political matters,” which complicates the situation. He suggested that if various issues were kept separate, many of such problems could be resolved.

He also expressed hope that border trade crossings, including Chaman and Spin Boldak, would strengthen mutual relations between the two countries.


 

Pakistan urges Afghanistan to take action against terror groups​


Pakistan on Thursday urged Afghanistan to take action against terror groups operating from its soil and the world to take notice of Indian atrocities on Kashmiri children as the world is marking Children’s Day.

Foreign Office Spokesperson Mumtaz Zahra Baloch said during weekly press briefing that Islamabad has on several occasions shared concrete evidence regarding the terror groups in Afghanistan.

She expressed the hope that the Afghan authorities would consider terrorism as a serious threat not just to the region but to their own security and fulfill their obligations under various international agreements including Doha agreement.

She said in its meeting the other day, the Apex Committee of the National Action Plan, had also expressed its concern about the support received by the terror groups from the hostile elements.

Asked about the progress in repatriation of illegal foreign nationals, the spokesperson said that the process continued as around 757,008 people had been repatriated till the end of October this year.

Speaking on Palestine issue, she regretted the United States veto of a resolution in UN Security Council calling for ceasefire in Gaza war. She reiterated Pakistan's call for an immediate, unconditional and permanent ceasefire, unhindered access to humanitarian assistance and full support to UN Relief and Works Agency and its mandated humanitarian activities.

She welcomed the latest report of the UN Special Committee to Investigate Israeli Practices, released last week describing Israel’s warfare practices in the occupied territories as acts of genocide.

Alluding to the plight of children in Indian Illegally occupied Jammu and Kashmir, Ms Baloch urged the international community to stand up for their rights and demand an end to their sufferings.

She said Pakistan would continue to extend political, moral and diplomatic support to their Kashmiri brothers and sisters for the just and peaceful settlement of the dispute in accordance with the UN Security Council Resolutions.

“Living in a highly militarized territory, the trauma faced by the Kashmiri children is immense leaving indelible scars on their psychological and mental health. Over 100,000 children have been orphaned as a result of Indian oppression in the IIOJK. Their plight deserves international attention,” Ms Baloch said.

Highlighting the diplomatic activities that took place during the last week, the spokesperson mentioned the visit of a high-level parliamentary delegation from Spain’s Senate Foreign Affairs Committee; the visit of UK Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State Hamish Falconer, the second round of Pakistan-Bosnia and Herzegovina Bilateral Political Consultations and the third round of Pakistan-Kazakhstan Bilateral Political Consultations.

She told the media that the 14th session of the Pakistan-EU Joint Commission would take place on Thursday. The EU delegation will be led by Deputy Managing Director for Asia and the Pacific, Paola Pampaloni, and Secretary Economic Affairs Division Dr. Kazim Niaz will head the Pakistani delegation.

She said that the dialogue reflected the growing partnership between Pakistan and the EU, providing a valuable platform for meaningful discussions and fostering mutual understanding in areas of bilateral cooperation.

Ms Baloch announced that President of Belarus Alexander Lukashenko would visit Pakistan from November 25-27, at the invitation of Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif.

President Lukashenko will hold extensive talks with Prime Minister Shehbaz and discuss areas of bilateral cooperation.

To a question about the TAPI (Turkmenistan-Afghanistan-Pakistan-India) gas pipeline, she said Pakistan was committed to promoting connectivity with the Central Asian states and continued to engage with them on such projects.

 

China pushes to ease Pak-Afghan tensions​


China seems to have launched a fresh diplomatic effort aimed at defusing brewing tensions between Pakistan and Afghanistan over the terrorist sanctuaries that Kabul has yet to dismantle despite Islamabad's repeated demands.

Following a visit to Islamabad, a top Chinese diplomat dealing with Afghanistan travelled to Kabul over the weekend to meet with the Taliban leadership.

China's Special Envoy for Afghanistan Yue Xiaoyong held talks with Afghan Deputy Prime Minister for Political Affairs Maulvi Abdul Kabir, Defence Minister Mullah Yaqub and others.

His visit to Kabul came days after he was briefed by authorities in Islamabad on the threat posed by the banned Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) and other militant groups operating from Afghan soil.

Sources said Pakistan conveyed to the envoy that without addressing the terror threat, bilateral relations with Kabul would not move forward.

It is believed that the visit of the Chinese envoy to Kabul and Islamabad was part of Beijing's latest push to ease tensions between Pakistan and Afghanistan.

China has in the past attempted to mediate between the estranged countries on the TTP issue, though those efforts yielded no progress.

Beijing is worried about the fallout of escalating Pakistan-Afghanistan hostilities on its regional ambitions for greater connectivity and trade.

Besides, the persistent presence of terrorist sanctuaries in Afghanistan also threatens Beijing's interests.

Chinese nationals have come under terror attacks in Pakistan. This year at least 7 Chinese nationals were killed in two different terrorist attacks.

Pakistan's investigations into the March 26 Besham terrorist attack concluded that there was a network connected to TTP was behind the attack. The probe also revealed that the suicide bomber was an Afghan national and the vehicle used in the attack was smuggled into Pakistan.

Similarly, Pakistan believes Baloch terrorist groups are now closely working with the TTP and also have their training camps in Afghanistan.

However, unlike other countries, China usually follows a carefully crafted policy where such concerns are conveyed from behind closed doors.

Officials here believe that they have this understanding that the Chinese envoy forcefully raised the issue of terrorist sanctuaries with the Afghan leadership.

A statement issued by the Afghan Deputy Prime Minister's Office indicated that Pakistan, and Afghanistan relationship was one of the subjects of discussions.

According to the statement, Mr Yue Xiaoyong commended Afghanistan's progress over the past three years and stressed the significance of fostering improved relations and mutual understanding among Afghanistan, Pakistan, and China.

The reference to Pakistan, Afghanistan and China, according to observers, shows that Beijing is keen to see issues between Islamabad and Kabul are sorted out.

The Afghan deputy prime minister told the Chinese envoy that the Islamic Emirate has consistently guaranteed its neighbours and the international community that Afghanistan poses no threat to any nation and has upheld this assurance over the past three years.

"The Deputy Prime Minister further noted that Afghanistan is transitioning from a prolonged period of conflict and is prioritizing the revitalisation of its national economy and the expansion of regional cooperation," according to the readout, which suggests that the Afghan side tried to placate concerns of China and Pakistan.

 
Soldier martyred, 4 terrorists killed in Pak-Afghan border infiltration bid

A Pakistan Army soldier embraced martyrdom and four terrorists were neutralised after security forces successfully thwarted a bid to infiltrate the Pakistan-Afghanistan border in Khyber district, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, the military's media wing said on Saturday.

Inter-Services Public Relations (ISPR), in a statement, said that the troops engaged the terrorists after their movement was picked in Rajgal area in the night between December 19 and 20.

During the intense exchange of fire, added the ISPR, 22-year-old Sepoy Amir Sohail Afridi — hailing from Khyber district — fought gallantly and embraced martyrdom.

Furthermore, the military's spokesperson underscored Islamabad's persistent calls urging Kabul's interim government to "fulfil its obligations and deny the use of Afghan soil by [terrorists or khwarij] for perpetrating acts of terrorism against Pakistan".

The statement refers to Pakistan's concerns regarding cross-border attacks which in essence have been communicated to the neighbouring countries on numerous occasions.

Earlier this week, security forces gunned down 11 terrorists in three separate operations in the violence-marred KP.

Seven terrorists were killed in an intelligence-based operation (IBO) in Tank, whereas two were neutralised in Datta Khel North Waziristan.

The third gun battle took place in Mohmand district where two more khwarij were gunned down.

Pakistan has been reeling from increased terrorist attacks for months with the third quarter (July-September) witnessing a sharp increase in fatalities of terrorist violence and counter-terrorism campaigns with a 90% surge in violence, according to a report issued by the Centre for Research and Security Studies (CRSS).

A total of 722 people were killed, including civilians, security personnel, and outlaws, while 615 others were wounded in as many as 328 incidents recorded during the period under review.

Nearly 97% of these fatalities occurred in KP and Balochistan – marking the highest percentage in a decade, and over 92% of these incidents of terror attacks and security forces’ operations were recorded in the same provinces.

The total fatalities from three quarters of this year have now surpassed the total fatalities recorded for the entire 2023; the number of fatalities rose to at least 1,534 in the first three quarters compared to 1,523 in 2023.

 
Airstrikes target suspected Pakistani Taliban hideouts in Afghanistan

Pakistan in rare airstrikes targeted multiple suspected hideouts of the Pakistani Taliban inside neighboring Afghanistan on Tuesday, dismantling a training facility and killing some insurgents, four security officials said.

The strikes were carried out in a mountainous area in Paktika province bordering Pakistan, said the officials. They spoke on the condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to speak to the media on the record. It was unclear whether the jets went deep inside Afghanistan, and how the strikes were launched.

No spokesman for Pakistan’s military was immediately available to share further details. But it was the second such attack on alleged hideouts of the Pakistani Taliban since March, when Pakistan said intelligence-based strikes took place in the border regions inside Afghanistan.

In Kabul, the Afghan Defense Ministry condemned the airstrikes by Pakistan, saying the bombing targeted civilians, including women and children.

It said that most of the victims were refugees from the Waziristan region.

“The Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan considers this a brutal act against all international principles and blatant aggression and strongly condemns it,” the ministry said.

Local residents said at least eight people, including women and children, were killed in the airstrikes by Pakistan. They said the death toll from the strikes may rise.

In a post on the X platform, the Afghan defense ministry said the Pakistani side should know that such unilateral measures are not a solution to any problem.

“The Islamic Emirate will not leave this cowardly act unanswered but rather considers the defense of its territory and territory to be its inalienable right.”

The strikes came hours after Mohammad Sadiq, Pakistan’s special representative for Afghanistan, traveled to Kabul to discuss a range of issues, including how to enhance bilateral trade, and improve ties.

Sadiq during the visit met with Sirajuddin Haqqani, Afghanistan’s acting interior minister, to offer his condolences over the Dec. 11 killing of his uncle Khalil Haqqani. He was the minister for refugees and repatriation who died in a suicide bombing that was claimed by a regional affiliate of the Islamic State group.

Sadiq in a post on X said he also met with Foreign Minister Amir Khan Muttaqi and he “held wide ranging discussions. Agreed to work together to further strengthen bilateral cooperation as well as for peace and progress in the region.”

A delegation of the pro-Taliban Jamiat-e-Ulema Islam also visited Kabul on Tuesday to convey condolences over the killing of Haqqani’s uncle.

Islamabad often claims that the Pakistani Taliban use Afghan soil to launch attacks in Pakistan, a charge Kabul has denied.

Syed Muhammad Ali, an Islamabad-based security expert, said Tuesday’s airstrike “represents a clear and blunt warning to Pakistani Taliban that Pakistan will use all the available means against the terrorist outfit both inside and outside its borders.” However, it is not an indiscriminate use of force and due care was taken by Pakistan in ensuring that only the terrorist bases were hit and no civilian loss of life and property took place, he said.

The Afghan Taliban seized power in Afghanistan in 2021 and the Taliban takeover in Afghanistan has emboldened the Pakistani Taliban, known as Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan, whose leaders and fighters are hiding in Afghanistan.

The TTP has stepped up attacks on Pakistani soldiers and police since November 2022, when it unilaterally ended a cease-fire with the government after the failure of months of talks hosted by Afghanistan’s government in Kabul. The TTP in recent months has killed and wounded dozens of soldiers in attacks inside the country.

AP NEWS
 
My message to Afghans and Iranians is that you must not overdo the politics against Pakistan. Remember they’re our baby brother and when things cross the line we will come to protect them for Sindhu Ghaati brotherhood sake. Don’t ever test our patience.
Only we have the right to talk loud to them. It is Sanatani Sanskriti.
 
PM Shehbaz calls for improved relations with Afghanistan but urges Kabul to take action against TTP

Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif on Friday reiterated his call for improved relations with Afghanistan but emphasised that the administration in Kabul must rein in Tehreek-i-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) first.

Relations between Pakistan and Afghanistan have been strained due to frequent border skirmishes and Islamabad repeatedly demanding Kabul take action against the banned TTP for using Afghan soil to launch attacks in Pakistan. Kabul denies the allegations.

Earlier this week, the Afghanistan government alleged that Pakistan conducted airstrikes in Patika province, which led to the killing of 46 civilians, while security officials said that the bombings targeted TTP camps there.

On Thursday, the Foreign Office (FO) parried queries regarding recent air strikes on Afghanistan. Although multiple questions were posed to her regarding the recent air strikes, FO spokesperson Mumtaz Zahra Baloch avoided directly confirming the action. She, however, maintained that Pakistan’s security and law enforcement personnel continue to conduct operations in the border areas to protect the people of Pakistan from terror groups, including the TTP.

While addressing a cabinet meeting on Friday, PM Shehbaz said Afghanistan was Pakistan’s “brotherly neighbour”, and that it was Islamabad’s heartfelt wish to improve relations with Kabul, especially with regards to the economy and trade.

“Unfortunately, the TTP is operating from Afghanistan and carrying out terror attacks and killing innocent people inside Pakistan. This cannot go on,” he said.

“We have conveyed to the Afghan government that we desire good ties with them but TTP should be stopped from killing our innocent people. This is a red line. TTP operating from there against Pakistan is unacceptable.”

The prime minister reiterated his call to the Afghan government to devise a concrete strategy, saying that Pakistan was ready for dialogue.

“But the policy of talks and allowing TTP to operate against Pakistan can’t go simultaneously,” he said.

He said that the armed forces and the law enforcement agencies of Pakistan were all-time ready to ensure the country’s peace and security.

“A few days ago, 16 FC personnel were martyred and the forces eliminated several terrorists in North Waziristan operations on Thursday, in which an army major was also martyred,” he recalled.

Afghanistan summon Pakistani envoy

Meanwhile, Afghanistan’s foreign ministry said it summoned the Charge d’Affaires of the Pakistani Embassy in Kabul on Wednesday afternoon and handed over a formal protest note regarding the bombing “near the Durand Line in the Bermal district of Paktika province”.

The ministry, in its statement, said the “violation” was condemned and alleged that the move was “an attempt by certain Pakistani factions to create distrust between the two countries” as the two sides engaged in talks.

Past escalations

Back in March, the FO confirmed Pakistan had carried out “intelligence-based anti-terrorist operations” inside the border regions of Afghanistan, hours after Kabul said airstrikes conducted on its soil had killed eight people.

FO said the prime targets of the operation conducted in the morning earlier today were terrorists belonging to the Hafiz Gul Bahadur Group, adding that the outfit, along with the TTP, was responsible for multiple terrorist attacks inside Pakistan, resulting in “deaths of hundreds of civilians and law enforcement officials”.

It said that the latest attack of such an instance took place on March 17 at a security post in Mir Ali in North Waziristan which claimed the lives of seven Pakistani soldiers.

In July, Defence Minister Khawaja Asif told BBC in an interview that Pakistan will “continue to launch attacks against Afghanistan as part of a new military operation aimed at countering terrorism”.

“It’s correct that we have been carrying out operations in Afghanistan, and we will continue to do so. We won’t serve them with cake and pastries. If attacked, we’ll attack back,” Asif had told the outlet.

 
It remains to be seen whether Afghan Taliban will use the presence of TTP as leverage against Pakistan. If they do, Pakistan might have to do drone attacks or airstrikes against TTP in Afghanistan.
What a prediction well done bro!
 
Integrated system at Torkham to enhance trade with Afghanistan

The adviser to chief minister on finance and inter-provincial coordination, Muzzamil Aslam, was told during a briefing on Wednesday that Integrated Transit Trade Management System (ITTMS) would be made operational at Torkham within two to three months to enhance bilateral trade between Pakistan and Afghanistan.

He was given a detailed briefing by relevant authorities at Michni checkpost during his daylong visit to the border crossing. He was told that with the activation of the ITTMS, cross-border vehicular movement would be increased from about 600 to 2,000 and would also reduce traffic congestion at the border crossing point.

He was told that efforts were also under way to install more electronic scanners at the custom terminal to reduce load on the existing one scanner each for export and import terminals.

The adviser on finance was informed that a mechanism would soon be devised to expedite custom clearance of fruits, vegetables and other perishable items.

He directed authorities concerned to explore ways and means to establish a market at the border point to facilitate local traders and provide business opportunities to more entrepreneurs.

He said that Torkham border could also be developed as a tourist spot as it had attracted a large number of foreigners in the past.

HOSPITAL: The adviser to chief minister on health, Ihtisham Ali detected gross irregularities in health delivery system during his visit to district headquarters hospital Landi Kotal on Tuesday evening.

Patients, their attendants and paramedic staff at out-patient department, emergency unit and general wards put before him a heap of complaints regarding lack of facilities and non-committal attitude of the medical superintendent of the hospital.

They told him that they were not provided with free medicines from the hospital medical store. Checking medical store at the OPD, he could found only dyclo (diclofenae sodium) injections with no other lifesaving drugs and necessary surgical instruments.

He was informed that nine specialist doctors had long gone on leave due to lack of facilities and unbearable attitude of the hospital’s medical superintendent. He found most of the hospital wards empty during his visit.

He expressed his utter displeasure over the absence of medical superintendent during his visit and directed relevant officials to initiate an enquiry into all the irregularities and discrepancies he personally witnessed during his visit.

Dr Jamshed Sherani, the medicial superintendent of the hospital, could not be approached for his reaction on Wednesday despite repeated efforts by this scribe though he was present at his office till late in the day.

DAWN NEWS
 

Kabul concedes TTP is a problem​


The interim Afghan government conceded to the Pakistani authorities in closed door meetings that the banned Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) was a problem but objected to Islamabad's approach in dealing the issue, sources familiar with the development told The Express Tribune on Sunday.

They said that Pakistan and Afghan Taliban authorities had extensive discussions recently to find a path forward for their troubled relationship. At the heart of their strained ties was the issue of the presence of the outlawed TTP and its affiliates in Afghanistan.

Pakistan has long standing concerns that terrorist hideouts across the border have given rise to the terrorist attacks. Islamabad has repeatedly urged the Taliban government in Kabul to neutralise the threat.

Publicly, the Taliban-controlled Afghanistan insists that the TTP is Pakistan's internal problem, but behind closed doors, Kabul admitted that their presence in Afghanistan was also a problem that needed a resolution.

However, Taliban officials objected to Pakistan's strategy to deal with the TTP problem. The sources explained that the Taliban authorities were of the view that a hardline approach to tackle the TTP threat would not work. Instead, Kabul suggested a process of dialogue.

The Taliban government also cautioned Pakistan that intimidation and threatening statements would be counter-productive. But Pakistan made it clear to the Taliban that they had exhausted the option of talks and given ample time to Kabul to resolve the issue, but to no avail.

Pakistan also told the Afghan authorities that the TTP demands were unacceptable. The Taliban, however, felt that parties often start talks with maximalist positions but soften their stance once the process went forward. Taliban cited the example of their painstaking talks with the US in Doha.

Pakistani officials insisted that there was no comparison between the two situations. The US was an occupying force and had to leave one day. The TTP and its affiliates, on the other hand, had been challenging the writ of state and seeking imposition of their own system in the country.

"There is no question of treating the TTP as a legitimate entity. Pakistan drove these terrorist groups out of its soil and would continue to seek their complete eradication," stressed a Pakistani official, while requesting anonymity. The official said that the Taliban needed to realise that harbouring TTP would hurt their cause in the long run.

Army Chief General Syed Asim Munir at a recent meeting in Peshawar underlined the need for Afghan Taliban government to tackle the TTP threat. He made it clear that Pakistan considers Afghanistan as "brotherly neighbour" and seeks improved tied. However, he added that improvement of bilateral relationship depended on Kabul eliminating terrorist hideouts from its soil.

 
Weapons left after US withdrawal from Afghanistan 'profound concern' for Pakistan, says FO

Following US President Donald Trump's pledge to take back military equipment left behind in Afghanistan during troops withdrawal in 2021, the Foreign Office said that the advanced weapons have been an issue of profound concern for the safety and security of Pakistan and its citizens.

"These weapons, left behind in the aftermath of the withdrawal of its troops in August 2021, have been used by terrorist organisations, including the TTP [Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan], to carry out terrorist attacks in Pakistan," FO spokesperson Shafqat Ali Khan said in a statement on Wednesday.

He noted that Pakistan has been "repeatedly calling upon the de facto authorities in Kabul to take all necessary measures to ensure that these weapons do not fall into the wrong hands".

On the eve of his presidential inauguration, Trump at a public rally threatened Afghanistan to snap all the financial assistance if the nation does not return US aircraft, air-to-ground munitions, vehicles and communications equipment.

"If we’re going to pay billions of dollars a year, tell them we’re not going to give them the money unless they give back our military equipment,” he said.

However, Taliban reportedly refused to return any of the military equipment and urged the US to provide them with more advanced weapons to fight Daesh.

According to a report by the US Department of Defence in 2022, the US left behind $7 billion worth of military equipment in Afghanistan which was quickly seized by Taliban fighters as they swept the country.

The US forces tried to dismantle or destroy as much of their machinery as they could in the last weeks of their chaotic pull-out. However, huge amounts still fell to the Taliban in August 2021.

Although it was Trump’s first administration that signed the deal with the Taliban to withdraw forces from Afghanistan, the president strongly slammed the way the Joe Biden administration handled the pullout.

Biden carried out the agreement, with the Western-backed Afghanistan government swiftly collapsing and the Taliban retaking power. The scenes of chaos in Kabul drew criticism, especially when scores of Afghans and around 13 American troops died in a suicide bombing at the city's airport.

 

Afghanistan's role in supporting terrorism against Pakistan exposed by TTP links​


Afghanistan's territory is being used for terrorism against Pakistan, and the death of the Afghan Taliban official's son alongside TTP militants is a clear proof of this fact.

On January 30, 2025, the son of Afghan Deputy Governor of Badghis, Mullah Ghulam Mohammad, named Badaruddin alias Yusuf, was killed in an operation by security forces in Kalachi, Dera Ismail Khan, along with three terrorists. He was killed alongside militants of the Khawarij faction (FAK).

The death of Yusuf with TTP militants proves that Afghanistan is openly supporting terrorism in Pakistan.

TTP and other terrorist groups in Afghanistan are being provided training, weapons, and safe havens. This is blatant aggression, which can no longer be tolerated.

Terrorist groups in Afghanistan pose a threat not only to Pakistan but also to the peace of the entire region. By providing shelter to these groups, the Kabul government is waging an open war.

Afghanistan has always harbored terrorists and attempted to harm Pakistan. The links between the Afghan Taliban and TTP are no longer hidden.

Whenever Afghanistan uses terrorists against Pakistan, Pakistan will respond vigorously. Terrorism under Afghanistan's state sponsorship will no longer be tolerated.

Afghanistan's use of terrorism as a weapon is a grave threat to regional stability. Pakistan will not tolerate terrorism on its soil.

 
Negotiations with Afghanistan not domain of provincial govt: Amir Muqam

Federal Minister for States and Frontier Regions, Kashmir Affairs, and Gilgit-Baltistan Amir Muqam said on Saturday that negotiations with Afghanistan fall outside the provincial government’s jurisdiction.

Islamabad has repeatedly conveyed its concerns to the Afghan government over the presence of terror outfits, including the banned Tehreek-i-Taliban Pakistan (TTP), inside Afghanistan, saying that the militants have consistently used Afghan soil to launch terror attacks inside Pakistani territory. Kabul denies the allegations.

Last month, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Chief Minister Ali Amin Gandapur announced plans to send a delegation to Afghanistan for dialogue on bilateral issues. This week, the provincial government said it would engage cross-border tribesmen to curb militancy and ensure regional peace.

“Negotiations with Afghanistan are not the domain of the provincial government, it is a federal subject,” Muqam said while appearing on the Dawn News programme ‘Doosra Rukh’ on Saturday.

He clarified that if a province wishes to speak with a foreign nation, it should pass on its request to the federation. “If the province talks on its own behalf, then who will implement [commitments made during the talks]?” he asked.

The minister continued, “In this manner, Balochistan will say tomorrow that they will talk to Iran, and Punjab will say that it shares a border with India, so they want to talk to them.

“Ali Amin Gandapur should not do this, it does not come under his domain, it is a federal subject.”

Muqam then turned his attention to negotiations between the PTI and the Tehreek-i-Taliban Pakistan (TTP). “What was the fate of the talks they held earlier and what was the result?” he asked.

When asked if the federal government was not taken into confidence before this statement by the KP chief minister, he replied: “He always follows his whims, he acts like a king. The PTI founder is like this as well as the party, whatever idea they have, they go on about it themselves.”

 
Part 1:

The problem is with the people of Pakistan who are not willing to listen to the argument of ordinary Afghans.

People of Pakistan think that because they hosted millions of Afghans during the Soviet-Jihad, the Afghans have lost their right to complain and should forever be in debt to Pakistan and ordinary citizens of Pakistan. People of Pakistan believe that Afghans are ungrateful people!

In order to solve a problem, you need to put your preconceived notions aside & listen to the problem. This applies to Bangladeshees, Balochees, Pushtun and Afghans.

You sit down with those who are able to articulate the issue and listen to what they are saying no mater how painful it is hear it.

Put aside loud-mouth disrespectful people but there are a lot of Afghans who very clearly tell you the problem with Pakistan.

I was in the Masjid of Rasul-ullah ﷺ 3 three weeks ago and next to me was a Pushtun and Punjabi and an Afghan sat next to us and clearly told us the issue and this is what he said to us.

Afghan: Pakhto Khabariy (Speak Pashto)?

Me: Na

Afghan: He then pointed to 3 of us and said, "Pakistan?" and put his hand on the chest and said "Afghanistan"

Me: Ho (Yes)

Afghan: He then pointed to 3 of us and said, "Pakistan?" and put his hand on the chest and said "Afghanistan"

Me: Ho (Yes)

Afghan: Pakistan-Afghan-Baradar KHO Pakistan Hukumat = Angraiz, Harami, Kaafir

Pakistan and Afghan are brothers BUT the Government of Pakistan are British, *******s and Kaafir.

The opposition to Pakistan from 1947-Taliban was commonplace in Afghan society due to its communist/Atheist/outlook and that was also the reason for their Pro-India stance.

The pivot away from Pakistan by the Taliban is an issue which is purely due to the policies of Pakistan Army and their shortsightedness, institutionalized corruption.

Part 2:
I had a meeting with the Assistant of Khalida Zia at his home in December who is a graduate of Karachi university (1970), once again you sit and listen and people of Bangladesh also very clearly tell you their grievance and problems with "Pakistan".

Once again, people of Pakistan are taught to regard Bangladeshees as traitors, Indian-supporters etc.

Part 3:

I have spent a considerable time in Baluchistan and ordinary Balochees (inside and outside) of Pakistan very clearly tell you their problems with Pakistan.

There is a common thread in all conversations of Afghans, Bangladeshis, Balochees but people of Pakistan are programmed to "label" people & not listen. The day people of Pakistan actually look into why their country was split, why Pakistan is a failed state and why nothing works will be the beginning of a new dawn.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
well pakistanis wanted the taliban in power, long live the ummah, lol. A hot pak afg war without the US would be miserable for Pakistan, and it looks more and more likely, as there is no way afghans are gonna kowtow to a weak and dysfunctional Pakistan. its a messy situation and its gonna get messier. long term pak have messed up every geostrategic advantage it had, for all the plaudits the army gives itself, its as much of a stuff up as the civilian set up if results are to go by.
 
well pakistanis wanted the taliban in power, long live the ummah, lol. A hot pak afg war without the US would be miserable for Pakistan, and it looks more and more likely, as there is no way afghans are gonna kowtow to a weak and dysfunctional Pakistan. its a messy situation and its gonna get messier. long term pak have messed up every geostrategic advantage it had, for all the plaudits the army gives itself, its as much of a stuff up as the civilian set up if results are to go by.

I am surprised Pakistan didn’t object in time to US leaving billions of dollars worth weapons and ammunition in Afghanistan for Taliban to pick up. Disastrous situations
 
I am surprised Pakistan didn’t object in time to US leaving billions of dollars worth weapons and ammunition in Afghanistan for Taliban to pick up. Disastrous situations
its doesnt take henry kissinger to work out if a very strong country abandons a very weak country, the first thing you do is move in "to stabilise" the country via your assets, and that way take control of all the war booty. alas this is Pakistan, and you will have some crusty military strategist beat it to stories about how they defeated the soviet empire when more than 2/3 of the country wasn't even born.
 
its doesnt take henry kissinger to work out if a very strong country abandons a very weak country, the first thing you do is move in "to stabilise" the country via your assets, and that way take control of all the war booty. alas this is Pakistan, and you will have some crusty military strategist beat it to stories about how they defeated the soviet empire when more than 2/3 of the country wasn't even born.

It’s crazy that Pakistan’s most tension free border right now is with Bharat.
 
It’s crazy that Pakistan’s most tension free border right now is with Bharat.
pakistanis dont take any stress, tension free life.

india cant push pak too much, then the whole bogeyman disappears, and the indian political class still uses bearded Pakistani mullahs speaking fancy classical urdu and wearing jinnah caps to remind the locals of how "good" hindu nationalism is. india ideally needs Pakistan to be stronger so at least Pakistan-focused conspiracies are somewhat believable. Bangladesh being the regional enemy is just unfair, esp given its like a toddler in a headlock, geographically speaking, and China is too strong for anyone to believe India can do anything to it. Pakistan is Indias goldilocks enemy.

its ironic that pak being so weak, and india kinda not knowing what to do, has made the Pakistani army, in court of public opinion at least, the weakest its ever been.
 

Pakistan deports 781 of illegal Afghan residents​


The Pakistani government has announced the deportation of hundreds of undocumented Afghan nationals as part of a broader repatriation initiative.

According to sources within the Ministry of Interior, the operation is ongoing in Islamabad and other areas of the country.

On Wednesday, 781 undocumented Afghan residents were deported via the Torkham border crossing, the ministry confirmed. However, Afghan citizens who have been sponsored by foreign countries for resettlement in third countries are currently not being deported.

The Ministry of Interior sources added that the Ministry of Foreign Affairs has notified the relevant countries to expedite the resettlement process for these sponsored individuals. Failure to do so will result in their deportation as well.

 
Afghan govt ‘receives’ body of terrorist killed in Pakistan

Afghan government on Monday received body of a terrorist killed in Pakistan, ARY News reported, citing rescue sources.

As per details, Luqman Khan son of Kamal Khan, resident of Khost district of Afghanistan, was killed during an operation by Pakistan security forces on February 6.

Earlier, Afghanistan also received body of Ahmed Ilyas son of Badhis’s Vice-Governor, Moulvi Ghulam Muhammad killed in Dera Ismail Khan.

The handover of terrorists bodies to Afghanistan, is a clear evidence that Kabul is trying to disturb peace of Pakistan.

On November 26, last year, Pakistan security forces thwarted an infiltration attempt at the Pak-Afghan border and killed three terrorists.


 
Pakistan’s Exports to Afghanistan Surge by 92% in Ten Months

The State Bank of Pakistan has announced that in the first six months of the 2024-2025 fiscal year, the country’s exports to Afghanistan have increased by 92% compared to the previous year.

Some Pakistani media outlets have reported that the total value of Pakistan’s exports to Afghanistan has surpassed $504 million from July to December of the current fiscal year.

During the same period, Pakistan’s imports from Afghanistan have also increased by 125.85%.

Meanwhile, the Ministry of Industry and Commerce of the Islamic Emirate has reported that in the first ten months of the 1403 solar year, trade between Afghanistan and Pakistan amounted to $2.065 billion.

Akhundzada Abdul Salam Jawad, the spokesperson for the Ministry of Industry and Commerce, stated: "The Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan and the Islamic Republic of Pakistan conducted a total trade of $2.065 billion over the past ten months of 1403. Of this, $655 million accounted for exports, while imports stood at $1.4 billion."

However, some Afghan traders and industrialists are urging Pakistan to remove barriers on Afghan exports to ensure trade balance between the two countries.

Zalmai Azimi, an Afghan businessman, said: "Pakistan has increased taxes on transit goods coming from Karachi to Afghanistan. We call on Pakistani officials to address our concerns."

Abdul Jabar Safi, head of the Kabul Industrialists Association, stated: "We need to work on two fronts: first, controlling imports, and second, increasing our exports."

Among Afghanistan’s key exports to Pakistan are coal, onions, cotton, tomatoes, and pomegranates. Meanwhile, industrial and consumer goods such as rice, medical drugs, cement, sugar, textile products, and fresh fruits are imported from Pakistan to Afghanistan.


 
Afghan Taliban continue providing funds, logistical support to TTP: UN

The Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP), a United Nations designated terrorist group, continued to receive from Afghanistan’s de facto authorities logistical and operational space as well as financial support in conducting cross-border attacks in Pakistan, according to a new U.N. report.

The U.N. sanctions monitoring team released its annual assessment late Thursday amid a surge in TTP terror attacks against Pakistani security forces and civilians, killing a number of them in recent weeks.

“The ambition and scale of TTP’s attacks on Pakistan, though, had significantly increased, with over six hundred attacks during the reporting period, including from Afghan territory,” the United Nations Analytical Support and Sanctions Monitoring Team reported.

TTP, it said, established new training centers in Afghanistan’s Kunar, Nangarhar, Khost, and Paktika (Barmal) provinces while enhancing recruitment within the group’s cadres, including from the Afghan Taliban.

Also reported was an increase in collaboration between TTP, Afghan Taliban, and al-Qaeda in the Sub-continent, conducting attacks under the banner of Tehrik-e-Jihad-e-Pakistan.

“Greater facilitation among these groups and TTP in terms of provision of suicide bombers and fighters and ideological guidance might transform the latter into an extra-regional threat and an umbrella organization for other terrorist groups operating in the region,” the report said.

“With over two dozen terrorist groups operating in Afghanistan, the security threat emanating from the country is a continuing driver of instability in the region and beyond,” it said.

“The presence of terrorist organizations in Afghanistan posed a serious challenge to the stability of the country, as well as to the security of neighbouring states.”

According to the report, ISIL-Khorasan suffered a significant setback in the summer, when Pakistani security forces foiled an attempt by its external operation branch to establish itself inside Pakistan, resulting in the arrest of high-profile operatives. These included Adil Panjsheri (Afghan), Abu Munzir (Tajik) and Kaka Younis (Uzbek), who, it said, were central figures in the recruitment, travel and funding of fighters and suicide bombers.

“To avoid detection and minimize arrests, ISIL-K leadership replaced electronic and internet-based communications in favour of old-fashioned methods through a network of couriers to deliver instructions and conduct in-person meetings.”

The Majeed Brigade, a dedicated death squad of the Baluchistan Liberation Army claimed carrying out several high-casualty attacks in the reporting period.

The brigade included females in its ranks and operated across the southern region of Pakistan, including Awaran, Panjgur and Dalbandin, it was pointed out.

The Majeed Brigade, according to the report, maintained connections with TTP, ISIL-K and other terrorist groups, including ETIM/TI.

It also said that ISIL-K represented the most serious threat to the de facto authorities, ethnic and religious minorities, the UN, foreign nationals and international representatives in Afghanistan.

The killing of acting Minister of Refugees & Repatriation, Khalil Ahmed Haqqani in a suicide bombing on 11 December, claimed by ISIL-K, marked the highest-profile casualty within the de facto Cabinet since the Taliban takeover, the report said, pointing out that the move was aimed at undermining Taliban’s credibility in providing security.

“ISIL-K benefited from the Taliban’s inability to protect itself against infiltration and corruption among its own ranks, despite raids conducted to arrest disloyal officials.” The group continued building its capabilities to threaten Central Asian countries from northern Afghanistan.

The group, it said, consolidated its support base while seeking to capitalize on the growing dissatisfaction among ethnic Tajiks against Taliban rule in northern provinces.

“Despite Taliban pressure against ISIL-K, particularly in Helmand and Kandahar Provinces, farmers affected by the poppy cultivation ban reportedly provided shelter for the group’s fighters in retaliation.”

ISIL-K maintained a presence across the region, while Afghanistan remained the main hub for ISIL-K’s recruitment and facilitation, the report said adding that the group prioritized the movement of fighters into the country. “Central Asians, mostly Tajik nationals, were recruited and used in this process.”

As regards al-Qaeda, the report said it sought to strengthen cooperation with regional terrorist organizations of non-Afghan origin that operate in the country (TTP, Islamic Movement of Uzbekistan, ETIM/TIP, Jamaat Ansarullah) to expand their presence in neighbouring countries.

“Member States judged Sayf al-Adl’s strategy to reorganize Al-Qaeda’s presence in Afghanistan and reactivate sleeper cells in Iraq, Syria, Libya, and Europe indicative of the group’s longer-term intent to carry out external operations.

“The Taliban maintained a permissive environment allowing Al-Qaeda to consolidate, with the presence of safe houses and training camps scattered across Afghanistan,” the report added.

 
Pak-Afghan officials fail to agree on reopening of Torkham border

Security officials of Pakistan and Afghanistan failed to reach an agreement regarding the reopening of the Torkham border on Sunday with both the sides showing some optimism that the issue would be resolved anytime this week.

Official sources at Torkham said that border security officials of both the countries met at the Zero Point at around midday with both sides explaining their positions and also insisting that previous protocols about any change in the existing border structure be honoured and respected.

Officials said that Pakistan was willing to reopen the border with the Afghan officials requesting for some time to discuss the matter with their higher authorities.

It was also learnt that the customs and immigration departments had also called their staff for duty on Sunday in anticipation of reopening of the border but they had to return back as no agreement could be reached.

Local sources said that hundreds of returning Afghans too gathered near the border with the hope that they would be allowed to go home as they impatiently waited for the entire day, but in vain.

A local youth organisation in the meanwhile arranged Iftar for the stranded Afghans both at Torkham and in Landi Kotal. Officials said that they were now waiting for the Afghan officials to come back with a positive massage about the border reopening.

DAWN NEWS
 
Torkham reopens after 27 days following successful jirga negotiations

The Torkham border crossing reopened on Wednesday after 27 days following much-awaited parleys between jirga members of Pakistan and Afghanistan, according to a jirga leader from the Pakistani side.

The cross-border movement of people via the Torkham border crossing was abruptly suspended on February 21 after Pakistani and Afghan security forces developed differences over construction activities on both sides of the border.

The situation worsened this month when eight people, including six troops, were injured as Pakistan and Afghan Taliban forces traded fire at the border.

A number of houses, a mosque and some offices of clearing agents were hit by artillery shells, and cross-border firing continued for three days. Since then, tribal elders on both sides of the border have been engaged in talks to end the stalemate.

Around 5,000 commercial trucks had been stuck on both sides, causing millions of dollars worth of losses to traders on both sides, according to the vice president of the Pak-Afghan Joint Chamber of Commerce and Industry, Ziaul Haq Sarhadi.

The decision to reopen the border was taken at a flag meeting at Torkham on the Afghan side on Wednesday, head of the Pakistani Jirga Syed Jawad Hussain Kazmi told Dawn.com.

Kazmi said that the border has now opened for cargo vehicles and will open for pedestrians and patients on Friday after the repair of Pakistani customs infrastructure damaged due to firing from the Afghan side.

Additionally, an immediate ceasefire has been agreed upon till April 15. Both sides agreed to stop construction of the controversial check posts, Kazmi added.

Nangrahar Governor Molvi Azizullah and Molvi Hikmatullah represented the Afghan side in the flag meeting.

“Pakistani members of the Jirga had pressed for a halt to the controversial constructions on the Afghan side,” Kazmi said.

Afghan state news agency Bakhtar also confirmed the crossing’s reopening for vehicles and patients. The report said movement of pedestrians would resume on Friday.

On March 17, a joint Jirga comprised of elders and traders had brokered a deal which included the reopening of the crossing, a ceasefire, and a halt to the construction of check posts on the Afghan side near the border.

Pakistan Foreign Ministry spokesman Shafqat Ali Khan told a weekly press briefing on March 13 that the Afghan side had carried out illegal and unilateral construction activity within the Pakistani territory at two points along the Pakistan border.

On their part, Afghan Taliban officials insisted that they wanted to build check posts on their side.

Afghan Taliban officials had claimed that Pakistan had been involved in the illegal construction of towers.

Pakistani officials had clarified to the Afghan side that the towers were being built in the border terminal to facilitate traders and patients.

Two meetings of Pakistani and Afghan officials and a previous Jirga meeting had failed to resolve the issue.

DAWN NEWS
 
Chatter on Taliban social media indicates that the Afghan Taliban are planning to build a new dam in Kunar and block the water flow into Pakistan.

The Pakistanis are obviously not happy about this and are threatening counter measures.

We could be seeing Taliban vs Pakistan water war in the future.

Worth noting that until now, Pakistan had water disputes with India. Now the Taliban seem to be opening a new water equation with Pakistan.

:kp.
 
Chatter on Taliban social media indicates that the Afghan Taliban are planning to build a new dam in Kunar and block the water flow into Pakistan.

The Pakistanis are obviously not happy about this and are threatening counter measures.

We could be seeing Taliban vs Pakistan water war in the future.

Worth noting that until now, Pakistan had water disputes with India. Now the Taliban seem to be opening a new water equation with Pakistan.

:kp.

Chatter on social Media and by your logic its Gospel Truth?

Or maybe Hypothetical thinking in your case. Lol
 
Excellent news of diverting the rivers

Just like the canal project for south punjab and cholistan to get the sardar of sindh and bolochistan by the gonads who are employing a system of medieval times of slave farmers and low productivity.

Finally pakistan is getting these afghans by their gonads
 
Terror main hurdle to better ties, Kabul told

Pakistan on Thursday reminded Afghanistan that terrorism remains a major impediment to improving bilateral relations, amid ongoing concerns over militant sanctuaries across the border.

“We have been trying to improve relations but the major roadblock, of course, remains the security situation and the sanctuaries enjoyed by terrorists,” Foreign Office spokesman Shafqat Ali Khan told reporters at the weekly media briefing.

Mr Khan made the comments while responding to a question about the anticipated meeting of the Pakistan-Afghanistan Joint Coordination Committee (JCC), a forum both countries had agreed to reconvene as part of efforts to strengthen trade and economic cooperation.

He declined to provide a date for the JCC meeting, saying: “We will share information once more concrete things are available.”

Pakistan’s Special Representative for Afghanistan Amb Muhammad Sadiq visited Kabul last month where both sides agreed to sustain engagement on key issues including security, trade, and refugees.

One of the key understandings reportedly reached during the visit was to hold the JCC meeting before mid-April. Afghan Commerce Minister Nooruddin Azizi was also expected to visit Islamabad after Eid.

“Special Representative’s visit to Kabul was very successful and certain understandings have been reached in terms of the follow-up action,” Mr Khan said, noting progress in bilateral discussions.

However, tensions have remained high. Speaking at a recent seminar hosted by a think tank, Amb Sadiq warned that “all deals with Afghanistan are off if the Taliban authorities fail to address Islamabad’s” mounting concerns about terrorism emanating from Afghan territory.

Mr Khan avoided commenting directly on Amb Sadiq’s statement, saying he had not seen it.

Since the Taliban returned to power in August 2021, terrorism has emerged as a growing source of strain between the two countries. Pakistan has accused the Taliban of allowing militant groups, “especially the Tehreek-i-Taliban Pakistan (TTP)” to operate from Afghan soil, intensifying cross-border attacks and undermining diplomatic efforts.

Islamabad, once hopeful that a Taliban-led Afghanistan would bring a more cooperative regional partner, has since grown wary as militant activity has surged. The lack of action against these groups has led to repeated diplomatic friction and cast a shadow over economic and security collaborations.

India’s Waqf Act

The FO also rejected India’s recently passed Waqf (Amendment) Bill, 2025, describing it as a discriminatory move that infringes on the religious and economic rights of Indian Muslims and could deepen their marginalisation.

“About Waqf Amendment Act, we strongly believe it is an infringement over the religious and economic rights of Indian Muslims,” the FO spokesman said. “Particularly the act usurps the property rights of Muslim community, and could potentially dispossess them of a number of mosques, shrines and other holy places.”

He added that the new legislation would “certainly undermine the Muslims’ management and control of their properties endowed for different religious and charitable purposes.”

The remarks come as India’s parliament earlier this month approved the Waqf (Amendment) Bill, which is now awaiting presidential assent. The law, which governs the management of Waqf properties “Muslim religious endowments” has drawn sharp criticism from Muslim leaders and opposition lawmakers who say it threatens religious autonomy.

The legislation mandates financial audits for Waqf institutions with annual incomes exceeding 1 lakh Indian rupees, lowers the mandatory contributions to Waqf Boards from 7 per cent to 5pc, and introduces a centralised digital portal for property oversight.

It also calls for the inclusion of Muslim women and non-Muslims in the Waqf Board management.

Critics argue that the bill amounts to an unconstitutional overreach and could pave the way for state interference in religious affairs.

“The passage of this discriminatory legislation is also reflective of the growing majoritarianism in India,” Mr Khan said. “There are serious apprehensions that it will contribute to further marginalisation of Indian Muslims.”

DAWN NEWS
 
Terror main hurdle to better ties, Kabul told

Pakistan on Thursday reminded Afghanistan that terrorism remains a major impediment to improving bilateral relations, amid ongoing concerns over militant sanctuaries across the border.

“We have been trying to improve relations but the major roadblock, of course, remains the security situation and the sanctuaries enjoyed by terrorists,” Foreign Office spokesman Shafqat Ali Khan told reporters at the weekly media briefing.

Mr Khan made the comments while responding to a question about the anticipated meeting of the Pakistan-Afghanistan Joint Coordination Committee (JCC), a forum both countries had agreed to reconvene as part of efforts to strengthen trade and economic cooperation.

He declined to provide a date for the JCC meeting, saying: “We will share information once more concrete things are available.”

Pakistan’s Special Representative for Afghanistan Amb Muhammad Sadiq visited Kabul last month where both sides agreed to sustain engagement on key issues including security, trade, and refugees.

One of the key understandings reportedly reached during the visit was to hold the JCC meeting before mid-April. Afghan Commerce Minister Nooruddin Azizi was also expected to visit Islamabad after Eid.

“Special Representative’s visit to Kabul was very successful and certain understandings have been reached in terms of the follow-up action,” Mr Khan said, noting progress in bilateral discussions.

However, tensions have remained high. Speaking at a recent seminar hosted by a think tank, Amb Sadiq warned that “all deals with Afghanistan are off if the Taliban authorities fail to address Islamabad’s” mounting concerns about terrorism emanating from Afghan territory.

Mr Khan avoided commenting directly on Amb Sadiq’s statement, saying he had not seen it.

Since the Taliban returned to power in August 2021, terrorism has emerged as a growing source of strain between the two countries. Pakistan has accused the Taliban of allowing militant groups, “especially the Tehreek-i-Taliban Pakistan (TTP)” to operate from Afghan soil, intensifying cross-border attacks and undermining diplomatic efforts.

Islamabad, once hopeful that a Taliban-led Afghanistan would bring a more cooperative regional partner, has since grown wary as militant activity has surged. The lack of action against these groups has led to repeated diplomatic friction and cast a shadow over economic and security collaborations.

India’s Waqf Act

The FO also rejected India’s recently passed Waqf (Amendment) Bill, 2025
, describing it as a discriminatory move that infringes on the religious and economic rights of Indian Muslims and could deepen their marginalisation.

“About Waqf Amendment Act, we strongly believe it is an infringement over the religious and economic rights of Indian Muslims,” the FO spokesman said. “Particularly the act usurps the property rights of Muslim community, and could potentially dispossess them of a number of mosques, shrines and other holy places.”

He added that the new legislation would “certainly undermine the Muslims’ management and control of their properties endowed for different religious and charitable purposes.”

The remarks come as India’s parliament earlier this month approved the Waqf (Amendment) Bill, which is now awaiting presidential assent. The law, which governs the management of Waqf properties “Muslim religious endowments” has drawn sharp criticism from Muslim leaders and opposition lawmakers who say it threatens religious autonomy.

The legislation mandates financial audits for Waqf institutions with annual incomes exceeding 1 lakh Indian rupees, lowers the mandatory contributions to Waqf Boards from 7 per cent to 5pc, and introduces a centralised digital portal for property oversight.

It also calls for the inclusion of Muslim women and non-Muslims in the Waqf Board management.

Critics argue that the bill amounts to an unconstitutional overreach and could pave the way for state interference in religious affairs.

“The passage of this discriminatory legislation is also reflective of the growing majoritarianism in India,” Mr Khan said. “There are serious apprehensions that it will contribute to further marginalisation of Indian Muslims.”

DAWN NEWS
did anyone ask Pakistan to accept the WAQF bill? :inti

Looney tunes!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Pakistan and Afghanistan set to hold talks amidst growing tensions

Pakistan and Afghanistan are holding key talks on security and border issues in the 7th session of the Pakistan-Afghanistan Joint Coordination Committee (JCC), set to take place in Kabul, officials said on Wednesday.

The meeting comes in the light of rising tensions between the two countries, with Afghan refugee deportations, skirmishes along the border, and the increased activity of armed groups within Pakistan since the Taliban takeover of Afghanistan in 2021.

Pakistan maintains that these armed groups operate from within Afghan soil, a claim that Afghan officials have denied, maintaining that no one can use afghan soil against any country.

Pakistan’s Special Representative for Afghanistan, Mohammad Sadiq is leading Pakistan’s delegation, which includes both military and intelligence officials. Ambassador Sadiq’s office in Islamabad said that he had reached Kabul this morning.

While on the other side, Afghan Deputy Defence Minister Mullah Abdul Qayyum Zakir is set to lead the meeting, according to Afghan government spokesperson, Zabiullah Mujahid.

Mullah Abdul Qayyum Zakir is a senior Taliban leader, who once led the Taliban military commission during the 20-year war against the US-Nato forces.

“SAPM/Pakistan’s Special Representative for Afghanistan arrived at Kabul at the head of a delegation to attend the JCC meeting. JCC meeting is being held after a long gap,” according to Sadiq’s X.

The last JCC meeting was held in Islamabad in early January 2024.

Afghan spokesperson Mujahid said both sides will “discuss resolving potential disputes along the Durand Line and creating facilities for the people of both sides.”

Last month, Pakistan and Afghan Taliban forces exchanged fire following the closure of Torkham border crossing over construction of posts.

Following this development, a Pakistan and Afghan Jirga brokered a deal that led to the reopening of Torkham on March 19 after 27 days.

Head of the Pakistani jirga, Syed Jawad Hussain Kazmi told Dawn.com last month that the JCC would discuss whatever the Jirga had decided including a ceasefire till April 15.

Both sides have agreed to stop construction of the controversial check posts, he added.

Pakistani Officials cite the issue of the banned Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) and other armed groups as a major hurdle in Pak-Afghan relationship.

Further, Pakistan Foreign Office revealed last month that the terrorists behind the Jaffar Express hijacking had Afghan connections, with phone records traced to Afghanistan.

The Afghan Taliban claim that militants of the ISKP (Daesh) enter Afghanistan from Balochistan and Khyber Pakhtunkhwa. Pakistani officials have labelled these claims as baseless.

Pak-Afghan trade talks

In a separate development, a delegation from the Afghan Ministry of Industry and Commerce, led by its minister Noor Uddin Azizi, will visit Pakistan today, Afghan Commerce Ministry spokesman Abdul Salam Jawad told Dawn.com from Kabul.

Pakistan and Afghan commerce ministers are expected to hold further discussions on the preferential trade agreement, reduction in tariffs on certain items, a revised transit agreement and facilities for traders at border points.

DAWN NEWS
 
Pak-Afghan trade talks begin after year-long hiatus

Pakistan and Afghanistan on Thursday resumed high-level trade and investment talks after a year-long gap to facilitate cargo movement at border stations to maintain unfettered bilateral and transit trade.

The last high-level meeting took place between both countries in March 2024, when Commerce Secretary Mohammad Khurrum Agha visited Kabul and met Afghan Acting Minister for Industry and Commerce Nooruddin Azizi to discuss bilateral trade and transit.

According to a statement released by Afghanistan’s commerce ministry, a big demand emerged for the renewal of the Afghanistan-Pakistan Transit Trade Agreement (APTTA), transit facilitation, counter-smuggling commodities, and exporting Afghan coal to Pakistan.

The Afghan side also discussed making Torkham port operational 24/7, allowing bilateral trade through Ghulam Khan port, crossing heavy vehicles between the two countries’ territories, providing bank guarantees, and establishing an inclusive mechanism for port administration between the two countries.

Mr Azizi is leading a high-level delegation to Pakistan to explore ways to enhance trade ties. On Thursday, he also met with Pakistan’s Commerce Minister Jam Kamal.

According to the statement, Pakistan proposed forming a joint committee to hold regular sessions to address trade-related issues. Discussions also touched on the situation of Afghan refugees.

Pakistan’s exports to Afghanistan increased 84.25 per cent to $592.84m in 8MFY25 from $321.75m last year. Imports stood at $18.21m against $5.47m in 8MFY24. The Torkham border was closed for nearly 27 days during this period, disrupting trade.

Pakistan’s main export to Afghanistan in the current fiscal year has been sugar, with more than 700,000 tonnes exported over the past four months, most of it bound for Afghanistan.

An official announcement from Pakistan’s commerce ministry said the talks revolved around strengthening bilateral trade relations, resolving transit issues, and improving border cooperation.

Commerce Minister Kamal welcomed the Afghan delegation and emphasized the historical and cultural ties between the two countries.

Both sides held comprehensive discussions on key issues impacting bilateral trade, including procedural hurdles, regulatory requirements, cargo handling, documentation, scanning, and cargo monitoring processes.

The two ministers also emphasized the importance of a structured border management framework to enhance customs coordination, facilitate cross-border movement, and reduce trade disruptions. They discussed cooperation in agricultural exports, coal, carpets, and resolving issues around Afghan cotton exports.

The Afghan Minister expressed optimism that mutual trade potential can be fully realized through continued dialogue and close collaboration.

Both sides reaffirmed their commitment to improving economic connectivity and trade integration and expressed hope that upcoming technical-level meetings would produce practical solutions to overcome existing bottlenecks.

DAWN NEWS
 
Pak-Afghan trade talks begin after year-long hiatus

Pakistan and Afghanistan on Thursday resumed high-level trade and investment talks after a year-long gap to facilitate cargo movement at border stations to maintain unfettered bilateral and transit trade.

The last high-level meeting took place between both countries in March 2024, when Commerce Secretary Mohammad Khurrum Agha visited Kabul and met Afghan Acting Minister for Industry and Commerce Nooruddin Azizi to discuss bilateral trade and transit.

According to a statement released by Afghanistan’s commerce ministry, a big demand emerged for the renewal of the Afghanistan-Pakistan Transit Trade Agreement (APTTA), transit facilitation, counter-smuggling commodities, and exporting Afghan coal to Pakistan.

The Afghan side also discussed making Torkham port operational 24/7, allowing bilateral trade through Ghulam Khan port, crossing heavy vehicles between the two countries’ territories, providing bank guarantees, and establishing an inclusive mechanism for port administration between the two countries.

Mr Azizi is leading a high-level delegation to Pakistan to explore ways to enhance trade ties. On Thursday, he also met with Pakistan’s Commerce Minister Jam Kamal.

According to the statement, Pakistan proposed forming a joint committee to hold regular sessions to address trade-related issues. Discussions also touched on the situation of Afghan refugees.

Pakistan’s exports to Afghanistan increased 84.25 per cent to $592.84m in 8MFY25 from $321.75m last year. Imports stood at $18.21m against $5.47m in 8MFY24. The Torkham border was closed for nearly 27 days during this period, disrupting trade.

Pakistan’s main export to Afghanistan in the current fiscal year has been sugar, with more than 700,000 tonnes exported over the past four months, most of it bound for Afghanistan.

An official announcement from Pakistan’s commerce ministry said the talks revolved around strengthening bilateral trade relations, resolving transit issues, and improving border cooperation.

Commerce Minister Kamal welcomed the Afghan delegation and emphasized the historical and cultural ties between the two countries.

Both sides held comprehensive discussions on key issues impacting bilateral trade, including procedural hurdles, regulatory requirements, cargo handling, documentation, scanning, and cargo monitoring processes.

The two ministers also emphasized the importance of a structured border management framework to enhance customs coordination, facilitate cross-border movement, and reduce trade disruptions. They discussed cooperation in agricultural exports, coal, carpets, and resolving issues around Afghan cotton exports.

The Afghan Minister expressed optimism that mutual trade potential can be fully realized through continued dialogue and close collaboration.

Both sides reaffirmed their commitment to improving economic connectivity and trade integration and expressed hope that upcoming technical-level meetings would produce practical solutions to overcome existing bottlenecks.

DAWN NEWS


Good.

Both nations must work in collaboration to manage their respective territories and let free trade across borders. Its for the benefit of people. That must be top priority.
 
Deputy PM Dar stresses ‘brotherly ties’ as he lands in Afghanistan for talks over security concerns

Deputy Prime Minister and Foreign Minister Ishaq Dar arrived in Kabul on Saturday for a day-long visit to discuss security issues that could potentially lead to a thaw in relations between the two neighbours after protracted stalemate over Islamabad’s terrorism concerns.

The much-awaited visit follows the latest round of the Pakistan-Afghanistan Joint Coordination Committee meeting in Kabul. Pakistan’s delegation was led by Ambassador Sadiq Khan, the country’s special representative for Afghanistan.

Speaking to the media before his departure, he said that the two countries share deep-rooted brotherly ties which must be further strengthened, state-media Radio Pakistan reported.

Dar said Pakistan has concerns regarding terrorism and discussions will be held with the Afghan side on this matter.

“Our aim is to foster collaboration that serves the mutual interests of the peoples of both countries as well as the region,” he added.

The deputy PM was welcomed at the airport by the dignitaries of the Afghan government, according to a statement by the Pakistan Embassy. The statement added that the Pakistan’s Head of Mission in Afghanistan Ambassador Ubaid-ur-Rehman Nizamani and officers of the embassy were also present on the occasion.

During the visit, Dar will call on Afghan Acting Prime Minister Mullah Muhammad Hassan Akhund, also meet with Afghan Acting Deputy Prime Minister for Administrative Affairs Mullah Abdul Salam Hanafi, and hold in-depth talks with Acting Foreign Minister Amir Khan Muttaqi, the Foreign Office (FO) said in a post on X.

“There are some reasons for the coldness in relations with Afghanistan in the last few years,” Dar told state-media Pakistan Television Corporation (PTV) ahead of his departure.

He continued, “I think that the security of Pakistan, the people, of their lives, and of their properties is very important. We have concerns regarding terrorism, which we will discuss.”

He said that there were immense opportunities for trade, economy, and investment between the two countries. “Our links with Central Asia can be done through rail, but unless Afghanistan becomes a partner, a railway link between Pakistan and Central Asia cannot be built without it,” he added.

He further said that the potential in trade was not being utilised, adding that the PM and other stakeholders decided that we would engage with Afghanistan.

Dar also highlighted the trade and investment talks between the two countries held earlier this week. Afghan Acting Minister for Industry and Commerce Nooruddin Azizi led a high-level delegation to Pakistan to explore ways to enhance trade ties.

He said that he was leaving with a “goodwill message” and stated, “Both Muslim countries should become close partners of each other and do whatever is possible for the economic development of the people of both countries and for the betterment of the people.”

A day earlier, FO spokesperson Shafqat Ali Khan said, “At the invitation of Acting Afghan Foreign Minister, […] Foreign Minister Ishaq Dar, will lead a high-level delegation to Kabul tomorrow.”

He said that the talks will cover the entirety of the Pak-Afghan relationship, focusing on ways to bolster cooperation in all areas of mutual interest, including security and trade.

The trip comes in light of rising tensions between the two countries, with Afghan refugee deportations, skirmishes along the border, and the increased activity of armed groups within Pakistan since the Taliban takeover of Afghanistan in 2021.

Pakistan maintains that these armed groups operate from within Afghan soil, a claim that Afghan officials have denied, maintaining that no one can use Afghan soil against any country.

DAWN NEWS
 
Security forces kill 54 terrorists attempting to infiltrate Pak-Afghan border
Security forces have killed 54 terrorists who were trying to infiltrate into the country through the Pakistan-Afghanistan border in North Waziristan district, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, the military's media wing said on Sunday.

According to the Inter-Services Public Relations (ISPR), the security forces picked up movement of a group of militants, who were trying to infiltrate through the Pak-Afghanistan border in the general area of Hassan Khel, North Waziristan district, on the night between April 25, 26 and 27.

"Own troops effectively engaged and thwarted their attempt to infiltrate. As a result of precise and skillful engagement, all 54 khawarij have been sent to hell," it said.

Fitna Al Khawarij is a term the state uses to refer to the banned Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP).

The security forces also recovered a large cache of weapons, ammunition and explosives from the killed terrorists.

"Intelligence reports indicate that this group of khawarij was specifically infiltrating on behest of their 'foreign masters' to undertake high-profile terrorist activities inside Pakistan," the ISPR said.

It added that such actions by terrorists, at a time when India is levelling baseless accusations against Pakistan, clearly imply on whose cues they are operating. "Such actions amount to treason and betrayal against the state and its citizens."

Referring to the meeting of the Parliamentary Committee on National Security, the ISPR said it underscored the fact that distracting Pakistan’s security forces from their focus on the war against terror seems to be the strategic intent of India to allow a breathing space to terrorists "which is reeling from the onslaught of our armed forces resolute offensive against them".

"The security forces demonstrated exceptional professionalism, vigilance and preparedness and prevented a potential catastrophe," it added.

The statement noted that this was the highest-ever number of terrorists killed by the security forces in a single engagement during entire campaign against terrorism.

"Security forces remain resolute and unwavering in their commitment to defend the nation’s frontiers and to eradicate the menace of terrorism," it said, adding such bold and decisive actions further strengthen collective resolve and underscore that Pakistan is winning the war against terrorism.

The two nations share a porous border spanning around 2,500 kilometres with several crossing points which hold significance as a key element of regional trade and relations between the people across both sides of the fence.

However, the issue of terrorism remains a key issue for Pakistan which has urged Afghanistan to prevent its soil from being used by groups such as the TTP to carry out attacks inside the former’s territory.

Islamabad’s reservations have also been confirmed by a report submitted to the United Nations Security Council (UNSC) by the Analytical Support and Sanctions Monitoring Team, which has revealed a nexus between Kabul and the TTP with the former providing logistical, operational and financial support to the latter.

Earlier this month, at least eight terrorists were neutralised as security forces successfully thwarted their bid to infiltrate through the Pakistan-Afghanistan border in North Waziristan district.

The country witnessed a sharp increase in terror attacks in January 2025, surging by 42% compared to the previous month, according to data released by the Pakistan Institute for Conflict and Security Studies (PICSS), a think tank.

The data revealed that at least 74 militant attacks were recorded nationwide, resulting in 91 fatalities, including 35 security personnel, 20 civilians, and 36 militants. Another 117 individuals sustained injuries, including 53 security forces personnel, 54 civilians, and 10 militants.

Source: https://www.thenews.com.pk/latest/1...ts-attempting-to-infiltrate-pak-afghan-border
 
Fighting in Pakistan without orders violates sharia, says Afghan Taliban

The Taliban government in Afghanistan has issued a stern warning to dissident groups, cautioning them against engaging in armed conflict outside the country, particularly in Pakistan, without official approval, ARY News reported.

Taliban commander Saeedullah Saeed, speaking at a recent event, stated that fighting against the orders of the Amir, particularly in countries like Pakistan, is not permissible.

He emphasised that those who join various factions to wage jihad abroad are not considered true mujahideen.

Saeed clarified that the declaration or permission to conduct jihad rests solely with the state Amir and cannot be claimed by any individual or group.


 
Apne Jase fake news post karne wala samja h kya ? 🤣🤣🤣


:kp
Fake News

India propaganda

came on the back of after afgan's/taliban issued a fatwa that they are not backing India in this conflict vs Pakistan unless its an order from their amir.

bit humilating for india if you ask me all this support india gave afghanistan and at the end they showed their big fat hairy backside to india :ua
 
Pakistan has to realise that terrorism is something that cannot be controlled. They cannot maintain a situation where they can conveniently use terrorism against India for their vested interests but also claim to be victims of it in Balochistan, KPK etc. The doctrine which produces these terrorists cannot be controlled by a nation state. It is so easy to manipulate these elements to go rogue.

The only way for Pakistan to progress in the future is to completely get rid of the ideology that creates terrorists in their country.

It is a pity that the so called big powers, you have aligned with never truly want you to go down that path and they will happily keep using you as a proxy in the region.
 
Kabul also levels up its Pakistan diplomat to ambassador as ties see ‘normalisation’

Hours after Pakistan decided to enhance ties with Afghanistan yesterday, the Afghan foreign ministry welcomed the decision and announced upgrading the status of its chargé d’affaires in Islamabad to ambassador.

Pakistan and Afghanistan agreed to upgrade their diplomatic relations by exchanging envoys earlier this month — a key step towards normalising ties after years of strained relations due to terrorism concerns repeatedly voiced by Islamabad.

“The Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan welcomes the decision of the Government of Pakistan to upgrade the level of its diplomatic mission in Kabul to that of an ambassador,” the Afghan foreign ministry said on its X account late on Friday.

“In reciprocity, the Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan will elevate the status of its mission in Islamabad from chargé d’affaires to ambassador,” the ministry added.

Zakir Jalaly, an Afghan foreign ministry official, wrote on X that the current chargé d’affaires in Islamabad, Sardar Ahmad Shakeeb, will assume responsibilities as the country’s ambassador to Pakistan.

Kabul’s Foreign Minister Amir Khan Muttaqi is due to visit Pakistan “in the coming days”, ministry spokesman Zia Ahmad Takal told AFP.

Following Pakistan’s decision from yesterday, its chargé d’affaires Ubaidur Rehman Nizamani will be levelled up to an ambassador.

This elevation in diplomatic representation between the two countries paves the way for enhanced bilateral cooperation in multiple domains.

Pakistan and Afghanistan made the announcements days after Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi said the two nations “expressed clear willingness to elevate diplomatic relations and agreed in principle to exchange ambassadors as soon as possible”.

Wang, who hosted an informal Afghanistan-China-Pakistan trilateral meeting in Beijing, had welcomed that development and said China would continue to provide assistance for the improvement of Pak-Afghan relations.

Pakistani experts have acknowledged the role of China, which pressed Pakistan and Taliban-ruled Afghanistan to normalise relations.

“China, as a bridge builder, is playing a historic role in bringing together Muslim countries,” Senator Mushahid Hussain, chairman of the Pakistan-China Institute, told Dawn.com today.

“They presided over the rapprochement between Iran and Saudi Arabia in 2023, then brought 14 Palestinian factions together in Beijing in 2024, and now they have helped in normalising ties between Islamabad and Kabul,” detailed Mushahid, who has served as the chairman of the Senate foreign affairs and defence committees.

He recalled that at the tripartite meeting hosted by FM Wang, all three countries agreed to expand the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) to include Afghanistan as well. Then they politely prodded both sides to restore their level of representation to ambassador level, he added.

The senator termed the decision as a good sign that both Pakistan and Afghanistan were willing, ready and able to move forward on the path of normalisation with China’s “excellent” facilitation.

“China as a South Asian power also has the highest stakes for peace, security and stability in the region,” Mushahid highlighted.

Afghan experts also view the decision as very important for engagement in the current environment in Pakistan and Afghanistan.

Dr Ubaidullah Burhani, an American academic writer of Afghan origin and a researcher in political strategy, noted that the levelling up of diplomatic ties represented a significant political development, adding it arrives belatedly within a context marked by complex geopolitical rivalries.

“It is imperative, however, that both sides seize this opportunity to engage in direct, constructive dialogue — independent of regional pressures — in order to lay the groundwork for policies that build mutual trust and deliver concrete outcomes,” Dr Burhani told Dawn.com.

The international affairs specialist stressed that priority should be given to advancing cooperation in critical areas such as trade, healthcare, and education, to ensure that diplomatic gestures are matched by practical steps that serve the interests of both nations and their people.

Ambassador Nizamani, who joined the Foreign Service exactly three decades ago, was sent as charge d’affaires in November 2022, months after Ambassador Mansoor Khan completed his tenure.

According to a profile of Ambassador Nizamani shared by the embassy with Dawn.com, he has served as the deputy chief of mission at the Embassy of Pakistan in Washington, DC from November 2019 to February 2021.

Other roles he has been posted at include deputy high commissioner at the High Commission for Pakistan in New Delhi, political counsellor at the High Commission for Pakistan in Dhaka as well as at Pakistan’s embassy in Berlin, and vice consul at the Consulate General of Pakistan in Jeddah.

In Islamabad, Nizamani has served as the director for the US, as well as director general for Europe and South Asia.

DAWN NEWS
 
Pakistan, Afghanistan sign trade agreement

Pakistan and Afghanistan on Wednesday signed an Early Harvest Programme (EHP) to reduce tariffs on eight agricultural items for one year, laying the foundation for a broader preferential trade agreement (PTA) between the two countries.

The EHP, which takes effect on Aug 1, will remain in force for one year and is renewable. It also allows for the future inclusion of additional items, making it the first tangible step towards launching negotiations on a comprehensive PTA.

The agreement was signed by Pakistan’s Commerce Secretary, Jawad Paul, and Afghanistan’s Deputy Minister of Industry and Commerce, Mullah Ahmadullah Zahid, who was accompanied by a delegation of senior technical officials. The Afghan delegation arrived in Islamabad on Monday night to hold detailed negotiations with Pakistan’s Ministry of Commerce.

Under the agreement, tariffs on four Afghan agricultural exports to Pakistan — grapes, pomegranates, apples, and tomatoes — and four Pakistani exports to Afghanistan — mangoes, kinnows, bananas, and potatoes — will be reduced to 27pc, down from over 60pc previously.

A senior official at the Ministry of Commerce told Dawn the agreement will serve as a catalyst for reviving formal PTA negotiations, which had been dormant for nearly a decade. “We will now resume talks to discuss the details of the PTA,” the official added.

In 2014, both countries agreed to initiate PTA talks, and Pakistan subsequently shared a draft agreement. However, progress stalled when the Afghan side, under then-President Ashraf Ghani, linked further talks to allowing the import of Indian goods via the Wagah border — a proposal repeatedly rejected by Islamabad. As a result, negotiations remained suspended in the following years.

In the meantime, Pakistan has taken several steps to facilitate bilateral trade, including offering transactions in Pakistani rupees and allowing limited barter trade in the wake of Afghanistan’s banking crisis.

Official data shows that Pakistan’s exports to Afghanistan surged 38.68pc to $773.89m in FY25, up from $558.03m in the previous fiscal year. Imports from Afghanistan more than doubled to $25.89m from $11.96m in FY24, an increase of 116.47pc.Pakistan’s key export to Afghanistan this year has been sugar, with over 700,000 tonnes shipped in the past four months alone.

DAWN NEWS
 
Back
Top