Sunny_majoka
Local Club Captain
- Joined
- Sep 29, 2016
- Runs
- 2,588
you're not winning the world cup with the likes of faheem and junaid
We are not winning with the likes of amir either
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
you're not winning the world cup with the likes of faheem and junaid
How is it a big gamble? When Shoaib Akhtar wasn't performing he was dropped during the WC. And Shoaib Akhtar is 3 times the bowler Amir is.
very mediocre squad.most of the players are mediocre captain himself doesn't merit a spot in the team and his buddies like faheem Junaid the trundlers are still there to haunt their own team with their pathetic performances.Less said about malak Saab is better.They are not going to make the semis that's assured but I hope they beat India that's what matters to me.
We are not winning with the likes of amir either
Faheem and Junaid haven't won you anything.
Amir has.
Correction, only Faheem hasn’t won us anything.
Junaid murdered the Indian batting lineup in India.
Amir won you CT, what have Junaid and Hasnain done?
What has Amir done since? Others have performed better..wayyyy better.
Won it on he’s own? No. Fakhar was the main factor. Junaid was also part of CT. Hasnain is new so it’s rather silly to be asking what he has done.
Starting career in 2009, Amir might end International career without playing a single WC game - which I think is a poetic justice. Guy did something he should have never done, so somewhere luck will balance it out. Still, he has 100% record for PAK in ICC events - played 2, won 2 (Not sure if he was in 2010 CT team).
Quite a bold squad to be honest - they picked Hasnain, JK & Abid. For the ENG tour, still they have picked couple of pacers, which I think is quite wise call - one of them might make the final cut before 25th May.
Amir’s non selection is not what bothers me.. I am bothered about Hasnain, abid, malik and Imad.
Didn’t the coach say no compromise on fitness? Three of the four players apparently struggled with the fitness test and Malik has a terrible terrible record in England. They should have take. Rizwan instead of Malik.
Bull!!! You know that was rigged because hey decided to include them and wanted to justify their selections.It was reported that Abid and Hasnain passed followup tests.
Amir played in CT 2009 ,
T20 WC 2009,
T20 2010,
T20 2016,
CT 2017,
So 2 out of 5.
Faheem and Junaid haven't won you anything.
Amir has.
Bull!!! You know that was rigged because hey decided to include them and wanted to justify their selections.
Why pick him for the ODI series if he is not part of the WC Squad? What if he performs well in the series?
He hasn't done anything but to drop him for the World Cup in the same conditions he won you the Champions Trophy is ridiculous. He surely should have been there in place of Junaid or Faheem, who are absolute garbage.
Do you not know India are the best chasers going around with the Top 3 able to chase almost anything? Not to mention how flat the pitch was if Pakistan is scoring 340?
Did Kohli, Dhawan and Sharma get dismissed all on their own? Why didn't somebody else dismiss them then?
Bull!!! You know that was rigged because hey decided to include them and wanted to justify their selections.
Before the WC one of the bowlers will get seriously injured. As a replacement Amir will be back and lead the attack.
What a failed investment of millions
Of rupees on amir. Only happens in pakistan
Faheem and Junaid haven't won you anything.
Amir has.
Chasing 340 in a major final is a different proposition. They would have folded without Amir too. Yes Amir bowled well.
I'm really shocked that no one asked about khushdil Shah
the media is asking about wahab, umar akmal , kamean akmal etc
if media could they would even ask why wasim bari or some 1960's player was not selected
Junaid picked 8 wickets during 2017 Champions trophy while Amir picked 5 wickets.
Junaids performance in winning CT 2017 was no less by any stretch.
Khusdil looks a like a guy that will struggle against decent Pacers.
have you seen him struggle ???
Junaid picked 8 wickets during 2017 Champions trophy while Amir picked 5 wickets.
Junaids performance in winning CT 2017 was no less by any stretch.
Statistically yes and it's exactly why stat bullies lack good insight into the game.
Only a jaahil could overlook the fact that Amir dismantled possibly the best top 3 in world cricket within the first powerplay. That virtually guaranteed Pakistan's win.
Also just like when he removed the leading run scorer of the tournament (Dilshan in the form of his life) in the first over of the 2007 WT20 final.
And the 3 of the 5 won you the match
He failed himself!
Why are people worrying?
If Amir does well against eng then he'll be in The squad if he doesn't then he won't.
It's pretty simple.
Statistically yes and it's exactly why stat bullies lack good insight into the game.
Only a jaahil could overlook the fact that Amir dismantled possibly the best top 3 in world cricket within the first powerplay. That virtually guaranteed Pakistan's win.
Also just like when he removed the leading run scorer of the tournament (Dilshan in the form of his life) in the first over of the 2007 WT20 final.
when the target is 340 runs the equation was in favour of Pakistan 90-10.
India has never chased that big a score ever outside Asia.
Defending 340 runs is not some once in a lifetime performance, scoring a ton in the final is.
Easier to dismantle a opposition when the scoreboard pressure is behind you, we all saw how Cheetah Amir performed in Asia cup against India when the target was not a mammoth 340.
Easier to dismantle a opposition when the scoreboard pressure is behind you, we all saw how Cheetah Amir performed in Asia cup against India when the target was not a mammoth 340.
Fakhar
Imam
Haaris
Malik
Hafeez
Sarfaraz
Shadab
Imad
Fahim
Hasan
Shaheen
Most likely eleven to play.
Lower order from Shadab onwards has more hit-or-miss players. Can't see Pakistan chasing more than 250 in any condition unless Hafeez/Malik have a solid World Cup.
You will sit babar out lol.
No idea why Shoaib Malik gets picked - a truly awful and incompetent decision. Rizwan (or even Umar Akmal) were far better options.
Amir missing out is a big surprise and yet another indication that Inzamam takes no shizz from anyone. Rizwan must be feeling hard done by but we could have only selected 17 players and including a player just because there might be an injury to Sarfaraz would be negative thinking. It is better to have an extra-pacer who might get a game against one of the weaker sides than a back-up keeper who won't get any game-time as long as things go well. Although I would have preferred Amir to be the fifth pacer instead of Faheem. Asif Ali being a part of the 17 is also a positive move, he's widely inconsistent so let us see what he does in England and then make a call on him versus Abid Ali or Shoaib Malik. Junaid's inclusion is a massive plus, as is the punt on Hasnain. Both should bowl well in England.
All in all, a fantastic squad. Inzamam has once again given us the best possible squad, MashaAllah. The rest is up to the management and of course, the players themselves.
Also don't see the need for Abid Ali, we already have Hafeez/Babar/Haris who can open.
Malik averages 13 in England, and yes even Akmal would have been a better choice and merited after the Pakistan Cup performance
Also don't see the need for Abid Ali, we already have Hafeez/Babar/Haris who can open.
Malik averages 13 in England, and yes even Akmal would have been a better choice and merited after the Pakistan Cup performance
have you seen him struggle ???
If Malik fails in the series against England, he will most likely be dropped for Asif Ali. Akmal is not getting anywhere near a Pakistan side again until he grows up.