What's new

Pakistan beat West Indies by 9 wickets in the first IT20

Brathwaite released whatever pressure there was on Pakistan in that over.
 
WI have missed the trick. Should have been bowling Samuels and Narine.
 
beutiful. that's difference betweeen a hack and class. [MENTION=138254]Syed1[/MENTION]
 
poor captaincy by WI should have bowled Narine and Budree if you are going to defend 115 need wickets
 
We should always select batsmen who are equally fluent on both sides of the field, in their shots, like Babar, this is where Latif should be chopped.
 
Ian Bishop is a great commentator. Very knowledgable and seems like he stays in touch with the game a lot
 
We need to win with 9 wickets ok

This is the plan, that is why Latif isn't hacking around. But Apparently Kids these days just want slam bang and nothing else :facepalm:

First game you win by 9 wickets, you practically set the tone for the entire LOI series.
 
beutiful. that's difference betweeen a hack and class. [MENTION=138254]Syed1[/MENTION]


Actually, that's the difference between a pro & a novice - one played Babar at 5 after watching him for 2 years, other put him at 3 after 2 matches.
 
This is the plan, that is why Latif isn't hacking around. But Apparently Kids these days just want slam bang and nothing else :facepalm:

First game you win by 9 wickets, you practically set the tone for the entire LOI series.

Exactly Azam is being unnecessarily aggressive
 
This is the plan, that is why Latif isn't hacking around. But Apparently Kids these days just want slam bang and nothing else :facepalm:

First game you win by 9 wickets, you practically set the tone for the entire LOI series.

This is T20I cricket, brother, you have to slam bang, we should always look to win brutally, not softly.
 
This is T20I cricket, brother, you have to slam bang, we should always look to win brutally, not softly.

Bro you need to understand, it will always say won by no of wickets on the score sheet rather than in how many overs the target was complete for whoever is batting second.

I would rather have Pakistan win by 9 wickets in 19 overs than win by 5 wickets in 15 overs. A dominating win would be to chase the target with minimal damage.
 
I feel like watching Mark Waugh & Shane Warne pair batting....
 
Bro you need to understand, it will always say won by no of wickets on the score sheet rather than in how many overs the target was complete for whoever is batting second.

I would rather have Pakistan win by 9 wickets in 19 overs than win by 5 wickets in 15 overs. A dominating win would be to chase the target with minimal damage.

I would want us to win by 9 wickets, within 15 overs.
 
Consecutive 9 wicket wins for Pakistan. A comfortable victory.
 
Bro you need to understand, it will always say won by no of wickets on the score sheet rather than in how many overs the target was complete for whoever is batting second.

I would rather have Pakistan win by 9 wickets in 19 overs than win by 5 wickets in 15 overs. A dominating win would be to chase the target with minimal damage.

Now this is a dominating victory, within 15 overs, by 9 wickets, not in 19 overs, lol.
 
very good batting display - just wondering, what MoHa is thinking now. For 5 years, he has bluffed people ....
 
This T20 lark sure looks easy, the last 2 matches have been blow-outs. :19:
Feel sorry for :uakmal, upstaged by his cousin :))
 
Good to see Babar among runs, he is the future, needs run under his belt to flourish at this stage. Best way is to first get at home!!!
 
Back
Top