What's new

Pakistan PM hints at further cabinet changes after 'batting order' shuffle

Zeeraq

First Class Captain
Joined
Sep 28, 2011
Runs
5,437
ISLAMABAD (Reuters) - Pakistani Prime Minister Imran Khan said on Friday that he would not hesitate to make more changes to his cabinet if required a day after a major reshuffle that saw the appointment of a new finance minister and nine other ministerial switches.

The cabinet shakeup, which comes eight months after Khan took office, included the replacement of Finance Minister Asad Umar, who has been a close ally to Khan for many years, with Abdul Hafeez Shaikh in a renamed role to steer the country out of worsening economic turmoil.

Pakistan is on the brink of signing up for its 13th International Monetary Fund (IMF) bailout since the late 1980s in a bid to stave off a balance of payments crisis and ease ballooning current account and fiscal deficits.

“I want to tell all my ministers that whoever is not useful for my country, I will change them and bring that minister who is useful for my country,” Khan said during a speech in the northern region of Orakzai.

Shaikh, who served as finance minister from 2010-2013 under the opposition Pakistan People’s Party when it was in power, has been appointed as “Adviser on Finance” but will be heading the finance ministry once again.

In Pakistan’ it is common for financial experts to be given the title of “adviser”, rather than federal minister, to head the finance ministry when they are not a sitting member of parliament.

Umar has been leading negotiations with the IMF but faced criticism over a worsening economic outlook on his watch, with inflation at a five-year high and the rupee currency down about 35 percent since December 2017.

The central bank last month cut growth estimates, forecasting the economy to expand 3.5 to 4 percent in the 12 months to the end of June, well short of a government target of 6.2 percent. The IMF paints a gloomier picture, predicting growth of 2.9 percent in 2019 and 2.8 percent next year.

In a speech laden with cricket metaphors, Khan, who led Pakistan’s cricket team to World Cup triumph in 1992, said such changes were part of good leadership.

“The captain has one objective and that is to get the team to win. The prime minister also has one objective and I have only one objective, to help my people win, to help them rise,” he said.

“For this, I have the changed the batting order in my team and I will do this again in the future.”

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-...ges-after-batting-order-shuffle-idUSKCN1RV0VF
 
We are headed towards a presidential system, and asad umar will get a second innings, i would guess.
 
We are headed towards a presidential system, and asad umar will get a second innings, i would guess.

Media is talking about IK thinking of dissolving the assemblies.

How does that work? Do you feel IK is trying to introduce the US Presidential System in Pakistan?
 
Media is talking about IK thinking of dissolving the assemblies.

How does that work? Do you feel IK is trying to introduce the US Presidential System in Pakistan?

All speculation on my part but look at the state of the world these day:
Illiberal system's of governance are in ascendancy: China, Russia, Saudi Arabia, UAE etc
Most democracies in the west are turning illiberal: US, India, Turkey, Poland, Hungary and Eastern Europe, Italy, Brexit to a certain extent
People are sick of democracy as an end objective if it delivers no relief.
In each of these illiberal democracies people are ok with sacrificing certain liberties, they are looking for men of action not bound by the nuisance of perpetual elections, coalitions etc.
Ik has certain tendencies that work well with security establishment in this country: they hate dynasty politics which bring in a guaranteed vote bank. They want to banish these families from politics.

I am still trying to figure which side of this debate I stand on but I have nothing but unmitigated contempt for PPP and PML.
 
To change the system IK will have to go for a referendum and i guess Public will say yes to the presidential system they are tired of the current one but the real issue is first he need to get the bill passed from Parliament before going to public for referendum and i don't see him getting it passed even by a simple majority. What are the chances that PTI as a party will stand with IK on this in parliament? What's there for them in a thew system? No more guaranteed ministries!
 
To change the system IK will have to go for a referendum and i guess Public will say yes to the presidential system they are tired of the current one but the real issue is first he need to get the bill passed from Parliament before going to public for referendum and i don't see him getting it passed even by a simple majority. What are the chances that PTI as a party will stand with IK on this in parliament?

haha. oh dont worry about that. there are people in our establishment who have a lot of experience with this.
 
haha. oh dont worry about that. there are people in our establishment who have a lot of experience with this.

Yea but still they would like to get something in exchange and here we are talking about no ministries or funds...
 
Yea but still they would like to get something in exchange and here we are talking about no ministries or funds...

it might be a little more basic than that i suspect. jaan hai to jahan hai. and a little bit lunch money.
 
it might be a little more basic than that i suspect. jaan hai to jahan hai. and a little bit lunch money.

Let's see because for them rupaya is more important thn jaan otherwise jitna khuwar yeh NAB main or adaalton main ho rahe hen thora sa paisa wapis keren or jaan churwaayen.
 
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Imran Khan says he has changed his batting order and brought in new players. Hafeez Shaikh, Brigadier Ijaz Shah, Firdous Ashiq Awan are new players? I feel so old</p>— mohammedhanif (@mohammedhanif) <a href="https://twitter.com/mohammedhanif/status/1119215945422123008?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">April 19, 2019</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
 
Let's see because for them rupaya is more important thn jaan otherwise jitna khuwar yeh NAB main or adaalton main ho rahe hen thora sa paisa wapis keren or jaan churwaayen.

It's more than that. If you pay the money then you're giving in and accept that you have been involved in a criminal offence.

That would end the careers of Maryam and Hamza.
 
It's more than that. If you pay the money then you're giving in and accept that you have been involved in a criminal offence.

That would end the careers of Maryam and Hamza.

Yea long term thinking for the survival of their families in politics...
 
Back
Top