What's new

Pakistan return to their trademark attacking mindset to march to the Champions Trophy final

Abdul

ODI Debutant
Joined
Jul 1, 2015
Runs
9,212
Writing for FirstPost Sports, Saj feels that Pakistan's current winning streak is a direct consequence of the bowling attack adopting an attacking brand of cricket.


Pak-v-Eng.jpg


Despite the hype and the bravado expressed in the pre-game media engagements, the Pakistan team that walked on the field to face India on the 4 June in what was termed the ‘El Clasico’ of cricket was a mere shadow of its glorious predecessors. A clearly irate Mickey Arthur in his post-game press conference after the fiasco against India was to describe his wards as overcome by the magnitude of the occasion which really seemed to be an admission of meek surrender.

The Pakistan team that stepped on to the pitch in Edgbaston on 4 June appeared devoid of any backbone and seemed to go through the motions as if the result was inevitable. The fielding was insipid, the batting lacked any planning but more importantly, Pakistan’s bowling was timid and offered no challenge to the opposition. The hesitancy to attack due to fear of failure was apparent from the start of the India innings and with that mindset, things could only go downhill as was clear from the final result.

As many would remark at the end the end of the 124-run drubbing that the Pakistan side received at the hands of their neighbour and arch-rival, the side was closer to a group of frightened kittens as compared to the much publicized ‘Cornered Tigers’ that the legendary Imran Khan spoke about during their victorious campaign in the 1992 World Cup.

The Imran Khan philosophy of unmitigated attack was one that he instilled in his side and left as a legacy for others to learn and follow once he retired. To the Great Khan, attack was a byword for success at the international level where better opposing sides could sniff fear from any sort of defensive approach. Imran's philosophy was to not take any backward steps against any opposition and it was an ideology that reaped rewards.

The ethos of all-out attack as the only strategy for victory was one that any team that Imran Khan was involved in demonstrated and no better example of that was in the manner in which he used the likes of Wasim Akram and Waqar Younis under his leadership.

To attack with two great fast bowlers in the most aggressive manner with fields set to put fear in the eyes of the opposing batsmen was something that Pakistan teams put into practice time and time again. It may appear strange in today’s world where statistics are over-analysed but the mantra of bowling as fast as you can without worrying about such things as extras or being hit for the occasional boundary was the order of the day in the old days under Imran.

The World Cup 1992 triumph which still ranks as Pakistan’s crowning glory was built upon the basis of a bowling attack that literally worked on blowing away the opposition. The idea was that to take wickets was the only way to restrict a side, containment was not an option and was regarded as a negative tactic. This obviously meant the use of resources which could take the fight to the enemy and were not there to put in a hard-days’ work with sanitized lines and lengths.

In the world of attacking cricket, even spinners were front-line wicket-taking options. Mushtaq Ahmed demonstrated this in the most emphatic manner to the world in 1992. His performances during that competition possibly changed the role of the spinner in all forms of cricket. Slow-bowlers were now weapons of choice for captains and the world of cricket was richer for that idea.

The Pakistan's Champions Trophy campaign in 2017 started off with a performance that literally brought tears of desperation to the eyes of their supporters. Imran Khan in comments after that game wanted his country’s team to approach each game with a will to win and not with thoughts of failure. The challenge for Mickey Arthur and Sarfraz Ahmed was to instill that spirit in their wards which they did with great success to take their team to the final of the tournament.

The tentative approach of the first game was replaced with an all-out attack by the bowlers in the do-or-die games against South Africa and Sri Lanka. The bowlers attacked the stumps and the batsmen in a manner which would have made the likes of Imran, Wasim, Waqar and Mushtaq proud of their successors. Mohammad Amir bowled with pace and accuracy and the yorkers from each of Junaid Khan and Hasan Ali were fired in with intent to take wickets. When Shadab Khan was asked to take his place in the team for the semi-final clash with England, he responded with a bowling performance which was not meant to save runs but took out arguably the best batsman England had on offer.

Similarly, Rumman Raees on his ODI debut during the game against England could have been excused to have looked to have bowled his quota of overs with a low economy rate but he did much more than that as he took two wickets which further eroded England’s chances of setting up a challenging total for Pakistan. The fact that the relatively unknown Hasan Ali who's now the leading wicket-taker of the Champions Trophy can be credited in no small measures to his ability to attack with all his might to take wickets as and when needed by the team. The occasional loose ball is not a matter of concern as the aggressive right-armer has shown the watching world.

There is no doubt that the tradition of bowling with intent is one that is ingrained in the Pakistani bowling psyche but what is equally true is the fact that Pakistan have been most successful when they have gone in to a game with a plan to attack and not contain. This is the same quality which is now seeing a resurgence during the current tournament in which Pakistan entered as underdogs but now find themselves as finalists, much to the amazement of many cricket followers.

The 92 Cornered Tigers they aren't, but what the current Pakistan team has shown is that they are at their best with an aggressive captain at the helm and bowlers who have no thought for defence and containment . This revival in an attacking mindset could well see Sarfraz Ahmed and his team-mates lift the Champions Trophy at The Oval on Sunday.

http://www.firstpost.com/sports/icc...ng-mindset-to-march-to-the-final-3646109.html
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The most important positive point i saw in batting was - not fakhar or azhar - it was Babar azam's intent from the first ball he faced. Yesterday he looked like a superstar batsmen ranked 8th in the world. I hope he carries on batting in this manner because his ceiling is very high.
 
every bowler kept coming at the englishmen... they just didnt give up on idea of taking wickets... whoever was bowling, was attacking, trying to get the batsmen out... they just kept coming hard....

many teams would have struggled, losing their premier fast bowler but we didnt... ruman raees was gr8... stopped runs at the beginning , almost took wickets, before taking them too, and was xcellent... job well done
 
The fact is it is our bowling which has always won us games and all we have done now is gone back to our strengths
 
There is a rich vein of Pakistani cricket lore that simplifies Pakistani wins to aggressive attack vs losses to timid behavior. Never mind the fact Australia and South Africa have pulverized 'attacking' Pakistani teams of the past.
It's a simplification and a fantasy. Pakistan win when they play well and execute well. All the attacking mindset in the world is not gong to help them if they poorly or drop catches.
 
There is a rich vein of Pakistani cricket lore that simplifies Pakistani wins to aggressive attack vs losses to timid behavior. Never mind the fact Australia and South Africa have pulverized 'attacking' Pakistani teams of the past.
It's a simplification and a fantasy. Pakistan win when they play well and execute well. All the attacking mindset in the world is not gong to help them if they poorly or drop catches.

I wish I could print this post out and stick it on every Pakistan fans' wall.

This mythical "aggressive mindset" that Pakistani fans eulogise about gets conflated with any good performance. We won because we batted well for a change, fielded well for a change and our bowling delivered, backed up by a sound gameplan and tactics.

Under Afridi's captaincy we had the human manifestation of this "aggressive Pakistani cricketing culture", all the positive body language in the world and it resulted in the square root of sod all because he was tactically inept and clueless in drawing up and executing a strategy. Azhar failed for the same reason not because of "timid" body language.
 
^^Agree with the above posts. Both truly sum up my feelings on this subject.
 
There is a rich vein of Pakistani cricket lore that simplifies Pakistani wins to aggressive attack vs losses to timid behavior. Never mind the fact Australia and South Africa have pulverized 'attacking' Pakistani teams of the past.
It's a simplification and a fantasy. Pakistan win when they play well and execute well. All the attacking mindset in the world is not gong to help them if they poorly or drop catches.

That's deep. Nicely summed up
 
The fact is it is our bowling which has always won us games and all we have done now is gone back to our strengths

Yes and its carrying our batting which rarely has improved in ODIs over last decade! we cant have consistantly good results with just our bowling carrying us.
 
Then somebody needs to tell Mickey Arthur and Safraz that we do not need so many spin options because India crave for spin and we learnt a harsh lesson in the group match. Only way to defeat india is with fast ruthless brutal bowling and we need to go with our strength.

Amir
Junaid
Hassan
Ashraf
Rumman

All of them need to play!
 
Back
Top