Gasherbrum
First Class Captain
- Joined
- Nov 6, 2004
- Runs
- 5,764
can inzi take it close to 300?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
MenInGreen said:Pak can still win this....if only Inzi can:
1. Play all positions from 1-10
2. Bowl from both ends
3. Field at all positions, simultaneously
the rest of the team qualifies for the top 10 in Annual Circus magazines, Jokers of the Year award.
Gasherbrum said:kya hogaya miggy? aik taraf amjid sahab achi achi baatein kar rahay hain, aur doosri taraf yeh ?
Raz said:People dont lost faith! Sami can bat and can bat well. He has solid defence and can play shots. He is the perfect foil for Inzi.
Marooned said:It's typical migsy. Match say pehlay sher gurbur ho jaye tu forien flat.
Waqar's inswinging yorker said:sami certainly can bat - and i agree with RH in that he is an ideal foil for inzi. Then we have akhtar who can throw his bat about a bit and shabbir can certainly put up a fight
Gasherbrum said:good stuff. looks like 500 is still on the cards.
anyhoooo, time to sleep it off.
immubhai said:Yehi agar ,,,,had Aussies been playing/batting today then they would have scored atleast 400 at the end of 88 overs. this i knew it from Pakistani batsman, although they have scored some 45 runs less than what i ve expected them to do.
True but with Afridi it wasn't just a century against the West Indies - that's the one frequently brought up - even though it was awesome in itself and, despite many people saying it was a "lost cause", with Afridi at the crease it certainly wasn't a lost cause. Afridi has also hit rapid fifties against India in tests (their speed gave us more time to bowl them out), a 46 against the might of Australia and has performed brilliantly with the ball - taking Sachin 3 out of 4 times and other big scalps and making crucial contributions to our victory eg producing figures like 11 overs 3 for 17 on that final day.Big Mac said:With Afridi it was a case of finding an opener, Afridi scored his century against the Windies batting in the lower order. His was a case of finding the right balance, the Kamal/Raza was a straight swap. Two different scenarios
Hash said:it is a slow wicket.
DM said:True but with Afridi it wasn't just a century against the West Indies - that's the one frequently brought up - even though it was awesome in itself and, despite many people saying it was a "lost cause", with Afridi at the crease it certainly wasn't a lost cause. Afridi has also hit rapid fifties against India in tests (their speed gave us more time to bowl them out), a 46 against the might of Australia and has performed brilliantly with the ball - taking Sachin 3 out of 4 times and other big scalps and making crucial contributions to our victory eg producing figures like 11 overs 3 for 17 on that final day.
zaf1986 said:Pakistan master of collapses.
zaf1986 said:Pakistan master of collapses.
Inzi is going to have to do something special if Pak are to win.
Its a question of if the other end supports him. Im not convinced about the batting prowess of our last 3. Another downside of not playing Rana da man.Hash said:Another 100 runs is really what we need. While Inzi is there that will remain possible.
Oh that was old England. Pakistan, new or old, will collapse in test cricket. Thats why its suspcious when they are 100-1 or something. More likely to win if they are 90/5 and Inzi plays a rearguard innings. He still could, remains to be seen if he gets the support from the other end.Billy said:English collapse > Pakistan collapse.
Here we go again...I like many others of us though have become used to this brainless cricket that bob with all his laptops cant seem to fix.