What's new

Pakistan v India | CT 2009 | Centurion | 26/9/09 | Indian Inns

Status
Not open for further replies.
Da Best said:
I had the same feeling ( except it was 3 runs :D ). Really weird.
It's a pity because if your feeling was 4 runs, we could have agreed on 3.
:inzi
 
khilari said:
dravid has done a remarkable job

Dravid's role becomes a lot easier when he has the likes of Gambhir, Raina going beserk at the other end.
 
phew...i was so close to close the lid of my notebook and give it up ;) Let's go Pak brother
 
The BAT hit the BALL after the pad, therefore it was out.

Good stuff from Ajjy.

Come on Afridi and Aamer should clean it up now.
 
mindless slogging said:
Hope Afridi gets that 'pathan' out

When two pathans face each others one shall stand and one must fall.. and if one of the pathans is Afridi forget about it :afridi
 
Bhogle need some binoculars and a lesson in cricket rules that the ball hit the pad first and also when it hits the bat after hitting the pad it is still out.
 
I dont think Raina's out was a bad decision, it could have gone either way but nothing wrong with the decision.
 
We really need to capitalize with this wicket.

Attack now, dont let them get away any more
 
Whats the thinking behind getting Amir back??? Using the bounce with the harder ball?
 
khalidali7070 said:
Bhogle need some binoculars and a lesson in cricket rules that the ball hit the pad first and also when it hits the bat after hitting the pad it is still out.

Harsha thinks hes an expert on cricket.. he isn't of course but you can't teach him anything. And i think hes already wearing binoculars.
 
Omar Malik said:
India whining and Willis joining in!

LBW wasnt out and bla bla

Honestly, that did not look out. The impact of ball on bat seemed to happen at almost the same time as supposedly pad. We were lucky on the decision because benefit really should go to the batsman in the situation
 
We need to get Dravid too, because batsmen can rotate around him.
 
I really hope Aamer can take a wicket here. He got a beating earlier and his spirit is prolly a little hurt.
 
khalidali7070 said:
Who cares it is cricket and Sh!t happens, its the umpires decisions and lots of times many teams get the sh!ty end of the stick.

EXACTLY we had so many times bad decesions and cost us matches .I will take anything today
 
The_Cricket_Devil said:
Honestly, that did not look out. The impact of ball on bat seemed to happen at almost the same time as supposedly pad. We were lucky on the decision because benefit really should go to the batsman in the situation


It didnt look out at first look but decisions go here and there!
 
The ball was close to the bat and pad. The replays need to be analyzed more carefully. It looked to the naked eye it hit the pad first.
 
AS sky sports commentater saying and showing it wasnt out. But do we care ? :) We got what we wanted
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top