Watsupdoc
Test Star
- Joined
- Sep 8, 2010
- Runs
- 36,512
finally Babar off the mark...
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
He's the best hack we have tried so far in recent years.)
Nice of you to show your ignorance, as usual.Yeah that happened a grand total of two times
He's the best hack we have tried so far in recent years.)
A friendly reminder that you didn't want Fakhar to be even picked in the Champions Trophy![]()
It's the shots he resorts to when things aren't going his way- he becomes very hack-ish, swinging at everything across the line. Now look at that shot he played to get bowled, what in the world was he trying to do?Can't believe people are calling Fakhar a hack. The important thing is, he's come good in every single match that we needed him to. Hen the team is winning, you back him to take risks and not change his game according to the situation.
You are a legend.
It's the shots he resorts to when things aren't going his way- he becomes very hack-ish, swinging at everything across the line. Now look at that shot he played to get bowled, what in the world was he trying to do?
In all honest, Shehzad is a much better player than fakher if he just sorts out his mental problems.
not sure when they 'll learn that Babar is not for t20s
Nice of you to show your ignorance, as usual.
ODIs
![]()
T20s (a couple slightly over, but I was giving a range. It's quick nonetheless)
![]()
Maybe post when you actually know what you're talking about in future.
not sure when they 'll learn that Babar is not for t20s
)
)
The discussion was only about T20s but you had to bring in ODIs to make a point.
Was that the question?[MENTION=132954]Aman[/MENTION] does that screenshot also include the number of New Zealand World Cup and Champions Trophy wins ?
Name one player that can replace fakhar ? Mostly our domestic batsmen are hacks so what ? Sharjeel 1.0 was also a heck then he become better
Just a minute ago you defended Sarfaraz's captaincy by saying we won 9 ODI's in a row...Why not stick to T20's then??
It's far more impressive to chase it down that quickly in ODIs)
)
The discussion was only about T20s but you had to bring in ODIs to make a point.
Was that the question?
Highest win %age since T20 world cup 2016 goes to Pakistan
That was a different discussion. This is a different discussion.![]()
I wonder what changed after the T20 WT20 debacle...![]()
![]()
Sharjeel was good. He could put fast bowlers wherever he wanted to. Too bad we lost a gem to corruption.
Our ODI batting line up is pretty messed up to be honest. In the middle order we have Baber,malik,Hafeez and Sarfraz as our power hitter and then the tail starts. This means Pakistan has no other choice but to rely heavily on layers like Fakher to work.
We should learn from England. Their ODI side may not have great power hitters but it is so perfectly balanced that you won't be surprised if they chase down 400.
I know right? I mean it's not like he won Man of the Series in the last T20I series we played or anything... oh wait![]()
You do realize it's a lot more difficult to chase down totals that quickly in ODIs?Yeah the question was only about T20s and I said a grand total of two times and you could only find four instances of which you yourself admit are marginal.
![]()
Sharjeel was good. He could put fast bowlers wherever he wanted to. Too bad we lost a gem to corruption.
Our ODI batting line up is pretty messed up to be honest. In the middle order we have Baber,malik,Hafeez and Sarfraz as our power hitter and then the tail starts. This means Pakistan has no other choice but to rely heavily on layers like Fakher to work.
We should learn from England. Their ODI side may not have great power hitters but it is so perfectly balanced that you won't be surprised if they chase down 400.
Sharjeel also failed in the UAE. These slow and low pitches don’t suit these kind of batsmen.
You do realize it's a lot more difficult to chase down totals that quickly in ODIs?
I never said it was constrained to T20s, I said I remember McCullum and Ryder/Guptill chasing down totals with 10-12 overs.
too early..lol playing against WXI proves everything OKAY!!... mark this and wait and watch he is not a t20 player
Hafeez batting below Malik![]()
too early..lol playing against WXI proves everything OKAY!!... mark this and wait and watch he is not a t20 player
Hum sub ka shehzada scoring 18 off 25
I just checked, your guru Sarfaraz hasnt scored more than 5 runs in a limited overs innings since the champion's trophy
You said "not sure when they'll learn".... you were expecting for him to be dropped after winning the MOS award in the previous series?
He's also the 5th ranked T20I batsman....
I just checked, your guru Sarfaraz hasnt scored more than 5 runs in a limited overs innings since the champion's trophy
Tbh if Fakhar is a hack as some posters are saying then Jason Roy is no less and to some extent Alex Hales as well but they are pretty important components of England's limted over squad
Still hundred times more valuable for the side than Shehzads and Akmals.
Infact Saifi can score ducks in his next twenty innings and still will be more valuable for the side than those two ever were.
Malik saab playing on a different pitch compared to everyone else.
Great shot![]()
Shadab looks like a real happy guy Ma sha Allah.
Regardless, 3 doesn't equal 2.You are just changing goal posts after you couldn't present sufficient evidence to refute what I said.
Shahzad has scored 150 runs in his last 4 T20 innings. sarfaraz has got about 5