What's new

Pakistan vs Zimbabwe | 2nd ODI | Lahore | 29th May | Pakistan innings

Status
Not open for further replies.
Lol Shafiq what did you do!!!!

I had predicted if he gets into 40s, he'll score big.
 
39 off 59 SR of 66. Terrible innings.

Flat track. Terrible bowling. Easy target to chase. Home pitch. What more could you want. If you can't do it here, where will you do it.

Stick to test cricket.
 
Gone, pathetic innings. Couldn't even feast on these mediocre bowlers.
So, sir [MENTION=131701]Mamoon[/MENTION], what excuse do u HV now?
 
He never looked comfortable at front foot. Gave away his wicket, that could have being avoided if fully committed to front foot.
 
another great ODI knock by good looking Shafiq with strike rate in the 60s. Pakistan needs target @ 6+ now. Thanks.
 
Gone, pathetic innings. Couldn't even feast on these mediocre bowlers.
So, sir [MENTION=131701]Mamoon[/MENTION], what excuse do u HV now?

His first match since returning to the team after the World Cup. Not a bad start in my opinion, needs to build on it now.
 
39 off 59 SR of 66. Terrible innings.

Flat track. Terrible bowling. Easy target to chase. Home pitch. What more could you want. If you can't do it here, where will you do it.

Stick to test cricket.

Pretty much this.

Scratched around for a bit, never looked convincing. Haris to hopefully take us home now.
 
A pretty mediocre innings from Shafiq comes to an end.

4MDbx4H.gif
 
You wouldn't said that if it was Shahzad.

Yes, because unlike Shehzad he hasn't had a free run for 2 years. He has been in and out of the team and up and down in terms of batting position. That doesn't help any player.
 
39 off 59 SR of 66. Terrible innings.

Flat track. Terrible bowling. Easy target to chase. Home pitch. What more could you want. If you can't do it here, where will you do it.

Stick to test cricket.

Malik should have come in at no.3 or 4
 
Azhar is turning out to be a very fine opener. If we can find another good opener or Ahmed Shahzad matures and decides to work on his weaknesses, our opener problem is solved.
 
Umar for Shafiq will make this team a lot better on paper.
thick and brainless team management and selectors won't agree with you mate.

First of all presisting with Sami and Anwar..then not playing Baber Azam,dropping Sami Aslam, including Ahmed Shehzad but not Umar Akmal and on top of all they give Asad Shafiq another comeback despite his 54 failures.
 
Not good enough. You pointed out earlier how mediocre the bowling is. He improved his average, though.

He has barely ever played more than 5-6 matches on the trot, so it's early to say if he's not good enough for ODIs. If Azhar can adjust, I think he can as well.
 
Yes, because unlike Shehzad he hasn't had a free run for 2 years. He has been in and out of the team and up and down in terms of batting position. That doesn't help any player.

Excuses Excuses Excuses. The bottom line is that Asad is a terrible ODI player.
 
He has barely ever played more than 5-6 matches on the trot, so it's early to say if he's not good enough for ODIs. If Azhar can adjust, I think he can as well.

Azhar was always fine. He averaged 41 before his comeback. Shafiq 24.
 
Azhar was always fine. He averaged 41 before his comeback. Shafiq 24.

Azhar has improved his SR to perfection, I think Asad can as well. He won't be as good as Azhar but he can replicate his Test success.
 
Yes, because unlike Shehzad he hasn't had a free run for 2 years. He has been in and out of the team and up and down in terms of batting position. That doesn't help any player.

Quality nazar aa jaati Hai, if it exists.
I m sorry but shafiq is poor at picking length up quickly which is why he is late on the short balls.
U can't HV such a player in the middle order and he doesn't HV the power of misbah to bail himself out in BTW the tukk tukk
 
I hope Azhar celebrates this hundred with more dignity than he did versus Bangladesh.
 
We don't have alternatives, need to persist with him.

please don't tell me Asad is better than Umar Akmal.

If Shafiq can't even score at 70+ strike rate against this attack then there is no justification to defend him.
 
He has barely ever played more than 5-6 matches on the trot, so it's early to say if he's not good enough for ODIs. If Azhar can adjust, I think he can as well.

You can't have Azhar, Malik, Haris, Hafeez and Shafiq in the same line-up. Someone has to make way for a more attack minded player.
 
Asad Shafiq is 29 years old, averages 24 , repeat 24 - after 52 ODI innings.

That's a large enough sample size to tell you he isn't good enough for ODI cricket. Its not like we're talking about a 19 year old who is just establishing himself into the side.
 
No, but he had started to look good.

he always does but he never takes his chances. He has been given god knows how many comeback series but he has always failed. His miserable stats tells no matter how good he looks while batting he is never going to be a half decent ODI player.
 
please don't tell me Asad is better than Umar Akmal.

If Shafiq can't even score at 70+ strike rate against this attack then there is no justification to defend him.

Umar needs to play some F/C cricket before he returns to ODIs.
 
please don't tell me Asad is better than Umar Akmal.

If Shafiq can't even score at 70+ strike rate against this attack then there is no justification to defend him.

Tbh both Umar and Asad are crap. Umar has been given a long run in Odi's still no improvement

Asad the less said the better

Umar will make a quick 30 then get out it will not be useful when we chase a 300+ score

A new player like Babar Azam should be inducted.
 
Asad Shafiq is 29 years old, averages 24 , repeat 24 - after 52 ODI innings.

That's a large enough sample size to tell you he isn't good enough for ODI cricket. Its not like we're talking about a 19 year old who is just establishing himself into the side.

forget average..his strike rate is even astonishing in the modern ODI cricket. I think it has to be the worst by any batsman currently playing for any top 8 teams.
 
Waseem Bukhari: "

Azhar Ali hasn't got the talent or natural ability to score quickly in ODI cricket, but his determination and will power is commendable. He is trying to score on every ball by maneuvering around in the crease and using his feet against the spinners. Salute to the efforts being put by him." ---- Wonder if that's a bit too much romanticism?

Cricinfo
 
You can't have Azhar, Malik, Haris, Hafeez and Shafiq in the same line-up. Someone has to make way for a more attack minded player.

The attack-minded players have shown inability to last more than 25 deliveries, so it's a difficult situation for the management.
 
He has barely ever played more than 5-6 matches on the trot, so it's early to say if he's not good enough for ODIs. If Azhar can adjust, I think he can as well.

Azhar is making his comeback after 3 years but you see the difference in result. Malik has been treated same but even he smashed his way to quick hundred in the last game. No excuse for Asad presenting his average performance once again screwing a fine run chase.
 
Umar Should be kept away from the team for the sake of team , he is an irresponsible player and has shown no signs of learning in 5 years.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top