What's new

Pakistan's defeat was orchestrated by inept performances from batsmen who lacked game awareness

MenInG

PakPassion Administrator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 2, 2004
Runs
217,977
In his article for FirstPost, Saj examines the reason for the shocking eight-wicket defeat for the Champions Trophy winners at the hands of their arch-rivals.


2018_9largeimg19_Wednesday_2018_200114206.jpg


The term ‘damp squib’ took a new meaning on the 19th of September. At least for Pakistan who brought what was regarded as their strongest squad to the Asia Cup, being played in the blazing heat of UAE. The game against India — despite their vehement denials to anyone who listened — was supposed to be the game that would truly put them ahead of their arch-rivals.

So the anti-climax of sorts, as orchestrated by the almost-inexplicable manner of Pakistan's batting dismissals, seemed to put an end to any hopes of a continuation of Pakistan’s superiority in a pretty spectacular fashion.

Of course for India, the emphatic victory in Dubai came in front of a crowd which reminded many of a full-house at the Wankhede in terms of the fervour and the sheer noise which accompanied every run scored by an Indian batsman or saved by an Indian fielder. The deafening roar which rose from the DSC when a Pakistani wicket fell could have easily been heard in neighbouring Sharjah.

Given India’s below-par performance against Hong Kong the night before, to many, the game on Wednesday was one for Pakistan to lose. This seemed to become a self-fulfilling prophecy, given how the Champions Trophy winners went about their task on Wednesday.

Sarfraz Ahmed’s day at the DSC began well. His body language was one of a captain who was looking forward to a high-tempo performance from his team and he translated that feeling at the time of the toss by electing to bat first after calling correctly.

This juncture also marked the end of Sarfraz’s good day at office, as nothing went right for Pakistan after winning the toss. The Pakistan openers came out to play a very odd, cautious and curious style of cricket. It seemed like a mixture of ‘hesitant’ and ‘not-so-sure’, mixed with a degree of incompetence. The opening partnership between Fakhar Zaman and Imam-ul-Haq yielded very little and soon it was down to Babar Azam and Shoaib Malik to provide some semblance of respectability to what appeared to be a disastrous position.

Azam’s progress in ODIs is indeed one of the greatest positives in Pakistan cricket at the moment and he continued to show why the faith in his abilities by Mickey Arthur is fully justified. His stroke-play and excellent temperament are improving with every innings and he was one of very few bright sparks against India. Malik, for his part, is the only survivor of the ‘veteran’ pack with the absence of Mohammad Hafeez. Malik's 43 under trying circumstances once again displayed his importance in a team that has a shortage of experienced players.

The inept and carefree batting performance from the rest of the Pakistan line-up was comical at times as witnessed by some of the rash shots attempted at crucial junctures in the game. It was almost as if the Pakistani batsmen were trying to outdo each other in having the most bizarre and unprofessional dismissal. Strange shots, lacklustre running between the wickets and a lack of a gameplan was the order of the day.

What also did not help Pakistan was the batting form of their captain. In 10 ODIs played by Sarfraz since the Champions Trophy he has a grand total of just 110 runs and which equates to a poor average of 15.71. His move to the Number 5 position on Wednesday was supposed to be an attempt to move things along for Pakistan at a time when wickets were falling quickly. However, all he managed to do, was to accelerate the demise of his side’s innings by playing recklessly at a time when stability and leadership was required.

Defending a modest total of 162, the hopes for Pakistan’s unlikely revival rested in most part on a ‘big match’ performance by Mohammad Amir, much in the same way he had played his role in the Champions Trophy final last year. Unfortunately for Pakistan and most worryingly for Amir, he could not make any in-roads into the Indian innings. It was said that UAE pitches are made to measure for spin attacks, but Pakistan persisted with their pacers who failed to deliver, or more accurately found no friends in the Dubai pitch. The feeling that Pakistan went into the Asia Cup one or two specialist spinners short was an overriding one as the Indian batsmen took well to the pace attack on offer.

With a minimum of three further games to play including another one against India, skipper Sarfraz and Head Coach Mickey Arthur have a few important points to ponder and tough decisions to make. Mohammad Nawaz is in the squad and is a good spin option which could be the difference in the coming days. Imam-ul-Haq has enjoyed a honeymoon period so far, but it came to a spectacular end against India when faced with a rather more challenging bowling attack. It is not beyond reason that Shan Masood could take his place soon if his lacklustre performances continue.

For those inclined to look at history as guide, Pakistan’s loss to India in the first Champions Trophy game and their subsequent turnaround to win the title could well be the way things go in the Asia Cup in 2018. However, a lot of lateral thinking and improvements in player performances and mindset will need to happen if lightning is to strike twice for Pakistan.

https://www.firstpost.com/firstcric...atsmen-who-lacked-game-awareness-5221361.html
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Pakistan Only lost because of impatience

After the horrendous batting display of yesterday by the pakistani team I doubt if Pakistan even had a game plan .every batsmen apart from Babar and Shoaib showed immpatience .In encounters against the top sides the first 10 overs can often be hard to score as the top teams usually are at the top of their game at that point even Rohit and Dhawan were struggling to score in the first 7 overs against pakistan in the second innings but they didnot go for slogs and eventually later on scoring became easier ,Imam and Fakhar really set up a poor tone for the rest of the guys their impatience was unnecessary and self destructing ,I personally dont value Imam as high at all so i must say i expected this but Fakhar should have been more sensible ITS 50 OVERS GAME THE FIRST 10 OVERS DONT MEAN THE GAME IS OVER.With the kind of Finishers we have if fakhar and Imam would have atleast stick untill 20 th over and than Babar and shoaib would have come in and taken it till 40th over after which we could have attacked we could have atleast scored 280 if not 300
TO SUM UP WE ONLY LOST BECAUSE OF OUR IMPATIENT OPENERS WHO COULD NOT WAIT TO SETTLE THEMSELVES IN.
 
If openers impatience was the only issue why did we get bowled out for 162 ?
 
If you lose early wickets you allready get into pressure yet still middle order offered resistance and scored (Babar and Shoaib) Sarfraz was impatient himself he went for a shot when he had just arrived after babar's dismissal and only had played a few bowls he too was impatient and then after that it was the lower order and you cant expect your lowerorder that only knows how to finish construct a innings for you ,Asif and everybody after him is a finisher except Shadab
 
That was true runs would have come easy if you had denied them wickets . India would have dropped their shoulders but as soon as they got Fakhar they started believing
Imam didn’t need to play that shot he is usually very defense and gets runs with some good strokes he tried to be Fakhar and failed
 
Pak Batsmen must learn from Inzammam as to have he bailed out Pakistan many times from Crisis by being patient and slowly building up the innings and inspite of being a poor runner between the wickets he used to bat patiently for 5 balls then flick one to the boundary and every over there used to be a four for him and slowly he will keep the score board ticking and then the Opposition will get restless and loose patience and start making mistakes which is when you need to go on the offensive . This may not always help you win but best strategy to fight with dignity and avoid a miserable loss and take the fight to the end .
 
Pak Batsmen must learn from Inzammam as to have he bailed out Pakistan many times from Crisis by being patient and slowly building up the innings and inspite of being a poor runner between the wickets he used to bat patiently for 5 balls then flick one to the boundary and every over there used to be a four for him and slowly he will keep the score board ticking and then the Opposition will get restless and loose patience and start making mistakes which is when you need to go on the offensive . This may not always help you win but best strategy to fight with dignity and avoid a miserable loss and take the fight to the end .

Misbah did the same thing and he played around the worst batting unit of Pakistan in history and he held the team together
 
47 dot balls in 1st 10 overs and something like 150+ dot balls in whole inns, i think that pathetic stat explains it all, but then again this isnt something new with pakistan.
 
Openers cannot fire all the time, Fakhar and Imam have gotten the team off to good starts for the last 5 plus matches. The middle and lower order needs to do their job properly.
 
Fakhar and Imam gotta improve their strike rotation if they're not getting boundaries. Bhuvi and Bumrah I feel will continue to bowl that same tight line-and-length to them so they have to find a way to improvise, at least to rotate the strike.
 
They'll come good. It was a bad day and India bowled really well (as is always the case these days) but these guys have it in them to win the next Indo-Pak encounter.
 
Back
Top